US House resolution shows how Democrats will navigate Donald Trump's impeachment inquiry
Let's be clear here: this wasn't a big, high-stakes resolution.
It's not the actual articles of impeachment which will determine whether the President will be impeached and tried in the Senate.
No, the resolution was about the process of taking the impeachment inquiry into the public arena.
It defines the procedures for holding public hearings, allowing the White House to respond to evidence and drafting the actual articles of impeachment later.
It will also allow the transcripts of some of the private depositions to be released to the public.
The rules, which were drafted by Democrats, are consistent with how other House investigations are conducted.
What are the Republicans doing? ... they're attacking the process
The investigation into a July phone call between Mr Trump and Ukranian President Volodomyr Zelenksy has so far been carried out behind closed doors.
Democrats think they have public opinion on their side
According to an aggregate of polls collected by FiveThirtyEight, support for impeachment outweighs opposition by roughly five percentage points.
The Republican talking points may sound familiar
1. The resolution is still unfair …
… because it prevents Republicans from subpoenaing witnesses without majority approval. Democrats say the process they've laid out is consistent with how all House investigations are conducted.
2. It's too late anyway …
… because the evidence is already "tainted" as it was collected behind closed doors.
The Democrats point out that Republicans, who hold minorities on each of the six committees conducting the investigations, have been present and active in every closed-door hearing.
3. The Democrats are only doing this because they're sore losers.
"Democrats are trying to impeach the President because they're scared they can't beat him at the ballot box," said Republican House Minority leader Kevin McCarthy.
The question will be whether Democrats can turn the new public evidence into a case that's compelling and clear enough for the American public to grasp.
Lot's more analysis here