Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 60
  1. #26
    RIP pseudolus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    18,083
    Quote Originally Posted by OhOh View Post
    It seems ameristan and it's vassals have no reason to attack terrorist use of CW's in Syria.
    Indeed. The US, israel, Saud etc pretty much rely on chemical weapons to fight their battles (mostly against civilian populations). ISIS (funded by Saud and Qatar, armed with US, British and French weaponry), being used to topple an unfriendly government in Syria with the white helmut head choppers (set up by the Brits as a propaganda outfit) supplying the lies.

    I wonder if harry thinks he is bellendcat or that monkey in the UK who calls himself and his pet spider "Syrian Observatory for Human Rights".

  2. #27
    Thailand Expat harrybarracuda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    96,552
    Quote Originally Posted by pseudolus View Post
    Indeed. The US, israel, Saud etc pretty much rely on chemical weapons to fight their battles (mostly against civilian populations).
    And along comes pseudopuss with another ridiculous fairy tale.


  3. #28
    fcuked off SKkin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    39.2014 N, 85.9214 W
    Posts
    7,554
    Quote Originally Posted by harrybarracuda View Post
    And along comes pseudopuss with another ridiculous fairy tale.


    U.S. Depleted Uranium as Malicious as Syrian Chemical Weapons
    https://www.huffingtonpost.com/craig...b_3812888.html
    Last edited by SKkin; 30-11-2018 at 03:16 PM.

  4. #29
    Thailand Expat harrybarracuda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    96,552
    Quote Originally Posted by SKkin View Post


    U.S. Depleted Uranium as Malicious as Syrian Chemical Weapons
    https://www.huffingtonpost.com/craig...b_3812888.html
    Yeah. Not chemical weapons.

  5. #30
    fcuked off SKkin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    39.2014 N, 85.9214 W
    Posts
    7,554
    ^Also neither in any way humane. But we're the good guys, so it's ok.

  6. #31
    RIP pseudolus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    18,083
    That is white phosphorous. Utterly disgusting that not only do the americans use it, on civilians, but sell it to the israelis who also use it on civilian populations. It is classified as one of the worst chemical weapons around, which it is. Harry is pretty much a despicable turd.

  7. #32
    fcuked off SKkin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    39.2014 N, 85.9214 W
    Posts
    7,554
    Quote Originally Posted by pseudolus View Post
    That is white phosphorous.
    Yeah the pic is willie pete and the link is about DU. I should have clarified that...

  8. #33
    Thailand Expat harrybarracuda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    96,552
    Quote Originally Posted by SKkin View Post
    ^Also neither in any way humane. But we're the good guys, so it's ok.
    I never said it was OK.

    But it's not a "chemical weapon" in the the strict definition of the phrase.

    So it isn't relevant in this thread apart from when you want the try and whine and distract.

  9. #34
    Thailand Expat harrybarracuda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    96,552
    Quote Originally Posted by pseudolus View Post
    That is white phosphorous. Utterly disgusting that not only do the americans use it, on civilians, but sell it to the israelis who also use it on civilian populations. It is classified as one of the worst chemical weapons around, which it is. Harry is pretty much a despicable turd.
    Also not a "chemical weapon".

    And also another attempt at diversion from the thread topic.

  10. #35
    RIP pseudolus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    18,083
    Harry probably believes that you can smell chrlorine on a back pack days after a "chlorine chemical weapon attack" because CNN tells him its true.


  11. #36
    RIP pseudolus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    18,083
    Quote Originally Posted by harrybarracuda View Post
    Also not a "chemical weapon".

    And also another attempt at diversion from the thread topic.
    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...on-516523.html

    Funny - the people dropping the stuff classify it as a chemical weapon.


  12. #37
    Thailand Expat harrybarracuda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    96,552
    Quote Originally Posted by pseudolus View Post
    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...on-516523.html

    Funny - the people dropping the stuff classify it as a chemical weapon.

    Funny. You never thought to examine the context.


    White phosphorus was used by Saddam Hussein during the Halabja poison gas attack. According to an undated ANSA article quoted by an RAI documentary, on the morning of 16 March 1988, the Iraqi Air Force bombed Halabja several times with a chemical cocktail of sulfur mustard, tabun, sarin, VX, napalm and white phosphorus." White phosphorus had not been previously mentioned in other reports on Halabja, but the use of napalm was commonly reported
    It's not a chemical weapon, it's an incendiary.

  13. #38
    fcuked off SKkin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    39.2014 N, 85.9214 W
    Posts
    7,554
    'arry, don't be a waffler.


    No chemicals used whatsover in making that shit...

  14. #39
    RIP pseudolus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    18,083
    Quote Originally Posted by SKkin View Post
    'arry, don't be a waffler.


    No chemicals used whatsover in making that shit...
    Less swearing if you simply ignroe harry and just read State Department press releases instead - both the same content, and each both basically bullshit.

  15. #40
    Thailand Expat harrybarracuda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    96,552
    Quote Originally Posted by SKkin View Post
    'arry, don't be a waffler.


    No chemicals used whatsover in making that shit...
    There was a bit of a clue in "chemical cocktail". But you do seem to need a lot of things explaining to you.

  16. #41
    fcuked off SKkin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    39.2014 N, 85.9214 W
    Posts
    7,554
    Quote Originally Posted by harrybarracuda View Post
    White phosphorus was used by Saddam Hussein during the Halabja poison gas attack. According to an undated ANSA article quoted by an RAI documentary, on the morning of 16 March 1988
    Well we weren't talking about a dead man's past history either.

  17. #42
    Thailand Expat harrybarracuda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    96,552
    Quote Originally Posted by SKkin View Post
    Well we weren't talking about a dead man's past history either.
    Maybe you should read the articles you post then. It specifically referred to Saddam's attack on the Kurds.

    My but you seem to be missing a lot of things today, just the alcohol or is it early onset dementia?

  18. #43
    Thailand Expat OhOh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Last Online
    Today @ 06:51 PM
    Location
    Where troubles melt like lemon drops
    Posts
    25,222
    Quote Originally Posted by harrybarracuda View Post
    Funny. You never thought to examine the context.
    Context in the linked source, eh? An opinion form a somebody or the title of an ADD, official ameristani government department suits the "context"of the discussion here.

    Actually it is:

    "said that a US intelligence assessment had characterised WP after the first Gulf War as a "chemical weapon". The assessment was published in a declassified report on the American Department of Defence website. The file was headed: "Possible use of phosphorous chemical weapons by Iraq in Kurdish areas along the Iraqi-Turkish-Iranian borders."


    "When Saddam used WP it was a chemical weapon," said Mr Ranucci, "but when the Americans use it, it's a conventional weapon. The injuries it inflicts, however, are just as terrible however you describe it."

    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...on-516523.html
    A tray full of GOLD is not worth a moment in time.

  19. #44
    fcuked off SKkin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    39.2014 N, 85.9214 W
    Posts
    7,554
    Quote Originally Posted by harrybarracuda View Post
    Maybe you should read the articles you post then. It specifically referred to Saddam's attack on the Kurds.

    My but you seem to be missing a lot of things today, just the alcohol or is it early onset dementia?

    Today it's sleep deprivation.

  20. #45
    Thailand Expat harrybarracuda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    96,552
    Quote Originally Posted by OhOh View Post
    Context in the linked source, eh? An opinion form a somebody or the title of an ADD, official ameristani government department suits the "context"of the discussion here.

    Actually it is:

    "said that a US intelligence assessment had characterised WP after the first Gulf War as a "chemical weapon". The assessment was published in a declassified report on the American Department of Defence website. The file was headed: "Possible use of phosphorous chemical weapons by Iraq in Kurdish areas along the Iraqi-Turkish-Iranian borders."
    You do know Halabja is a Kurdish area, right?

  21. #46
    RIP pseudolus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    18,083
    Doesn't matter where it is, nobber, it is the US, who is dropping these chemical weapons on civilians in Syria who previously called these weapons Chemical Weapons. You really are as dense as your swingers profile was scary.

  22. #47
    Thailand Expat
    Klondyke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Last Online
    26-09-2021 @ 10:28 PM
    Posts
    10,105
    Sanders: Tear Gas Was Used At Border On Average Once Per Month During Obama Administration

    White House press secretary Sarah Sanders strongly pushes back against criticism of the border patrol's use of tear gas to handle a crowd of migrants throwing rocks at the U.S.-Mexico border this weekend, saying that tear gas was used about once per month on the border during the Obama administration.

    "Law enforcement officials used appropriate non-lethal force to protect themselves and to prevent an illegal rush across the border," she said. "And let's not forget this is not the first time that non-lethal force like this has been used -- in fact, tear gas was used, on average, once per month during the Obama administration for very similar circumstances."

    "In fact, they were actually for far less circumstances, because they didn't have the same numbers, and the mass rush that we're seeing in this caravan take place," she added.

    "Certainly, no one wants women and children or any individuals to have this happen," she also said. "Which is why we encourage them to follow the law and go through ports of entry."

    https://www.realclearpolitics.com/vi...lclearpolitics

  23. #48
    Thailand Expat harrybarracuda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    96,552
    Quote Originally Posted by pseudolus View Post
    Doesn't matter where it is, nobber, it is the US, who is dropping these chemical weapons on civilians in Syria who previously called these weapons Chemical Weapons. You really are as dense as your swingers profile was scary.

    You're like OhOh. It's pointless posting facts for you because you either ignore them or you're too stupid to understand them.

    And you just invent things.

    You're an idiot.

  24. #49
    Thailand Expat
    Klondyke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Last Online
    26-09-2021 @ 10:28 PM
    Posts
    10,105
    Ivanka Trump says father did not authorise lethal force against migrants, before being shown clip of him authorising lethal force

    Ivanka Trump insisted her father had not authorised the use of lethal force on migrants at the US border.

    Ms Trump was then confronted with a clip of her father telling reporters last week: “If they have to, they’re going to use lethal force. I’ve given the OK, if they have to. I hope they don’t have to.”

    After seeing the footage, Ms Trump defended her father.

    “Lethal force under any circumstance would be the last resort,” she said. “But he is the commander in chief of the armed forces of this country so he always has to protect the border.

    “He’s not talking about innocents. He’s not talking about innocent asylum-seekers.”

    On Sunday, US border agents fired tear gas at migrants they said they been trying to illegally enter the country from the Mexican border town of Tijuana.

    Pictures emerged of families with young children fleeing the gas, scenes condemned as “shameful” by American activists and Democrat politicians.

    https://www.yahoo.com/news/ivanka-tr...120850828.html

  25. #50
    Thailand Expat OhOh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Last Online
    Today @ 06:51 PM
    Location
    Where troubles melt like lemon drops
    Posts
    25,222
    Quote Originally Posted by harrybarracuda View Post
    You do know Halabja is a Kurdish area, right?
    I was unaware that certain "groups" of people were denied human rights based on, name, location or ethnicity. Care to quote the UNGA document confirming this?

    I apologise upfront if I've missed a goldilocks tweet. He and his followers, however disguised, do accept his tweets as galactic law ?


Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •