can't argue with that
can't argue with that
I see the French government have now decided there isn't really any sensible reason to stop two people being married just because they don't do it in the missionary position.
Well done.
And big up to the Kiwi MP (sorry if this got posted on the thread before, if it hasn't been, it should be):
It's often said - I think rightly - that religion is a good thing for good people and a bad thing for bad people. There's not much question which of those descriptions Rick falls under but I do think it makes some difference which religion you are a follower of. However much of an uptight right-wing bigot Rick is, he's going to have a harder time finding scriptural or cultural support for his views in Buddhism than in, say, Christianity or Islam and to the extent that's true, it probably tempers the wilder excesses of his views.
^ Yes, good to see.
It's a normal revulsion of another male touching me in a sexual way. Religion has no part in it,or the indoctrination from the media hijacked by the British poof parade. I don't fancy Men,never have and never will,that is My natural instinctive choice. I enjoy good Male company,but I don't want to be sodomized.
^
Spot on there mate
That's completely true, but has no baring on how we should feel about other people doing it.
I hate celery, the thought of the taste of it doesn't appeal to me at all. Thinking about other people eating it doesn't affect me in the slightest though. Same difference really.
There's nothing wrong with finding the sexual acts of people of a different sexuality to yourself unappealing. That's the problem so many homophobes have, they think they will somehow be forced to suck cock unless they stand up for their hetro rights.
They can't seem to disconnect themselves from the act. How many times has Rick graphically talked about being fucked up the ass, as if he was experiencing it first hand. Quite pathetic.
If people don't want to think about it, why do they spend so much time thinking about it? Not just thinking about it, but typing at considerable length about it?
Much of their grey matter must be given over to composing their latest op-ed piece, as inspiration strikes them.
It reminds me of Blackgang and Texpat, who would home in on boyfuck topics like flies around a bull's bottom, and invariably be the leading posters, ostensibly to inform people how repulsed they were by all the lurid detail.
well you see they have all given into temptation; allowed a gay man to sodomise them and they really enjoyed even though they new it was bad thing to do. They hate themselves for this, they only thing they hate more than themselves are the gay men that they find so attractive and continue to cause them them to have sinful thoughts.Originally Posted by Aberlour
comprendi
My view too. From a classic small 'c' conservative viewpoint (which you really won't see from the neo-republicans) no one makes you 'like' homo's or homosexuality, or dislike for that matter. Same applies with religion and race- but what you individually like or dislike is one thing, a persons individual right to be treated equally by society and before the law quite another.Originally Posted by wasabi
oh its legal so its ok ?Originally Posted by gaysexbyproxy
like getting married to a 9 year old is legal in some muslim countries ..
like fucking animals is legal in some countries...
beating your wife is legal in some countries ...
funny how you pick and choose the laws you like .
so what about when buggery was illegal in Britain ,very recently espescially for under 18 ,
should there be charges brought against historic offenders ?
fuck all decent about aids generating paedo /faggotsOriginally Posted by gaysexbyproxy
who is been judgemental nowOriginally Posted by gaysexbyproxy
yes , just as you like pick and choose which laws you likeOriginally Posted by gaysexbyproxy
someone here needs to ,Originally Posted by gaysexbyproxy
and you know who ,,,,
Totally brainwashed by politically correctness you are , be it climate change, immigration or pooftery. you toe the party line ,without a moment of real thinking .
The big brother PC state has you well trained like an obedient dog , to hunt down dissenters and ''challenge'' them ,
how long before one of you lot report thier parents / family to the authorities for them saying out loud thier opinion of homos and gets them 25 years in a Gulag in Siberia ?
seriously you need to lose your PC chains ,and rejoin the human race .
Good old Blue, if he were any more right wing he'd have to rescind his BNP membership.
Wot, you mean poofta bashing?Originally Posted by blue
The 'Age of Consent' in Vatican City is 14 and 13 in Spain.Originally Posted by blue
Do you have any link that 9 year olds can get legally married in some countries?
Marriageable age - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Age of Consent ?
pay attention son , I talking about marriageable age for which
Spain is 18, or 16 with parental consent.
Vatican 16 for males and 14 for females with parental or judicial consent .
9 year olds ?
see that was the age Ashita got married to 50 + mohamud
so it's enshrined in stone in sharia law
Lebanon - 18 for males and 17 for females. 15, or 9 with judicial permission for Shi'a.
Sudan - Puberty, with requirement for willing consent of both parties
Yemen - In practice, "Yemeni law allows girls of any age to wed, but it forbids sex with them until the indefinite time they are 'suitable for sexual intercourse'." Following the widely publicised divorce of a 10 year-old girl in 2008, and a 6 year old married, there have been public and parliamentary efforts to raise the age to 17 or 18.
If there is a 'god given right to happiness' then there must also be a 'god given right to unhappiness'.
Therefore, let the fags suffer as much potential misery as the rest of us. Give them the right to suffer
(with apologies to my current wife )
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)