Thread: Brexit - It's Still On!

Originally Posted by Troy

Possibly, but with a majority of one and several Tory MPs likely to vote against the government, he is on thin ice. If an interim government is formed then brexit can be delayed until a more reasonable agreement can be made.

You mean an extension, awwww...!

Originally Posted by Troy

The only sensible approach is to leave with an agreed framework for future trade between the UK and the EU. The current idea of leaving without a deal is both messy and not in line with the referendum. It is the spoilt kid approach and doesn't belong in British politics.

The best framework for future trade would be well served by a hard Brexit with no FWA.

Done, and everything goes back on the table for future trade, but this time both parties are motivated to arrive at fair terms, one that desperately needs money to throw away while the other has a pile of it.

There is nothing in place regarding crucial issues like the N. Ire backstop.

BoJo has not put anything forward!

I know you'll mither on about the BBC, but here he is blatantly bullshitting on about the 'alternatives', while giving no detail whatsoever.

The German MEP who sees right through him is worth listening to.

Of course there must be an extension unless BJ can get real fast.

Not that I think he will succeed, but his strategy appears to be a bluff to the EU while covering his back by laying the ground to blame Parliament for obstructing his promise to deliver by 31 Oct.

I hope he doesn't present a reworded May's surrender Treaty as his own work, with the real danger that Parliament, running scared as is, might just pass it.

And such a fuss about prorogation for 5 weeks, look closer and he's effectively closing shop for less than a week; four working days.

Originally Posted by jabir

Not that I think he will succeed, but his strategy appears to be a bluff to the EU while covering his back by laying the ground to blame Parliament for obstructing his promise to deliver by 31 Oct.

I hope he doesn't present a reworded May's surrender Treaty as his own work, with the real danger that Parliament, running scared as is, might just pass it.

And such a fuss about prorogation for 5 weeks, look closer and he's effectively closing shop for less than a week; four working days.

Well yes...he’s already voted in favour of May’s treaty. The prorogation is symbolic of how reality is so far apart from BREXIT dreams.

When he said it was time to take back control people thought he was talking about the UK electorate being in control, not parliament being muzzled.

Lies upon lies upon lies...that’s his house of cards.

Originally Posted by Switch

And yet you continue to claim (incorrectly) that none of this can happen without the EU's permission? So why are they bothering to try and stop something that the EU can fix so easily.
Hoist by your own petard, powder monkey.

because they are incompetent and have no clue what's going on at the EU level,

the last thing they need is to witness the EU saving the UK again from their own self-destructing behavior, a sure win for the majority in the next GE

Originally Posted by Chittychangchang

Word on the street is there's gonna be massive disruption and protests all over the country.
It'll make the poll tax riots look like a tea party

We'll see

unlikely, Brits are sheeps, they will take it silently from their glorious leaders

Originally Posted by Dragonfly

unlikely, Brits are sheeps, they will take it silently from their glorious leaders

Is that why as history shows we always kicked your ass (1066 being an exception) in wars and saved it in a couple more?

Originally Posted by Dragonfly

because they are incompetent and have no clue what's going on at the EU level,

the last thing they need is to witness the EU saving the UK again from their own self-destructing behavior, a sure win for the majority in the next GE

As usual, your post makes absolutely no sense at all, so i will try again. Just for you numb nuts.

1. You claim that the UK cannot leave the EU without the permission of the member states. Yes, it's difficult to believe you said that but you did, on more than one occasion.

2. Despite that stupid and blatant falsehood, why would the commission and it's de facto leaders, the Germans and the French, be trying so hard to keep the UK in the broken, collapsing EU?

You might think that you answered that already. Read your reply again, and you might understand why it is that your answer is nonsense.

Eurochav thicko strikes again.

Originally Posted by buriramboy

Is that why as history shows we always kicked your ass (1066 being an exception) in wars and saved it in a couple more?

you never saved the ass of anyone, except barely you own. Next you are going to tell us that the UK liberated France all by herself

what about France who saved you from collapse by granting you access to the CU after years of vetos?

Originally Posted by cyrille

There is nothing in place regarding crucial issues like the N. Ire backstop.

BoJo has not put anything forward!

I know you'll mither on about the BBC, but here he is blatantly bullshitting on about the 'alternatives', while giving no detail whatsoever.

The German MEP who sees right through him is worth listening to.

Of course there must be an extension unless BJ can get real fast.

Not much point in putting forward aything. Just so the EC can reject it?

It's a bit like a man who divides his time between Chiang Mai and the sandpit, reading the Guardian for answers. Answers to a question that doesn't affect him in the slightest.

Originally Posted by Switch

As usual, your post makes absolutely no sense at all, so i will try again. Just for you numb nuts.

1. You claim that the UK cannot leave the EU without the permission of the member states. Yes, it's difficult to believe you said that but you did, on more than one occasion.

and you don't even see what's wrong with your statement? hello earth maybe you could prove me wrong with links etc... unless the truth hurts and you can't face it

Originally Posted by Switch

2. Despite that stupid and blatant falsehood, why would the commission and it's de facto leaders, the Germans and the French, be trying so hard to keep the UK in the broken, collapsing EU?

falsehood? maybe you have evidence to the contrary? go head, show us

and how is all this relevant with France and Germany keeping the UK in a broken EU? you have completely lost your marbles, old man

Originally Posted by Switch

You might think that you answered that already. Read your reply again, and you might understand why it is that your answer is nonsense.

Eurochav thicko strikes again.

speaking of losing it, here is another clear indication that you are not well

anyway, another day, let's see what Boris has for us today

Boris, best PM ever !!!

Originally Posted by Dragonfly

you never saved the ass of anyone, except barely you own. Next you are going to tell us that the UK liberated France all by herself

Hitler assured his generals, turn back if they fire one shot in your general direction.

And that is why France needed liberating.

Originally Posted by Dragonfly

and you don't even see what's wrong with your statement? hello earth maybe you could prove me wrong with links etc... unless the truth hurts and you can't face it


falsehood? maybe you have evidence to the contrary? go head, show us

and how is all this relevant with France and Germany keeping the UK in a broken EU? you have completely lost your marbles, old man



speaking of losing it, here is another clear indication that you are not well

Why do you insist on being such a complete buffoon?

The reason there is nothing to support you claim in favour of the EU or the EC, is because no such mechanism exists. If it did, you would be able to find it and c&p it on here numbskull.

It is a fantasy of your own making. THE EU CANNOT STOP BREXIT. Like you, they are completely powerless under the articles that they drafted and put into EU law. As much as you would like it to be true, the fact is, they have no means to stop brexit, other than bending over and taking it up the bum. Surely that thought pleases you?

There is no mechanism for a divorce where both parties are involved? are you really there?

so what is Article 50 then? at one stage, both parties will have to agree to part, deal or no deal. Both parties, that is the UK and the EU, even for a no deal. Read the damn thing, you fool

THE EU CANNOT STOP BREXIT.

it doesn't need to, if no deal was found, and there is no vote by the EU27 for a no deal exit, then the default is REMAIN.

You don't leave an agreement without a vote by both parties. What so hard to understand that you need both sides to agree for an exit. So far the EU has granted an exit with a deal, but not granted an exit with no deal.

Eat that, old man

meanwhile Merckel is laughing as she has Boris by the balls,

again my bet is Boris is either trying to force Doris deal to MPs or prepare for a FULL REVOKE when the legality of NO DEAL will be impossible to ignore, even for a blind Tory

Originally Posted by Dragonfly

Boris, best PM ever !!!

Early days for that.

Originally Posted by Dragonfly

There is no mechanism for a divorce where both parties are involved? are you really there?

so what is Article 50 then? at one stage, both parties will have to agree to part, deal or no deal. Both parties, that is the UK and the EU, even for a no deal. Read the damn thing, you fool


it doesn't need to, if no deal was found, and there is no vote by the EU27 for a no deal exit, then the default is REMAIN.

You don't leave an agreement without a vote by both parties. What so hard to understand that you need both sides to agree for an exit. So far the EU has granted an exit with a deal, but not granted an exit with no deal.

Eat that, old man

You really are stupid beyond words, the Belgian version of bsnub. A50 is perfectly clear, if after 2 years no deal is reached then the country leaves with no deal. Try reading it.

Originally Posted by Dragonfly

There is no mechanism for a divorce where both parties are involved? are you really there?

so what is Article 50 then? at one stage, both parties will have to agree to part, deal or no deal. Both parties, that is the UK and the EU, even for a no deal. Read the damn thing, you fool


it doesn't need to, if no deal was found, and there is no vote by the EU27 for a no deal exit, then the default is REMAIN.

You don't leave an agreement without a vote by both parties. What so hard to understand that you need both sides to agree for an exit. So far the EU has granted an exit with a deal, but not granted an exit with no deal.

Eat that, old man

The default is, and always has been leave for the UK. Why do you think the EU keeps extending the deadline? You fucking drunken stupid muppet?

Produce the evidence to support your claim or fuck off. Simple really.

Parliament should be good viewing next week with Jacob Rees Mogg up against remoaner speaker Bercow. My money is on Mogg making Bercow lose the plot.

the EU27 is going to vote unlimited extension before OCT 31, basically REMAIN, so there is nothing you can do

if the EU27 really wanted you to leave or go for hard Brexit, they would have a vote now to void Doris deal

NEVER GOING TO HAPPEN, the EU wants the UK to fulfill all political and financial obligations it has

If had to choose one outcome would you prefer having a new referendum and voting to remain in the EU

You all ready that that choice and it was to leave. FFS. Get over it you losers/remainers.