Thread: Kyle Rittenhouse. Murder or self defense ?

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

His mom isn't even 40.

100% she has a gunt

Originally Posted by Edmond

They're just desperately grasping at thin air because they were/are wrong.

And even attacking an innocent young man's mother now. :/

Just shows that nothing ages more than hate and stupidity......socal is fucked.

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

His mom isn't even 40.

Source ?

Wendy Rittenhouse - Wiki

Wendy Rittenhouse is the mother of Kyle Rittenhouse. She is a nurse’s assistant. She is a single mother of Kyle Rittenhouse. They have been living in the apartment in Antioch which lies in the south of Wisconsin border. Kyle shot the demonstrators who were shooting on the protest” Black Lives Matter” of Jacob Blake.
Wendy Rittenhouse is also suspected by the cops. Police is unknown whether she has dropped her son during that day of shooting. Kyle Rittenhouse shotted Two of the Demonstrators. Anthony Huber and Joseph D Rosenbaum are the two victims of Kenosha protest.

Name	Wendy Rittenhouse
Age	55-60 years

LULZ...the one woman beta cuck incel tries to white knight for and it's a horrible slapper that drove her son across state lines with a weapon he shouldn't have and dropped him in a place he shouldn't have been.

Trailer park trash solidarity yo!

Originally Posted by Edmond

And even attacking an innocent young man's mother now.

Because she's pasty-white, ginger and saggy eyed.



The energy, time and stress of raising a young man that risks not only his freedom... but his life... to help protect the property of strangers.

Trailer park trash solidarity yo!

They're circling the wagons, I mean trailers!

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

beta cuck incel

No flaming or abuse allowed. All posts should include your opinion on the subject, not your opinion of the member posting

Please respect the rules of Speakers Corner.

They're circling the wagons, I mean trailers!

I'll give them this though those low-IQ genetic throwbacks are good at solidarity.

Herd mentality I suppose. Like sheep.

Originally Posted by Backspin

Source ?

Wendy Rittenhouse - Wiki

You really need to learn to cross check your sources...that one looks to have been written by a five year old.

You could always check her facebook account...

Originally Posted by Backspin

Wendy Rittenhouse is the mother of Kyle Rittenhouse. She is a nurse’s assistant. She is a single mother of Kyle Rittenhouse. They have been living in the apartment in Antioch which lies in the south of Wisconsin border. Kyle shot the demonstrators who were shooting on the protest” Black Lives Matter” of Jacob Blake.
Wendy Rittenhouse is also suspected by the cops. Police is unknown whether she has dropped her son during that day of shooting. Kyle Rittenhouse shotted Two of the Demonstrators. Anthony Huber and Joseph D Rosenbaum are the two victims of Kenosha protest.

When did you start writing for Wikipedia, Backspit?

Originally Posted by koman

First. Trial by public opinion....driven by...Trial by MSNBC, CNN et al.
Trial by social media...and trial by Teakdoor.

Then we have the actual trial with a judge, jury, and experienced trial lawyers to present facts, evidence and a suitable amount of theater.
The Teakdoor legal team who wish him to be convicted and burned at the stake without even the trouble and expensive of an actual trial.

Originally Posted by panama hat

You do realise that a forum is there to exchange views . . . views YOU may not agree with, views that have no bearing on a trial in WI, views that are made by laymen . . . That, in essence, is what a chat forum is about.

Originally Posted by koman

but we can be sure that will come after the verdict if it's doesn't turn out the way CNN wants.

Originally Posted by koman

The opinions, pre judgements, and virtual signalling of folks like you have no bearing on the matter.

Still, the penny hasn't dropped as to what a forum is all about

Originally Posted by koman

I'm staying an opinion same as everyone else....or do you think that opinions should only be in lockstep with your own.

Ah, so it would be correct for others to tell you to stop because your wittering has no bearing on the outcome of the case . . . and that FOX will decide his innocence.

Originally Posted by Troy

You really need to learn to cross check your sources...that one looks to have been written by a five year old.

You could always check her facebook account...

I simply asked for a source. So far nobody has produced one.

Originally Posted by Backspin

I simply asked for a source. So far nobody has produced one.

Many are still waiting for your 'sources' - why not start there

^

Rittenhouse already agreed:

Jury to get to weigh some lesser charges in Rittenhouse case

Schroeder told Rittenhouse that by including the lesser charges, “you’re raising the risk of conviction, although you’re avoiding the possibility that the jury will end up compromising on the more serious crime. And you’re also decreasing the risk that you’ll end up with a second trial because the jury is unable to agree.”


Rittenhouse said he understood.

Originally Posted by Samuel

Rittenhouse already agreed:

Well, there ya go. Shows my ignorance re this trial.

Originally Posted by Samuel

Rittenhouse already agreed:

This says to me (to ME, Koman - and I know my opinion won't sway the jury, lawyers or the judge in this trial) that Rittenhouse's lawyers know he'll be found guilty and are happy to cop a lesser charge or sentence.

If only they had a less contentious judge . . . why do they so often think they're the main gig at these things . . .

Originally Posted by panama hat

This says to me (to ME, Koman - and I know my opinion won't sway the jury, lawyers or the judge in this trial) that Rittenhouse's lawyers know he'll be found guilty and are happy to cop a lesser charge or sentence.

If only they had a less contentious judge . . . why do they so often think they're the main gig at these things . . .

No argument on that position.
The list of charges is quite long and at the very least he would be found guilty on the illegal weapon charge.

He may be well be found guilty on some of the other charges as well, bur the "self defense" case is strong and well supported by video evidence and accounts of threats to his life by Rosenbaum... .being attacked while laying on the ground and having a handgun pointed at him etc etc....
The jury has a lot to argue over.

Apparently the judge is now being bombarded with threats to himself and his family. American society seems to have descended into chaos and virtual barbarism.

Originally Posted by koman

The list of charges is quite long and at the very least he would be found guilty on the illegal weapon charge.

True . . . the mother should cop something as well, I'd suggest . . . no, I'm not a lawyer but my wife is

Originally Posted by koman

being attacked while laying on the ground and having a handgun pointed at him etc etc....

Yes, that's only one incident, though. Simply put the jerk should not have been there in the first place.

Originally Posted by koman

The jury has a lot to argue over.

Yes. I was recently a juror at two cases here . . . nasty, nasty stuff . . . but as you said, there are so many things to consider even when the case is relatively clear and there is more than one charge.

Originally Posted by koman

Apparently the judge is now being bombarded with threats to himself and his family.

Unacceptable . . . he should have been simply the judge, not try to portray himself as the 'star' of the show. Honestly, he came across as an angry drunk . . . and the 'not a victim' ruling? Simply scandalous.

Originally Posted by koman

American society seems to have descended into chaos and virtual barbarism.

It takes less and less to happen it seems . . . the cretin simply should not have been there, driven there by his mother, in the first place.

Originally Posted by koman

American society seems to have descended into chaos and virtual barbarism.

This is a thread about a minor who went to a protest over racial injustice armed with an assault rifle at a time when even the president espoused violent rhetoric, his party continues to undermine democracy and is currently engaged in book bannings, and the right to own and carry weapons is more precious and hard fought for than the right to affordable healthcare.

What tipped you off?