Why doesn't she get married again, and bring her newly betrothed with her? Bradford will throw a street parade in celebration- if Luton doesn't nab her first. She'll get a bigger Council house too.
Why doesn't she get married again, and bring her newly betrothed with her? Bradford will throw a street parade in celebration- if Luton doesn't nab her first. She'll get a bigger Council house too.
who would want to marry her,with a track record of continuously being shagged,being pregnant from the start,a baby girl who managed to live for 1yr.
a baby boy who only lived for 3months,and now she is pregnant again.what was she used for BREEDING?
I can think of many fresh faced young Isis boys who would line up to jump her bones to get into Britain. Plenty of virgins waiting for them in Heaven.
Shamima Begum cannot return to UK, Supreme Court rules
Shamima Begum, who left the UK for Syria to join the Islamic State group as a teenager, will not be allowed to return and fight her citizenship case, the Supreme Court has ruled.
The court said in a unanimous ruling that her rights were not breached when she was refused permission to return.
Shamima Begum cannot return to UK, Supreme Court rules - BBC News
So there ya go, dave.
You need exclaim 'Oh FFS!' no more.
Well, she's had her day in court and a judge has decided against her.
You seemed disgusted by her even being able to access the judicial process.
Isn't that a major thing that distinguishes most of the western powers from the thugs and nutters with whom she threw in her lot?
Great, so it's settled then.
The judges agreed with my original thought
cyrille, I've been clear from the outset what my opinion was.
From your posts, maybe you think a different course of action fitted within your moral goalposts?
It's assumed that you thought that she should be allowed back into the UK to 'fight her case'.
She should be given the full gambit of legal recourse to the country that she said can go
Possibly a Council free house and full legal support to fight her charges leveled by the UK Government.
If I've got your position wrong, please feel free to rebuff and explain EXACTLY what she should receive.
Yeah, you have got my position wrong.
I just posted above exactly what I thought she should receive...a hearing.
Anything else you've arrived at is just down to your suburban 'so white' angst.
I can only think you didn't really understand what was happening with this case and/or couldn't adequately express it, because why be so exasperated simply about someone getting a hearing?
You know what was meant.
You're just being a pedantic twat.
Nope, you have got it wrong. I understand exactly what is 'happening with this case' ... and the UK Judges have agreed. You seem to be the outlier.
'someone getting a hearing' ... she's had her hearing ... and she lost.
OH ... are you saying she should be allowed back in the UK?
Ummm, who will pay for her court defense?
Oh ... the UK Tax Payer.
And her accommodation?
Oh ... the UK Tax Payer.
The UK ... the country she said ... you can go yourself.
So much angst...about a legal system paid for by someone else doing its job.
That's not really the cause of it though, is it.
Ever make any errors of judgement when you were 15?
You seem an odd mix of a usually easy going person who rants about things like this and your neighbour's dustbin.
Actually she didn't have her day in court as the judges won't allow her to be present in the UK on advice of the security services. Instead they deferred the decision on hearing her case until she can find a location and method to appear which could be zoom if she ever leaves the camp.
From the OP, referring to Shamima Begum's original quote ...
Humm, the quantum of my 'errors of judgement' probably didn't extend to "When I saw my first severed head in a bin it didn't phase me at all."
I probably got in trouble for throwing my soggy sandwiches into the bin ... don't recall seeing any severed heads in the bin ...
Well you put up a news story and didn't add a link, which is always unfortunate.
But I'm guessing the source of that "quote" was not of the highest quality.
It reads to me like someone summarising and passing it off as a quote.
Straw man clutching. Falling fast.
Australian Government news source ... UK schoolgirl Shamima Begum who fled to join Islamic State '''wants to return home to England''' - ABC News
^^It's now been corrected dave.
Please be more attentive.
Your punctiliousness on this is rather surprising for someone who hasn't been able to understand the difference between 'it's' and 'its' for over five years.
She had her hearing. Brit courts don't make judgements without hearing both sides, so without needing specifics we can be confident she was represented and her case duly submitted, by a legal team and on our tab...perhaps this is another difference between 'us' and 'them' which you conveniently overlooked.
If you're really stuck, dig deep enough and you might be able to find a few more differences.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)