Thread: Brexit - It's Still On!

Originally Posted by DrB0b

Exit with May's deal, exit with no deal knowing what we now know, revoke a50 and remain.

The first two are fine but the last one is out of the question given the result of the last referendum. And what, in your opinion, would be the purpose of revoking article 50?

Originally Posted by NamPikToot

Bob, who I formerly viewed a having a fairly balanced stance has had some life event which has affected him so much he too is becoming a parody of Genticles;

I always thought they were the same person with different logins.

Originally Posted by DrB0b

Exit with May's deal, exit with no deal knowing what we now know, revoke a50 and remain.

According to you, when the electorate were given two choices, it caused three years of mayhem. Do you honestly believe that four choices will improve that scenario?

Given that even a two choice referendum would take 9-12 months before it were possible, the time available would surely cause even more chaos.

Many contend that people have changed their minds and use that to justify a second referendum. Simply repeating the same question would meet these needs, and shorten the time needed to make it possible.

Much simpler to just leave now and get on with it. Uncertainty gone and instability unknown. Nothing changed but, action essential. No more dithering with Bercow and his whomps. Collective responsibility enforced by default. Win win.

A view from Ireland. My apologies if this has been posted before.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z5V0x1fvK5o&t=707s

Originally Posted by NigelFarage

This is an illogical argument

Sure, Spock Unlike you most people prefer to make informed decisions.

Originally Posted by Switch

Do you honestly believe that four choices will improve that scenario?

Three choices. Count again. Use both paws this time.

Oh, so "revoke a50 and remain" was actually only one choice rather than two. OK. That answers my question.

Originally Posted by DrB0b

Exit with May's deal, exit with no deal, revoke a50 and remain.

Some people say a three option ref. would be too complicated.

I don't see how anyone but a moron could find that too complicated to understand.


Oh wait.

They really haven't been trying too hard.

Mostly they just seem bemused by the idiocy, and who can blame them.

The lack of an "and" between 'deal' and 'revoke'.

Originally Posted by DrB0b

Unlike you most people prefer to make informed decisions

Originally Posted by NigelFarage

Informed about what?

Q.E.D.

Originally Posted by NigelFarage

Er, it's them that won't budge on the backstop and made the deal unattractive, because they know it puts them in a very strong position going forwards.

They won't budge on the backstop because nobody in their right mind wants to go back to the nightmare that was NI before the Good Friday agreement, you cretin. The English might have no qualms about throwing their fellow British under the bus but others do.

Asking a BREXITer to understand the importance of this is like asking a dog about Bach.

Originally Posted by cyrille

Asking a BREXITer to understand the importance of this is like asking a dog about Bach.

At least a dog is loyal and trustworthy and rarely shits in its own house. The only way to compare the average TD Brexiter to a dog is if the word rabies is involved.

That was a 'miss', smeggly.

Originally Posted by cyrille

Some people say a three option ref. would be too complicated.

I don't see how anyone but a moron could find that too complicated to understand.


Oh wait.

That's because you are a total tit whose been trapped in a classroom all his life, what do you think the outcome would be with 2 leave options on the ballot thus splitting the leave vote versus one option for remain. #idiot

Originally Posted by NigelFarage

So what does the below mean? It was obvious years ago that the choice would be either leaving or a crappy half in half out one-sided deal.

it means the British people are starting to realize how incompetent their elected officials are, and without the EU directives protecting them from such fuckwits, the British people will be back to the 1970s mismanagment fuckups the UK was so famous for

I am confused, is the no deal the new default? it's not anything else, right?

Originally Posted by Dragonfly

I am confused, is the no deal the new default? it's not anything else, right?

Nothing has changed apart from the date. Leave with or without a deal. Now April 12th.

Originally Posted by Dragonfly

I am confused, is the no deal the new default? it's not anything else, right?

No deal will never be allowed by the remainers who now have control of parliament from the government and will be tabling a motion on Thursday to prevent us leaving with no deal under any circumstances. They will try and make it law.

Originally Posted by Dragonfly

t means the British people are starting to realize how incompetent their elected officials are

It's nothing to do with incompetence, it has to do with elected officials realising that if they deliver the hard Brexit desired by people who seem to love democracy when it goes their way and hate it when it doesn't that they will wreck the economy and reduce the UK to a state of global powerlessness. A politician's first duty is to the country and not to the people who voted for them, and I'm glad to see some of them behaving them way. They have been given an impossible task because the task was devised by charlatans and con-men who had no interest in the consequences. Interesting to see some of those con-men back-tracking now they see how far along the road to perdition we've travelled