Results 1 to 11 of 11
  1. #1
    Thailand Expat OhOh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Last Online
    Today @ 12:01 AM
    Location
    Where troubles melt like lemon drops
    Posts
    25,240

    George Soros dream: To turn China into a neoliberal grabitization opportunity

    George Soros: Investors in Xi’s China face a rude awakening

    The leader’s crackdown on private enterprise shows he does not understand the market economy
    George Soros

    George Soros: Investors in Xi’s China face a rude awakening | Financial Times


    A rebuttal:

    George Soros’s dream: To turn China into a neoliberal grabitization opportunity

    By Michael Hudson (Michael Hudson)

    "In a Financial Times op-ed, “Investors in Xi’s China face a rude awakening” (August 30, 2021), George Soros writes that Xi’s “crackdown on private enterprise shows he does not understand the market economy. … Xi Jinping, China’s leader, has collided with economic reality. His crackdown on private enterprise has been a significant drag on the economy.” Translated out of Orwellian Doublethink, the “crackdown on private enterprise” means cutting back on what the classical economists called rent-seeking and unearned income. As for its supposed “drag on the economy,” Mr. Soros means the economy’s polarization concentrating wealth and income in the hands of the richest One Percent. Soros lays out his plan for how U.S. retaliation may punish China by withholding U.S. funding of its companies (as if China cannot create its own credit) until China capitulates and imposes the kind of deregulation and de-taxation that Russia did after 1991. He warns that China will suffer depression by saving its economy along socialist lines and resisting U.S.-style privatization and its associated debt deflation.

    Mr. Soros does recognize that China’s “most vulnerable sector is real estate, particularly housing. China has enjoyed an extended property boom over the past two decades, but that is now coming to an end. Evergrande, the largest real estate company, is over-indebted and in danger of default. This could cause a crash.” By that, he means a reduction of housing prices. That’s just what is needed in order to deter land becoming a speculative vehicle. I and others have urged a policy of land taxation in order to collect the land’s rising site value, so that it will not be pledged to banks for mortgage credit to further inflate china’s housing prices.

    Warning about the economic consequences of China’s falling birth rate, Soros writes: “One of the reasons why middle-class families are unwilling to have more than one child is that they want to make sure that their children will have a bright future.” This is of course true of every advanced nation today. It is most extreme in the neoliberalized countries, e.g., the Baltics and Ukraine – Soros’s poster countries.

    Soros gives his game away by stating that “Xi does not understand how markets operate.” What he means is that President Xi rejects rapacious rent-seeking, exploitative free-for-all, and shapes markets to serve overall prosperity for China’s 99 Percent. “As a consequence, the sell-off was allowed to go too far,” Soros continues. What he means is, too far to maintain the dominance of the One Percent. China is seeking to reverse economic polarization, not intensify it.

    Soros claims that China’s socialist policies are hurting its objectives in the world. But what he really is complaining about is that it is hurting America’s neoliberal objectives for how it had hoped to make money for itself off China. This leads Soros to remind Western pension fund managers to “allocate their assets in ways that are closely aligned with the benchmarks against which their performance is measured.” But the tragedy of financializing pensions is that fund managers are rated on making money financially – in ways that hurt the industrial economy by promoting financial engineering instead of industrial engineering.

    “Almost all of them claim that they factor environmental, social and corporate governance (ESG) standards into their investment decisions,” Soros writes. At least, that’s what their public relations advisors advertise. Exxon claims to be cleaning up the environment by expanding offshore oil drilling in Guyana, etc. As for “social standards,” the neoliberal mantra is trickle-down economics: by making our stock prices rise, by stock buybacks and higher dividend payouts, we are helping wage-earners earn a pension, even though we are offshoring and de-industrializing the economy, de-unionizing it and “freeing” the economy from consumer and workplace protection laws.

    Soros has a radical solution, which he suggests “should obviously apply to the performance benchmarks selected by pensions and other retirement portfolios: … The US Congress should pass a bipartisan bill explicitly requiring that asset managers invest only in companies where actual governance structures are both transparent and aligned with stakeholders.”
    Wow. Such a bill would block Americans from investing in many American companies whose behavior is not at all aligned with stakeholders. What proportion: 50%? 75? More?

    “If Congress were to enact these measures,” Soros concludes, “it would give the Securities and Exchange Commission the tools it needs to protect American investors, including those who are unaware of owning Chinese stocks and Chinese shell companies. That would also serve the interests of the US and the wider international community of democracies.” So Mr. Soros wants to block the United States from investing in China. He seems not to see that this is President Xi’s objective also: China doesn’t need U.S. dollars, and is in fact de-dollarizing.

    George Soros is obviously upset that President Xi is not Boris Yeltsin, and that China is not following the kleptocracy dependency that warped Russia’s economy. Soros thought the ending of the Cold War would simply let him buy up the most lucrative rent-yielding assets, as he has aimed to do in the Baltics and Ukraine. China said “No,” so it is not deemed to be a “market economy,” Soros-style. It has not made its social organization marketable, and has avoided the financial dependency that makes “markets” a vehicle for U.S. control via sanctions and foreign buyouts."

    George Soros’s dream: To turn China into a neoliberal grabitization opportunity | The Vineyard of the Saker
    A tray full of GOLD is not worth a moment in time.

  2. #2
    Hangin' Around cyrille's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Home
    Posts
    33,825
    Says some blogger in ... Iceland.


  3. #3
    Thailand Expat misskit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Chiang Mai
    Posts
    48,395
    And OhNo thinks it is news and posts it in the news forum. He just can’t tell the difference even when it actually states OPINION.

    Getting tiresome OhOh.

  4. #4
    Thailand Expat harrybarracuda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    96,815
    What a surprise that a hugely successful investor says chinastan is a house of cards and some academic thinks otherwise.

    When I say academic....

    He is distinguished research professor of economics at the University of Missouri–Kansas City and professor at the School of Marxist Studies, Peking University in China.

  5. #5
    In Uranus
    bsnub's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    30,503
    Quote Originally Posted by misskit View Post
    Getting tiresome OhOh.
    He was tired years ago.

  6. #6
    Thailand Expat harrybarracuda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    96,815
    Quote Originally Posted by bsnub View Post
    He was tired years ago.
    When one is a snivelling chinky sycophant, one must never give up the snivelling.

  7. #7
    Thailand Expat
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    38,456
    China is certainly capitalist, but it certainly ain't neo-liberal, and it is a long way from being the 'open society' that Soros advocates. Given it's record of roaring economic success this century however, Soros' ideas will carry absolutely no shrift with policy planners there.

    Right or wrong, well you can decide. But measured by the simple expedients of national GDP growth and average income growth, I doubt you can find a developing Soros neo-liberal utopia that matches China. Then again, if a Free press etc is more important to you maybe you can find an emerging Soros neo-lib open society utopia. But it sure ain't Ukraine, or Russia for that matter.

  8. #8
    Thailand Expat
    panama hat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Last Online
    21-10-2023 @ 08:08 AM
    Location
    Way, Way South of the border now - thank God!
    Posts
    32,680
    Quote Originally Posted by sabang View Post
    But measured by the simple expedients of national GDP growth and average income growth,
    You also have to take ito consideration that China had a very low base to grow from, therefore posting amazing growth numbers, but there is no doubt that any system other than the one they have now would not have provided for a general 'wealth' like this. Neo-liberal it ain't and won't be

  9. #9
    Thailand Expat
    Klondyke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Last Online
    26-09-2021 @ 10:28 PM
    Posts
    10,105
    Quote Originally Posted by harrybarracuda View Post
    When one is a snivelling chinky sycophant, one must never give up the snivelling.
    The Chinese people - with their incredible accomplishment within 30 years - have surely a good laugh when reading some clever comments of some from countries that cannot help themselves, some even still struggling with aftermath of Katrina 15 years ago...

  10. #10
    I'm in Jail

    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Last Online
    14-12-2023 @ 11:54 AM
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    13,986
    The Chinese have previously (on a few occasions) posted amazing growth numbers, the most notable of which was called The Great Leap Forward.

    Er....just how many millions died of starvation then ? Wasn't it 30 million ? Some were even reduced to cannibalism, weren't they ?

  11. #11
    Thailand Expat
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    38,456
    Been to China, then? Since the Cultural Revolution, anyway?








    [NO]

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •