Thread: Homophobia - Progressive Intimidation?

Originally Posted by RickThai

It had nothing to do with you being attracted to me. Duh!

Missed the part where homophobes are also c.u.n.ts, eh?

You are painfully stupid, Rick.

Originally Posted by hazz

let me explain rick

the simple fact is that you hate and fear gays; the depth to which you hold these emotions tells us that this goes well beyond the simple belief that homosexuallity is immoral and wrong.


Essentially you see all gay men as deviants and immoral but at the same time you find yourself attracted to them. Unable to reconcile these two contradictory feelings, you have redirected your self loathing and hatred into a deep hatred of these men who tempt you into immorality; in order to preserve your self-esteem.

Your gay, just accept it and learn to live it. You might then be able to become a real Buddhist by ridding yourself of the strong emotions and materialism that bind you to this world... preventing you from reaching nirvana.
I am somewhat shocked that as a Buddhist you are unaware of one of the most basic teaching of this religion.

hazz,

You need to learn to read the post my closely. Nowhere did I state homosexuals were immoral. I just stated that homosexuality was un-natural (think basic biology/precreation - the natural reason for male to female sexual attraction).

I actually have friends that are gay (just as I have friends that are liberal). I just don't think about their sexuality (much like having a friend who is missing an arm or a leg - you just don't bring it up).

As far as Buddhism, I know I have a long way to go to find nibbana. As the Lord Buddha taught, a layman should adhere to the 5 precepts and practise following the 8-fold Noble Path. As long as a person is speaking the truth (as he/she perceives it) and some good can come from this truth, than that person is practising "Right Speech".

Can any good come from someone stating that homosexuality is un-natural and may be attributed to some disorder?

I think yes. What I find frightening is that children are growing up thinking "men buttfukcing other men" and "giving each other blowjobs" is just another safe, healthy alternative to human sexuality. Liberals are playing a high stakes game with their childrens psyche and don't seem to realize it.

Also, if homosexualiy is studied as a disorder, than perhaps a cure can be found. That is a good thing IMO.

Santi,

RickThai

Originally Posted by RickThai

I just stated that homosexuality was un-natural (think basic biology/precreation - the natural reason for male to female sexual attraction).

Aren't Buddhist monks celibate?

Very un-natural if you ask me.

It seems as though Rick's issue is with anal sex itself.

I presume you have never had anal sex with a living organism, Rick?

Originally Posted by RickThai

Also, if homosexualiy is studied as a disorder,

So the fact that all the marvelous medical minds in the world don't, hasn't had any baring on your though process then?

Perhaps you should give them a ring and let them know Rick says they are wrong.

Originally Posted by The Ghost Of The Moog

It seems as though Rick's issue is with anal sex itself.

I presume you have never had anal sex with a living organism, Rick?

I was going to bring up woman fucking men up the ass using strap ons, but I think it may push him over the edge.

I guess we shouldn't tell gayboy that consuming human shit is a genuine medical treatment, that used to send Git into apoplexy.

Originally Posted by hazz

I guess we shouldn't tell gayboy that consuming human shit is a genuine medical treatment, that used to send Git into apoplexy.

Hazz: have you ever partaken of anal sex with a woman?

homosexuality, that is the physical attraction of same sex individuals, not necessarily a sexual act, is actually the norm for humans.

the sexual act is actual irrelevant, you could have a platonic love for another individual without sharing any physical intimacy

some men have sexual admiration for others without disclosing their emotions or acknowledging it's an homosexual emotion

therefore gayness is normal, and shouldn't be feared

Originally Posted by Aberlour

By definition, most people believe homosexuality to be an "accepted social standard" so it is you who is deviating from "usual or accepted standards" by having an issue with it.

Not true
it's just the latest debating plot the Politically correct are taught to bleat,

they will try and say there's only 6 or 7 people against same sex weddings in USA etc -
or climate change is decided , 656565 scientists accept it while 4 disagree etc

-IN thier patronising way that they think people will join in because they don't
want to be the odd one out .

Homophobia is real ! its good and it's healthy
and cleverly installed by natural selection / mother nature to help keep us safe .

It's a great way of helping people naturally avoid gays , especially young boys , whom gays are likely to abuse as most puffs have paedophiles inclinations .

Gays are like dog shit ,which is stinking and disease riddled , but protective mother nature offers a helping hand : and people have a phobia- a revulsion for the foul smelling dog muck, and so stay well away from it and thus avoid harm.
Similarly boys avoid been abused by gays if thier homophobia alerts them to keep well , well away .
Homophobia is helpful to adults too , as crossing the street when you see a gay mincing towards you , saves you letting out an involuntary laugh eg at thier prancing ponciness , and thus avoids you been arrested on a hate crime charge .

Also homophones are better equipped to avoid catching AIDS, as alarm bells would ring at the first sight of a faggot , long before they get in the reeking danger zone of the stinking gays HIV pong .

In a perfect world homophobes themselves would be protected by strict hate crime laws ,and any queers aggravating thier medical condition would be arrested and sent to secure medical centre to be cured of thier homosexuality .

In conclusion , gays are filthy , disgusting, boring , hysterical , noisy , shrieking unstable paedophiles and thus are best totally avoided .


This public information advice was brought to you by
blue
president of Homophobes Without Borders

Originally Posted by The Ghost Of The Moog

Originally Posted by hazz

I guess we shouldn't tell gayboy that consuming human shit is a genuine medical treatment, that used to send Git into apoplexy.

Hazz: have you ever partaken of anal sex with a woman?

I must admit that the pleasures of giving and receiving anal and oral sex are alien to me, but I don't see what the issue is some people have with those who do. My best guess is that its a hangover from that catholic sex is original sin thing, ok if its for making little catholics as long as you don't enjoy it... but otherwise very bad.

YouTube

Originally Posted by hazz

I must admit that the pleasures of giving and receiving anal and oral sex are alien to me,

.

No oral sex?

You should consider putting it on your 'to do' list. It's quite passable.

Giving has never appealed and I am not trusting enough to accept ; Ive seen The Graduate I know what the score is

So Rick, a couple of questions you need to answer.

How is possible that you don't approve of gay men because it's un-natural in the sense that woman and men are designed to be together to reproduce, yet you don't have a problem with lesbians who are also unable to reproduce in a natural way? How is that not highly illogical and hypercritical? Aren't you making a mockery of your own ideals?

Secondly, why is it that all the medical geniuses in the world don't consider homosexuality as something that can be treated as a disease, yet you do?

Is that not you, implying that you know more than all the best medical minds in the world?

Originally Posted by blue

Homophobia is real ! its good and it's healthy
and cleverly installed by natural selection / mother nature to help keep us safe .

It's a great way of helping people naturally avoid gays , especially young boys , whom gays are likely to abuse as most puffs have paedophiles inclinations .

Gays are like dog shit ,which is stinking and disease riddled , but protective mother nature offers a helping hand : and people have a phobia- a revulsion for the foul smelling dog muck, and so stay well away from it and thus avoid harm.
Similarly boys avoid been abused by gays if thier homophobia alerts them to keep well , well away .
Homophobia is helpful to adults too , as crossing the street when you see a gay mincing towards you , saves you letting out an involuntary laugh eg at thier prancing ponciness , and thus avoids you been arrested on a hate crime charge .

Also homophones are better equipped to avoid catching AIDS, as alarm bells would ring at the first sight of a faggot , long before they get in the reeking danger zone of the stinking gays HIV pong .

In a perfect world homophobes themselves would be protected by strict hate crime laws ,and any queers aggravating thier medical condition would be arrested and sent to secure medical centre to be cured of thier homosexuality .

In conclusion , gays are filthy , disgusting, boring , hysterical , noisy , shrieking unstable paedophiles and thus are best totally avoided .


This public information advice was brought to you by
blue
president of Homophobes Without Borders

You see what kind of people share your beliefs Rick!

Scary huh?

All Men are ugly looking,never could and never will understand how a male can be sexy attractive.

Originally Posted by wasabi

All Men are ugly looking,never could and never will understand how a male can be sexy attractive.

Don't agree with that myself Wasabi. I'm as straight as they come, but I don't have a problem saying another bloke is good looking.

You can say somebody is attractive without it inferring that you are attracted to them yourself.

If I could look like someone else, I would like to look like a young Tom Berenger. That was one good looking mother fucker, don't have a problem saying it.

I don't like the modern terms "bromance" and "man crush" myself, but there is nothing wrong with a bloke having a huge amount of respect and admiration for another bloke. What man doesn't "love" his best buddies that he grew up with? I do.

People who don't have any doubts about their own heterosexuality, shouldn't be worried for one second about saying that they love another bloke or they think that they are good looking.

Originally Posted by Aberlour

So Rick, a couple of questions you need to answer.

How is possible that you don't approve of gay men because it's un-natural in the sense that woman and men are designed to be together to reproduce, yet you don't have a problem with lesbians who are also unable to reproduce in a natural way? How is that not highly illogical and hypercritical? Aren't you making a mockery of your own ideals?

Secondly, why is it that all the medical geniuses in the world don't consider homosexuality as something that can be treated as a disease, yet you do?

Is that not you, implying that you know more than all the best medical minds in the world?

No the real question is rick, when did you start noticing you fancied men far more than women and what made it so hard for you to accept this?

Originally Posted by hazz

No the real question is rick, when did you start noticing you fancied men far more than women

The same time he turned to Buddhism I reckon.

Originally Posted by Aberlour

you don't have a problem with lesbians who are also unable to reproduce in a natural way?

You haven't thought the whole issue through have you ....

A women who has an orgasm during or after the man ejaculating is much more likely to be fertilised , as the orgasms causes ripples , which the sperm 'surf' on , all the way to the egg .
So if the man is a 2 pumps and a squirt merchant , no chance of the lady having an orgasm .
Enter another lesbian , they get each other steamed up , so when the man enters they do orgasm increasing thier fertility.
So perhaps lesbians do have a role in sexual reproduction , and thus the trait being slightly beneficial in evolutionary terms is passed on .

In short all lesbians are is a warm up act , while the man finishes his beer..

Originally Posted by Aberlour

Secondly, why is it that all the medical geniuses in the world don't consider homosexuality as something that can be treated as a disease, yet you do?

If they are so clever why can't they even pinpoint what causes the male defect of homosexuality?
Perhaps its not a disease , could be : a mental illness ,a demon , a birth defect ,or just a lack of testosterone in the womb ?
But still homos are tax payers and humans ( although not very good ones ) and they deserve to have thier problems addressed , the same as any other sick person .
shame on the medical profession if they not not prepared to face down Political correctness and offer treatment.

It wouldn't surprise me if you were beating off to gay porn, right this second Blue.

I regard my current position as comfortably homophobic. I am undeniably homophobic.
But I don't let that get in way of my normal perception of others.
If blue gets turned on by gay porn why should we deny him that small pleasure?

^ Could you possibly make two sentences more contradictory than that if you tried? I couldn't