Thread: Homophobia - Progressive Intimidation?

Originally Posted by Eliminator

The homos seem to be squeaking the LOUDEST, so we must all grease them up so everyone can be happy.

well, have fun with that greasing

So are we all in agreement yet that the OP is a latent homosexual, angry because of his disgust of himself at the things that pop into his mind when he is on his vinegars then?

^ Yep.

Originally Posted by pseudolus

So are we all in agreement yet that the OP is a latent homosexual, angry because of his disgust of himself at the things that pop into his mind when he is on his vinegars then?

Sounds more of the mind of a repressed Christian than one of a repressed Buddhist...

This Buddhist projection [crap] from RT is bit of a wind-up and ruse, if anything.

Originally Posted by Aberlour

So Rick, a couple of questions you need to answer.

How is possible that you don't approve of gay men because it's un-natural in the sense that woman and men are designed to be together to reproduce, yet you don't have a problem with lesbians who are also unable to reproduce in a natural way? How is that not highly illogical and hypercritical? Aren't you making a mockery of your own ideals?

Secondly, why is it that all the medical geniuses in the world don't consider homosexuality as something that can be treated as a disease, yet you do?

Is that not you, implying that you know more than all the best medical minds in the world?

Firstly, I never stated that lesbian attraction was natural, just that I don't find the thoughts of the physical part of the sex acts between lesbians disgusting (more humorous).

As I stated lesbians also appear to have some sort of disorder that makes them go against natures boy/girl sexual attractions. Rather than making up statements like "most people" and redefining words (my Webster's defines deviant as" Deviating from what is considered normal in a group or society" and has nothing to do with what is "socially acceptable), perhaps you should carefully read the posts. Maybe if you wrote down my salient points, you could clarify your responses and then post your rebuttals?

As to medical research into the whys of homosexuality, in the 1970s and 1980s, there was a lot of research into the study of homosexuality but it seem to have tapered off due to the concept of "homophobia!". Who knows? Perhaps it is still on-going, but with a low-key approach to avoid inciting the "educated Westerners" as you put it.

I would think all people, homosexuals and hetrosexuals would embrace that type of research, as it could lead to actual understanding from a scientific perspective.

I know I would, but would you?

Originally Posted by Aberlour

Originally Posted by RickThai

I just stated that homosexuality was un-natural (think basic biology/precreation - the natural reason for male to female sexual attraction).

Aren't Buddhist monks celibate?

Very un-natural if you ask me.

I agree celibacy (on purpose) is very un-natural (as is all religon).

Originally Posted by Eliminator

The squeaky wheel gets the grease. The homos seem to be squeaking the LOUDEST, so we must all grease them up so everyone can be happy.

There is some fine company you are keeping, you disgusting bigot:

Pat Buchanan Calls For 'A New Era Of Civil Disobedience' Against LGBT Equality | ThinkProgress

Originally Posted by The Ghost Of The Moog

It seems as though Rick's issue is with anal sex itself.

I presume you have never had anal sex with a living organism, Rick?

Concerning my disgust with the phsycal act of homosexuality, your are correct.
Being attracted to a man's butthole seems to be very un-natural and disgusting to me.

And yes, once upon a time (back when I was in my twenties), a very attractive girl wanted me to take her in the ass. I complied, and although I had an orgasm, I didn't particularly want to do it again, ever. (Actually, the next night the girl wanted it up her butt again, but I refused and we had sex the normal way.)

I read a story a couple of years ago, where a boy went to the doctor complaining of pain in his lower intestine. It turned out the boy had a parasite in his rectum. The doctor stated that this type of parasite is very common in homosexual men. An investigation turned up that the boy had been having anal sex with a homosexual friend.

Now I know, Aber is going to state that butt parasites are "socially acceptable to most educated Westerners", but to me, that just another reason why anal sex (especially between men) is disgusting.

RickThai

The original topic of this thread was the concept of how homosexuals and homosexual supporters use the cries of "homophobia" as a tool to squash opposing viewpoints on the topics of homosexuality.

I think it is very plain for all to see how Aber et. al. have tried to do just that in this thread. I think the general tone of this thread was personal attacks on myself and anyone else who was brave enough to voice their opinion that homosexuality is a disorder and consists of deviant sexual practices.

My thanks to the few posters who were brave enough to post their dissenting views and the posters who provided thoughtful discourse (pro or con) on the topic.

RicThai

Originally Posted by RickThai

In any event, the soundness of my logic/observations aside, why do liberals/progressive try to drown out or stifle any meaningful dialog that is contrary to theirs?

Comments?

RickThai

It's not only liberals/progressive who try to drown out or stifle any meaningful dialog that is contrary to theirs. Conservatives are just as likely to try to do the same.

I think the general tone of this thread was personal attacks on myself and anyone else who was brave enough to voice their opinion

True. On the other hand, you are clearly a weapons-grade shitbag so maybe it's not entirely unwarranted. And on the subject of the long road to nibanna (you're a long way off, you say? No fucking kidding), perhaps if you spent less time worrying about what other people did for fun (although it's clear that for you constant meditation on muscular young men and what naughty things they do with their thick, veiny cocks has a boundless appeal - oohhh I bet just reading that gives you goosebumps, doesn't it), you might make a touch more progress. That or move over to one of the Abrahamic religions, which I would have thought - what with all the fucked up sexual hangups you clearly cart around - would have been rather more appealing.

Originally Posted by RickThai

I think the general tone of this thread was personal attacks on myself and anyone else who was brave enough to voice their opinion that homosexuality is a disorder and consists of deviant sexual practices.

yes, you're very brave for posting this.

heroic, in fact.

i'm going to recommend you for some sort of medal.

keep being such a example of bravery for the rest of us.

i would like to suggest the admin adds a new bravery emoticon and that the code be :rickthai:

Originally Posted by raycarey

Originally Posted by RickThai

I think the general tone of this thread was personal attacks on myself and anyone else who was brave enough to voice their opinion that homosexuality is a disorder and consists of deviant sexual practices.

yes, you're very brave for posting this.

heroic, in fact.

i'm going to recommend you for some sort of medal.

keep being such a example of bravery for the rest of us.

i would like to suggest the admin adds a new bravery emoticon and that the code be :rickthai:

Ah, I guess my post was too subtle for you. I deliberately started this thread knowing I would get flamed. No bravery on my part, just anticipation that the posters (such as yourself) would prove my point. The comment about the bravery was for the other posters who jumped in with their "homophobic" opinions.

What is also interesting about this thread was how many "homosexual/homosexual supporters" attacked me by calling me a "latent homosexual or a poof". That indicates to me that on a sub-conscious level, that they really believe homosexuality is a bad thing. Think about it.

Speakers Corner
Air your opinion on current world affairs. A forum for civil discussion and exchange of ideas. No flaming or abuse allowed. All posts should include your opinion on the subject, not your opinion of the member posting.

Interesting, that its just the politically correct homosexual supporting members here who have been abusive, uncivil and have broken the spirit of speakers corner.

The present situation regarding homosexuals , at least in the west , is that they ,can 'marry' , adopt vulnerable young boys , have the law set so even laughing at them is a hate crime,they have pressure groups that ensure job and social housing, they can even have sex in public toilets and local parks , without having to worry about the police .
In short they have everything they want ,a total victory.

Are they and there politically supporters happy ?
it would seem not , they feel the need to squash any dissenting voice , and even
sink to disgusting insults , eg unprovoked comments about other members watching homo porn etc .
Politically correct fascists are trained to '' challenge'' dissenters
by any means , and just cannot help themselves.

If they feel they are so right, and victory is won ,you have to ask why do they bother ?
if there was a thread here stating the Earth was flat ,would the round earth believers be top posters here ?, of course not .
The answer is because the political correct members posting here are closet homophobes themselves , and it's there sub conscious that nudges then here, to hear the sick truth about gays, and solutions and cures.
Deep down they know what's natural healthy and good for mankind.
And it's not homosexuality.

Originally Posted by mao say dung

Originally Posted by RickThai

It had nothing to do with you being attracted to me. Duh!

Missed the part where homophobes are also c.u.n.ts, eh?

You are painfully stupid, Rick.

Actually I have an IQ of about 140. However, I have no idea what the acronym c.u.n.ts means. Is it some kind of homosexual code?

Santi,

RickThai

Originally Posted by Aberlour

Originally Posted by The Ghost Of The Moog

It seems as though Rick's issue is with anal sex itself.

I presume you have never had anal sex with a living organism, Rick?

I was going to bring up woman fucking men up the ass using strap ons, but I think it may push him over the edge.

Actually, I do think that is pretty disgusting and deviant as well. I guess I'm just not an "educated Westerner".


RickThai

Originally Posted by Aberlour

Originally Posted by blue

Homophobia is real ! its good and it's healthy
and cleverly installed by natural selection / mother nature to help keep us safe .

It's a great way of helping people naturally avoid gays , especially young boys , whom gays are likely to abuse as most puffs have paedophiles inclinations .

Gays are like dog shit ,which is stinking and disease riddled , but protective mother nature offers a helping hand : and people have a phobia- a revulsion for the foul smelling dog muck, and so stay well away from it and thus avoid harm.
Similarly boys avoid been abused by gays if thier homophobia alerts them to keep well , well away .
Homophobia is helpful to adults too , as crossing the street when you see a gay mincing towards you , saves you letting out an involuntary laugh eg at thier prancing ponciness , and thus avoids you been arrested on a hate crime charge .

Also homophones are better equipped to avoid catching AIDS, as alarm bells would ring at the first sight of a faggot , long before they get in the reeking danger zone of the stinking gays HIV pong .

In a perfect world homophobes themselves would be protected by strict hate crime laws ,and any queers aggravating thier medical condition would be arrested and sent to secure medical centre to be cured of thier homosexuality .

In conclusion , gays are filthy , disgusting, boring , hysterical , noisy , shrieking unstable paedophiles and thus are best totally avoided .


This public information advice was brought to you by
blue
president of Homophobes Without Borders

You see what kind of people share your beliefs Rick!

Scary huh?

I do not have to agree with everything someone says, to believe that they have the right to speak their opinions without being attacked. If it is honest opinions than "good for him". Besides, who knows, maybe blue has his reasons for what he says?

RickThai

Originally Posted by Aberlour

Originally Posted by wasabi

All Men are ugly looking,never could and never will understand how a male can be sexy attractive.

Don't agree with that myself Wasabi. I'm as straight as they come, but I don't have a problem saying another bloke is good looking.

You can say somebody is attractive without it inferring that you are attracted to them yourself.

If I could look like someone else, I would like to look like a young Tom Berenger. That was one good looking mother fucker, don't have a problem saying it.

I don't like the modern terms "bromance" and "man crush" myself, but there is nothing wrong with a bloke having a huge amount of respect and admiration for another bloke. What man doesn't "love" his best buddies that he grew up with? I do.

People who don't have any doubts about their own heterosexuality, shouldn't be worried for one second about saying that they love another bloke or they think that they are good looking.

Aber, I'm not trying to be funny (or mean) but from your posts, I assumed you were female!

My bad.

RickThai

Originally Posted by Neverna

Originally Posted by RickThai

In any event, the soundness of my logic/observations aside, why do liberals/progressive try to drown out or stifle any meaningful dialog that is contrary to theirs?

Comments?

RickThai

It's not only liberals/progressive who try to drown out or stifle any meaningful dialog that is contrary to theirs. Conservatives are just as likely to try to do the same.

I agree that it is a tactic used by people of all beliefs, but I think liberals/progressives seem to be the most aggressive in trying to drown out any opposing viewpoints. Just my opinion of course.

Originally Posted by Mr Earl

Well there is some scientific evidence which indicates differences in the hypothalimus of homos.
Hence suporting the nature argument.
Interesting article here: Homosexuality: Nature or Nurture in AllPsych Journal

Regarding homophobia I agree that it shouldn't be part of preschool or grade school curiculum and that gay pride parades might better in Odessa Texas and not in front of Disneyworld.

Yet on the other hand some African cultures the right of passage into manhood involves boys being sodomized by the elders before turning 15 years old.

I agree with the OP that we are indeed witnessing a cultural transformation where homosexuality is not only pushed as normal but socially encouraged.
I wont be long before it will be acceptable to sodomize all school age children as a right of passage. That seems to me where it is all going.
Right or wrong it is what it is, what people do with each other buttholes is thier own business and should be kept that way.
I certainly dont think stringing homos from lightposts is particularly civilized.
The thing about homosexuals is that since they cant reproduce by nature they are forced to recruit.

I agree with everything you posted. Well said.

RickThai

Originally Posted by RickThai

What is also interesting about this thread was how many "homosexual/homosexual supporters" attacked me by calling me a "latent homosexual or a poof". That indicates to me that on a sub-conscious level, that they really believe homosexuality is a bad thing. Think about it.

I thought about it and came to the conclusion that someone saying you are a latent homosexual is not an attack, more a belief gained due to your attitudes

think about it

Originally Posted by Eliminator

Out of context and you can do all the greasing you want, seems that is what you're into. Surely not what I look for but more power to you

It wasn't me that mentioned greasing up, but scream all you want

Originally Posted by Eliminator

Hope you can have an easier time with your bowel movements after you're finished.

oh dear; is that another of your fetishes?

Originally Posted by DrAndy

Originally Posted by RickThai

Actually, I do think that is pretty disgusting and deviant as well. I guess I'm just not an "educated Westerner".

nothing to do with education, more to do with being sympathetic to people who are discriminated against

Originally Posted by RickThai

to believe that they have the right to speak their opinions without being attacked.

Of course you have a right to your opinions, whether they are based on fact or hearsay

however, if your opinion is blatant discrimination based on predujice, then you will get attacked

think about it

and consider this as well; there are many homosexuals, male and female, who do not indulge in the sexual practices that make you shudder in horror

are they to be painted with the same brush? maybe before you condemn someone for being a homosexual, you should ask them what they do

Dr. Andy,

I never stated that I hated homosexuals, or that they should be discriminated against.

I stated that I personally, felt that anal sex between homosexuals is disgusting, and that homosexuality was probably the result of some sort of disorder. I also stated that it was a deviant form of sex and unnatural.

I believe homosexual adults should be allowed to marry if they chose to. As far homosexuals adopting children, I don't believe that is necessarily in the child's best interest. I also believe that churches have the right to not perform homosexual marriages if they chose not to.

My point is that people have a right to express criticisms of homosexuality or any topic without being "brow beat" by the left.