Time for sleep I'll give you time to come up with some evidence that anon are vandals/anarchists
I will look forward to your post.
Time for sleep I'll give you time to come up with some evidence that anon are vandals/anarchists
I will look forward to your post.
disparaging stupid cnuts on internet forumsOriginally Posted by Horatio Hornblower
and these script kiddies just compromise webpages on misconfigured servers - nothing useful about that - these servers and pages are not hosted on their LANs which is where this information that is interesting resides
no time required - look up LOIC and you will see the DDos tool used by these toolsOriginally Posted by Horatio Hornblower
If you torture data for enough time , you can get it to say what you want.
Or perhaps he's ignoring your complete lack of understanding of such groups.
here's a little insight into the new world of bringing the world population to what happening around the planet.
It's their world now you and all the other denialists had your time and let the fuckers fuck the world up.
Did they have separate burgers or were they both doing one half?
What is anyone denying?Originally Posted by Horatio Hornblower
How is it their world now? Why isn't it mine anymore?
You didn't contribute to letting the fuckers fuck the world up, but somehow others did?
What did you do that's different than me, other than copying and pasting links?
Let's see if you can answer some questions about the topic rather than posting up links and hurtling abuse.
CS As I previously mentioned to you I don't give a flying fcuk what you post so off you go to McD's or wherever else you go for your daily intake of 5000 calories.
See what happens when someone tries to be civil and tries to engage in an exchange of opinions with you?Originally Posted by Horatio Hornblower
You react in a negative manner which discourages discourse between yourself and everyone else.
Personally, I think you should be banned from posting threads in "Speaker's Corner" because the only "speaking" you do is to abuse everyone that posts on your thread.
Perhaps if you got your tail clipped, you would learn that being nothing but abusive is not the way to post in this forum.
Feel free to abuse my opinions, but when you get personal, it only shows you're nothing more than a common, uneducated thug.
But that's just me. I might be wrong.
One-punch accused's personal details published by Anonymous, sparking condemnation from legal world
A prominent criminal lawyer says he is astonished and disappointed by the actions of hacktivist group Anonymous, who claim to have named and shamed a man charged over a one-punch assault in Canberra's CBD.
The 20-year-old Braddon man handed himself in after police released video of the New Year's Day attack, which left the victim requiring emergency surgery.
He was later charged with recklessly inflicting grievous bodily harm.
Anonymous Australia has published what they claim is the attacker's name on social media, and have threatened to also release his home address and phone number.
The group's post has been shared on social media more than 10,000 times since it was posted early on Sunday morning.
Adrian McKenna of Ben Aulich & Associates said while members of the public had every right to express their feelings, there were legal risks when commenting on matters before the courts.
"Any charge of intentionally or recklessly causing grievous bodily harm must in the ACT end up in the Supreme Court," Mr McKenna, who is also a member of the ACT Law Society, said.
Criminal lawyer with Ben Aulich Associates Adrian McKenna
PHOTO: Criminal lawyer Adrian McKenna said some social media commentary undermined the concept of a trial by jury. (ABC News)
"But if it is for trial then an option for the offender is for the trial to be in front of a jury.
"If this material ends up in the hands of a potential juror [then] it may lead the offender's lawyers to make an application for the matter to be heard by trial by judge alone and take the matter out of the hands of 12 members of a jury who would in effect represent the community for these proceedings."
Unlike some other jurisdictions, defendants in the ACT have the right to request judge-alone trials when there has been a negative-running commentary in public.
Mr McKenna said that when threats are made to alleged offenders, defence lawyers may also seek an application for the proceedings to be closed and for a non-publication order to be made.
"In essence for the remainder of the trial to be unknown to the public," he said.
ACT Law Society president Martin Hockridge said any form of trial by social media was unhelpful.
"When there are serious criminal charges, and this will obviously be a serious criminal charge, the best place for the matter to be sorted out is in a court of law," he said.
"In terms of a fair trial, and it will probably be a jury trial, you want the people that are sitting on the jury to be influenced by the evidence that is presented in court, and not anything that is presented in social media outside of the court that could be entirely wrong.
"I note that in some of the comments there is the suggestion that they are not going to put anything else up just at the moment and I would encourage that to be the case all the way through.
"Let the police do their job, let the criminal justice system take its course."
ACT Police said they were aware of the hackers post and the reaction to it online, but did not comment further, as the matter is yet to be mentioned in the ACT Magistrates Court.
One-punch accused's personal details published by Anonymous, sparking condemnation from legal world - ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)
Why would Anonymous, a force for good you claim HH, spark condemnation from the legal world?
Do you have an opinion? Did you read the article?
neither does yasojackOriginally Posted by harrybarracuda
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeli...with_Anonymous
And the numerous attacks on US govt depts.
Now why should the people of the world be kept in the dark, after all, the west are democratic countries?
Where's that scallywag Julian Assange and his gang when ya need 'em?
Anon was a supporter of Wikileaks (Julian Assange) until they put up a donation paid to be able to see the documents
What has Anonymous exposed?Originally Posted by Horatio Hornblower
Why do you suppose they did that?Originally Posted by Horatio Hornblower
The hacker group Anonymous has exposed hundreds of alleged Ku Klux Klan members
Hours Before Paris Terror Attack, Facebook Stopped Anonymous From Exposing ISIS Recruiters - Counter Current News
Sandra Bland: Anonymous release video claiming to 'expose Texas police for releasing dead mugshot' - Mirror Online
There?s a new Edward Snowden: Terrifying abuses of drone program exposed by anonymous government whistleblower - Salon.com
Exclusive: FBI warns of U.S. government breaches by Anonymous hackers | Reuters
Its goes on and on
Damn subversive anarchists....
Originally Posted by Horatio Hornblower
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)