Good for her for going on Fox News. The other candidates should have followed her lead.
Good for her for going on Fox News. The other candidates should have followed her lead.
yeah, nice try.
it's not about going on fox news....it's about going on fox news to to attack the obama administration over not saying the term "radical islamic terrorism".
PolitiFact | Looking back: Tulsi Gabbard’s Fox News presence in the Obama yearsGabbard ramped up her appearances in 2015, going on Fox News several times to blast Obama over his refusal to refer to the Islamic State’s beliefs and terrorism as "Islamic extremism" or "radical Islam."
in the year leading up to an election, this is what she did.....and you're wringing your hands about she had to endure "a barrage from the DNC elites".
they should have thrown her out of the party.
she'll never be the VP.
she shouldn't be the VP.
and there's a very good reason why she isn't running for re-election for her congressional seat....she wouldn't win.
she can either go to live in russia or get a job on fox news.
Tulsi's record as a progessive a big plus for me but Joe will never pick her. As far as I know she is not even being vetted.
Kamala's previous record as Cal AG will come back to haunt her big time. This is not the time to pick a former AG or for that matter anyone who is or was envolved in law enforcement. The Jamal Trulove case along with others is bound rise up during the campaign.
Her selection will cost Joe black votes in many States including CA.
Being a CA resident, have never much liked the woman. Find her to be a political opportunist who's positon changes as necessary to gain votes. Mind she is certainly not alone in this regard.
Will I vote for Joe if he chooses her? Damn right I will!
If I was Joe here would be my 1st pick. Michelle LaVaughn Robinson Obama.
"Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect,"
And she was right.
So you think when someone from Congress or the Senate disagrees with their leader, they should be thrown out? That's not very Democratic, and is straight out of Trumps playbook.
Ah yes, conspiracy theories from the elite, and you took the bait.
It's about 3000 miles away from me, so not sure why I would do that.
Most sane election strategies involve acquiring votes in order to win. Tulsi is popular with some Republicans, and would gain a lot more for Biden than Harris would.
again...because you say so. i guess?
yet another straw man (growing increasingly tiresome).... she can disagree with the president and make it known through various methods...but it's not acceptable to go on a propaganda network determined to undermine his presidency and throw red meat to his opponent's base....in the months leading up to an election. it not only hurts the president but everyone down the ticket.
again with the 'elite'.
anyway, if you're not aware of how russian internet trolls and bots boosted her campaign, then there's not much i can do except tell you to get better informed.
as ridiculous as your other claim that andrew gillum should be on the ticket.
you really don't have any idea what you're posting about. at all.
it's quite honestly one of the stupidest things anyone has posted on this thread...and that's no mean feat.
yawn.
i have provided explanations and support to my positions on this thread.
you should consider giving that a try.
but at this point i'm beyond caring. it's abundantly clear that there's nothing i can learn from you on the topic.
But it wasn’t a “media outlet“. It was Fox.
It’s a pointless term. They’re terrorists, period. The average Muslim doesn’t believe that there’s anything “radical”about Islam, and those that kill, are not true Muslims. Again, it demonizes an entire religion, IMO.
Last edited by beachbound; 10-06-2020 at 01:38 AM.
People are seeing the bias and are now getting a view from both perspectives.
• U.S. cable news network viewership 2020 | Statista
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)