Thread: President Donald Trump

I'm sure this will clear things up.

Taking the Fifth Amendment in Front of the Federal Grand Jury in Order to Protect White Collar Defendants and Their Papers | Solomon L. Wisenberg. | Washington D.C.

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

I'm sure this will clear things up.

Right.... so, a person can invoke the 5th amendment, which says it cannot be invoked before a Grand Jury, before a Grand Jury, if they have a 5th amendment privilege.....

My head hurts. Can't someone just shoot everybody?

Originally Posted by bsnub

This is why Lawyers in America have fat stacks of cash. The have been exploiting everyone for decades.

If you are poor you go to prison and support that industrial complex.

If up are rich then you poor massive amounts of monies to lawyers and get off.

America is a broken nation.

Europe is worse

Nowadays the design of lamp posts makes it impossible to hang lawyers where they belong

Originally Posted by Buckaroo Banzai

Committing perjury again is a new crime. It is as if I met you in the pub and beat the crap out of you . you take me to court, and I am convicted, then my budy trump pardons me. The fact that my buddy trump pardoned me for the assault , does not mean that every time I see you I now am free to beat the crap out of you. Though it would be pretty hilarious, I am sure regardless of your political affiliation you would agree with the above. LOL

I am the FBI and I ask you "Did you talk to the Russians about blah blah blah"; you say no; I can prove you did; you get jailed for it; you get pardoned.

Then I ask you "Did you talk to the Russians about blah blah blah"; you say "I don't give a fuck, you can't try me for the same offence twice"; then I fuck off because you are right. Or I have to try you for a different crime.

Asking you "Did you talk to the Russians about a different blah blah blah" is probably the sort of thing a lawyer will eat for breakfast.

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Then I ask you "Did you talk to the Russians about blah blah blah"; you say "I don't give a fuck, you can't try me for the same offence twice"; then I fuck off because you are right.

I don't think that "I don't give a fuck" can be an acceptable answer in a court of law. They'd hold you for contempt of court. Indefinitely.

The right answer might be "I have been asked this in court [places, dates], I have denied it under oath, and I have been convicted. In law, then, I am guilty. This is a matter of public record."

The same question then gets asked over and over, with different wording, but the answer doesn't change. What can they do to you?

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

I am the FBI and I ask you "Did you talk to the Russians about blah blah blah"; you say no; I can prove you did; you get jailed for it; you get pardoned.

Then I ask you "Did you talk to the Russians about blah blah blah"; you say "I don't give a fuck, you can't try me for the same offence twice"; then I fuck off because you are right. Or I have to try you for a different crime.

Asking you "Did you talk to the Russians about a different blah blah blah" is probably the sort of thing a lawyer will eat for breakfast.

But they don't have to ask the same question they can ask "why did you lie" and be careful How you answer that because we are talking to others and you don't know what evidence we have.
And call us crazy , but we don't think Biden will pardon you also . So again Mr Flynn , Why did you lie to us knowing the penalty?

Originally Posted by Buckaroo Banzai

But they don't have to ask the same question they can ask "why did you lie" and be careful How you answer that because we are talking to others and you don't know what evidence we have.
And call us crazy , but we don't think Biden will pardon you also . So again Mr Flynn , Why did you lie to us knowing the penalty?

"I invoke my rights under the 5th Amendment".

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

"I invoke my rights under the 5th Amendment".

" But Trump's pardon, which he announced in a tweet, means Flynn will theoretically no longer be protected from self-incrimination under the 5th Amendment should he ever be called to testify against Trump."
Why Trump's Flynn pardon could backfire

Originally Posted by Buckaroo Banzai

" But Trump's pardon, which he announced in a tweet, means Flynn will theoretically no longer be protected from self-incrimination

By accepting the pardon he has admitted guilt



if I can read

Originally Posted by Buckaroo Banzai

Why did you lie to us knowing the penalty?

FBI be like "Why you lie, foo?"
Perp be like "Fuck you, pig!"
FBI be like "Your ass is grass, muvver!"

Prosecutor be like "Why did you lie, sir?"
Defender be like "Objection, Yonner! Counsel is leading the witness."
Judge be like, "Dang!"

Originally Posted by helge

By accepting the pardon he has admitted guilt

What? No! How?

Originally Posted by TheMadBaron

What? No! How?

Are you playing with me tonight ?

Burdick v. United States - Wikipedia

I'm tired

Originally Posted by TheMadBaron

FBI be like "Why you lie, foo?"
Perp be like "Fuck you, pig!"
FBI be like "Your ass is grass, muvver!"

Prosecutor be like "Why did you lie, sir?"
Defender be like "Objection, Yonner! Counsel is leading the witness."
Judge be like, "Dang!"

LMAO
The FBI agent will be played by James Brown


and the Perp will be played by Cheech Marin

and the judge

Originally Posted by helge

Are you playing with me tonight ?

Not at all. As I said, I know nuffink. Thanks for clarifying. The law is an asshole. Dickens.

Originally Posted by Buckaroo Banzai

The FBI agent will be played by James Brown
and the Perp will be played by Cheech Marin

Good work. I want Gillian Anderson for the prosecutor. I want Jodie Foster for the defender. I want torrid love interest between the two.

Now we have to find a role for Tommy Chong.

Originally Posted by TheMadBaron

a role for Tommy Chong.

3 roles left: Butler, Hooker and Corpse

What do you think ?

Originally Posted by helge

Butler

That's a tough one. The best butlers were played by Sir John Gielgud (Hobson, Arthur) and Robert Guillaume (Benson, Soap), but they're both dead. What's the budget? If we can afford the CGI, we'll deep fake Gielgud. God forbid that we get stuck with Stephen fucking Fry.

Originally Posted by helge

Hooker

Shatner, obviously.

Originally Posted by helge

Corpse

Well, Biden's 78 years old, and we're not even in pre-production yet.....

I would like Putin as Narrator.

He deserves a breakthrough

Originally Posted by TheMadBaron

Originally Posted by helge

Hooker

Shatner, obviously.

I think I might have misunderstood. Chong, then.

We are in danger of drifting off topic.....

Originally Posted by TheMadBaron

We are in danger of drifting off topic..

I noticed. Why I snok Putin along. He and Trump are close

Originally Posted by Buckaroo Banzai

" But Trump's pardon, which he announced in a tweet, means Flynn will theoretically no longer be protected from self-incrimination under the 5th Amendment should he ever be called to testify against Trump."
Why Trump's Flynn pardon could backfire

You should read what you post.

Q re: Flynn pardon and 5th Am right against self-incrimin. This rt is waived only w/r/t to illegal conduct he was pardoned for—lying to FBI re: contacts w/ Rus amb, right? I.e., hypothetically if Flynn conspired in some unrelated scheme, he retains 5th Am there? @AshaRangappa_

Awwwwwwww poor baldy orange loser so wanted to hurt the social media companies but it seems he never got his Xmas wish....

https://edition.cnn.com/2020/12/27/p...eve/index.html

...big shift underway: "news" source tRump cult members watch to reinforce their views:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/media...ch-to-newsmax/

Originally Posted by tomcat

...big shift underway: "news" source tRump cult members watch to reinforce their views:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/media...ch-to-newsmax/

Can you cut and paste it for those of us who don't want to subscribe.

Originally Posted by Cujo

Can you cut and paste it for those of us who don't want to subscribe.

It's about how a load of trumpanzees have switched from Fox to NewsMax because Fox betrayed them by declaring Arizona for Biden at an early stage.

They feel.... wait for it.... drum roll........ "Duped".