Let’s do it.
Link please.
Parler Free Speech Social Network
It won’t let me sign up/doesn’t accept my passwords.
Just anecdotal but a couple of Republicans I know said they weren’t going to bother with the Senate run-off. They are tired of the election and bombarded with advertisements everyday. All good! In the meanwhile, I’ve ordered my absentee ballot in case ‘rona makes it too dodgy to do early voting in person. Hope Stacy Abrams is out there working her magic!
Trump’s conspiracies have MAGA world talking Georgia boycott
President Donald Trump’s demonization of mail-in voting may have cost him votes in the recent election. Now, his demonization of Georgia’s entire electoral system is hurting his party’s chances at keeping the Senate.
Driven by Trump’s insistence that Georgia’s elections are indelibly rife with fraud, conspiratorial MAGA figures are calling for a boycott of the two Senate runoff races, slated for Jan. 5, that will determine which party controls the upper chamber.
Their reason: The two GOP candidates, Sens. Kelly Loeffler and David Perdue, are not only insufficiently pro-Trump, they may be complicit in Georgia’s electoral fraud.
It doesn’t matter that both candidates are essentially lock-step with Trump, or that there is no evidence of links to electoral malfeasance. On Twitter and its less-restrictive alternative Parler, Trump’s more hardline followers have linked the duo to the president’s favorite — and untrue — voter-fraud theories. Hashtags like #CrookedPerdue and #CrookedKelly are flying around. The two lawmakers’ Parler accounts are brimming with posts accusing them of being secret “liberal DemoRats.”
MORE Trump’s conspiracies have MAGA world talking Georgia boycott - POLITICO
Just too delicious!
So that’s what we need to do. Get in Parlor and run down Kelly Loffler and David Perdue as Rinos who were complicit in Georgia election fraud.
I joined. Dull as a brick.
Could this have any bearing on things or fake news. Considering the source, but it's a pretty bold claim if fake.
Google News -Nevada judge has agreed to let the Trump campaign present its evidence that fraud and illegalities plagued the state’s election, enough to reverse Joe Biden's win and set an example for other state challenges.
According to Trump officials, the judge set a Dec. 3 hearing date and is allowing 15 depositions. What’s more, the campaign plans to present its evidence that could result in the rejection of tens of thousands of mail-in ballots in Democratic Clark County where Biden ballots outnumbered Trump ballots by 91,000 in unofficial results.
“BIG news in Nevada: a Judge has allowed NV Republicans to present findings of widespread voter fraud in a Dec. 3rd hearing. Americans will now hear evidence from those who saw firsthand what happened—a critical step for transparency and remedying illegal ballots. Stay tuned,” White House chief of staff Mark Meadows tweeted.
American Conservative Union Chairman Matt Schlapp, one of those heading the Nevada case, told Secrets, “It gives us a real chance, if to do nothing else, to begin to show this historic level of fraud.”
^ Think that’s the case where they want to throw out military ballots which were sent by Nevada servicemen who were stationed out of state. That’s not going over, I reckon.
GOP List of Alleged Voter Fraud in Nevada Contains Hundreds of Military Addresses | Military.com
What a shit show politics are in the USA
After loosing , the president has three months to burry the bodies
and those he cant burry, he pardons.
I can hear the conversation in the oval office right now. "But boss , I cant do that. it's illegal and I could go to jail" and the president replying
"don't worry about it, I will pardon you "
Why should the president (republican or democrat) have the right to pardon anyone ?
The argument by Mason at the constitutional convention was:
"“ought not to have the power of pardoning, because he may frequently pardon crimes which were advised by himself. It may happen, at some future day, that he will establish a monarchy, and destroy the republic. If he has the power of granting pardons before indictment, or conviction, may he not stop inquiry and prevent detection? The case of treason ought, at least, to be excepted. This is a weighty objection with me.” "
Does it sound familiar?
The counter argument by Madison was:
"“There is one security in this case to which gentlemen may not have adverted: if the President be connected, in any suspicious manner, with any person, and there be grounds to believe he will shelter him, the House of Representatives can impeach him; they can remove him if found guilty.” "
A faulty argument because, all the president has to do is wait until the end of his term.
The sooner you fall behind, the more time you have to catch up.
Just tried and used my old Chicago number . . . but it's a landline . . . and the confirmation text needs a mobile.
Otherwise it works.
Password needs to be:
"Use eight or more characters with at least one capital letter, lowercase letter, number, and special character."
I used @Gooseberry7 and it accepted it.
Use Google voice...
Send & get text messages - Computer - Google Voice Help
The repubtards won't let it die.
They're baaack: Trump and allies still refuse election lossMonday seemed like the end of President Donald Trump's relentless challenges to the election, after the federal government acknowledged President-elect Joe Biden was the “apparent winner” and Trump cleared the way for cooperation on a transition of power.
But his baseless claims have a way of coming back. And back. And back.
By Wednesday, Trump was phoning into a local Pennsylvania Republican lawmakers' meeting that had been orchestrated by his campaign to assert falsely, again, that the election was tainted.
“This election was rigged and we can’t let that happen," Trump said by phone, offering no specific evidence.
The 2020 presidential race is turning into the zombie election that Trump just won’t let die. Despite dozens of legal and procedural setbacks, his campaign keeps filing new challenges that have little hope of succeeding and making fresh, unfounded claims of fraud.
But that’s the point. Trump’s strategy, his allies concede in private, wasn’t to change the outcome, but to create a host of phantom claims about the 2020 presidential race that would infect the nation with doubt and keep his base loyal, even though the winner was clear and there has been no evidence of mass voter fraud.
“Zombies are dead people walking among the living — this litigation is the same thing,” said Franita Tolson, a professor at the University of Southern California Gould School of Law. “In terms of litigation that could change the election, all these cases are basically dead men walking.”
It's a strategy tolerated by many Republicans, most notably Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, who are clinging to Trump as they face a test of retaining their own power in the form of two runoff elections in Georgia in January.
“This really is our version of a polite coup d’etat,” said Thomas Mann, senior resident scholar at the Institute of Governmental Studies at the University of California at Berkeley. “It could end quickly if the Republican Party acknowledged what was going on. But they cower in the face of Trump’s connection with the base.”
A day after Trump said his administration should begin working with Biden's team, three more lawsuits were filed by allies attempting to stop the certification in two more battleground states. In Minnesota, a judge did not rule on the suit and the state certified the results for Biden. Another was filed in Wisconsin, which doesn't certify until Tuesday. Arizona Republicans filed a complaint over ballot inspection; the state certification is due Monday.
And the campaign legal team said state lawmakers in Arizona and Michigan would hold meetings on the election “to provide confidence that all of the legal votes have been counted and the illegal votes have not been counted in the November 3rd election.”
In Pennsylvania, where state Republican lawmakers met at Gettysburg on Wednesday to air grievances about the election, Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani attended in person and Trump dialed in from the Oval Office.
“We have all the evidence," Trump asserted. “All we need is to have some judge listen to it properly without having a political opinion.”
An insecure Trump flips out at reporter.
I can only assume this is very recent.
Fraud fraud fraud . . . yet nothing is shown by the Trump camp. If it's so massive then it should be obvious to all.
What a surprise that no MSM have shown anything from the PA election hearing (OK, just that Trump was calling)?
Over 3 hours talk of people who had seen really awkward things...
(but all just conspiration theories, who would believe that such "irregularities" could happen, we are not in Belarus, are we?)
Hearing? You're imagining things again.
People fantasizing about what they thought/imagined/hoped they saw/overheard.Over 3 hours talk of people who had seen really awkward things...
Did you forget that at the ACTUAL hearing the judge threw their case out because he said it was based on a "gross misunderstanding of the electoral process"
Last edited by Cujo; 27-11-2020 at 02:48 PM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)