Another one for you Humbert. Real, or not real?
Breitbart and InfoWars are drawn into FBI?s Russian bot probe | New York Post
Another one for you Humbert. Real, or not real?
Breitbart and InfoWars are drawn into FBI?s Russian bot probe | New York Post
^ Then you quote a Rupert Murdock media outlet.
Of course Breitfart and infowars are compromised sources and they are the perfect example of the type of site that the Russians would want to push with bots. This is not hard to follow for people who have a few extra brain cells.
^
Tell that to Humbert.
Crowdstrike would have given a very detailed and comprehensive report of the breach in question, and the FBI very probably have them as a trusted resource; in fact I wouldn't be surprised if Crowdstrike have a number of ex-Intelligence staff on their books; even the CEO is ex-DoD.
I doubt very much there would be anything the FBI could have learned from the server that Crowdstrike didn't tell them (with the possible exception of levels of deleted files, which wasn't even the issue here).
So this non-story is all GOP wind and piss.
Your comment was that every source of information was compromised. I didn't argue that they didn't exist. You argued that all information was contaminated and only first hand witnessing of events were to be believed. Or did you forget already?Originally Posted by rickschoppers
astro turfing companies in the US are likely to be contractors and utilised by corporationsOriginally Posted by Neverna
I think it is much more subtle as they aim to use " influencers " - the rus and the chin are a bit more clublike with their push
influencing online is becoming much more targeted to individuals - they know you better than you know yourself if you are a facebook user - you may be able to decieve yourself , but large data sets , targeted questions and your responses ( think news feed and like button / share ) will enable them to tailor the exact wording required to push you in the direction you want
have a read of this article
https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/a...lped-trump-win
and understand that with the advances in cgi , video can be created to show you exactly the sort of clip you are likely to respond to in way the purchaser of your eyeballs requires
If you torture data for enough time , you can get it to say what you want.
Hmmmm, you keep putting words in my mouth Humbert. Please show me the comment you are referring to that says what you have stated in your first sentence. I did not say what you have misquoted in the third sentence. I believe I said all information should be suspect, not the same as all information was contaminated.
Maybe I took you literally and not figuratively as you may have intended.
Originally Posted by rickschoppersOriginally Posted by rickschoppers
Well Rick it seems to me that misinformation or non-factual information is contaminated information.
Just to lighten the mood away from the semiotics discussion.
Sex robot cafe aims to offer Londoners fellatio with their morning coffee
https://www.rt.com/uk/361200-robot-sex-cafe-london/
The job the bots do is posting links to shit articles on FB and twitter. The shit articles from sites like brietfart, infowars, sputnik and RT.Originally Posted by harrybarracuda
Or the alleged unbiased investigation company funded by partisan groups and and employing biased investigators is creating a scenario of lies?Originally Posted by harrybarracuda
I like the slim girls with long legs and medium breasts, what do you like/your preference?
We enjoy Japanese threesomes in this house mate. My Kay catalogues were left behind.Originally Posted by harrybarracuda
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)