The Dems are going to lose and they know it, might as well send Bernie
Peter would have more chance than Bernie against Trump,
Trump is a monster that will destroy anyone in an intelligible debate, so completely pointless
The Dems are going to lose and they know it, might as well send Bernie
Peter would have more chance than Bernie against Trump,
Trump is a monster that will destroy anyone in an intelligible debate, so completely pointless
do you think that sanders should release his full medical file ASAP?
in 2008, john mccain gave the media access to over 1,000 medical documents.
bernie had a heart attack in october and reluctantly released letters from his doctors. no hard data.
Okely Dokely Mr Snubbles.
But Bush senior was the 3rd of 3 consecutive Republican terms.
I have now had a quick google on the wikipedia and it seems that Carter's term was the only time since the 19th century that either party was bookended by the other party to yield a single term party occupancy of the hot seat.
So what is your point? You were still wrong.
I have it on good authority that Bush senior was not gay.
He apparently liked to grab women's buttocks during group photos.
I would like to see all the relevant group photos together in one place for comparison to see if you can see a common hint of surprise in all the ladies' eyes
Kudos to Pete Buttigieg if he tries to pull this stunt when he is elected!
he could win the popular votes, but we know this is irrelavant in a US election,
not saying that Bernie would be a bad POTUS, but he would 100x more controversial than Trump because he would actually try to do the right things
some have been assassinated for less
hence the Pentagon/NSA will have Trump re-elected with the help of the KGB of course
I don't know what all this kerfuffle is about the presidential race, Bernie can't do anything unless the Dems win the senate back anyway.
Nice non-sequitur.Originally Posted by Chico
You have no idea what you're talking about do you.
Prove me wrong.
Why bother.Originally Posted by Chico
The absence of a negative is not proof of the positive and you are intellectually dishonest so would just ignore it and move on to the next non-sequitur (a word you clearly don't know the meaning of ).
same old same.
All's Good, Don is the Winner and becomes President again with the middle classes and the banksters supporting him.
God Bless America.
Keep crying losers.
...you do realise the election isn't until Nov, right?Originally Posted by Chico
Serious question since I've learnt to never underestimate your stupidity.
I'm still trying to figure what Bloomberg is doing in the race; he was a Republican, defected to Dem, hates what Sanders represents, doesn't like Trump one bit, and he has lots of money, enough to buy the nomination, and if he seriously wanted to become potus he could well afford to bulldoze a fine run as an independent. But he doesn't want to be potus, that's clear, having entered his first debate totally unprepared and crashing to the obvious bollicking.
I suspect something evil this way comes, and she ain't quite dead yet.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)