Thread: Who will succeed Boris Johnson?

Originally Posted by bsnub

As an American, the one thing I have deduced after all these years on this forum. Which oddly I count as a blessing is that the Tories are utter shitbags beholden to pathetic royals and their families of inherited wealth.

This, from the country that elected Trump as president?

Sadly, China and Russia will see the light, once every other source has been tried, and failed.

Some lunatic suggested Corbyn as the answer. Said lunatic was looking at the wrong question.

Starmer is worse than Corbyn, just slightly better dressed. The electorate don’t really like champagne socialists. Maybe that’s why Cyrille left UK but still cares enough to debate the topic?

Remember the mandate this fat doofus had coming in. He truly fell flat on his face. Does anyone support him ? Other than Taxexile

Originally Posted by Backspin

Does anyone support him ?

some are more willing to swallow

^^ His approval rating has dropped to 26-28%. Tories need to push him aside. Not that the likely replacements are any better, Jeremy Hunt? Liz Truss? Dominic Raab? Dreadful choices.

Mind you, Jeremy would have a good following due to such an appropriate nick.

Originally Posted by Switch

Starmer is worse than Corbyn

You are a completely deluded, out of touch relic.

Originally Posted by Troy

Mind you, Jeremy would have a good following due to such an appropriate nick.

It's just a shame his first name isn't Mike.

Then I'd vote for him just to hear his name said on the news.

His second and third names are Richard Streynsham.

Dave could have some fun with those...

211 for, 148 against - not good for Bojo

Originally Posted by malmomike77

211 for, 148 against - not good for Bojo

Not good at all and not good for many of the 211 for voters.

But exactly what the country needs.

The noose is tightening on this lying pos.

Originally Posted by Switch

This, from the country that elected Trump as president?

Sadly, China and Russia will see the light, once every other source has been tried, and failed.

Some lunatic suggested Corbyn as the answer. Said lunatic was looking at the wrong question.

Starmer is worse than Corbyn, just slightly better dressed. The electorate don’t really like champagne socialists. Maybe that’s why Cyrille left UK but still cares enough to debate the topic?

You seem to have no coherent political views of any kind

Originally Posted by Backspin

You seem to have no coherent political views of any kind

He goes for ad hom in response to any post about politics because of this. Any level of analysis is too much for his enfeebled brain.

All he has is well worn cliches. He's still blabbering about Corbyn, ffs.

Originally Posted by Norton

The number of votes against Boris Johnson tonight is most likely to fall within the 100 to 149 bracket, according to the odds offered by Ladbrokes. This is what they are offering.

0-49 - 66/1

50-99 - 3/1

100-149 - 15/8

150-199 - 2/1

200-249 - 5/1

250-299 - 16/1

300+ - 100/1

Ladbrokes called it...

The result is bad for the Tories as well as for Boris.

Originally Posted by cyrille

They'd have to go some to be as disastrous as the Tories.

From Dim Dave with his dodgy deals, through Theresa May to the Greased Piglet. What an absolute fkin shambles they've reduced the country to.

Iraq
Devolution
‘I’m afraid there is no money.’

Oh how funny.

I vote we go back to absolute monarchy, politicians are fucking c^^ts, I don't care what side of the fence they're from.

Originally Posted by Bonecollector

I do not know what the answer is

Great minds think alike, I think many bright young educated people without kids have or will emigrate

The IT gifted anywhere
The Enrepreneurs the buzzing places Singapore, Silicon Valley , Dubai Vienna , Copenhagen, Munich
The interior designers/artistes to MIian Paris Tinseltown
The tradesmen with real ability Oz Canada NZ

The Mongers and bum detector salesmen with a pension welcome to TD and beach road

Originally Posted by cyrille

You are a completely deluded, out of touch relic.

Im so pleased that you recognize their better qualities.

Originally Posted by Backspin

You seem to have no coherent political views of any kind

You seem to be on the wrong thread. You know nothing about the war in UKR and even less about UK politics. Stick to ogling flabby hookers.

For Khvn reverse rotate

Allegras Mostyn and Statton firked
Arcuri pole dancing pal firked
countless other chinless bimbos firked
The Tory party firked' England firked . lectors of teh Uxbrigdge Minglish dick shunerry frkied
N Irleand protocol and harmony with UK llagest trading partner firked

That Boris de peffel really is a firker, he does still have a 1/3 of Uk parliament 211/650 with him but more presciently is shameless be a bit like posting garbage even when you know its tosh.

As for Switch one may not agree with him always or Tomscat, Nevernude, DR Silly, milfomike Hole Shabang, Hairrymuffakhvnta, Squirrel but one gets the impression they have read books without pictures? and the first few without moving their finger along the loin simultaneously.

Originally Posted by Backspin

The Duran boys summed it up well. This doofus was arguably in a stronger position coming in than blair.is a disgraced fuckwit.

A good example of confirmation bias there. Well done posting vid by Sputnik, a Russian government owned propaganda site that has been banned in the EU and the US.
Using a former disgraced and disbarred QC was a nice touch.

Seems Boris has that baldy orange cunto quality of scaring representatives into supporting him or something.