The state of Washington is 100% vote by mail and has next to zero fraud. The vote by mail system is less at risk to fraud than in person voting. The truth is the GOP does not want free and fair elections the fact is the more people that vote the more likely they are to lose.
Clearly you have no idea what you are talking about. The Bush era tax cuts are to blame for ballooning the deficit and debt. In fact most of the debt added during the Obama presidency was due to the Bush era tax cuts, but your side was quick to push the utter falsehood that it was "Obama's debt" when in fact he had nothing to do with it.
It is a sad testimony to your level of indoctrination that you actually believe what you posted even though it is a total and complete falsehood. You and most of the other trumpanzee lemmings consume a massive and nonstop diet of propaganda and lies. This is just another prime example of the level of indoctrination that exists on the right.
This.
GOP: We lied about election fraud / integrity and now morons believe those lies despite there being no evidence so we have to take steps which amount to disenfranchising people who won't vote for us because we have no actual policies beyind crying over stupid culture wars shit like Dr. Suess that we also just make up.
Top US companies increase donations to Democratic groups
Executives shift contributions on expectations of Biden victory in November
While the dollar amounts companies give to these groups are typically only a few hundred thousand dollars, the funds can help win friends in powerful places. Last year, dozens of state attorneys-general started investigating Google, Facebook, Amazon and others for possible anti-competitive practices.
In 2018, all 50 state attorneys-general reached a $575m settlement with Wells Fargo over its sales practices. Before she became a US senator and then Joe Biden’s running mate, Kamala Harris was California’s attorney-general. Most state attorneys-general are elected by voters, while US attorneys are nominated by the president and confirmed by the Senate.
Already in 2020, the Democratic Attorneys General Association has raked in $19.4m from companies and their trade associations, compared with $9.8m during the previous presidential election cycle in 2016.
Companies often shift their contributions to individuals who are ahead in the polls, said Brendan Quinn, a manager at the Center for Responsive Politics, which tracks money in US politics.
“If the winds are shifting in one party’s favour that is who they are going to support,” Mr Quinn said. If a politician is running behind in the polls, companies might give less “considering that would be a waste of money if she or he loses.”
Companies are increasingly expecting Mr Biden to win the White House. Three quarters of business leaders surveyed by the Yale School of Management on September 23 said they would be voting for Mr Biden, the Democratic presidential candidate, over Donald Trump and 62 per cent of these business leaders believed Mr Biden would win.
Subscribe to read | Financial Times
Meaningless.
The usual Klongdick unrelated tripe . . .
Isn't it nice to have a president that isn't a weedy Putin suck up?
Russia Recalls Envoy as Biden Says '''Killer''' Putin Will '''Pay the Price''' for Election MeddlingRussia Recalls Envoy as Biden Says 'Killer' Putin Will 'Pay the Price' for Election Meddling
Russia called its US ambassador back to Moscow for consultations on Wednesday after Joe Biden described Vladimir Putin as a “killer” who would “pay a price” for election meddling, prompting the first major diplomatic crisis for the new American president.
In an interview with ABC News, Biden was asked about a US intelligence report that the Russian leader tried to harm his candidacy in the November 2020 election and promote that of Donald Trump. “He will pay a price,” the 78-year-old Biden said.
Asked if he thought Putin, who has been accused of ordering the poisoning of opposition leader Alexei Navalny and other rivals, is a “killer,” Biden said: “I do.”
Vyacheslav Volodin, speaker of Russia’s lower house of parliament, denounced Biden for agreeing with the description of Putin as a “killer.”
“Biden insulted the citizens of our country,” Volodin said. “Attacks on (Putin) are attacks on our country.”
Indeed, there is a logical argument. The increase in donations to Democratic groups is due to the fact that words have consequences. When the capital was invaded by insurrectionists who wanted to further the Q/Putin agenda to topple American democracy they are criminally liable for their actions. Many are held in federal jails still today and rightly so.
It is a shame that an idiot like slick was too broke to travel back to the insurrection, because he was most likely stuck on an oil field in some shithole Arab nation that he despises.
He should be locked in a federal jail. He once forgot about the repo he sent me three years ago before he flounced. He told me that he would "kill" me and my family in a "shit hit the fan" scenario if his family needed food.
The dude is a subhuman creeper.
BTW if the Apocalypse happens you are all welcome to my house for a BBQ.
Last edited by bsnub; 18-03-2021 at 07:20 PM.
Not at all, I was also against Hitters invention of Czechoslovakia , and don't get me started on Genghis Khan
By the way , nice changing the subject. The subject was that Terrorisms that Clinton caused by kicking the can down the road, sparked the war.
You said : "Clinton kicked the terrorism can down the road for political reasons, an attack happened under bush because of it, this sparked a massive war that the population of the USA overwhelmingly supported "
If terrorism sparked the war, and 15 out of the 19 terrorists' were Saudi, and non of them Iraqi , why did we attack Iraq then, and not the Saudis???
The sooner you fall behind, the more time you have to catch up.
Wondering why all the judicial institutions in country had refused in November to investigate the many accusations of the election fraud or any foreign intervention?
If they investigated they could have discovered the foreign meddling, couldn't they? But they did not want to look into it...
And knowing only now?
Actually, who does it know? Just few weeks ago was a declaration of NSA (?) that there was no foreign influence detected, recognized, no evidence or whatsoever. Similarly, as it was 4 years ago. However, now this accusation was quite strong... It will surely go in history (Guiness book?)
Obviously, in the terms of "America is back, Diplomacy is back"...
They did not determine that there was no foreign influence, they determined that there was no technical influence , like compromised voting machines, voter registration, vote tabulation. etc .
The operative word here is "technical"
Below is the uncalcified report. see page 4, paragraph Key judgment 1.
Page 4 . Key judgment 2:
" President Putin authorized and a range of Russian government organizations conducted, influence operations designed to denigrate President Biden's candidacy"
https://www.dni.gov/files/ODNI/docum...ss-16MAR21.pdf
Last edited by Buckaroo Banzai; 18-03-2021 at 11:19 PM.
The President held a meeting, via videoconference, with public representatives of the Republic of Crimea and the city of federal significance Sevastopol.
March 18, 2021 15:20 The Kremlin, Moscow
Meeting with public representatives of Crimea and Sevastopol • President of Russia
The LORD's reply to one question":
"International Music Festival volunteer coordinator and representative of Crimea Federal University Polina Bolbochan:
Mr President, I have a somewhat personal question for you. Yesterday, President Biden got quite tough in his interview, including with regard to you. What would you say to him?
Vladimir Putin: With regard to my US colleague’s remark, we have, indeed, as he said, met in person. What would I tell him? I would say “stay healthy.” I wish him good health. I am saying this without irony or tongue in cheek. This is my first point.
Secondly, taking a broader approach to this matter, I would like to say that difficult, dramatic, and bloody events abound in the history of every nation and every state. But when we evaluate other people, or even other states and nations, we are always facing a mirror, we always see ourselves in the reflection, because we project our inner selves onto the other person.
You know, I remember when we were children and played in the yard, we had arguments occasionally and we used to say: whatever you call me is what you are called yourself. This is no coincidence or just a kids’ saying or joke. It has a very deep psychological undercurrent. We always see ourselves in another person and think that he or she is just like us, and evaluate the other person’s actions based on our own outlook on life.
With regard to the US establishment, the ruling class – not the American people who are mostly honest, decent and sincere people who want to live in peace and friendship with us, something we are aware of and appreciate, and we will rely on them in the future – their mindset was formed in rather challenging circumstances which we are all aware of.
After all, the colonisation of the American continent by the Europeans went hand-in-hand with the extermination of the local people, the genocide, as they say today, outright genocide of the Indian tribes followed by a very tough, long and difficult period of slavery, a very cruel period. All of that has been part of life in America throughout the history of the United States to this day. Otherwise, where would the Black Lives Matter movement come from? To this day, African Americans face injustice and even extermination.
The ruling class of the United States tends to address domestic and foreign policy issues based on these assumptions. After all, the United States is the only country to have used nuclear weapons, mind you, against a non-nuclear state – Japan, in Hiroshima and Nagasaki at the end of WW II.
There was absolutely no military need for the bombing. It was nothing but the extermination of civilians. I am bringing this up, because I know that the United States and its leaders are determined to maintain certain relations with us, but on matters that are of interest to the United States and on its terms. Even though they believe we are just like them, we are different. We have a different genetic, cultural and moral code. But we know how to uphold our interests. We will work with the United States, but in the areas that we are interested in and on terms that we believe are beneficial to us. They will have to reckon with it despite their attempts to stop our development, despite the sanctions and insults. They will have to reckon with this.
We, with our national interests in mind, will promote our relations with all countries, including the United States. This is generally all I want to say about this."
A tray full of GOLD is not worth a moment in time.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)