Thread: Hunter Biden Busted?

Originally Posted by Backspin

Why did you omit the part about how Steve Bannon

From Ant




You still believe the bullshit?

I can understand his reluctance Who wants to pretend to write a serious article based on fake Russian emails? It would end most careers and leave the author a laughing stock.

The New York Post’s front-page article about Hunter Biden on Wednesday was written mostly by a staff reporter who refused to put his name on it, two Post employees said.
Bruce Golding, a reporter at the Rupert Murdoch-owned tabloid since 2007, did not allow his byline to be used because he had concerns over the article’s credibility, the two Post employees said, speaking on the condition of anonymity out of fear of retaliation.
Coming late in a heated presidential campaign, the article suggested that Joseph R. Biden Jr. had used his position to enrich his son Hunter when he was vice president. The Post based the story on photos and documents the paper said it had taken from the hard drive of a laptop purportedly belonging to Hunter Biden.
Many Post staff members questioned whether the paper had done enough to verify the authenticity of the hard drive’s contents, said five people with knowledge of the tabloid’s inner workings. Staff members also had concerns about the reliability of its sources and its timing, the people said.

New York Post Published Hunter Biden Report Amid Newsroom Doubts - The New York Times

^Perhaps the FB and Twitter (isn't it the same owner?) have made a good deed for population to suppress the issue, they did not want to have such accident like now in Paris where they exercised freedom of expression, did they?

Or is it the other way around?

Originally Posted by Klondyke

Perhaps . . .

. . . you're talking absolute bullshit again and conflating issues from different dimensions.

Originally Posted by panama hat

You still believe the bullshit?

What that Hunter Biden was paid 50k a month in a job and industry he had no skill or experience in, and actually therefore did no work in return for the month, and the only reason he got that was because his father, corrupt Joe Biden, wangled it for him?

YEs. If you don't you are a fucking moron as well. Or you can come up with an explanation as to how this coke addict got this massive job.

VEry standard DMC response this is. They can not and never do refute the facts, but attack the messenger. Their dim witted blue flag waving fans then fall into line dutifully doffing their caps to their masters.

Conspiracy nutters ans NYP readers . . . fetch . . . unleash the truth

Originally Posted by pseudolus

Or you can come up with an explanation

They only question and quote opinions they read,don't be expecting to much from them.........

They are all like beaten housewife's. Desperate to believe that their tormentors love them, will change, are good, with look after them.

Originally Posted by panama hat

Conspiracy nutters ans NYP readers . . . fetch . . . unleash the truth

Well there is a conspiracy for sure. One fabricated by the DMC and swallowed by idiots.

So what part is wrong? Did the little shit have a 50k a month job? What was his vast experience that got him that?

Originally Posted by pseudolus

What that Hunter Biden was paid 50k a month in a job and industry he had no skill or experience in,

this is not illegal.
don't like it?
here's a four step plan for you to enact change:
1. apply for US citizenship
2. get approved
3. write your congressman to change the law.
4. wait.
or...
continue to barking at the moon on a thai based internet message board.

Originally Posted by pseudolus

did no work in return for the month

link?
yeah, of course not.
and since he was only given the job for his access, he was, in fact, doing the work he was paid for.

Originally Posted by pseudolus

corrupt Joe Biden

yeah, that's what you keep posting...but never providing any credible support whatsoever.
and if he was indeed corrupt, why wasn't he indicted or why didn't the republicans bring him before congress in 2010 when they controlled both chambers ? or in 2016 when the controlled both chambers of congress?
why hasn't trump's DOJ indicted him?

Originally Posted by pseudolus

come up with an explanation as to how this coke addict got this massive job.

FFS, he got the job because of his access.
everybody knows this.
stop behaving like a naive 12 year old with a learning disability.
this is how the system works in the US and whatever godforsaken rock you've crawled back out from under.
don't like it?
see my four step plan above.



btw, it's pretty clear that you're out of your depth.

Originally Posted by raycarey

stop behaving like a naive 12 year old with a learning disability.

There's every possibility that he has the mental age of a 12 year old and a learning disability.

It is cruel of you to say he can just "stop". I feel offended.

Originally Posted by pseudolus

What that Hunter Biden was paid 50k a month in a job and industry he had no skill or experience in, and actually therefore did no work in return for the month, and the only reason he got that was because his father, corrupt Joe Biden, wangled it for him?

I do not think so, because :
Madhani, Aamer (September 21, 2019). "Biden: I never talked to son Hunter about overseas business dealings". USA Today. Retrieved October 19, 2020.

Originally Posted by helge

I do not think so, because :
Madhani, Aamer (September 21, 2019). "Biden: I never talked to son Hunter about overseas business dealings". USA Today. Retrieved October 19, 2020.

That's OK then. Clearly, no politician ever lies. Sorry I doubted Creepy Joe.

It is a good one

I'm betting somewhere a Russian intelligence person is going "See, I told you they believe anything! Give me my winnings!"

Originally Posted by bsnub

You continue to expose yourself as a buffoon posting up trash from a tabloid rag like the NYP just confirms it. Anyone dumb enough to believe anything they publish is beyond stupid. Frankly you should be banned from SC as you contribute nothing of value aside from pushing your batshit crazy tin foil tomfoolery.

Case in point just look at the company you keep. Backspin/Skidmark has become your acolyte and it is no surprise since he too swallows the right wing propaganda. Morons.

So answer me this bsnub.Would you propose banning everyone who doesn’t agree 100% with you?

Originally Posted by raycarey

this is not illegal.
don't like it?
here's a four step plan for you to enact change:
1. apply for US citizenship
2. get approved
3. write your congressman to change the law.
4. wait.
or...
continue to barking at the moon on a thai based internet message board.




link?
yeah, of course not.
and since he was only given the job for his access, he was, in fact, doing the work he was paid for.




yeah, that's what you keep posting...but never providing any credible support whatsoever.
and if he was indeed corrupt, why wasn't he indicted or why didn't the republicans bring him before congress in 2010 when they controlled both chambers ? or in 2016 when the controlled both chambers of congress?
why hasn't trump's DOJ indicted him?





FFS, he got the job because of his access.
everybody knows this.
stop behaving like a naive 12 year old with a learning disability.
this is how the system works in the US and whatever godforsaken rock you've crawled back out from under.
don't like it?
see my four step plan above.



btw, it's pretty clear that you're out of your depth.

Whar is pretty clear from your post is that you have completely buried your head in the sand.What will be your defense when this all plays out to be true?

Originally Posted by RPETER65

Whar is pretty clear from your post is that you have completely buried your head in the sand.What will be your defense when this all plays out to be true?

Given that even the author of the piece is trying to disassociate himself from the story he was asked to write, I'd recommend you stop peeing in your Depends over it.

Originally Posted by RPETER65

So answer me this bsnub.Would you propose banning everyone who doesn’t agree 100% with you?

Agree, you cannot have an opinion on here unless it is as the inner sanctum, it opens up to being called names, small minded lot, very small.

Originally Posted by RPETER65

So answer me this bsnub.Would you propose banning everyone who doesn’t agree 100% with you?

It has nothing to with agreeing with me. It has everything to do with not being a gullible idiot who deliberately pushes falsehoods because it fits your agenda.

why do people even engage on these obvious fabrications - if you ignored their drivel they would move onto another questionable leap of logic as their adhd demands

Originally Posted by raycarey

perhaps...but they're probably disappointed that unlike the clinton campaign in '16, the biden campaign is pushing back forcefully...and that the media is actually doing it's job and not running with a story that is little more than an unsubstantiated smear.

. . . and not limiting their coverage to Trump, saturation point was reached a long time ago

even fox news didn't want to touch this steaming pile of shit....

Fox News Passed on Hunter Biden Laptop Story Over Credibility Concerns

Fox News was first approached by Rudy Giuliani to report on a tranche of files alleged to have come from Hunter Biden’s unclaimed laptop left at a Delaware computer repair shop, but the news division chose not to run the story unless or until the sourcing and veracity of the emails could be properly vetted.


With the general election just three weeks away, Giuliani ultimately brought the story to the New York Post, which shares the same owner, Rupert Murdoch. The tabloid has been exhaustively covering the contents of the laptop — which include everything from emails regarding Hunter Biden’s work for a Ukrainian company to personal photos of the recovering addict — with each morsel being amplified in the conservative media world, including on Fox News’ top-rated opinion programs. Thus far, the Fox’s News division has only been able to verify one email from the tranche leaked.

according to two sources familiar with the matter, the lack of authentication of Hunter Biden’s alleged laptop, combined with established concerns about Giuliani as a reliable source and his desire for unvetted publication, led the network’s news division to pass. Fox News declined to comment on this story.


Some of Fox News’ top news anchors and reporters have distanced themselves from the story. During an on-air report that largely focused on how social media platforms handled this story, Bret Baier said, “Let’s say, just not sugarcoat it. The whole thing is sketchy.”


“You couldn’t write this script in 19 days from an election, but we are digging into where this computer is and the emails and the authenticity of it,” he added.


Chris Wallace also called the story “suspicious” and said, “I can understand the concern about this story. It is completely unverified and frankly, Rudy Giuliani is not the most reliable source anymore. I hate to say that, but it’s just true.”

Fox News Passed on Hunter Biden Laptop Story

and you know gauchebag got it from his russian backers

dan's show today has some more interesting points, including congress testimony that aligns dates with hunter's emails.