Thread: President Donald Trump

Peters is now lumped in with these idiots supporting Trump. The stupidity is literally beyond belief.

The above reminds me of Jay Leno years ago doing walkabouts and asking average Americans common sense and geography questions.
Thick as shit was a compliment.

Originally Posted by thaiguzzi

The above reminds me of Jay Leno years ago doing walkabouts and asking average Americans common sense and geography questions.
Thick as shit was a compliment.

Somewhat like Fox News’ Jesse Waters talking with know nothing young liberals who don’t even know why they are liberal. Quite amusing really.

The real question is would you shag roller hair girl? If you could, still shag that is.

Poll to follow.

Add none, had none. No quid pro quo. So little time, so much to know.

I had a bet he'd never make it through his term. Not that I read his book or anything like that. Just feeling the waters is all. Those LP's haven't moved for decades though if he pulls out I'd be more than happy to hand deliver.
Luck is on your side 57.

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

the big words in Fiona Hill's testimony

Fiona Hill Calls ‘Globalist’ Description “Anti-Semitic” Despite Writing For a Media Outlet Called ‘The Globalist’
Well, this is awkward.

During her testimony in the impeachment hearings this week, Fiona Hill dismissed charges she was a “globalist” by referring to the term as an “anti-Semitic” conspiracy theory, despite the fact that she writes for a publication literally called ‘The Globalist’.

Hill was responding to a question by Democratic Representative for Illinois Raja Krishnamoorthi, who quoted Hill’s earlier deposition in which she complained about Roger Stone labeling her “the globalist leftist [George] Soros insider.”

Hill claimed that “a conspiracy” had been launched against her and that ‘globalist’ was an anti-Semitic trope, while admitting that she was a “leftist maybe,” but implying she was not a globalist.

“This is the longest-running anti-Semitic trope that we have in history, and a trope against Mr Soros was also created for political purposes, and this is the new Protocols of The Elders of Zion,” Hill said.

During her testimony in the impeachment hearings this week, Fiona Hill dismissed charges she was a “globalist” by referring to the term as an “anti-Semitic” conspiracy theory, despite the fact that she writes for a publication literally called ‘The Globalist’.

Hill was responding to a question by Democratic Representative for Illinois Raja Krishnamoorthi, who quoted Hill’s earlier deposition in which she complained about Roger Stone labeling her “the globalist leftist [George] Soros insider.”

Hill claimed that “a conspiracy” had been launched against her and that ‘globalist’ was an anti-Semitic trope, while admitting that she was a “leftist maybe,” but implying she was not a globalist.

“This is the longest-running anti-Semitic trope that we have in history, and a trope against Mr Soros was also created for political purposes, and this is the new Protocols of The Elders of Zion,” Hill said.


This statement is somewhat at odds with Hill literally being a contributing writer for a publication called ‘The Globalist’.

Stone also previously asserted that Hill was was serving as George Soros’ “mole” under the supervision of former NSA adviser H.R. McMaster.

Hill is also a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, which is considered to be one of the pre-eminent globalist institutions in the United States.

https://summit.news/2019/11/22/fiona...the-globalist/

And what's awkward?
You fall too easily for the smear tactics.

^^That’s some absolutely crazy shit by Infowar’s Paul Joseph Watson.

Originally Posted by misskit

^^That’s some absolutely crazy shit by Infowar’s Paul Joseph Watson.

He's like Jones, just a carnival barker to the paranoid whackjobs.

Probably takes a cut of the stoopid "male vitality" elixirs that Jones peddles to these idiots.

Remember the "before and after" pictures he posted to show what a miracle it was?

Who knows, maybe baldy uses them too.

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

He's like Jones, just a carnival barker to the paranoid whackjobs.

Probably takes a cut of the stoopid "male vitality" elixirs that Jones peddles to these idiots.

Remember the "before and after" pictures he posted to show what a miracle it was?

Who knows, maybe baldy uses them too.

That's fucking hilarious.

a federal judge ruled today that the former white house counsel must testify before congress ...and also stated that her ruling also applies to the others claiming executive privilege (bolton).

this is a huge loss for trump.

They'll appeal and drag the whole process out.

Baldy orange cunto's DOJ wrote to SCOTUS to say they shouldn't release baldy's tax records.

What the fuck happened to separation of powers? ***
















*** Rhetorical question.

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

What the fuck happened to separation of powers?

They only blocked it until Dec.5 so his defense team can file the appeal. Then they will review that and decide to dismiss the appeal or hear it in court. If they dismiss the orange moron will have to release his taxes immediately.

Originally Posted by bsnub

They only blocked it until Dec.5 so his defense team can file the appeal. Then they will review that and decide to dismiss the appeal or hear it in court. If they dismiss the orange moron will have to release his taxes immediately.

And what if he, well, doesn't ?
Claims executive privilege or something ?

Well looks like there's an answer now why Devin Nunes is such an obstructionist and card carrying Trumptard: apparently he made his own tax-payer funded trip to dig dirt on the Bidens and even submitted expense claims for it.

This really is Stupid Watergate.

Good morning shit stains. I'm great and thanks for asking.

So it sure looks like my mate The Donald as per usual will just carry on and be re-elected as head Kunto of Septic land.

Why you may ask ?

Because you pathetic wankers who hate on The Donald and for the last 3 years have been trying so hard to bury him have failed spectacularly aint cha's.

Ya best shot Muller shit his Nappy under pressure and folded and now your last shot at impeachment is going into the deep blue and will drown as surely as Snubby shags dead goats.

How does it feel Bitches to know that all your angst and hatred towards the great leader The Donald aint amounted to a a fart in the wind and he surely will be your cuntries supreme leader for another 4 years.

Yer, i love to see you plebs go down in flames, it makes me feel all warm and very happy.

Anyway , the strong always survive and the weak perish and wither away.

Anyway wank stains, have a lovely day.

How has the last shot at impeachment gone down in flames?
More and more egregious information, evidence and testimony comes to light daily.

It's Twerry, he has just become a parody of a parody of himself posting utter shite.

Originally Posted by panama hat

Simple. It hasn't. It's even gaining momentum. They don't need more for Congress to send the process to the senate, which will quash it irrespective of how much dirt they unearth.

Just get it over and done with

The House Intel committee has just finished.

The House Judiciary committee starts next week.

Oh baldy, who ya gonna try and throw under the bus for this one?

Donald Trump’s business reported conflicting information about a key metric to New York City property tax officials and a lender who arranged financing for his signature building, Trump Tower in Manhattan, according to tax and loan documents obtained by ProPublica. The findings add a third major Trump property to two for which ProPublica revealed similar discrepancies last month.
In the latest case, the occupancy rate of the Trump Tower’s commercial space was listed, over three consecutive years, as 11, 16 and 16 percentage points higher in filings to a lender than in reports to city tax officials, records show.
For example, as of December 2011 and June 2012, respectively, Trump’s business told the lender that 99% and 98.7% of the tower’s commercial space was occupied, according to a prospectus for the loan. The figures were taken from “borrower financials,” the prospectus stated.
In tax filings, however, Trump’s business said the building’s occupancy was 83% in January 2012 and the same a year later. The 16 percentage point gap between the loan and tax filings is a “very significant difference,” said Susan Mancuso, an attorney who specializes in New York property tax.
A spokesperson for the Trump Organization said that “comparing the various reports is comparing apples to oranges” because reporting requirements differ.
Trump had much to gain by showing a high occupancy rate to lenders in 2012: He refinanced his share of Trump Tower that year and obtained a $100 million loan on favorable terms.
The vast majority of the gap between occupancy figures could be explained by diverging reports on how much space the Trump Organization used in Trump Tower. In loan documents, the company said it and its affiliates occupied 74,900 square feet in mid-2012, or 31% of the building. But tax reports from the January before and after listed the company and related parties as occupying 41,600 square feet — or about 18% of the tower.
“I cannot give you an explanation,” said Kevin Riordan, a financing expert, former accountant and real estate professor at Montclair State University who reviewed the tax and loan records for Trump Tower at ProPublica’s request.
More than a dozen tax and finance experts, presented with ProPublica’s earlier findings, also said they could not decipher a reason for the differences. As with Trump Tower, the discrepancies made the two properties — a skyscraper located at 40 Wall Street and the Trump International Hotel and Tower near Columbus Circle — appear more profitable to the lender and less so to property tax officials.
Those discrepancies were “versions of fraud,” according to Nancy Wallace, a professor of finance and real estate at the Haas School of Business at the University of California-Berkeley. The penalties for false filings can include fines or criminal charges.

https://www.propublica.org/article/trump-inc-podcast-trump-tower-tax-records-reveal-new-inconsistencies

^ Old news.
Meanwhile,

Donald Trump was briefed on the whistleblower complaint about his dealings with Ukraine before the White House released nearly $400m in military aid to Kyiv, officials said on Wednesday, shedding new light on events that triggered the impeachment inquiry.

The president was told about the complaint in late August in a briefing by the White House counsel, Pat Cipollone, and John Eisenberg, an attorney with the White House national security council, according to two officials not authorized to publicly discuss the matter.

The lawyers told Trump about the complaint, explaining that they were trying to determine whether they were legally required to give it to Congress, the officials said. The aid was released on 11 September amid growing pressure from members of Congress.

The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Wednesday.

The White House has claimed there was no link between the military aid suspension and Trump’s request for Ukraine to investigate his political rival Joe Biden and his family.

But it was his request to Ukraine’s president, Volodymyr Zelenskiy, in a July phone call that prompted the government whistleblower’s complaint about a link. The assertion of such a link has since been corroborated by a parade of witnesses testifying on Capitol Hill during closed-door and public hearings in the impeachment inquiry to date.

The August briefing with Trump was first reported by the New York Times.
The revelation comes just days before the House judiciary committee takes over the impeachment inquiry, scheduling a hearing for next week as it pushes closer to a possible vote on charges of high crimes and misdemeanors and a congressional trial for the president in the Senate.

Trump has been invited to attend the hearing, but is not widely expected to turn up.

The judiciary panel scheduled the hearing as the intelligence committee on Tuesday released two last transcripts from its depositions, including from a White House budget official who detailed concerns among colleagues as Trump ordered them, through intermediaries, to put a hold on military aid to Ukraine.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...nt-ukraine-aid

Originally Posted by Cujo

^ Old news.

No it's not, it's November 27th.

Your report might be news but that news has been floating around for a couple of months.
Don't take well to being contradicted do you.