true, but this is the new world we live in, everyone is doing it, so it's the de-facto new standard, and calling Trump on it and not the others is basically having double standards and not really a solid foundation to combat corruption. Again not excusing Trump per se.
sure in the news now, and tomorrow it will be gone with something else or another distraction
anyway, news or not, won't change a thing, no impeachment and Trump will re-elected, and you will be crying in your bed in fetal position over the whole thing with all the others
Calling others on what, stuff you've just made up and posted?Originally Posted by Dragonfly
You should go on TV and replace Giuliani. He actually gets money to peddle bollocks and debunked conspiracy theories whereas you do it for free and get mocked for it.
GW Bush and Dick Cheney business dealings over the whole Iraq thing is not conspiracy,
I personally know of one action Obama did that could constitute corruption, in the 2008 crisis, he and his family lost money in a mutual fund, and went after the company to recover the money while he was POTUS, in complete illegality, by secretly settling with them to recoup the cash while other investors couldn't and threatening to use the US Treasury to ban activities of that Mutual Fund company if he didn't his cash back.
There are also a lot of stories about him in Chicago, doing the usual 'traffic of influence' politicians do etc...
Obama wasn't a choir boy, he couldn't have gone that high by being too nice, he was a skilled killer
Originally Posted by Dragonfly
Good work... Now film that shit and get Fox News to play it!
Meanwhile, back here in the real world, Trump abused his office to go after political opponents in a quid pro quo with a foreign government and all the Trumptard witterings and whataboutisms in the world don't change that.
I assume that the population will appreciate the quest for a truly fair election - as it always had been (unless not meddled by foreign powers). This is surely much more important than an investigation of some funny business peanut involvement...
Trump: 'I could shoot somebody and I wouldn’t lose any voters'
He was talking about Trumptards like you, Butters.
and I bet he could,
that said, there were plenty of easy angles to entrap Trump, and yet his enemies choose the loser way, so you have to wonder if they are really serious or just playing games
Would love to see Trump fall from grace, eventually, but it's not happening now, snowflake
^^ Jesus, that news clip is full of hot air
hopeless
the plot is too complex to get the support of the public,
simple plot are better to entrap a politician, like a sex affair, or an illegal breakin
[QUOTE=AntRobertson;4017165]He abused his office to go after political opponents in a quid pro quo with a foreign government...
That's about as straight-forward and easy to understand as it gets. It's only difficult for those who put the 'stupid' in Stupid Watergate. [/QUOTE
Except he hasn’t been found guilty of that. You,being a lawyer,would of course understand how that works.
I think Ant is a little bit biased against Trump
That doesn't mean he didn't do it.Originally Posted by RPETER65
You, being a Trumptard, are desperate to ignore and obfuscate from that.
The idiot Trump does not even know US geography, let alone world... Unbelievable, his supporters ate it up...
https://www.sfgate.com/local-politic...o-14557631.php
Trump claims US is building a border wall in Colorado, which is impossible
By Greg Keraghosian
Updated 4:31 pm PDT, Wednesday, October 23, 2019
- 85
Photo: Evan Vucci, AP
IMAGE 1 OF 8
President Donald Trump speaks at the 9th annual Shale Insight Conference at the David L. Lawrence Convention Center, Wednesday, Oct. 23, 2019, in Pittsburgh.
President Donald Trump has been exaggerating for months about the progress being made in building his desired border wall with Mexico. But on Wednesday, he took it a step further by including the wall in a state that is nowhere near the border.
Trump was speaking in Pittsburgh at the Shale Insight Conference when he began touting his 2020 re-election prospects with the supposed building of hundreds of miles of wall. He curiously added Colorado to the list of places where it’s being built, drawing a standing ovation from the crowd.
“You know why we're going to win New Mexico?” Trump said. “Because they want safety on their border. And they didn't have it. And we're building a wall on the border of New Mexico!
“And we're building a wall in Colorado,” the president said. “We're building a beautiful wall, a big one that really works — you can't get over, you can't get under.”
President Trump announces he's building a border wall in Colorado. He gets a standing ovation. #9NEWS #copolitics pic.twitter.com/H9fxzr18uC
— Kyle Clark (@KyleClark) October 23, 2019
Trump added, “And we're not building a wall in Kansas, but they get the benefit of the walls that we just mentioned. And Louisiana is incredible.”
As has been repeatedly fact-checked, all that has been built along the border so far is 66 miles of replacement fencing – far from the hundreds of miles of concrete wall Trump promised. Trump did declare a national emergency to divert $3.6 billion from military construction projects to the wall.
ALSO
Despite the ovation Trump got after claiming a geographic impossibility, pool reporter Michael C. Bender of the Wall Street Journal was attributed with the following quote on Twitter: “A POTUS riff on his promise to build a border wall — in which he ticked off the list of states the wall would touch, including, incorrectly, Colorado — drew laughs from more than a few of the conference attendees. Several shook their heads.”
Greg Keraghosian is an SFGATE homepage editor. Email: greg.keraghosian@sfgate.com
LAVIQ SUKHUMVIT 57 ลงทะเบียนรับส่วนลดเพิ่ม 100,000 บ* คอนโดทำเลเอกมัย Start 10.9 MB*Bangkok CitiSmart|Sponsored
SC Asset X LeicaSC Asset|Sponsored
Windows Users Advised To Do This Before Turning Computer OffThe Security Savers|Sponsored
The very stable genius has now said that he's building a wall between Colorado and Mexico. Are the Mexicans paying for this one too?
A group of House Trumptard Republicans are now obstructing justice by interrupting impeachment hearings. What do the Democrats have to do? Call in the police to have the hearings proceed?
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/world/new...ectid=12279194
Simples really.The Trump administration's official policy, which had bipartisan backing, was to support a young democracy "struggling to break free of its past" and battling Russian aggression. But it was becoming increasingly clear to Taylor that those noble intentions were being "fundamentally undermined by an irregular, informal channel of US policy-making" in which Trump and a handful of allies were withholding desperately needed military aid in exchange for political favors that would benefit Trump's reelection campaign.
If you can't see the issue there then you've lost any legitimate claims to being impartial and you support a corrupt administration.
I wonder if there was a Repub dude with a hole punch certifying their "storming testimony" cards so they can prove to trump their loyalty.
What a joke.
There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)