Thread: Mueller's Russian Interference investigation

Didn't we have a similar style poster a short while ago? ben45.
Constantly trying to derail this thread.

Originally Posted by Cujo

Then who does?
Surely if indictments for 'certain people' had been issued it'd be all over the right wing news/blogosphere. How about just ONE link to a credible source with ACTUAL evidence (not hearsay) these indictments have been issued.

Is this another one of them "Q" wankers?

Originally Posted by Humbert

I am arguing the exact opposite of what you are suggesting. He will not be impeached in the House if Republicans hang on to a majority no matter what Mueller's findings are.

Please, do us all a favor and do not contribute to this forum until your reading comprehension improves. You are a nuisance.

It it is you that seems to have comprehension problems as you missed the point of my post,which was to say why are we even using the impeachment word when Trump,is not even a target of Muelers investigation.

No I will not stop posting in speakers corner,if you don’ Like my posts don’t read them.

^ You really are a moron.

Originally Posted by bsnub

^ You really are a moron.

What,you calling names without sending a red I am quite disappointed.

Originally Posted by bsnub

^ You really are a moron.

I feel much better now that the red arrived thank you.

Originally Posted by bsnub

.... try to validate your stupid shit conspiracies.

How about 'trying to validate this stupid shit conspiracy' The Meuller investigation.

Lol.....

[QUOTE=Humbert;3809103]He is a 'subject' of the Mueller investigation. Who has not yet been interviewed and will likely end up getting subpoenaed. If you think Trump is off the hook you are living in clown cuckooland. For your information, Mueller has no power to indict a President. He will write a report. It is possible that the house could impeach him without anything from Mueller. It is a political act and requires a super majority vote.[/QUOTE

Yes he is a subject,not a target,in Mueller’s investigation. He will probably never be interviewed. No I do not think Trump is off the hook,nor do I care either way. I also realize Mueller has no power to indict Trump,but I also realize with out some pretty damaging evidence from Muellers investigation against Trump it is highly unlikely the house will make an impeachment try. As it takes a super majority vote it is highly unlikely,in the case of an impeachment attempt,it would be successful. Once again I ask why all the talk of impeachment when it is highly unlikely to occur.

Originally Posted by RPETER65

but I also realize with out some pretty damaging evidence from Muellers investigation against Trump it is highly unlikely the house will make an impeachment try

Which was my original point you idiot. Listen, if you cannot comprehend the English language you should not waste people's time with nonsensical responses.

Originally Posted by RPETER65

I ask why all the talk of impeachment when it is highly unlikely to occur.

Because if the dems regain the majority in the house after the midterms the possibility becomes very real.

Originally Posted by BelAir

How about 'trying to validate this stupid shit conspiracy' The Meuller investigation.

I figured you would not come through with some credible source to back up your stupid conspiracy theory. You are just another brainwashed numpty.

Originally Posted by rpeter65

.... Once again i ask why all the talk of impeachment when it is highly unlikely to occur.

It makes 'em feel all warm & fuzzy, heh

Originally Posted by Humbert

Which was my original point you idiot. Listen, if you cannot comprehend the English language you should not waste people's time with nonsensical responses.



Because if the dems regain the majority in the house after the midterms the possibility becomes very real.

i did and do now the point of your original post,and my response was to ask why the impeachment talk,why do you see that as nonsensical.

Yes if the dems regain majority in the House I suppose you could say impeachment would be closer,but without a super majority impossible.

^ I can explain these things for you but I cannot understand them for you.

If there's so much talk about impeachment why isn't it showing up on my news feed?

Originally Posted by Humbert

^ I can explain these things for you but I cannot understand them for you.

No, you carry on mr.humbert.You don’t seem to have the iq to understand my posts how do you think you can explain anything to me, your way to dim for me to waste my time with.

Originally Posted by RPETER65

your way to dim for me to waste my time with.

Derp.

Originally Posted by RPETER65

your way to dim for me to waste my time with.

He is vastly more intelligent than you are. Your stupidity is really very remarkable. Many people have pointed it out to you on this forum and not all of them are liberals. Clearly you are to stupid to know you are stupid.

Originally Posted by BelAir

How about 'trying to validate this stupid shit conspiracy' The Meuller investigation.

Oh look, another trumpanzee.

Originally Posted by bsnub

He is vastly more intelligent than you are. Your stupidity is really very remarkable. Many people have pointed it out to you on this forum and not all of them are liberals. Clearly you are to stupid to know you are stupid.

Well yes there is a chance he could be more intelligent than me,but from the fact he struggled to comprehend my post he sure wasn’t showing it.

Originally Posted by Cujo

Interesting that RUSSIAN interests are trying to shut down the probe. Interesting that the idea that Russian entities would be able to attempt it is even entertained.
There's some BLATANT interference in the U.S. system right there.
The legal framework the U.S. has created is being used against it.

Filing a 'Motion For Dismissal' is a standard operating legal procedure, not "...interference in the US system" and certainly not using the 'legal framework the U.S. has created against it'.

Plaintiffs are entitled to file this action under U.S. law.

Originally Posted by BelAir

Filing a 'Motion For Dismissal' is a standard operating legal procedure, not "...interference in the US system" and certainly not using the 'legal framework the U.S. has created against it'.

Plaintiffs are entitled to file this action under U.S. law.

Kinda odd that a foriegn 'entitiy' is concerned with a US court case though, especially this one....guess u missed that part