1. #2801
    Days Work Done! Norton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Last Online
    Today @ 09:40 AM
    Location
    Roiet
    Posts
    34,935
    Quote Originally Posted by panama hat View Post
    Republicans wouldn't hesitate now, they have the fire of the dragon in them - especially with the obvious dumbing down of the population with Trump
    The dumb was there long before Trump hatter. Trump simply is a master of tapping into the dumb to get what he wants.

  2. #2802
    Thailand Expat harrybarracuda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    96,840
    Quote Originally Posted by panama hat View Post
    He should appoint three more judges - nothing says the number of judges now are the required number . . . but the Dems are too chicken shit to do things like that while the Republicans wouldn't hesitate now, they have the fire of the dragon in them - especially with the obvious dumbing down of the population with Trump
    Yeah great. The problem is that basically leaves the Republicans with the door wide open the next time they're in power.

  3. #2803
    Thailand Expat
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    38,456
    Is there a requirement for the Federal government to provide funding to hospitals in states that do not allow a woman's right to choose?

  4. #2804
    Thailand Expat harrybarracuda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    96,840
    Quote Originally Posted by sabang View Post
    Is there a requirement for the Federal government to provide funding to hospitals in states that do not allow a woman's right to choose?
    Oh yeah, tit for tat would definitely win over those independent voters.


  5. #2805
    Thailand Expat
    panama hat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Last Online
    21-10-2023 @ 08:08 AM
    Location
    Way, Way South of the border now - thank God!
    Posts
    32,680
    Quote Originally Posted by harrybarracuda View Post
    Yeah great. The problem is that basically leaves the Republicans with the door wide open the next time they're in power.
    Better than what the situation is now

  6. #2806
    Thailand Expat harrybarracuda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    96,840
    Quote Originally Posted by panama hat View Post
    Better than what the situation is now
    No it isn't, it's completely pointless.

    The Democrats are going to get chewed up and spat out in the midterms, and then the Republicans will concentrate on making Biden unelectable in 2024, which let's face it is not going to be difficult unless they run Baldy against him.
    The next post may be brought to you by my little bitch Spamdreth

  7. #2807
    Guest Member S Landreth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    left of center
    Posts
    20,590


    President Biden said that he wouldn’t be disappointed if there was a rematch between him and former President Trump in the 2024 presidential election.

    “I’m not predicting. But I would not be disappointed,” the president told Israel’s Channel 12 in an interview that aired on Wednesday.

    “No, look, the one thing I know about politics and American politics in particular is there’s no way to predict what’s going to happen. I’m not even halfway through my term yet … but my hope is that the Republican Party moves back to a normal position that’s not this MAGA party it’s become in many ways,” Biden added.

    The president pre-taped the interview at the White House on Tuesday and it aired at 8 p.m. in Israel.

    The prospect of a White House rematch between Biden and Trump is growing more serious and Trump is holding discussions about announcing a third White House bid with current and former advisers, sources recently told The Hill.

    Meanwhile, support for a Biden reelection bid hit a record low on Wednesday when nearly two-thirds of Americans said he should not run for a second presidential term in a new poll.

    Biden on Tuesday insisted Democrats want him to run for reelection, firing back at doubters after polling has showed a majority of primary voters wanted someone else at the top of the ticket in 2024.

    ____________




    Biden lands in Israel for first visit to the region as president

    President Biden landed in Israel Wednesday for the start of his first trip to the region since taking office.

    Why it matters: The trip is aimed at showing the Israeli people that Biden cares deeply about the Jewish state and its security, as well as reassuring the Palestinians of his administration's support, officials have said. But the more important, and controversial, stop on his trip will be his visit to Saudi Arabia, where he will meet with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman.

    Driving the news: Upon landing in Tel Aviv, Biden was greeted by Yair Lapid, who became acting prime minister less than two weeks ago after the coalition government collapsed and new elections were called. Israel is in the midst of its fifth election campaign in less than four years.


    • "We will discuss building a new security and economy architecture with the nations of the Middle East, following the Abraham Accords and the achievements of the Negev Summit," Lapid said at the welcoming ceremony.
    • "We will discuss the need to renew a strong global coalition that will stop the Iranian nuclear program," he added.
    • Biden said that even though he knows "it won’t happen in the near future, we will discuss ... my support for a two-state solution," as well as work on increasing Israel’s integration in the region.


    What to expect: On Thursday, Biden and Lapid will have a working meeting before holding a virtual summit with Emirati President Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed and Indian Prime Minister Narandra Modi that will focus on food security.


    • During his talks with Israeli officials, Biden is expected to discuss Iran, the normalization process between Israel and its Arab neighbors and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
    • White House national security adviser Jake Sullivan told reporters on Air Force One en route to Tel Aviv Wednesday that Biden will emphasize his support of the two-state solution as the only way to keep Israel as a Jewish and democratic state while achieving independence for Palestinians.
    • Sullivan added that at the same time, the president is aware of the challenges and therefore will not present any initiatives to resume peace talks between Israeli and Palestinian officials, but will urge the parties to take steps that could improve the situation and allow peace talks in the future.


    Biden and Lapid will also sign "The Jerusalem Declaration," which will serve as the framework for the U.S.-Israel strategic relationship moving forward. Israeli officials said it will be the main deliverable of the visit.


    • Israeli and U.S. officials have been working on the declaration for almost two months and Israeli officials say that such a broad and comprehensive statement on the U.S.-Israeli relationship hasn’t been published in more than two decades.
    • The joint declaration will include a clause that says the U.S. and Israel will use all elements of their national power to ensure Iran doesn't get a nuclear weapon, Israeli officials said.
    • Sullivan said Israel has a different view than the U.S. about the Iran deal but the Biden administration believes diplomacy is the best way to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon. “There is a deal on the table and the president believes Iran should take it," Sullivan said.


    Also on Thursday, Biden will meet Israeli President Isaac Herzog and participate in a reception with senior Israeli officials. He will also hold a 15-minute meeting with opposition leader Benjamin Netanyahu.


    • Biden and Netanyahu have known each other for 40 years, but in the last year the U.S. president’s top unofficial priority on Israel was to help the Israeli government survive, which would prevent Netanyahu from returning to power.
    • Sullivan said that one of the messages Biden wants to convey in this visit is that U.S.-Israeli relations are not about “who sits in which chair." Sullivan stressed that the fact Israel is in an election period won’t influence the president’s talks.


    • Sullivan said the meeting with Netanyahu shows Biden is talking to different political leaders in Israel.


    On Friday morning, Biden will visit the Augusta Victoria Palestinian hospital in East Jerusalem, where he is expected to announce $100 million in U.S. assistance to the Palestinian hospitals network in the area.


    • Biden’s visit to the hospital is diplomatically sensitive due to the fact it is located in East Jerusalem, which most countries see as the future Palestinian capital. Biden administration officials rejected an Israeli request to have Israeli officials join the visit to the Augusta Victoria Hospital, as Axios previously reported.
    • While there, Biden is expected to meet Palestinian civil society activists before traveling to Bethlehem for a meeting with Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas and a visit to the Church of Nativity.
    • The Palestinian leadership has very low expectations for the U.S. president's visit, Palestinian officials say.


    Biden will travel to Saudi Arabia for the last leg of his trip late Friday.


    • Biden's visit, which will reset his administration's relations with the Gulf kingdom, is seen as diplomatically and politically sensitive.
    • Biden once vowed to make Saudi Arabia a "pariah" and relations have been strained over a number of issues, including the kingdom's human rights record and the murder of Washington Post columnist Jamal Khashoggi. U.S. intelligence says MBS is responsible for Khashoggi's murder — an allegation Saudi Arabia denies.


    The Saudi visit will include a summit with the leaders of Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Kuwait, Qatar, Oman, Egypt, Jordan and Iraq.


    • It will also include a bilateral meeting, focused on repairing relations, the U.S. need for an increase in Saudi oil production and on normalization steps between Saudi Arabia and Israel. Biden earlier this month tried to downplay the bilateral part of his trip amid criticism among some Democrats in Congress.
    Keep your friends close and your enemies closer.

  8. #2808
    Thailand Expat harrybarracuda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    96,840
    If Biden runs in 2024, he'll lose, even if baldy orange cunto is his opponent.


    President Joe Biden-untitled-jpg'

  9. #2809
    Guest Member S Landreth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    left of center
    Posts
    20,590
    looking forward to watching Biden sign this bill into law




    Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) announced Wednesday he planned to support a deficit reduction package that addressed both climate change and prescription drug reform, a stark reversal for the one senator who has been blocking key planks of President Biden's agenda.

    Why it matters: The declaration from Manchin marks yet another about-face in a year-long negotiation over the size and scope of a Democrat-only reconciliation package.

    By the numbers: The nascent deal would generate $313 billion in new revenue over ten years by increasing the corporate minimum tax to 15%, according to a one-page summary distributed by Manchin's office.


    • It would bring in an additional $124 billion from enhanced Internal Revenue Service enforcement.
    • And in a major blow to the private equity industry, the agreement calls for another $14 billion by treating so-called "carried interest" as regular income and taxes it at a higher rate.


    For the climate provisions, the proposed package would spend $369 billion, while providing another $64 billion to shore up the Affordable Care Act for three years.


    • That would leave an additional $300 billion for deficit reduction.


    Driving the news: The reversal came just hours after the Senate passed a $280 billion package to support U.S. domestic semiconductor manufacturing.


    • Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) had previously threatened to hold the CHIPS Act hostage if Democrats continued negotiating with Manchin, but that threat evaporated after Manchin opposed new climate spending earlier this month.


    What they're saying: "I now propose and will vote for the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022," Manchin said in a statement.


    • "Rather than risking more inflation with trillions in new spending, this bill will cut the inflation taxes Americans are paying, lower the cost of health insurance and prescription drugs, and ensure our country invests in the energy security and climate change solutions we need to remain a global superpower through innovation rather than elimination."



    The big picture: Two weeks ago, in response to the 9.1% Consumer Price Index release, Manchin said that he was only willing to support a bill that allowed Medicare to directly negotiate prescription drugs prices.


    • That pronouncement effectively killed any prospects for the $300 billion in spending to address climate change that Manchin previously supported. Democrats were depressed and vented their anger at Manchin.
    • But privately, some Senate Democrats continued to negotiate.


    _______

    Manchin, Schumer announce slimmed-down $670 billion deal https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/...-billion-deal/
    Last edited by S Landreth; 28-07-2022 at 05:11 AM.

  10. #2810
    Thailand Expat
    Buckaroo Banzai's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Last Online
    03-08-2023 @ 01:50 PM
    Location
    My couch
    Posts
    4,889
    Quote Originally Posted by Cujo View Post
    Honestly, the fact that this buffoon and Trump buffon could get elected to the school board, let alone prime minister/President tells us there is something seriously wrong with the population.
    I blame it on decades of dumbing down.
    I agree that people leaders such as tramp and Boris are a symptom rather than the decease , but the disease is more complicated than just the "dumbing down" of the population. I would argue that in no time in human history did people have more information available than they do now.
    I know what you are thinking and I agree. Having information and being able to use it are two different things, and that's where the "Players" come in , and by "Players" I don't mean just people like trump. He IMO is a product. There is a manufacturing process with many "Players" behind a products such as trump.
    IMO there is an overload of information and people don't know how to handle it, and they gravitate in the direction of the bias. This is not lost to the "Players" who have become increasingly expert in manipulating information and shaping public opinion. They "Farm" such people and as you are well aware, farming requires a lot of fertilizer
    Propaganda has become so sophisticated as to make Goebbels a rank amateur .
    Making Democracy affectively dead.
    Socrates Hated Democracy. not because he did not like the concept, but because it could be easily manipulated , leading to foolish decisions, .And that was over two thousand years ago. Imagine the sophistication in such manipulation. that has developed in two thousand years
    Interesting take on the subject by Noam Chomsky
    The sooner you fall behind, the more time you have to catch up.

  11. #2811
    Guest Member S Landreth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    left of center
    Posts
    20,590
    Little more about the bill Biden will hopefully be able to sign




    Climate activists are feeling hopeful after Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) and Majority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) reached an agreement to move forward with legislation that includes energy and climate provisions.

    While the senators did not specify exactly what will be in the package, they said it will cut carbon emissions by approximately 40 percent by 2030 and will spend $369.75 billion on energy security and climate change programs over 10 years.

    Manchin indicated that this spending could help various types of energy, including fossil fuels, in addition to renewables.

    As it previously looked like congressional climate change legislation may have been dead, the news was generally met with cheers by activists.

    “Wow! We are so excited that Majority Leader Schumer and Senator Manchin have reached a deal that includes climate investments to reduce carbon emissions by roughly 40 percent by 2030, and we are eager to see the details,” said Tiernan Sittenfeld, senior vice president of government affairs at the League of Conservation Voters, in a statement.

    “Passing a climate bill should be Congress’ number one priority. The reported agreement between Senator Manchin and Leader Schumer presents the opportunity for a major breakthrough in America’s fight against climate change,” Jamal Raad, executive director of Evergreen Action, said in a statement.

    Melinda Pierce, the Sierra Club’s legislative director, said in a statement that her group was “encouraged” by the development.

    “The Sierra Club is encouraged by the potential of the Senate finally passing bold climate action,” she added. “We are eager to see text of this legislation, and are grateful that Biden and Schumer have remained resolute in finding a path to pass once-in-a-generation investments in our communities, our economy, and our future.”

    The progressive Sunrise Movement, meanwhile, offered some criticism of the process.

    “The system is rigged when one man, who profits off of fossil fuels, can hold life-saving climate legislation hostage. But if 50 Senators are actually committed to voting for a package that reduces emissions by 40% by 2030, Congress must pass it immediately,” the group tweeted.

    ___________

    From one of the climate scientists I follow.......

    Zeke Hausfather - Maybe maybe maybe: https://twitter.com/hausfath/status/1552409352589688832


  12. #2812
    Guest Member S Landreth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    left of center
    Posts
    20,590


    President Biden on Wednesday embraced a deal between Senate Majority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) and Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) to revive key pieces of his agenda, including provisions on health care, prescription drugs and climate change.

    “This afternoon, I spoke with Senators Schumer and Manchin and offered my support for the agreement they have reached on a bill to fight inflation and lower costs for American families,” Biden said in a statement.

    Schumer and Manchin earlier Wednesday said they had agreed to a $670 billion deal on Democratic priorities — weeks after Manchin seemingly had scuttled any chance of an agreement with hesitancy over inflation.

    Biden touted that the agreed upon bill, details of which were still being finalized, would help lower health insurance costs for millions of Americans under the Affordable Care Act, would lower the cost of prescription drugs and would provide tax credits to promote clean energy.

    The bill would also adjust the tax code to close loopholes for corporations and the wealthiest Americans.

    “This is the action the American people have been waiting for. This addresses the problems of today – high health care costs and overall inflation – as well as investments in our energy security for the future,” Biden said in a statement.

    “If enacted, this legislation will be historic, and I urge the Senate to move on this bill as soon as possible, and for the House to follow as well,” the president added.

    The Senate agreement seemed to catch even some Democrats by surprise given it came so quickly after Manchin had seemingly torpedoed hopes of a large-scale reconciliation package to pass major party priorities.

    It will require the support of all 50 Democrats in the Senate to pass, as well as a simple majority in the House, where Democrats hold a narrow majority.

    If the bill gets over the finish line, it would mark another legislative win for Biden, who has been racking up incremental victories despite his low approval ratings. Congress has in recent months passed a bipartisan infrastructure bill, a bipartisan gun safety bill, and the Senate on Wednesday passed a bill intended to improve competitiveness with China and manufacture semiconductors.

    ______________




    Senate Majority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) and Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) have agreed to spend billions of dollars to accelerate the production of electric vehicles, solar panels, wind turbines and to provide other incentives to bolster the clean-energy economy.

    Schumer announced the details of a $369 billion energy-and-climate deal Wednesday, which Democrats plan to include in a budget reconciliation package scheduled for the floor next week.

    Lawmakers estimate it will reduce U.S. carbon emissions by roughly 40 percent by 2030, putting the nation closer to meeting President Biden’s pledge of reducing carbon emissions by 50 percent by 2030, compared to 2005 levels.

    “By a wide margin, this legislation will be the greatest pro-climate legislation that has ever been passed by Congress. This legislation fights the climate crisis with the urgency the situation demands and puts the U.S. on a path to roughly 40 percent emissions reductions by 2030, all while creating new good-paying jobs in the near and long-term,” Schumer said in a statement.

    He said the package is now under review by the Senate parliamentarian and expects the Senate to vote on it next week.

    It would also allocate $300 billion to reducing the federal deficit and extend expiring health care subsidies under the Affordable Care Act at a cost of $64 billion over three years.

    The package is entirely paid for by $451 billion in tax proposals, including the establishment of a 15-percent corporate minimum tax, beefing up IRS enforcement of tax law and closing the carried interest loophole for money managers.

    An additional $288 billion would come from empowering Medicare to negotiate lower drug prices.

    “I thank Senator Manchin for his willingness to engage and his commitment to reaching an agreement that can earn the support of all 50 Senate Democrats,” Schumer said.

    The energy and climate change provisions are spread across a broad bill aimed at lowering consumer energy costs, boosting manufacturing of clean energy technology and reducing carbon emissions throughout the economy.

    The highlights include $4,000 consumer tax credits for lower- and middle-income Americans to buy used clean vehicles and up to a $7,500 tax credit to buy new clean vehicles, as well as a $1 billion grant program to make affordable housing more energy efficient.

    The bill would offer $9 billion in consumer home energy rebate programs and 10 years of tax credits to make homes more energy efficient and use clean energy.

    It would provide tax credits to encourage the manufacture of solar panels and wind turbines, $10 billion in investment tax credit to incentivize clean technology manufacturing centers, and $2 billion in grants to retool existing auto manufacturing facilities to produce clean vehicles.

    The agreement calls for tax credits for clean sources of electricity and energy storage and $40 billion for grant and loan programs for states and public utilities to transition away from fossil fuels.

    The tax chapter of the bill would tighten requirements for an estimated 200 large corporations that use loopholes in the tax code to pay an effective tax rate below 15 percent.

    The IRS would receive $46 billion to beef up its enforcement operations and $25 billion for operations support along with $4.8 billion for modernization.

    The legislation puts emphasis on directing new climate spending into lower-income and minority communities by including over $60 billion in “environmental justice priorities,” such as $3 billion for a block-grant program aimed at disadvantaged communities.

    It would also fund $3 billion worth of grants to “reconnect communities divided by existing infrastructure barriers,” according to a summary of the proposal. This provision is aimed at what some critics call “racist highway design” that was intended to divide Black and White neighborhoods.

    Another $3 billion would go to address air pollution at ports by purchasing and installing “zero-emission” equipment and $1 billion would go toward purchasing school and transit buses and garbage trucks that emit less pollution.

    __________


    • Dr. Leah Stokes


    We now have a game-changing clean energy and climate package ready to go in the Senate. What's in the "Inflation Reduction Act of 2022?" $369 billion in transformative investments.

    Here's one BIG, IMPORTANT climate policy thread.. https://twitter.com/leahstokes/statu...72204343840770

  13. #2813
    Guest Member S Landreth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    left of center
    Posts
    20,590
    Could be a bump in the road for Biden’s new climate bill........




    Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (D-Ariz.) had a message for her Democratic colleagues before she flew home to Arizona for the weekend: She's preserving her options.

    Why it matters: Sinema has leverage and she knows it. Any potential modification to the Democrat's climate and deficit reduction package — like knocking out the $14 billion provision on carried interest — could cause the fragile deal to collapse.


    • Her posture is causing something between angst and fear in the Democratic caucus as senators wait for her to render a verdict on the secret deal announced by Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer and Sen. Joe Manchin last Thursday.


    Driving the news: Sinema has given no assurances to colleagues that she’ll vote along party lines in the so-called “vote-a-rama” for the $740 billion bill next week, according to people familiar with the matter.


    • The vote-a-rama process allows lawmakers to offer an unlimited number of amendments, as long as they are ruled germane by the Senate parliamentarian. Senators — and reporters — expect a late night.
    • Republicans, steaming mad that Democrats have a chance to send a $280 billion China competition package and a massive climate and health care bill to President Biden, will use the vote-a-rama to force vulnerable Democrats to take politically difficult votes.
    • They'll also attempt to kill the reconciliation package with poison pills — amendments that make it impossible for Schumer to find 50 votes for final passage.


    The intrigue: Not only is Sinema indicating that she's open to letting Republicans modify the bill, she has given no guarantees she’ll support a final “wrap-around” amendment, which would restore the original Schumer-Manchin deal.

    The big picture: Schumer made a calculated decision to negotiate a package with Manchin in secrecy. He assumed that all of his other members, including Sinema, would fall into line and support the deal.


    • Now his caucus is digesting the specifics, with Sinema taking a printout of the 725-page bill back to Arizona on Friday for some dense in-flight reading.
    • Schumer will find out this week if his gamble in keeping Sinema in the dark will pay off.


    What we're watching: While Sinema supported the 15% minimum book tax back in December, which would raise more than $300 billion, Schumer never bothered to check if her position changed, given the darkening economic outlook.


    • Schumer and Manchin also inserted the language on taxing carried interest as regular income, which would raise approximately $14 billion, knowing full well that Sinema never agreed to it. That move blindsided Sinema.




    The intrigue: While Schumer and Manchin have a well-documented and tumultuous relationship — replete with private fence-mending Italian dinners — Schumer and Sinema do not regularly engage.

    Flashback: The Schumer-Sinema relationship took a big blow back in February when Schumer declined to endorse Sinema for her 2024 re-election when directly asked by CNN.


    • She didn't attend her party's caucus meeting on Thursday.


    Between the lines: Sinema and Manchin always agreed that President Biden’s initial $3.5 trillion Build Back Better plan needed to be trimmed down.


    • They are also on the same page on the need to act on climate change.
    • If Manchin has been primarily concerned with inflation, her guiding principles have always been economic growth and new jobs in Arizona.


    The bottom line: Sinema isn't terribly pleased with how Schumer has foisted this package upon her. She reserves the right to modify it.


    • But she also knows that a progressive challenger, like Rep. Ruben Gallego, is all but guaranteed in 2024 if she's held responsible for killing the Democrats best shot at a climate bill in years.


    ___________

    • Climate bill could be a huge help for EV buyers


    Electric vehicles could become a lot more affordable if Congress approves a spending bill that features sweeping climate provisions, among other components.

    Why it matters: EVs' up-front costs are still too high for many buyers, despite their lower long-term cost of ownership.


    • Revised tax credits, along with incentives for domestic manufacturing of EV batteries and mining of raw materials, should help jump-start America's electric vehicle industry.


    Yes, but: Some climate activists worry that tying tax credits to a domestic supply chain that doesn't yet exist could actually limit their effectiveness, reports E&E News.

    Details: In the current version of the bill, EV buyers can earn up to $7,500 in federal tax credits on North American-built vehicles, but only if the battery minerals are mined in the U.S., or in a trade partner country, and the battery is largely built in North America. (That means cars like the popular Mexico-built Ford Mustang Mach-E would qualify.)


    • There are new income qualifications and sticker price limits ($80,000 for trucks and SUVs, $55,000 for sedans) to ensure that the incentives are directed to mass-market customers, not wealthy buyers of luxury EVs.
    • The credits can be applied as a rebate at the time of purchase, rather than at tax filing time, which could make EVs' up-front costs more affordable for many.
    • Buyers of pre-owned electric vehicles would be eligible for a credit of up to $4,000 — important, because 70% of cars are purchased used.
    • Commercial fleet owners would be eligible for EV purchase credits, too.


    The bill would also remove a cap limiting tax credits to 200,000 vehicles per manufacturer, which would have put early leaders like Tesla, GM and Nissan at a disadvantage.


    • Instead, the credits will sunset for all automakers in 2032.


    There's also money in the bill to encourage U.S. manufacturing of EV batteries, components and minerals, in line with the Biden administration's efforts to build a domestic EV supply chain. The package includes:


    • $10 billion in investment tax credits and $20 billion in loans to build clean technology manufacturing facilities.
    • $2 billion in grants to retool existing auto manufacturing facilities to produce clean vehicles.
    • $500 million in the Defense Production Act for heat pumps and critical mineral processing.


    What they're saying: "This, in aggregate, is a very big deal that will really catalyze domestic manufacturing," said Joe Britton, executive director of ZETA, the Zero Emission Transportation Association.

    What to watch: The legislation will need unanimous Democratic support to pass the Senate (which is uncertain), and details could still change during the amendment process.

    https://www.axios.com/2022/07/29/cli...ehicle-credits

    __________

    • Biden speaks via FaceTime with, sends pizza to veterans protesting for burn pit bill


    President Biden spoke with veterans who are camping out at the Capitol building until the Senate passes a bill to expand care for veterans with burn pit injuries via FaceTime and sent them pizza on Saturday.

    Biden tweeted that he was originally planning to visit them in person to meet with veterans and their families supporting the Sgt. 1st Class Heath Robinson Honoring Our PACT Act, but he needed to cancel after testing positive for COVID-19.

    He said he instead had Secretary of Veterans Affairs Denis McDonough bring them pizza and facilitate a FaceTime call with them.

    “These heroes fought for our country — they shouldn’t have to fight for health care, too,” McDonough’s office said in a tweet. “The Senate must pass the PACT Act now.”

    Biden said on the FaceTime call that the country has a “sacred obligation” to care for those who go into war and care for them and their families after they return. He said opposing the legislation is “despicable,” and he has to believe that the bill’s opponents are “going to make up for the mistake they made.”

    The Senate attempted to advance the bill on Wednesday, but it only received 55 of the necessary 60 votes to overcome a filibuster. All Democrats and eight Republicans voted in favor of the bill, while three senators were absent.

    Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) said the day after the bill failed that he plans to bring it up for a vote again on Monday.

    Sen. Pat Toomey (R-Pa.), one of the votes against the legislation, said on the Senate floor that he was not opposed to the main purpose of the legislation, but he opposed that the bill would include $400 billion in unrelated spending, which he called a “budgetary gimmick.”

    Toomey tweeted on Saturday that the bill could have passed weeks ago if Senate Democrats dropped the spending from the bill.

    Schumer said in his comments after the bill failed that he offered Toomey the ability to propose an amendment to remove the spending after the legislation received 60 votes to advance, but Toomey insisted on the amendment passing in advance.

    Toomey called for the Senate to vote on the amendment in a subsequent tweet. He said Sen. John Tester (D-Mont.) is working in good faith to resolve the conflict.: https://thehill.com/homenews/adminis...burn-pit-bill/

    Extra


    • Eventually is not Okay.



  14. #2814
    Guest Member S Landreth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    left of center
    Posts
    20,590


    The Senate on Tuesday passed legislation expanding care for veterans who suffer from illnesses because of exposure to toxins during their military service, ending a standoff after Republicans blocked the bill last week.

    The Sgt. First Class Heath Robinson Honoring Our PACT Act passed with a vote of voted 86-11 and aims to expand benefits from the Department of Veterans’ Affairs to 3.5 million veterans.

    The bill now heads to President Biden’s desk and he is expected to sign it.

    Tuesday’s vote comes after Senate Republicans unexpectedly blocked the bill during a procedural vote last week. The upper chamber on Wednesday voted 55-42 in favor of the bill, failing to reach the 60-vote threshold needed to overcome a filibuster. Twenty-five Republicans who initially voted to advance the bill in June changed their votes.

    The upper chamber previously passed the bill in June by a vote of 84-14, and the House passed the bill in July on a bipartisan 342-88 vote. The measure had to go back to the Senate, as the House version included changes.

    Republicans have argued that the bill would create a “budgetary gimmick” by moving $400 billion spent by the Department of Veterans’ Affairs to mandatory spending, where it wouldn’t be subject to annual appropriations like discretionary spending would.

    Earlier on Tuesday, GOP Senators reached a deal for votes on three amendments, with 60 votes needing to pass the measures, followed by a vote on final passage of the bill.

    Veterans’ groups have been camping outside the Capitol since last Thursday in a bid to pressure the Senate to pass the bill. Those same veterans, joined by comedian Jon Stewart, sat in the Senate Gallery to observe the vote.

    Senate Majority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) thanked the advocates for their efforts, saying they could “go home knowing the good and great things you’ve done for America.”

    In addition to expanding VA eligibility for toxic exposed-veterans, the legislation also adds 23 burn pit and toxic-exposure related connections to the agency’s list of presumptive service connections.

    The bill also expands presumptions related to exposures to Vietnam War-era Agent Orange to veterans who served in Thailand, Cambodia, Laos and Guam.



    Who voted against the burn pit bill

    Toomey (R-PA) ultimately voted against the bill, along with Sen. Mike Crapo (R-ID), Sen. James Lankford (R-OK), Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT), Sen. Cynthia Lummis (R-WY), Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY), Sen. James Risch (R-ID), Sen. Mitt Romney (R-UT), Sen. Richard Shelby (R-AL), Sen. Thom Tillis (R-NC) and Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-AL).
    Last edited by S Landreth; 03-08-2022 at 07:28 AM.

  15. #2815
    Thailand Expat harrybarracuda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    96,840
    Quote Originally Posted by S Landreth View Post
    The Senate on Tuesday passed legislation expanding care for veterans who suffer from illnesses because of exposure to toxins during their military service, ending a standoff after Republicans blocked the bill last week.

    The Sgt. First Class Heath Robinson Honoring Our PACT Act passed with a vote of voted 86-11 and aims to expand benefits from the Department of Veterans’ Affairs to 3.5 million veterans.

    The bill now heads to President Biden’s desk and he is expected to sign it.

    Tuesday’s vote comes after Senate Republicans unexpectedly blocked the bill during a procedural vote last week.
    I suspect the release of the video of Republicans fist-bumping and laughing at their initial success in blocking the bill may have possibly swayed their decision.

    Great way to throw away the Veteran vote.

  16. #2816
    Guest Member S Landreth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    left of center
    Posts
    20,590


    resident Biden on Wednesday signed an executive order directing the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to consider working with states to use Medicaid waivers to pay for expenses for women who cross state lines to receive abortions.

    The executive order was the second that Biden has signed over the past month in response to the Supreme Court’s June ruling striking down the landmark 1973 abortion decision in Roe v. Wade.

    “I believe Roe got it right, and it’s been the law for close to 50 years,” Biden, who is isolating with COVID-19, said in virtual remarks at a meeting of an interagency task force on reproductive health care.

    “I commit to the American people that we are doing everything in our power to safeguard access to health care, including the right to choose that women had under Roe v. Wade which was ripped away by this extreme court,” Biden said.

    Biden’s executive order also directs HHS to consider actions like providing technical assistance and issuing new guidance to make sure health care providers comply with nondiscrimination laws in the wake of the ruling.

    And the order instructs HHS to improve federal research and data collection at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in order to evaluate the impact of the Supreme Court’s ruling on maternal health and reproductive healthcare.

    Biden administration officials did not provide many specifics about what the Medicaid waivers could look like, leaving the details up to HHS.

    The executive order states that Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra “shall consider actions to advance access to reproductive healthcare services, including, to the extent permitted by Federal law, through Medicaid for patients traveling across State lines for medical care.”

    Officials said Biden’s new order paves the way for Becerra to invite states to apply for Section 1115 Medicaid waivers to cover certain costs related to traveling for abortion.

    White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre stressed that the use of Medicaid funds would help low-income women who live in states with abortion restrictions and cannot afford to travel across state lines.

    “It’s going to help in particular low-income women,” Jean-Pierre told reporters at a press briefing Wednesday afternoon. “It paves the way for Medicaid to pay for abortions for women having to travel out of state.”

    However, the Hyde Amendment prohibits the use of federal funds to pay for most abortions, with exceptions given for cases of rape, incest and when the life of the pregnant person is endangered. The Medicaid waivers are likely to face Republican-led legal challenges.

    Jean-Pierre insisted that the executive order did not run afoul of the Hyde Amendment and said that HHS would ensure that the law is followed. She later seemed to clarify that the waivers could be used to support transportation, contraception and abortion procedures in some cases.

    “Medicaid provides comprehensive health care to women with low incomes,” Jean-Pierre said. “This care includes family planning services such as contraception, non-emergency medical transportation and support services like targeted case management which allows health care providers to help patients coordinate their care and it also includes abortion care in certain circumstances as excepted by the Hyde Amendment, which is rape, incest and life of the mother.”

    The actions triggered by the executive order, she said, “leverage Medicaid to support patient care for those living in states with abortion bans.”

    The Biden administration has faced pressure to take more aggressive action to protect access to abortion, as several states have moved to implement new restrictions following the Supreme Court decision in June.

    The White House had been internally considering using Medicaid funds to help pay for travel for abortion as early as May, following the leak of a draft opinion suggesting the Supreme Court was poised to overturn Roe.

    While Wednesday’s action is likely to be welcomed by abortion rights advocates, the administration has resisted calls to declare a public health emergency with respect to abortion access.

    A senior administration official previewing the order told reporters that the White House continues to review options to protect access to abortion services, but suggested that such a declaration would not yield much in the way of additional resources or legal authority.

    “The president is looking at all his options,” Jean-Pierre said Wednesday.

    Wednesday’s task force meeting took place a day after voters in Kansas dealt a resounding defeat to a state constitutional amendment that would have paved the way for new restrictions on abortion.

    Biden heralded that result, saying that “voters made it clear politicians should not interfere in the fundamental rights of women.”

    Also, he again called on voters to elect more Democrats so that Congress can pass federal legislation codifying abortion rights.

  17. #2817
    Guest Member S Landreth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    left of center
    Posts
    20,590
    Biden administration declares monkeypox a public health emergency

    The Biden administration on Thursday announced it is declaring monkeypox a public health emergency, a move intended to speed up the distribution of the vaccines and expand testing as the outbreak continues to spread.

    “We’re prepared to take our response to the next level in addressing this virus,” Department of Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra told reporters. “And we urge every American to take monkeypox seriously and to take responsibility to help us tackle this virus.”

    A decision memo created by HHS has circulated through U.S. health agencies over the past week and has secured broad support from agency heads.

    White House National Monkeypox Response Coordinator Robert Fenton described the virus as fast-moving and said it is spreading “faster than previous outbreaks.”

    “This public health emergency will allow us to explore additional strategies to get vaccines and treatments more quickly out to impacted communities,” Fenton told reporters. “And it will allow us to get more data from jurisdictions so we can effectively track and attack this outbreak.”

  18. #2818
    Guest Member S Landreth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    left of center
    Posts
    20,590
    About that bump in the road.......




    Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (D-Ariz.) announced Thursday evening that she has reached a deal with Senate Majority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) that could pave the way for Democrats to pass their budget reconciliation package.

    The deal would remove a provision closing the so-called carried interest loophole from the package announced last week by Schumer and Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.).

    Sinema said she and Schumer have also reached agreement on protecting manufacturing from the impact of a proposed 15 percent corporate minimum tax, which business leaders in Arizona warned would dampen economic growth.

    The announcement paves the way for Sinema to vote Saturday for a motion to proceed to a budget reconciliation package that would reform the tax code, tackle climate change, reduce the cost of prescription drugs and shrink the federal deficit.

    “We have agreed to remove the carried interest tax provision, protect advanced manufacturing, and boost our clean energy economy in the Senate’s budget reconciliation legislation,” Sinema said, signaling that she plans to vote to begin debate on the bill.

    “Subject to the parliamentarian’s review, I’ll move forward,” she said.

    Senate Democrats had waited anxiously for days for a positive sign from Sinema, whom they feared was angry after being left out of a final round of talks.

    With Sinema’s vote, Democrats now have the support of all 50 members of their caucus to pass what would become President Biden’s biggest domestic legislative achievement. It would reduce the federal deficit by between $100 billion to $300 billion, according to various estimates, an accomplishment Democrats can pitch to voters at a time of 40-year-high inflation.


    “I am pleased to report that we have reached an agreement on the Inflation Reduction Act that I believe will receive the support of the entire Senate Democratic conference,” Schumer said in a separate statement confirming the deal.

    He said the agreement “preserves the major components” of the deal he announced with Manchin last week to lower drug costs, fight climate change, close tax loopholes and reduce the deficit.

    “The final version of the reconciliation bill, to be introduced on Saturday, will reflect this work and put us one step closer to enacting this historic legislation into law,” Schumer said.

    Democrats expect to vote to begin debate on the more-than-700-page bill sometime Saturday afternoon.

    That will begin up to 20 hours of floor debate followed by an open-ended series of amendment votes, known as a vote-a-rama, and then a vote on final passage of the legislation.

    Sinema in her statement promised to work with colleagues to address the carried interest preferential tax rate, which allows asset managers to pay a 20 percent capital gains rate on income they earn from advising clients on profitable investments.

    “Following this effort, I look forward to working with Sen. [Mark] Warner [D-Va.] to enact carried interest reforms, protecting investments in America’s economy and encouraging continued growth while closing the most egregious loopholes that some abuse to avoid paying taxes,” she pledged.

    The announcement capped off several days of intense discussions between Sinema, Schumer and Manchin.

    Democratic senators said Sinema wasn’t happy about being left out of the secret negotiations Schumer and Manchin held last month to add sweeping tax reform and climate provisions to the budget package.

    The Arizona senator had previously made clear that she opposed eliminating the carried interest tax rate as well as reforms that would effectively raise corporate taxes and threaten economic growth. Those priorities appeared to be somewhat overlooked in the Schumer-Manchin deal.

    Sinema held back her support for the legislation and insisted on changes to soften the tax hit on manufacturers from a 15 percent corporate minimum tax, according to sources familiar with the negotiations.

    Manchin held at least two long conversations with Sinema on the Senate floor in recent days to win her over.

    Multiple people familiar with the issue said Sinema wanted to exempt U.S. manufacturing companies from the 15 percent corporate minimum tax that Schumer and Manchin inserted in the Inflation Reduction Act. That bill caught almost every senator — including Sinema — by surprise when it became public last week

    Exempting manufacturing companies from the book minimum tax would cost about $45 billion over ten years, according to one Senate estimate floated this week.

    Book is a tax accounting term that in effect would make it harder for companies to avoid declaring profit and therefore increase what they would pay in taxes.

    Sinema also told colleagues that she opposed closing carried interest loophole, which critics say allows wealthy money managers to pay a lower effective tax rate than many middle-income Americans.

    And the Arizona senator wanted $5 billion in drought resiliency funding for her home state, according to two Democratic senators.

    The statements released by Sinema and Schumer Thursday evening made no mention of drought relief.

    Sinema declined to answer reporters’ questions when she emerged from her Capitol basement hideaway Thursday afternoon.

    She came under heavy pressure from business leaders in Arizona to oppose the corporate minimum tax.

    “In the face of record-high inflation, supply chain backlogs and a major labor crunch, now is not the time to hammer manufacturers with new taxes,” Arizona Chamber of Commerce and Industry President Danny Seiden said in a statement earlier Thursday.

    “Arizona job creators will continue to urge lawmakers to reject this manufacturers tax and instead focus on policies that encourage job growth and strengthen our state and economic competitiveness,” he said.

    The Schumer-Manchin deal would have established a 15 percent minimum tax for corporations with more than $1 billion in annual profits, though it exempted green-energy and microchip manufacturing tax credits from getting wiped out by that minimum tax threshold.

    Republicans said the Democrats’ proposal would hit manufacturing companies especially hard by superseding a key reform of former President Trump’s 2017 Tax Credits and Jobs Act allowing companies to fully expense capital expenditures for a given year.

    Full expensing under the Tax Credits and Jobs Act is due to phase out over the next four years.

    Sinema told the Arizona Chamber of Commerce in April that she would be “unwilling to support any tax policies that would put a break on … economic growth, or stall business and personal growth for America’s industries.”

    She made clear to senior White House officials and Senate Democratic colleagues early during the negotiations over the budget reconciliation bill that she would not support increasing the 21 percent corporate tax rate, a key achievement of the 2017 tax reform law.

    “The entire country knows that I am opposed to raising the corporate income tax. That was true yesterday and it is true today,” Sinema told the Arizona Chamber of Commerce earlier this year.

    Republican critics of the Schumer-Manchin deal said that preventing full and immediate expensing of capital expenditures would effectively increase taxes on many corporations.

    Sen. Rob Portman (R-Ohio), who worked closely with Sinema in drafting last year’s $1 trillion bipartisan infrastructure law, warned in an op-ed for The Wall Street Journal that it would “essentially” place a “tax on manufacturing.”

    He pointed out that the bipartisan Joint Committee on Taxation estimates that nearly 50 percent of the new tax would hit manufacturers.

    “Imposing this new tax on U.S. companies, and restricting certain U.S. manufacturers from writing off investment costs immediately, would make America less competitive and drive investments and jobs overseas,” he warned.

    Sinema’s request for $5 billion in drought resiliency funding also loomed as a potential problem, sources warned.

    Guaranteeing access to more water to states lower in the Colorado River basin such as Arizona, Nevada and California may come at the expense of upper-basin states such as Colorado, Utah, Wyoming and New Mexico.

    “We are facing historic drought in Colorado. The state has had the worst wildfires in our state’s history. There is very little water in the Colorado River. And I think it would be great if we could do something on drought, but it has to be something that meaningfully improves the situation in Colorado and in the upper basin of the Colorado River,” said Sen. Michael Bennet (D-Colo.), who is up for reelection in November.

    Bennet warned that any drought resiliency language must provide an “enduring solution to the problem, otherwise it’s not worth doing.

    Democrats secure Sinema's support for Inflation Reduction Act
    Last edited by S Landreth; 05-08-2022 at 09:50 AM.

  19. #2819
    Guest Member S Landreth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    left of center
    Posts
    20,590
    Inflation Reduction Act – Maybe a vote tomorrow (Saturday)




    The potential climate and economic benefits of the surprise reconciliation package Democrats unveiled last week and are likely to pass as soon as this weekend are starting to come into a clearer view.

    Researchers have crunched the numbers to forecast how the more than 100 climate provisions in the $740 billion deal, called the Inflation Reduction Act, would impact planet-warming carbon emissions, jobs, electricity prices and more.

    The findings have given climate advocates, Democratic lawmakers and the majority of American voters who support the bill a lot to celebrate.

    Three independent research organizations — the Rhodium Group, Energy Innovation and the REPEAT Project — found that the bill, if passed, could slash U.S. carbon emissions by 40 percent or more below 2005 levels by the end of the decade.

    Those estimates came just a few weeks ago when Rhodium released a report warning the U.S. was way off track of meeting its emissions reduction goals. That analysis found that without additional policy actions, the U.S. would reduce planet-warming emissions 24% to 35% by 2030 — far short of Biden’s 50% to 52% target.

    The economic package includes $369 billion in climate and clean energy spending. If passed, it would be the most significant investment the U.S. has ever made to confront fossil fuel-driven climate change and its mounting impacts.

    Talks seemed to have collapsed for the third and final time last month between the White House and Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) over a historic clean-energy spending package in Congress’s reconciliation bill, a piece of budgetary legislation that Democrats can pass without a single Republican vote. Given the Senate’s 50-50 split, doing so would require every Democrat’s vote – giving Manchin, a frequent critic of Biden’s agenda and chair of the Senate Energy Committee, unrivaled leverage over the negotiation.

    Manchin signed off on the bill last week. And on Thursday, Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (D-Ariz.), another key swing vote, announced her support, all but guaranteeing Democrats will have just enough votes to pass it.

    “This package, additional action from executive agencies and subnational actors can put the U.S.’s target of cutting emissions in half by 2030 within reach,” the Rhodium analysis found.

    The bill’s climate investments are also expected to jumpstart clean energy jobs, lower electricity bills and improve public health.

    t could ultimately lead to the creation of more than 9 million jobs over the next decade, according to a new analysis commissioned by BlueGreen Alliance, a coalition of labor unions and environmental organizations, and conducted by the Political Economy Research Institute (PERI) at the University of Massachusetts Amherst. That includes nearly 6 million jobs in clean energy deployment and manufacturing, 600,000 focused on protecting forests and other natural resources, and 150,000 to confront pollution in low-income and BIPOC communities.

    Energy Innovation’s report found the IRA would create closer to 1.5 million jobs, primarily in manufacturing and construction, and prevent up to 3,900 premature deaths, about 100,000 asthma attacks and up to 417,000 avoided lost workdays by 2030.

    As for how much the average American household would expect to save on future energy bills, Resources for the Future estimates it could amount to between $170 and $220 per year over the next decade. That would translate to up to $278 billion in total savings for consumers nationwide.

    Moody’s Analytics pegged the potential savings at more than $300 per year for the average household.

    Biden touted the package’s potential job opportunities, health benefits and energy savings during a Thursday roundtable with business and labor leaders.

    “The vast majority of people in America support what’s in the Inflation Reduction Act,” Biden said. “So my message to Congress is this: Listen to the American people. This is the strongest bill you can pass to lower inflation, continue to cut the deficit, reduce healthcare costs, tackle the climate crisis and promote America’s energy security, all while reducing the burdens facing working-class and middle-class families. Pass it.”

    A poll conducted this week by environmental group Climate Power and think tank Data for Progress found that 73% of all likely voters, including 95% of Democrats and 52% of Republicans, support the reconciliation package.

  20. #2820
    Guest Member S Landreth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    left of center
    Posts
    20,590
    Harris breaks 50-50 deadlock to advance landmark climate, tax, health bill



    The Senate voted along party lines Saturday afternoon to advance a sweeping bill to reform the tax code, tackle climate change and lower the cost of prescription drugs, taking a big step closer to giving President Biden a major victory before the November midterm elections.

    The Senate voted 51 to 50 to proceed to the 755-page bill, after Vice President Kamala Harris arrived at the Capitol to cast the tie-breaking vote.

    The vote puts the bill on a trajectory to pass the Senate sometime Sunday, barring an unexpected setback, such as the sudden absence of a Democratic senator.

    Senate Majority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) hailed the bill’s impending passage as a major achievement.
    Last edited by S Landreth; 07-08-2022 at 09:03 AM.

  21. #2821
    Thailand Expat harrybarracuda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    96,840
    It must be nerve wracking knowing that a c u n t like Sinema is on the phone to her paymasters to find out if she should support it or not.

    It seems she (and she alone) said she would not support this bill if it removed a $14Bn tax cut for HEDGE FUND MANAGERS and the like. So it was left in.

    Clearly they are the poor dears that have suffered the most in these times of economic pressure.

    She's an absolute fucking scumbag.

    Kyrsten Sinema Donors Score Win From $14B Carried Interest Tax Break

  22. #2822
    Guest Member S Landreth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    left of center
    Posts
    20,590
    Update


    • Senate Democrats kill off amendments as vote-a-rama goes all night


    Senate Democrats are killing off amendments to their climate, tax and health bill as part of a marathon, around-the-clock series of votes known as a vote-a-rama that started after 11 p.m. Saturday night and will stretch toward midday Sunday.

    The Senate has not taken a break overnight, with senators from both parties mingling on the floor as they consider one amendment after another.

    Most of the GOP amendments are intended to put Democrats on the spot on tough issues. If any were approved, it could also make the sweeping package more difficult to pass in the House at the end of the week.

    The process was initially expected to last as long as 12 to 14 hours, with some optimistic observers wondering if it could wrap up more earlier if lawmakers exhausted one another with the overnight work.

    Senators appeared relatively chipping after dawn broke Sunday morning, despite the grueling work. The vast majority of the did not appear to be getting fatigued.

    At 6:30 a.m., the Senate was dispensing with an amendment from Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) on crime. Several more hours of votes were expected.

    The vote-a-rama is a feature of the Senate budget process, which Democrats are using to pass a major climate, tax and health bill with 51 votes, bypassing a Republican filibuster.

    The budget reconciliation process allows the party in control of the Senate to pass major legislation with a simple-majority vote but the trade-off is Democrats must allow Republicans vote on an unlimited number of back-to-back amendments.


    Each side has only one minute to make an argument for or against an amendment before a vote is called.

    Votes on amendments that violate the Byrd Rule, which requires that legislation passed through the budget reconciliation process have a non-tangential impact on spending, revenues or the debt limit, are subject to procedural objections, which require 60 votes to be waived.

    Not all the votes have been on GOP amendments.

    The first amendment of the vote-a-rama is one sponsored by Senate Budget Committee Chairman Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), which would require Medicare not to pay more than what the Department of Veterans Affairs does for prescription drugs.

    It was defeated 1-99.

    The last vote-a-rama the Senate held in August of 2021 to pass the budget resolution lasted 14 hours and included consideration of more than 40 amendments.

    Democratic senators say they expect this weekend’s vote-a-rama to last until 11 am or noon Sunday, judging by past experiences.

    Where to watch live [when it starts back up this (EST) morning]:


  23. #2823
    Guest Member S Landreth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    left of center
    Posts
    20,590
    Nice Monday morning!

    Senate passes sweeping tax, climate package after marathon vote; Harris breaks tie


    Senate Democrats have passed their sweeping tax, health care and climate change legislation after a marathon night of voting, with Vice President Harris casting the decisive vote to break a 50-50 deadlock and send the package to the House.

    The long-awaited $740 billion bill would raise taxes on corporations, tackle climate change, lower prescription drug costs and reduce the deficit.

    The bill was approved on Sunday afternoon after a full night and morning in which senators worked nonstop on the consideration of amendments to the legislation. Democrats generally stuck together to defeat GOP amendments that might have scuttled the bill.

    A last-second hiccup occurred when Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (D-Ariz.) backed an amendment that extended a cap on state and local tax (SALT) deductions that was a key feature of the 2017 Trump tax cut bill. It was seen as endangering the bill because the ceiling on the deduction hurts many households in blue states and districts.

    Seven Democrats ended up backing the amendment offered by Sen. John Thune (R-S.D.), but any damage was undone by the immediate passage of another amendment that replaced the SALT cap extension with a different revenue stream.

    As the vote on final passage took place, several Democrats offered hugs to Sinema, who had been involved in a number of negotiations over the bill in the last several days that some worried could topple the package.

    Democratic senators also applauded their staff, who were seated at the back of the chamber.

    Once seen as all but dead, the bill came back to life last week after Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) and Senate Majority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) reached a deal that narrowed the more than $3 trillion legislation and renamed it the Inflation Reduction Act.

    Sinema reached a separate agreement with Schumer on Thursday, giving Democrats their 50th vote and paving the way for the party to steer the legislation through the Senate using special budget rules that prevented the GOP from killing it with a filibuster.

    The House is set to reconvene at the end of the week to vote on the package. Final passage by the House would send it to the White House for President Biden’s signature less than three months before the midterm elections.

    Biden and Democrats hope it sweetens their changes of holding their House and Senate majorities by exciting a disenchanted Democratic base, while Republicans are expected to attack the spending as unnecessary and misguided.

    A vote-a-rama on the bill started just before midnight Saturday as Democrats stuck together to defeat a barrage of Republican-sponsored amendments designed to put the majority party on the spot.

    One such amendment sponsored by Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.) would have pulled $1 million from the Affordable Care Act to maintain the Title 42 health order denying migrants seeking asylum entry into the United States.

    Democrats defeated another amendment by Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) to strike a 16.4 cent a barrel tax on imported petroleum products and crude oil refined in the United States.

    A third amendment sponsored by Sen. Mike Crapo (R-Idaho) would have barred the IRS from auditing individuals and business owners with income under $400,000.

    The vote capped a long, grueling process that began more than a year ago when Senate Democrats began negotiations to enact the priorities of Biden’s Build Back Better agenda.

    Over the past year, many of the president’s most ambitious social spending priorities were cast aside because of the opposition of Manchin and Sinema. At two points, the negotiations collapsed entirely amid angry recriminations.

    In the end, Democrats rallied around a bill to raise more than $300 billion in new tax revenue from wealthy corporations, substantially reduce global-warming emissions by 2030, and give Medicare broad new power to negotiate lower prescription drug prices.

    “I thank all my colleagues who have dedicated their blood, sweat and tears towards shaping this outstanding legislation. This is one of the most comprehensive and impactful bills Congress has seen in decades,” Schumer said on the floor.

    Democrats say the bill will reduce the deficit by nearly $300 billion, but Republicans say it will have a negligible impact on inflation.

    “Sounds like a bill that’s going to address the number one problem facing our nation, which is inflation, and then you actually look at the bill’s contents and will discover that the bill will do nothing to reduce inflation,” said Thune.

    The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) projects the legislation will reduce the deficit by $90 billion over 10 years.

    A Democratic aide, however, said CBO recognizes the legislation will likely increase tax revenues by more than $200 billion by beefing up Internal Revenue Service programs and enforcement of tax compliance.

    Many Democratic lawmakers were thrilled to reach a deal on a $369 billion energy security and climate package, especially after talks between Schumer and Manchin collapsed during a heated exchange on July 14.

    Democrats last month were prepared to move a slimmed-down package consisting of just prescription drug reform and a two-year extension of expiring health insurance subsidies under the Affordable Care Act.

    But then Manchin met with Schumer on July 18 to revive the negotiations and within days crafted a bill that provided tens of billions of dollars in incentives for green energy technology and energy efficiency and penalties on fossil fuels, such as a fee on methane emissions and a tax on foreign oil imports.

    It provides $4,000 and $7,500 tax credits to buy used and new electric vehicles but doesn’t allow them to be used for vehicles with batteries made from Chinese processed minerals.

    It is expected to reduce climate-warming emissions by 40 percent over the next decade.

    “I can’t stop talking to my kids about the climate provisions,” said Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.). “This is the first time they’ve been legitimately excited about my job. We really owe to the next generation to get this right and a lot of young people in this country were developing an acute sense of hopelessness that adults weren’t taking seriously the climate crisis.”

    Republicans argued the legislation would have little impact on rising global temperatures and wind up forcing to pay more for gas because of the revived tax on foreign oil.

    Graham called the tax on oil imports a “vampire tax” because it was eliminated in 1995 and now is coming back from the dead.

    “This bill imposes a new gas tax of 16.4 cents per barrel on all imported petroleum products and crude oil refined in America,” Graham said. “This creates new gas taxes for the American consumer in the name of climate change.”

    Senate Budget Committee Chairman Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) expressed deep disappointment with the prescription drug reform component of the bill. He said it should have done more to empower Medicare to negotiate lower drug prices.

    But other Democrats rejected Sanders’s view, arguing the reform would set a powerful new precedent by giving the federal government more influence over the market.

    “There is a reason why big PhRMA is fighting this so hard. They know once you put negotiation, embedded into law, there will be no turning back. That’s what this is all about,” said Senate Finance Committee Chairman Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), who helped craft the prescription drug reform piece. “This is a seismic shift between government and this lobby.”

    Sanders offered an amendment to require Medicare to pay no more than the Department of Veterans Affairs for prescription drugs. His amendment failed by a lopsided vote of 1-99, with Sanders casting the only “yes” vote.

    Another Sanders amendment to extend a $300-a-month child tax credit and pay for it by raising the corporate tax rate from 21 percent to 28 percent failed by vote of 1-97. Only Sanders voted for it.

    The legislation includes a three-year extension of Affordable Care Act subsidies at a cost of $64 billion.

    The legislation will raise $258 billion over 10 years by imposing a 15 percent corporate minimum tax on companies with over $1 billion in profits and require companies to follow generally accepted accounting principles when reporting income to the IRS.

    Sinema won a significant concession from Schumer by shielding manufacturing companies from losing their ability to fully write off capital expenditures because of the 15 percent minimum tax. That shrunk the projected revenue from the proposal from $313 billion to $258 billion.

    Schumer also had to drop a proposal to close the carried interest tax loophole, which lets asset managers pay a favorable tax rate, to secure Sinema’s vote.

    But the Democratic leader made up for the lost revenue by adding a 1 percent excise tax on stock buybacks, which will raise an estimated $74 billion.

    “I hate stock buybacks. I think they’re one of the most self-serving things that corporate America does,” the Democratic leader explained to reporters Friday.

    “I don’t think I need to tell anyone what happens when you raise taxes on businesses, particularly when the economy is shrinking. You get less growth, lower wages and fewer jobs,” Thune said.
    Last edited by S Landreth; 08-08-2022 at 03:56 AM.

  24. #2824
    Days Work Done! Norton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Last Online
    Today @ 09:40 AM
    Location
    Roiet
    Posts
    34,935
    Quote Originally Posted by S Landreth View Post
    Nice Monday morning!
    Saw it on CNN and was not impressed. The fact it was a totally inadequate bill and the vote was 50/50 along party lines is again an example that the state of affairs in US politics has fuck all to do with really serving the interests of America's citizens.
    "Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect,"

  25. #2825
    Guest Member S Landreth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    left of center
    Posts
    20,590
    ^It’s a good start. https://s3.documentcloud.org/documen...ct-of-2022.pdf



    Democrats pass a major climate, health and tax bill. Here's what's in it

    Tackling climate change

    More than $300 billion would be invested in energy and climate reform, the largest federal clean energy investment in U.S. history.

    This portion of the bill takes on transportation and electricity generation, and it includes $60 billion for growing renewable energy infrastructure in manufacturing like solar panels and wind turbines.

    It also includes several tax credits for individuals on things like electric vehicles and making homes more energy efficient.

    Lowering the cost of prescription drugs

    The bill includes a historic measure that allows the federal health secretary to negotiate the prices of certain expensive drugs each year for Medicare.

    The bill puts a cap of $2,000 on out-of-pocket prescription drug costs for people on Medicare, effective in 2025.

    There's also a three-year extension on healthcare subsidies in the Affordable Care Act originally passed in a pandemic relief bill last year, estimated by the government to have kept premiums at $10 per month or lower for the vast majority of people covered through the federal health insurance exchange.

    That helps millions of Americans avoid spikes in their health care costs.

    Tax reform

    Instead, a 1% excise tax on stock buybacks was introduced, and it could bring in roughly five times as much revenue as the carried interest measure (which was estimated at $300 billion). However, it wouldn't take effect until next year, raising predictions of a rush of buybacks by some companies before 2023 rolls around.

    And one other part of the bill that doesn’t get the attention it should…….

    The bill also includes President Biden’s proposal to restore $80 billion of the enforcement budget that has been cut from the IRS over the past decade, which will more than pay for itself. As ITEP has explained, years of budget cuts have caused the IRS to reduce its audits of very large corporations in half and reduce its audits of millionaires by even more.

    “Even those opposed to changing our tax laws should agree with the commonsense notion that corporations and the richest Americans should follow tax laws already on the books. This proposal gives the IRS the tools to ensure that happens,” continued Hanauer.

    Just a start!

    Gavin Schmidt - This is the first US federal legislation that is at all commensurate with the size of the climate challenge. Still a long road ahead, but finally the global embarrassment of legislative inaction is over.

    The US has had useful action at the executive level (particularly these last two years) and effective regional, state, and local initiatives to reduce emissions, but there are things that can only be done at the legislative federal level. Finally! : https://twitter.com/ClimateOfGavin/s...87220596072450
    Last edited by S Landreth; 08-08-2022 at 03:24 PM.

Page 113 of 164 FirstFirst ... 1363103105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121123163 ... LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •