^Yes, but that arrogance can be channeled if it doesn't get out of control. That same arrogance gives him an exciting edge. He is a risky candidate, and therefore exciting.
Printable View
^Yes, but that arrogance can be channeled if it doesn't get out of control. That same arrogance gives him an exciting edge. He is a risky candidate, and therefore exciting.
Out of control is the operative word. As you say, channeled arrogance is ok and too much humility can be a bad thing as well.Quote:
Originally Posted by chinthee
Dick Morris further had some advice for Obama. He said it was ridiculous being tainted for something his Pastor said. He said just as you don't rely on your hairdresser, doctor, or dentist for political advice, and can't be held accountable for their values, so too should Obama argue that his Pastor's views on politics are not his views, and not relevant to his views.
In other words, he goes to his pastor for religious guidance, not political guidance.
which channel did you watch that on? :) that channel you rarely watch?Quote:
Originally Posted by chinthee
and more breathless play by play from fauxnews....
Quote:
Originally Posted by chinthee
Quote:
Originally Posted by chinthee
Quote:
Originally Posted by chinthee
Quote:
Originally Posted by chinthee
captivating.Quote:
Originally Posted by chinthee
^Ray Carey. Mr. excitement and charisma, thank you for your valuable input.
Well, boys, it's really all about the so-called "White Guilt" that's infested America and elsewhere. Check this out.
An excerpt:
"Bargaining is a mask that blacks can wear in the American mainstream, one that enables them to put whites at their ease. This mask diffuses the anxiety that goes along with being white in a multiracial society. Bargainers make the subliminal promise to whites not to shame them with America's history of racism, on the condition that they will not hold the bargainer's race against him. And whites love this bargain -- and feel affection for the bargainer -- because it gives them racial innocence in a society where whites live under constant threat of being stigmatized as racist. So the bargainer presents himself as an opportunity for whites to experience racial innocence."
Read it all for it is good...:)
IHT today
"Obama wants to add more than 90,000 troops to the U.S. military and envisions expanding their mission to stabilizing and rebuilding nations or confronting mass atrocities, he wrote in Foreign Affairs magazine. He would double foreign aid to $50 billion by 2012."
Is Barack Obama a hawk or dove? - International Herald Tribune
***
Wow, 90K more troops. Great! Wonder what he proposes to pay them with? Proceeds from the cancelled tanker contract?
even though you don't read about it on the drudge report, the iraq debacle (which obama will end in '09) is wasting $12 billion/ month.Quote:
Originally Posted by the war hero
I find Hilary's heir-presumtive attitude worse!Quote:
Originally Posted by Associated Press
So... he's arrogant because he was "little-known" :confused:Quote:
Originally Posted by Associated Press
That remains to be seen; Obama deserves a chance just like the then-unknown Clinton got his chance.Quote:
Originally Posted by Associated Press
If the Republicans start calling Obama "arrogant' it shows how desperate they are; in conjunction with the controversial pastor, the underlying message is: "Do you really want this uppity Black to be ordering you around?" The GOP has to be careful because I think the average American can see through that as the worst type of negative stereotyping, and I'm sure Obama is ready for it, probably planning to capitalize on it.
He's got that in spades. yeh, I kinda like it too.Quote:
Originally Posted by Texpat
When he was a kid, he was asked what he wanted to do when he grew up (weren't we all?). His answer-
President of the US.
He's still a hypocrite.Quote:
Originally Posted by chinthee
Castigating Don Imus but yet letting his daughters sit in church and listen to the same ranting/raving.
Politics as usual...:bunny3:
how many times have you typed imus' name on this forum in the last 24 hours?Quote:
Originally Posted by Boon Mee
your desperation is palpable...and your position, laughable.
Seems reasonable.:)Quote:
Originally Posted by Boon Mee
Obama's new theme song. Joy To The World. All together now, "Jeremiah was a bullfrog, was a good friend of mine, never understood a single word he said but I always drank his wine.........
:dev+ang:
Twice...again, get a grip.Quote:
Originally Posted by raycarey
p.s. your old tired saw "position - laughable" is really wearing thin.
Got any new material there ray?:rolleyes:
Heh...;)
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Democrat Barack Obama's big national lead over Hillary Clinton has all but evaporated in the U.S. presidential race, and both Democrats trail Republican John McCain, according a Reuters/Zogby poll released on Wednesday.
Obama's lead over Clinton narrows: Reuters poll | Politics | Reuters
Obama still holds a 1.7% edge over Clinton (8 poll average)
McCain 1.4% over Obama (8 polls average)
McCain 1% over Clinton (8 Poll average)
RealClearPolitics - Polls
it's mid march, right?
^just what I was thinking. At least one of the candidates will fall in a ditch before Aug. And its looking like it'll be, the economy stupid, all over again. Iraq may be a second-tier issue by then.
Yes much to early to take much from the polls. Just posted them because I like the Real Clear Politics website's approach of averaging poll results.Quote:
Originally Posted by raycarey
It usually is. If not directly then by the impact on it based on candidates stance on other issues. Cost of war, cost of universal health etc.Quote:
Originally Posted by Texpat
I agree.Quote:
Originally Posted by Texpat
7.5 months is a lifetime in political elections, and I think more water will flow under the bridge until the conventions and election.
Yes, I think the economy will be the number 1 issue (even though the President and Congress) cannot and do not have as much influence over it as many in the public think.
Iraq, is fading in the minds and consciousness of the public and voter, according to poll results.
not taking a shot at you, but i have some real clear questions about that site and its methodology. how do they average polls? of the polls they average, are the questions phrased in precisely the same manner? are the questions in each poll in the same order? for example is question 'a' always followed by question 'b' and then question 'c'....or do some of the polls not even ask question 'b'? or ask them 'c', 'b', 'a'?Quote:
Originally Posted by Norton
again, right now.Quote:
Originally Posted by Milkman
once AQ decides that it's time to resume operations on a large scale again, iraq will be back in the news. does anyone really think that they just went home and gave up? and frankly, it seems like they're starting to ramp things up already...how many bombs have gone off in the last two weeks? how many have been killed? clearly something is afoot.
and if between now and november either the sunnis and shiites decide it's time to have their inevitable civil war, i can assure you iraq will be back on the front page. and norton brings up a good point about relating the economy to out of control cost of fiasco in iraq. obama will certainly be talking about this in the summer. but i'm sure the white house will be throwing around even more money to try and make sure that doesn't happen.
Hopefully some real clear answers.:)Quote:
Originally Posted by raycarey
Simple mathematical average of all the polls they list.Quote:
Originally Posted by raycarey
From the ones I just looked at each ask which candidate they favor. Very straight forward. For example, registered democrats are asked; Do you favor Obama? Do you favor Clinton. For the general election it is a mix of Dem and Rep.Quote:
Originally Posted by raycarey
We all know all polls are not created equal so I believe this is what prompts your question. One can always find a poll to support an augment so for me having an average is about the best we can hope for. This site, a Time/CNN owned one seems to generally objective in presenting both parties on an even field.
i undestand how they do it mathematically, but their final results seem suspect if the methodololgy and the questions asked aren't exactly the same in each and every poll that they're averaging.Quote:
Originally Posted by Norton
i'll go and check out their site a bit more.
green on the way.
That may it be but essentially, the race is over. And I do mean the national election. Both these loser democrats will go down in flames as the American people will realize that they can't afford another tax & spend, terror-appeasing whimp like either of them in the White House...heh:rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by raycarey