Back at ya you doll scrounging bottom dweller.
Printable View
What part of the USA are you from? The part with a massive crippling debt? The part with the highest level of incarceration in the world, more than China (ffs..)? The part with healthcare cost causing 60% of all bankruptcies? The part where every house has a stupid flag waving, and grieving mothers and fathers for children blown apart in a part of the world that they are too uneducated to point to on a fucking map? The part where nearly 2% of your population is a "Disable Veteran"?
Fuck the troops - fuck the military - fuck the flags and the watery eyed "Thank you for your service" and fuck your stupidity for worshiping hired murderers
That's The problem, they are not psychopaths, they are just young kids, and in many ways IMO also victims.
I can not believe that you could possibly be so wrong.
I am convinced that you are a troll, trying to get a rise out of people.
From someone who has a bit of formal experience in the subject, Let me give you a bit of advice . Propaganda works best when subtle and disguised in a cell of truth. If you bludgeon people over the head with hyperbole you get dismissed ,and ignored .
To get people to go where you want them, You need to construct your argument in such a way ,that they feel they got there on their own.
Kids joining the army "Psychopaths" ??? don't you think that's a bit over the top? Don't you think that many kids join the army for many different reasons some of them,regardles of how misinformed they might be, altruistic??
a definition of politics is " Telling people to go fuck themselves in such a way that they say thank you" you seem to have accomplished the polar opposite,
Telling people something they agree with , in such a way that they tell you to go Fuck yourself.
Those were the days...
Attachment 59165
^ When the US had actually WON a war as opposed to taking credit for the CHinks and Rooskies work, you can keep talking lad.
If you walk down a street with a group of blokes, kick down a door, kidnap a father in front of his kids, take him away for torture, and brutalise the rest of the family, does that "being your job" make that acceptable? Id you are sat in a Apache, pick out a group of men 2 miles away, ask permission to kill them, granted, and you then do, does that "being your job" excuse you? MAke it morally acceptable.?
All this "nice young folks, apple pie and ribbons in their hair, saluting the flag" nonsense IS the propaganda, IS the false narrative. The might well be nice young kids, but at the point where their chosen career option starts or enables the murder, theft, torture, rape, destruction , of other people and countries, your right to call them "nice young kids" ends. They are no. Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold might have been nice young kids to some people, but their actions, their choices were repugnant. Dropping a bomb on a school from 2,000 miles away is significantly worse than the Columbine shooting. You condemn on, and excuse the other.
^ FO Ant :smileylaughing:
You did not understand a word I said.
Perhaps it is time for another change of Avatar,
I suggest this one.
Attachment 59171
Fuck off Klondyke go back to your troll factory.
There were just a few...
Quote:
According to the 2014 Russian census, 84% of Crimean inhabitants named Russian as their native language; 7.9% – Crimean Tatar; 3.7% – Tatar; and 3.3% – Ukrainian.[citation needed] It was the first official census in Crimea since a Ukrainian-held census in 2001.[129]
According to the 2001 census, 77% of Crimean inhabitants named Russian as their native language; 11.4% – Crimean Tatar; and 10.1% – Ukrainian.
Crimea - Wikipedia
The mere fact that they invaded and forced the non russians out. There was not the slightest indication of a threat for the ethnic russians before that. Russia could have pressed for a referendum under international supervision. They did not go that way because they knew they would lose.
When did Russia "invade" Ukraine, 13th, 18th, 20th century. When did Russia force Ukrainians out of Ukraine, where did they go?
:rofl:
Why would Russia want Ukraine? It had a valid agreement for the part it wanted to keep.
Peacekeeping in African shitholes.
Peacekeeping in ME shitholes.
Humanitarian aid during famines.
Disaster relief after storms & seismic events.
Fairly mundane and not headline grabbing events. That's what armed forces around the world do most. What you're complaining about is the big boy bullies of Russia, China, and the US and you're blaming the pawns for the actions of the royalty.
^
Plenty that are cause by local psychopaths in power. The reason every country has a military is because psychopaths aren't exclusively western.
You obviously don't know how a modern military works. Do you have some romantic picture in your head where everyone lines up on a battlefield and the best team wins? Most soldiers/sailors/airmen don't even carry weapons. They move stuff around the world, fix broken infrastructure, and supply means of communication and control when there is none locally.
I've been reading your rants on here, making some good points but also going way out there and painting with the broadest brush.
When you say that no military is needed . . . country A has one. Country B doesn't. Country A wants valuable B land. Country A marches in and takes it. Country B ceases to exist and is a slave to country A.
So yes. Unfortunately this isn't nirvana.
As for enrichment, sure for a time. After that the state goes bankrupt because military expenditure creates very little and is a social program as such. Why do you think most world powers eventually died off?
A - conscription.
B - a job, whether you like it or not. Especially in the US it is a way for financially disadvantaged people to get a job and an education . . . and the vast majority don't see any military action.
I think a grand idea would be to split our defence forces into two separate services- Defence force and Offence force.
Thus, quiet patriots and young people who just wanna earn a buck and get a trade can join the Defence forces, safe in the knowledge they are never going to be required to kill often unarmed people in far away places, quite possibly in some extremely lurid ways.
Mercenaries, Gung-ho's, psychopaths, right wing Xtians, homicidal maniacs & ilk could join the Offence force, secure in the hope they might well (god willing) be sent to kill 'people' - well gooks, chinks, ragheads etc- in foreign places at somebody elses behest.
I reckon that simple step would help make for a better world. :chitown:
https://teakdoor.com/images/imported/2020/10/685.jpgQuote:
They obviously broke that agreement by invading Ukraine
Oh look. A bullshit artist.
Oh look mum. Another one.Quote:
Except he's quite correct
https://teakdoor.com/images/imported/2020/10/689.jpg
Nice debate style, sabang. Convincing
Most of the first 20-21 years of my time in the Navy we were mostly just a big stick. With the exception of the very short Desert Shield/ Desert Storm period. And then 9/11 went down and it seems the country lost it’s mind. Something that should have been nothing more than a month or so bombing campaign turned into an unnecessary full scale couple decades long war. Yeah, I supported it ... supported the troops but I still blame it on the civilians. The USA is ran by the civilians. As it should be.
And where are they now, the ones "forced out"? Just curious... (and where from you take your knowledge, from the "unbiased" MSM sources?)
On the second thought - yes, they were some "forced out": the ones who prepared for the Navy base of (please no names here). However, they were not "forced out", they disappeared very fast...
I understand that the people who are profiting from wars do want the wars.
But why ordinary people do support and apologize wars and the murdering? Beside the fact that even many of those are killed and maimed by the wars...
Anyway, is it fair to point out that attacking troops are generally more unpopular than defending troops? :frog: