Page 1 of 9 123456789 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 210
  1. #1
    En route
    Cujo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Last Online
    21-04-2024 @ 08:24 PM
    Location
    Reality.
    Posts
    32,939

    Is North Koreas time up..?

    Is it time NK was confronted?
    US warns Pyongyang 'time for talk is over' as bombers fly over Korean skies

    US warns Pyongyang 'time for talk is over' as bombers fly over Korean skies

    I really believe sooner or later it will happen. Is the time almost upon us?

    ---
    News Suite bit.ly/newssuiteapp
    “If we stop testing right now we’d have very few cases, if any.” Donald J Trump.

  2. #2

  3. #3
    Thailand Expat David48atTD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Palace Far from Worries
    Posts
    14,393
    Quote Originally Posted by Looper View Post
    Maybe TD needs a North Korea sub-forum

    https://teakdoor.com/thailand-and-asi...is-thread.html
    I think this one has particular merit ...


    BTW, ole' Kim Jong-un isn't looking to fire first or invade anyone.
    He just wants to make sure that no-one comes knocking on his door.

  4. #4
    . Neverna's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    21,269
    Quote Originally Posted by Looper View Post
    Maybe TD needs a North Korea sub-forum
    Or a North Korea "Mega Thread".

  5. #5
    A Cockless Wonder
    Looper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Last Online
    Today @ 01:35 AM
    Posts
    15,242
    Quote Originally Posted by David48atTD
    I think this one has particular merit ...
    That is one of my personal favourites D

    Quote Originally Posted by David48atTD
    BTW, ole' Kim Jong-un isn't looking to fire first or invade anyone. He just wants to make sure that no-one comes knocking on his door.
    That theory of NK missile strategy does not really fly with me...(!)

    Any country looking to proliferate nuclear missile tech, in an age when the world is moving towards limitation, reduction and ultimately elimination, needs to be stamped on and stamped on hard.

  6. #6
    Thailand Expat
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    18,022
    Not yet.
    The traditional Western powers require invented boogiemen to perpetuate and justify their pathetic existences.

    And so it goes.

  7. #7
    Thailand Expat
    Klondyke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Last Online
    26-09-2021 @ 10:28 PM
    Posts
    10,105
    Quote Originally Posted by Looper
    Any country looking to proliferate nuclear missile tech, in an age when the world is moving towards limitation, reduction and ultimately elimination, needs to be stamped on and stamped on hard.
    "Any country"? Do you really mean ANY of all nuclear ones?

    BTW, "the world is moving towards limitation, reduction and ultimately elimination" - do you have a link?

  8. #8
    En route
    Cujo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Last Online
    21-04-2024 @ 08:24 PM
    Location
    Reality.
    Posts
    32,939
    This is a new provocation/strategy on the part of the states. Flying bombers over the country. The Koreans were probably caught with their pants down.
    What will happen if the yanks do it again but this time the Koreans manage to get a missile off and get lucky.
    How will the yanks retaliate.

  9. #9
    Thailand Expat

    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Last Online
    02-08-2017 @ 04:02 PM
    Location
    slow lane
    Posts
    1,058
    Quote Originally Posted by Cujo
    The Koreans were probably caught with their pants down.
    happens pretty often...they did it last month too

    http://https://www.theguardian.com/w...s-nuclear-test

  10. #10
    A Cockless Wonder
    Looper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Last Online
    Today @ 01:35 AM
    Posts
    15,242
    Quote Originally Posted by Klondyke
    "Any country"? Do you really mean ANY of all nuclear ones?
    I mean any non-nuclear armed states looking to achieve a nuclear capability.

    Quote Originally Posted by Klondyke
    BTW, "the world is moving towards limitation, reduction and ultimately elimination" - do you have a link?
    Jesus F'in H Christ, do you really need friggin spoonfed with a google link to prove the bleedin obvious?

    Why would civilised western nations be interested in anything other than reduction and elimination?

    Nuclear weapons are of zero tactical use to civilised countries because the threat is not credible. Nobody would believe that a civilised western country would actually use nuclear weapons for any reason under any circumstances.

    They are taboo. They are toxic. They are unusable.

    The only organisations to whom nuclear weapons are useful as a credible threat are rogue nations and terrorists.

    That is why the civilised world is only moving in one direction: towards reduction and elimination.

  11. #11
    En route
    Cujo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Last Online
    21-04-2024 @ 08:24 PM
    Location
    Reality.
    Posts
    32,939
    Quote Originally Posted by fred flintstone View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Cujo
    The Koreans were probably caught with their pants down.
    happens pretty often...they did it last month too

    http://https://www.theguardian.com/w...s-nuclear-test
    Interesting. I missed that.

  12. #12
    A Cockless Wonder
    Looper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Last Online
    Today @ 01:35 AM
    Posts
    15,242
    ^The link does not work now

    page 404

    what was it about?

  13. #13
    Thailand Expat

    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Last Online
    02-08-2017 @ 04:02 PM
    Location
    slow lane
    Posts
    1,058
    Quote Originally Posted by Looper
    ^The link does not work now
    try this....

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...s-nuclear-test

  14. #14
    Thailand Expat
    Klondyke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Last Online
    26-09-2021 @ 10:28 PM
    Posts
    10,105
    Quote Originally Posted by Looper
    The only organisations to whom nuclear weapons are useful as a credible threat are rogue nations and terrorists.

    That is why the civilised world is only moving in one direction: towards reduction and elimination.
    Tell it to the states that are not part of any treaty, nor member of the Intl. nuke commission, nor having shown to anybody what they possess.

    Haven't you ever heard about one? (I do not dare to mention one such name...)

  15. #15
    Thailand Expat

    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Last Online
    02-08-2017 @ 04:02 PM
    Location
    slow lane
    Posts
    1,058
    Quote Originally Posted by Cujo
    Interesting. I missed that.
    I think the Japanese flying along with the US and ROK is something new.

  16. #16
    Thailand Expat jabir's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    12,009
    Won't happen peaceably, unless fatboy and the queue of wannabe successors are taken out in one big putsch.

  17. #17
    Harbinger of Doom

    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    1,622
    Quote Originally Posted by Looper View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by "Klondyke"
    "Any country"? Do you really mean ANY of all nuclear ones?
    I mean any non-nuclear armed states looking to achieve a nuclear capability.

    Quote Originally Posted by "Klondyke"
    BTW, "the world is moving towards limitation, reduction and ultimately elimination" - do you have a link?
    Jesus F'in H Christ, do you really need friggin spoonfed with a google link to prove the bleedin obvious?

    Why would civilised western nations be interested in anything other than reduction and elimination?

    Nuclear weapons are of zero tactical use to civilised countries because the threat is not credible. Nobody would believe that a civilised western country would actually use nuclear weapons for any reason under any circumstances.

    They are taboo. They are toxic. They are unusable.

    The only organisations to whom nuclear weapons are useful as a credible threat are rogue nations and terrorists.

    That is why the civilised world is only moving in one direction: towards reduction and elimination.
    The United States is undertaking a trillion dollar upgrade of its nuclear arsenal. Britain is going to replace Trident. The Russians have been busy upgrading their nuclear weapons. The Chinese, needless to say, have been updating their ICBMs, fitting them with multiple warheads. The French, well, I don't know much about them but I don't think Macron has got any plans to get rid of their nuclear missiles. And India, Pakistan and Israel don't seem to be doing an awful lot to get rid of theirs.

    Your ignorance and stupidity is only equalled by your ignorance of your stupidity. Stick to playing with your Action Men and model planes. Twat.

  18. #18
    Thailand Expat

    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Last Online
    02-08-2017 @ 04:02 PM
    Location
    slow lane
    Posts
    1,058
    US detects 'highly unusual' North Korean submarine activity
    )The US military has detected "highly unusual and unprecedented levels" of North Korean submarine activity and evidence of an "ejection test" in the days following Pyongyang's second intercontinental ballistic missile launch this month, a defense official told CNN on Monday.

    An ejection test examines a missile's "cold-launch system," which uses high pressure steam to propel a missile out of the launch canister into the air before its engines ignite. That helps prevent flames and heat from the engine from damaging either the submarine, submersible barge or any nearby equipment used to launch the missile.

    Carried out on land at Sinpo Naval Shipyard, Sunday's ejection test is the third time this month -- and fourth this year -- that North Korea has conducted a trial of the missile component that is critical to developing submarine launch capabilities, according to the US defense official.
    US detects 'highly unusual' North Korean submarine activity - CNNPolitics.com

  19. #19
    A Cockless Wonder
    Looper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Last Online
    Today @ 01:35 AM
    Posts
    15,242
    Quote Originally Posted by Passing Through
    The United States is undertaking a trillion dollar upgrade of its nuclear arsenal.
    Existing arsenals have to be maintained if only to keep them safe. That is likely to involve updating components of command and control systems. They cannot be allowed to obsolesce into a state of becoming dangerous.

  20. #20
    Harbinger of Doom

    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    1,622
    Quote Originally Posted by Looper
    Existing arsenals have to be maintained if only to keep them safe. That is likely to involve updating components of command and control systems. They cannot be allowed to obsolesce into a state of becoming dangerous.
    So the Americans spending a trillion dollars on upgrading their stock of nuclear weapons is evidence of how 'the civilised world is only moving in one direction: towards reduction and elimination' is it? You're clearly a profoundly stupid individual but even you can't possibly think that that's right. Though maybe, given the way you love to splash about that infantile fucking wank about 'the civilized nations', that's their get out of jail card. Anyway, the easiest and safest way of dealing with ageing nuclear weapons is just to decommission them. In other words, to move towards 'reduction and elimination', though that's clearly something that no nuclear power has any intention of doing.
    Last edited by Passing Through; 01-08-2017 at 11:07 AM.

  21. #21
    A Cockless Wonder
    Looper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Last Online
    Today @ 01:35 AM
    Posts
    15,242
    ^You are not really getting the big picture PT.

    Think about it for a moment.

    Nuclear weapons are not a credible threat coming from from western democracies as their use is abhorrent to citizens in whose names democratically elected governments act.

    As long as less civilised (non-democratic) major powers such as China and Russia still retain an arsenal then the west has to maintain their arsenal.

    But as a credible threat nuclear weapons are only genuinely useful to terrorists and rogue states.

    You might notice that NK (a rogue state) is the only country to actually issue threats that it intends to use nuclear weapons.

    The only long term goal for western countries (since their nuclear arsenals are of relatively little tactical value in the 21st century) is to aim for global reduction and elimination of nuclear weapons.

    One activity that forms part of reaching the strategic goal of elimination is to stamp hard on any countries that threaten to undermine that goal by travelling in the wrong direction and instead proliferating nuclear weapons technology.

    That is why it is time-up for North Korea.

  22. #22
    Harbinger of Doom

    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    1,622
    The picture, both big and little, is that you're a clueless cock. There is no process under way which is going to lead to nuclear disarmament. This is pure, unadulterated fantasy on your part, though you are clearly addicted to your My Little Pony worldview so I'm sure you will come out with yet more fatuous cockcheese about the 'civilized' nations.

  23. #23
    A Cockless Wonder
    Looper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Last Online
    Today @ 01:35 AM
    Posts
    15,242
    Quote Originally Posted by Passing Through
    There is no process under way which is going to lead to nuclear disarmament.
    I am pretty confident that you are wrong here.

    It would be irrational if there were no such endeavour as nuclear weapons have become a liability not a security for the west.

  24. #24
    Thailand Expat raycarey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    15,054
    things are heating up very quickly. about ten days ago some general said (paraphrasing)---war on the korean peninsula is not unimaginable.

    and today, a us senator said this..

    There will be war between the United States and North Korea over the rogue nation's missile program if it continues to aim intercontinental ballistic missiles at America, Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., said President Donald Trump has told him.

    "He has told me that. I believe him," the lawmaker said Tuesday on TODAY.
    "If there’s going to be a war to stop [Kim Jong Un], it will be over there. If thousands die, they’re going to die over there. They’re not going to die here. And He has told me that to my face," Graham said.

    "And that may be provocative, but not really. When you're president of the United States, where does your allegiance lie? To the people of the United States," the senator said.

    Sen. Lindsey Graham: Trump Says War With North Korea an Option - NBC News


    of course this could just be posturing, but at the very least this is quite worrisome---particularly because neither kim jong-un nor trump seem to be reasonable or rational.

  25. #25
    Harbinger of Doom

    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    1,622
    I am pretty confident that you are wrong here.

    It would be irrational if there were no such endeavour as nuclear weapons have become a liability not a security for the west.
    Christ on a bike. Which galaxy of mental impairments have you been diagnosed with? The facts of the world can't be right because they don't align with what some knicker-wearing, toy-playing Australian manchild happens to believe is 'logical'? Fuck off, Looper. You are an insufferable fucking imbecile; the major nuclear powers are maintaining and upgrading their nuclear weapons systems and that is that. Nobody (other than perhaps a handful of lonely middle-aged Australian men) thinks that there is the remotest possibility of the world becoming nuclear-free in any likely future. Nobody.
    Last edited by Passing Through; 02-08-2017 at 07:54 AM.

Page 1 of 9 123456789 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •