Thread: Mueller's Russian Interference investigation

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

You are wrong: constantly and consistently.

You are however correct in that it’s obviously too complicated for you.

You should’ve just quit when you were behind.

Right Anty, you likely didn't notice some of the finer points; like when the news broke yesterday precious little facts where coming from amid the leftist hysteria.

Today, it is possible to form an educated opinion.
Do you understand those little nuances Anty?
Yesterday was yesterday?
Today is today?

Is that too subtle for you?

Maybe stick to your classic wheels, at least they wont talk back to you and make you look stoopid and butthurt...

There were facts reported Earl.

You just have no interest in facts.

^Like I said Anty; Stupid and Butthurt, try to get over it!

You also said that you don’t abuse people in SC. That was just another one of your lies wasn’t it.

Like I said you should’ve quit while you were behind — facts are just too complicated for you and all you’re doing is illustrating how ignorant and ill informed you are.

^ Oh yea the fact; there will be no impeachment.

Just like Manafort wouldn’t be found guilty eh Earl.

Don't you ever tire of being wrong? It clearly has a detrimental effect on your self-esteem and self-respect — you basically have none left at this point, much less respect for facts.

Nobody else will respect you or your opinions if you don’t Earl.

^There's one very important fact Anty; There will be no impeachment.

What part don't you understand?

Don't you understand all your anti-trump hysteria and ignorant rhetoric is the cause of your Butt-Hurt?

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

Nobody else will respect you or your opinions if you don’t Earl.

LOL...he's just trolling the thread...

Yup. He just posts dumb shit for the sake of it or the attention.

It’s equal parts sad and pathetic.

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

Yup. He just posts dumb shit for the sake of it or the attention.
It’s equal parts sad and pathetic.

As it bumps the forum's post count, I guess such drivel is ok with the mods.

Dunno but there has definitely been some clean-up of his drivel going on.

Could be another jailing for dribbling piss coming up whereupon he will just repeat the whole whiny victim / hollow threats of flounce pattern.

Again.

Originally Posted by CSFFan

LOL...he's just trolling the thread...

Sure what a well thought out opinion.
Ignoring facts like Manafort conviction was about 12 year old tax issues.
No crime of collusion, not even a little hint of indictable criminal activity implicating Donald Trump
A great national embarrassment thanks to Hillary Clinton and the DNC.
No forthcoming impeachment, therefore massive butt-hurt prevails.

Try not to lead with your chin Topper.

remember this....



tick tock mofo

^believe want you chose to believe Topper.

The astute liberal legal pundit Alan Dershowitz opines; there will be no impeachment.

If you wanna go on ranting drivel and hate, have at it.

BTW the Manafort convictions had nothing to do with Trump or the election. The unrelated prosecution was Robert Mueller's attempt to bully Manafort into revealing something, because after two years investigating Mueller had zero, nothing absolutely nada.

So do carry on your precious little personal hate-fest on Trump, how smart you are...

one lone juror held out on giving manafort 18 convictions....

prepare for an epic meltdown at 1600 pennsylvania avenue.....

david pecker was given full immunity and is cooperating with the feds.

trump should be very, very worried.

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2018...-michael-cohen

Originally Posted by raycarey

prepare for an epic meltdown

More like Ray's epic grandstanding over nothingness.

Kinda like some extra double nothing with the Hillary/Russiagate nothing-burger.
Epic indeed Ray, yes sirree.

The dust on Trump's left shoe has more significance than David Pecker...

Originally Posted by uncle junior

one lone juror held out on giving manafort 18 convictions....

The women in that pic is the one who came out on fox news. She voted to convict on all 18 charges.

Originally Posted by Humbert

CIt's an open and shut case against Trump.

Is it?

Is it not obvious any Cohen testimony is under duress from a over-zealous prosecutor, Bob Mueller?

What about the tapes Cohen made, are they admissible evidence?

Originally Posted by Mr Earl

Is it not obvious any Cohen testimony is under duress from a over-zealous prosecutor, Bob Mueller?

Mueller is not involved in Cohen's prosecution you idiot.

Originally Posted by Mr Earl

Is it not obvious any Cohen testimony is under duress from a over-zealous prosecutor, Bob Mueller?

No.

Next red-herring / irrelevancy...

The Manhattan district attorney’s office is considering pursuing criminal charges against the Trump Organization and two senior company officials in connection with Michael D. Cohen’s hush money payment to an adult film actress, according to two officials with knowledge of the matter.

A state investigation would center on how the company accounted for its reimbursement to Mr. Cohen for the $130,000 he paid to the actress, Stephanie Clifford, who has said she had an affair with President Trump, the officials said.

Both officials stressed that the office’s review of the matter is in its earliest stages and prosecutors have not yet made a decision on whether to proceed.

State charges against the company or its executives could be significant because Mr. Trump has talked about pardoning some of his current or former aides who have faced federal charges. As president, he has no power to pardon people and corporate entities convicted of state crimes.


The Trump Organization recorded the reimbursement as a legal expense. But Mr. Cohen, Mr. Trump’s longtime fixer, said on Tuesday that he paid Ms. Clifford, better known as Stormy Daniels, to buy her silence during the 2016 campaign. Federal prosecutors have said the reimbursement payments were for sham legal invoices in connection with a nonexistent retainer agreement. Mr. Cohen, who pleaded guilty to federal campaign finance charges, did no legal work in connection with the matter, prosecutors said.

“On its face, it certainly would be problematic,” said one of the officials familiar with the district attorney’s office review, noting that listing the reimbursement as a legal expense could be a felony under state law.

The Trump Organization’s lawyer, Alan S. Futerfas, declined to comment.

As the district attorney, Cyrus R. Vance Jr., considers opening an investigation, the New York State attorney general’s office has moved to open a criminal investigation into whether Mr. Cohen has violated state tax law, an inquiry that would be unrelated to the federal tax evasion charges that he pleaded guilty to on Tuesday, according to a person with knowledge of the state matter.

The attorney general, Barbara D. Underwood, in recent days sought a referral from the state Department of Taxation and Finance, which is needed to conduct such an inquiry and to prosecute any violations of state tax law it might uncover, the person said. Such requests are seldom denied. The state’s double jeopardy laws do not apply to tax crimes.


Mr. Cohen’s Washington lawyer, Lanny J. Davis, declined to comment.

Prosecutors in the district attorney’s office have reviewed the court papers containing the campaign finance charges and other federal crimes to which Mr. Cohen pleaded guilty on Tuesday in United States District Court in Manhattan, the officials said. The papers provide some details about how two Trump Organization executives handled the reimbursement and recorded them as legal fees.

Manhattan prosecutors are focused on whether business records were falsified, one of the officials said. That could be charged as a low-level felony, or as a misdemeanor. It’s a misdemeanor for a person or company to make a false entry in a business record or cause one to be made, with intent to defraud. It becomes a felony if it is done to commit or conceal another crime.

One of the officials stressed that a state investigation into possible violations of state law could be complicated or delayed by three other open inquiries relating to Mr. Trump: The federal investigation into Mr. Cohen; the inquiry by the special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, into Russia’s interference in the 2016 election; and a lawsuit that the state attorney general has brought against the Trump Foundation, a charity.

Court papers in the federal case against Mr. Cohen said he ultimately received $420,000 from the Trump Organization to reimburse him for his $130,000 payment to Ms. Clifford. That is because the Trump Organization included money to cover his taxes on the $130,000, a bonus for him and reimbursement for other campaign expenses.

The company, according to the court papers, accounted for the payment as legal expenses and Mr. Cohen issued phony monthly invoices for $35,000 “pursuant to retainer agreement.”

If Mr. Vance decides to proceed, it would not be the first time he investigated members of the Trump family. He was faulted for not pursuing charges against Ivanka Trump and Donald Trump Jr., who were under criminal investigation in 2012 over allegations that they misled buyers interested in the Trump SoHo condominium project.

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/23/n...ges-vance.html

Originally Posted by bsnub

Mueller is not involved in Cohen's prosecution you idiot.

Keep telling yourself that!

Haven't your mind-reading sessions revealed the content of discussions between Lanny Davis and little Bob Mueller?