Thread: Sarah Palin

Originally Posted by foreigner

>murdering unborn babies<

like it or not that is a religious position, giving the status of life to something that is attached to & relies on the mother for life..

no point in arguing the zygote vs fetus vs living entity..
this is an issue of the evangelicals .. similar to virgin birth, return from the dead, kangaroos hopping over the Himalayas (or did they swim the Indian ocean) .. or the the grand canyon idiocy. .

if the question of life was the only point of idiocy evangelicals support it would be different ..
face it: evangelicals do not let facts or science or logic or common sense come in the way of their goofy mystical beliefs

I care not about your stupid myths .. just do not try to deny my daughters health care or education.
When your mystical beliefs interfere with my family's welfare then your goofiness becomes the enemy of my family .. & must be exposed & ridiculed .. & denied all status in society.

keep your goofy beliefs in your church, bedroom or closet .. & outa my f'n life.

evangelicals tend to be angry people that want to dominate those that do not submit to their fantasies.
how many smiling happy people were at sarah's events? .. at the republican convention?

"So far as I can remember, there is not one word in the Gospels in praise of intelligence." - Bertrand Russell.

Well arn't we special, you non beleivers are trying your damdest to get any thing that vaguely resmbles Christianity out of the class rooms, and you talk about not denying your daughters rights to edducation, a little one sided are we. I have yet to see where Christians are trying to deny the teaching of the theory of evolution, and you notice I say theory as I don't think you can find a sientist who will absolutely say they can prove the evolution theory. Equal time, most students are able to decern the truth for themselves. What you really want is to make sure they are taught to be bigots like yourself.

Just goes to show how uninformed you are, when you state that evangelicals in general are angry, most could care less about dominating you or any one else, stop the attempts at doing away with there beleifs and you and evangelicals will happly coexist, just as Israel and the rest of the Arab world could coexist if the Arabs dropped the idea of destroying Israel.

You sound very bitter toward Christians, have they somehow caused you personally to suffer, or are you just a biggot, who wants to deny a large sector of society there rightfull place in this world.

Originally Posted by foreigner

> like Reverend Wright? You counting radical Muslims and Jews<

i definitely understand ..or have empathy .. for where the reverend wright is coming from .. he was speaking as a negro in a religious setting.

jews: the orthodox jews are a main problem in the mideast. Do not forget the zionist bombed the brit military headquarters in the late 30s in-order to get the brits to back down from the brit mandate of the early 20s.

militant muslims are mainly reacting to the zionists (bin laudins prime reason for 9-11) & americas blind support for their biblical land grant of palestine.

IMHO: if the us walked from isreal many of our problems would disappear

my ex-wife would be much more attractive in a burka (she'd have a tie dyed or loud flower print burka! .. she would now require a XXXXL) .. ummm, a burka with an intergral gag ball..

Hitler attacked most of europe, should we be trying to eliminate Germany?

Originally Posted by foreigner

>murdering unborn babies<

like it or not that is a religious position, giving the status of life to something that is attached to & relies on the mother for life..

no point in arguing the zygote vs fetus vs living entity..
this is an issue of the evangelicals .. similar to virgin birth, return from the dead, kangaroos hopping over the Himalayas (or did they swim the Indian ocean) .. or the the grand canyon idiocy. .

if the question of life was the only point of idiocy evangelicals support it would be different ..
face it: evangelicals do not let facts or science or logic or common sense come in the way of their goofy mystical beliefs

I care not about your stupid myths .. just do not try to deny my daughters health care or education.
When your mystical beliefs interfere with my family's welfare then your goofiness becomes the enemy of my family .. & must be exposed & ridiculed .. & denied all status in society.

keep your goofy beliefs in your church, bedroom or closet .. & outa my f'n life.

evangelicals tend to be angry people that want to dominate those that do not submit to their fantasies.
how many smiling happy people were at sarah's events? .. at the republican convention?

"So far as I can remember, there is not one word in the Gospels in praise of intelligence." - Bertrand Russell.

You really missed the point I was stating that the killing of unborn babies is just as bad as bombing abortion clinics, and I or do the majority of Christians promote either one.

By the way a lot of abortions are preformed on women with babies that could support there own life, they nare just murdered after they are aborted. being the oneway biggot you seem to be I am sure you could care less about the facts if they don't support your opinion.

Originally Posted by panama hat

Originally Posted by Jet Gorgon

^ A word quoted from the title of one of your threads in the Lounge. *sic* is usually added in parens. I take it you do understand what *sic* means, hatter. The silence from your side after all this time (as I add this extra info for you) indicates you must be doing an ignore to this post or maybe trying to resurrect your business?

Nothing to resurrect, it's doing ok. Not brilliant yet, just ok.

On the contrary, I was wondering why you had misspelled a word and then used (sic) afterwards. A simple question, not meant to disparage you or what you wrote, just trying to figure out what you meant to imply.

I'm still not clear, but if you'd care to explain I'd be happy to answer your questions.

Of course, how kind of you to ask. I merely pointed out that you misspelled the word "quantify" in a thread title, dearie (only because you chastised another member for spelling friend incorrectly in a post text; not as bad as a spelling error in a thread title tho, IMO), and I added (sic) to signify that it was quoted verbatim (ie, I'm sorry to say, your error, not anyone else's). But, perhaps you still do not see the error.
https://teakdoor.com/the-teakdoor-lou...-quanitfy.html

"It would be my honor to assist and support our new president and the new administration"

Palin says she doesn't regret Couric interview - CNN.com

I think most believe you have done more than your share already Sarah.

^ Saw a few interviews. She seems to be much better "unleashed" but still a way to go.

Originally Posted by RPETER65

I guess I missed all the news reports of the suicide bombings done by Christian Fundamentalists.

I guess there were cartoons or something on when Timothy McVeigh was in the news then. Or that bloke that killed the clinic workers. Or when your President declared a war of 'good Vs. evil'. Or when your President ordered the invasion of another country because God Bless America right, He wanted the US to do it.

<Hitler attacked most of europe, should we be trying to eliminate Germany?<

should germany have been held responsible for what they did.. YES!

if the jews had been given part of germany instead of palestine much of todays world problems would not be present.

1947 question: punish white christian germans for what they did to europe or f'over some brown muslims in the mid east ..
answer: easy, f'over the browns

palestinians did nothing to europe or northern european jews .. but they, 700,000 people, were the ones removed from thier homes & put in rufugee camps 60 years ago .. & there they remain today 60 years later.

western support for ongoing land grabs (most of the scattered settlements are on aquafers) is a major factor for Bin Laudin's successful movement.
a huge % of zionsits in the settlements hold US passports & live in homes financed by US banks.

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

Originally Posted by RPETER65

I guess I missed all the news reports of the suicide bombings done by Christian Fundamentalists.

I guess there were cartoons or something on when Timothy McVeigh was in the news then. Or that bloke that killed the clinic workers. Or when your President declared a war of 'good Vs. evil'. Or when your President ordered the invasion of another country because God Bless America right, He wanted the US to do it.

You guys are dillusional if you consider Timothy McVeigh to be a Christian fundamentalist, McVeigh and his co-conspirators are far from Conservative Christians, same with that bloke that killed the clinic workers. You are really grasping at straws. What I am talking about here are the mainstream Conservative Christians not a couple of wacked out crazies.

Originally Posted by foreigner

>You really missed the point I was stating that the killing of unborn babies<

& I was trying to point out that a fetus is not an unborn baby, it is a fetus.
& that due to other evangelical idiocy the argument of evangelicals against the medical community & the society as a whole is as goofy as other evangelical idiocy.

if the fetus vs unborn baby was the only point of evangelical idiocy it would be different .. but on many points of science evangelicals prove they are goofy believers in mystical fairy tales. .. & hate facts or science that disagree with their goofy mysticism

if you believe kangaroos hopped over the Himalayas .. shut the f' up on matters of science or education!
if you believe the earth is only 6000 YO .. shut the f' up on matters of science or education!
if you believe mary was a virgin ... shut the f' up on matters of science or education!
if you believe anyone arose from the dead ... shut the f' up on matters of science or education!
if you believe the grand canyon was formed in a short period of time by Noah's flood ... shut the f' up on matters of science or education!

& we haven't even gotten to loaves & fishes .. or the rest.

Once there was a time when all people believed in god and the church ruled. This time is called the Dark Ages

So were down to shut the f' up, typical responce from a loonie leftist.

You have no rebuttle on the killing of aborted babies fully able to survive on there own? Typical only address that which fits into your leftist opinion.

If you really did your research you would actually find there are a lot of scientist who are saying the possibility of the universe and life forming as the evolutionist claim is highly improbable, so much so as to be nearly beyond the realm of possibility.

No responce to the killing of unborn babies fully capable of sustaining life on there own?

No responce to teaching both sides of the origin of life, or do the Christians just let you libtards brainwash them, with no chance to decide for themselves?

As to the formation of the Grand Cayon, I tend to sway more to the Missoula flood theory.

You also need to realize there is a huge difference between the "church" and Christians, what happened during the dark ages was far from Christian it was a few people exploiting the masses, and claiming to do so in the name of the " church ", no resemblence to Christianity.

Originally Posted by foreigner

<Hitler attacked most of europe, should we be trying to eliminate Germany?<

should germany have been held responsible for what they did.. YES!

if the jews had been given part of germany instead of palestine much of todays world problems would not be present.

1947 question: punish white christian germans for what they did to europe or f'over some brown muslims in the mid east ..
answer: easy, f'over the browns

palestinians did nothing to europe or northern european jews .. but they, 700,000 people, were the ones removed from thier homes & put in rufugee camps 60 years ago .. & there they remain today 60 years later.

western support for ongoing land grabs (most of the scattered settlements are on aquafers) is a major factor for Bin Laudin's successful movement.
a huge % of zionsits in the settlements hold US passports & live in homes financed by US banks.

Add to that the massive US financial support for the Isralie econemy and the support in military technology and hardware, plus the protection the US gives to Israel in the UN by way of its power of veto over complaints against Israeli human rights abuses. Its not a pretty picture or something that any US citizen should be proud of. Economically, Israel is going to become an increasing burdeon on USA as their strategic importance dwindles with decreased reliance on Middle East Arab oil reserves. But politically, the Jewish lobby pretty much has US politicans by the balls because of their dominance in media ownership and control.

Ron Paul proposed cutting back on blind support for the zionists & IMHO this is why he could not network TV time.
ABC interviewed him & put the interview on their web site not TV

Obama made a statement about controlling the zionists & the backlash was so great he backed off

MSNBC gets a taste of its own medicine?

MSNBC retracts false Palin story; others duped
By DAVID BAUDER – 20 hours ago
NEW YORK (AP) — MSNBC was the victim of a hoax when it reported that an adviser to John McCain had identified himself as the source of an embarrassing story about former vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin, the network said Wednesday.
David Shuster, an anchor for the cable news network, said on air Monday that Martin Eisenstadt, a McCain policy adviser, had come forth and identified himself as the source of a Fox News Channel story saying Palin had mistakenly believed Africa was a country instead of a continent.

The Associated Press: MSNBC retracts false Palin story; others duped

Originally Posted by Jet Gorgon

in a thread title, dearie (only because you chastised another member for spelling friend incorrectly in a post text; not as bad as a spelling error in a thread title tho, IMO), and I added (sic) to signify that it was quoted verbatim (ie, I'm sorry to say, your error, not anyone else's). But, perhaps you still do not see the erro

so, i was right then.

as I thought.

pedantic one upmanship.

^ Hatter attacked another poster for a typo; I kindly pointed out one of his errors to show his hypocrisy is all. And the other poster's error, "freind", is a common typo.

^ Attacked? Strong words, Jet.

RPETERS seemingly didn't see it that way judging by his not responding, but it is your right to avenge anyone you feel has been 'attacked'.

Why not just admit that in your fervor to have a stab at me you chose the wrong example.

I make lots of mistakes, you should grab a pertinent one to highlight my shortcomings.

Originally Posted by panama hat

I make lots of mistakes, you should grab a pertinent one to highlight my shortcomings.

Yes, you are right, there are so many.

Originally Posted by Jet Gorgon

Originally Posted by panama hat

I make lots of mistakes, you should grab a pertinent one to highlight my shortcomings.

Yes, you are right, there are so many.

Indeed there are, and you may repeat what I said . . . oh, you did.

I'm not above admitting my mistakes, perhaps you should as well.

Sign the “Dear Sarah Palin, Please Shut Up Already”petition.

I signed it,…………………..my signature number 850.

http://www.petitiononline.com/1113nov8/petition.html

Palin's now set with a $7 million dollar book deal.

Sarah Palin&rsquo;s failure set to reap her &#36;7m book deal - Times Online

Given our history of electing brain-dead automatons such as Reagan and Bush, it's probable that Palin will be president one day.

Originally Posted by Bexar County Stud

Palin's now set with a $7 million dollar book deal.

Sarah Palin&rsquo;s failure set to reap her $7m book deal - Times Online

Given our history of electing brain-dead automatons such as Reagan and Bush, it's probable that Palin will be president one day.

I'd be surprised if they dont make it into a movie co starring big Arnie.

today's dick cavette's blog on sarah is a hoot:
The Wild Wordsmith of Wasilla - Dick Cavett Blog - NYTimes.com

definitely worth a read

a few snips
>>>>
a rare gift to produce a paragraph in which whole clumps of words could be removed without noticeably affecting the sense
>
Her “answer” did not contain the words “daughter,” “pregnancy,” “what to do about it” or, in fact, any two consecutive words related to Lauer’s query

If it happens again, Matt, I bequeath you what I heard myself say once to an elusive guest who stiffed me that way: “Were you able to hear any part of my question?
>
Sarah-ites are numbered among that baffling 26 percent of our population who, despite everything, still maintain that President George has done a heckuva job?
>
that lies in our future if God points her to those open-a-crack doors she refers to

>co starring big Arnie<

Tommy Chong (cheech & chong) was a pot smoking friend with Arnie & his body building pals (see "AKA Tommy Chong" on showtime)
Mr. Chong infers that in 1 on 1 conversation Arnie is a dummy.

AKA Tommy Chong is about how John Ashcroft involved as many as 2000 federal law enforcement officers & $12,000,000 bustin' a bong manufacturer.
Chong pleaded to 9 months at a federal facility to avoid the feds harassing his wife & son .. no one else was charged with anything ..