No it doesn't. Because you don't have very much, just incredibly dull word salads. But your annoying stupidity is enough to earn you reds.Quote:
Originally Posted by Chico
Printable View
No it doesn't. Because you don't have very much, just incredibly dull word salads. But your annoying stupidity is enough to earn you reds.Quote:
Originally Posted by Chico
Yeah, posting dumb shit on the IntraGoogles and having it called dumb shit isn't really much of an achievement.
Oh my! That's almost too much irony for one day.....Quote:
Originally Posted by AntRobertson
:aus:
Q.E.D.
Shut up ya runt!Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Earl
She's done.
How will prego master react to this news? Prego Master must be depressed today :(
FBI Examining Hillary Clinton Emails Found in Anthony Weiner Probe
The FBI is examining additional emails related to Hillary Clinton‘s use of a private email server four months after closing its investigation, the bureau’s director said in a letter to lawmakers on Friday, a surprise twist in a turbulent campaign just 11 days before election day.
In a note to congressional committee chairs, FBI director James Comey said that the FBI had discovered additional emails relevant to the investigation into Clinton’s server and agents were examining the emails to determine whether they contain classified information.
The newly discovered emails were found on at least one device belonging to longtime Clinton aide Huma Abedin and her husband, former congressman Anthony Weiner, as part of an investigation into Weiner’s sexting scandal, multiple news outlets reported citing law enforcement officials.
“In connection with an unrelated case, the FBI has learned of the existence of emails that appear to be pertinent to the investigation,” said Comey. “I am writing to inform you that the investigative team briefed me on this yesterday, and I agreed that the FBI should take appropriate investigative steps designed to allow investigators to review these emails to determine whether they contain classified information, as well as to assess their importance to our investigation.”
There was no additional information about what information the emails contain or how long the investigation could take.
Clinton called on the FBI to release all the information it had about the additional emails.
“We are 11 days out from perhaps the most important national election in our lifetimes. Voting is already underway in our country,” Clinton told reporters hours after Comey’s letter became public. “So the American people deserve to get the full and complete facts immediately. [Comey] himself has said he doesn’t know whether emails referenced in his letter are significant or not. I’m confident, whatever they are, will not change the conclusion reached in July.”
Abedin and Weiner separated after it was reported in August that the former congressman allegedly sent sexually suggestive photos to a minor. Previously, Weiner sent lewd photos to women on numerous occasions, ending his career in Congress and his subsequent campaign for New York City mayor in two separate scandals.
The FBI found the additional Clinton emails as part of an investigation into Weiner’s alleged habits, news outlets reported.
Clinton’s use of a private email server during her time as Secretary of State has become a central issue of the campaign. After a months-long investigation, the FBI decided in July not to recommend criminal charges against Clinton, saying there was no prosecutorial precedent for doing so.
At question in the investigation was the former secretary of state’s handling of classified information. The FBI found that in a handful of instances, classified email was discovered on Clinton’s personal server, but that they were not clearly marked as classified.
The additional emails are a political pitfall for Clinton, whose campaign had hoped to coast into election day with a sizable victory after watching Donald Trump’s campaign slowly collapse under the weight of sexual assault allegations and erratic statements.
On Friday, Clinton’s campaign chairman said that the FBI should promptly release more detailed information about the emails, calling it “extraordinary” that to “see something like this just 11 days out from a presidential election.”
“The Director owes it to the American people to immediately provide the full details of what he is now examining,” said campaign chairman John Podesta. “We are confident this will not produce any conclusions different from the one the FBI reached in July.”
Trump’s campaign manager, Kellyanne Conway gloated about the revelation on Friday afternoon.
HECK, I WOULD TOO!!!
More
Hillary Clinton: FBI Reopening Email Investigation
Stupidity you say,now here's stupidity in its enormity.Quote:
Originally Posted by Humbert
You have two goons running for president.
Hilary goon has been found to be corrupt,though because of the Washington elite gets away with it time and time again.The same woman has been totally and utterly humiliated by her husband, though supports women's rights.
Donald Goon is also a total scum bag,though Donald has touched a nerve,that has sent the elite into overdrive to try and destroy him.
The absurdity of the situation is like watching a Thai soap opera.
The same people on this thread have become unhappy with certain remarks made about your political system, though the very same people shake there head in disbelief at the goings on in Thai politics.:)
Finally if your country is so good what the fuck are you all doing over here.
Learn to laugh at your own stupidity gentleman.:)
a basket of vegetables ?Quote:
Originally Posted by slackula
putin , dribbles , shoots , scoresQuote:
Originally Posted by IsaanBoy
It is remarkable what the Clintons have gotten away with!
The Cold Clinton Reality - WSJQuote:
House, and voters who want to know what this portends should examine the 12-page memo written by a Clinton insider that was hacked and published Wednesday by WikiLeaks. This is the cold, hard reality of the Clinton political-business model.
Longtime Clinton aide Doug Band wrote the memo in 2011 to justify himself to lawyers at Simpson, Thacher & Bartlett who were reviewing his role and conducting a governance review of the Clinton Foundation at the insistence of Chelsea Clinton. In an email two weeks earlier, also published on WikiLeaks, Ms. Clinton said her father had been told that Mr. Band’s firm Teneo was “hustling” business at the Clinton Global Initiative, a regular gathering of the wealthy and powerful that is ostensibly about charitable activity.
Poor innocent Chelsea. Bill and Hillary must never have told her what business they’re in. If she had known, she would never have hired a blue-chip law firm to sweep through the hallways of the Clinton Foundation searching for conflicts of interest. Instead of questioning Mr. Band’s compensation, she would have pleaded with him never to reveal the particulars of his job in writing.
But she didn’t, and so Mr. Band went ahead and described the “unorthodox nature” of his work while emphasizing his determination to help “protect the 501(c)3 status of the Foundation.” That’s the part of the tax code that has allowed the Clinton Foundation to remain tax-exempt on the premise that it is dedicated to serving humanity.
Mr. Band graciously copied John Podesta, then adviser to the board, who would eventually become Hillary’s campaign chief. His helpful reply was to suggest that Mr. Band “strip the defensive stuff out” and later “go through the details and how they have helped WJC” [ William Jefferson Clinton].
The Band memo reveals exactly what critics of the Clintons have long said: They make little distinction between the private and public aspects of their lives, between the pursuit of personal enrichment, the operation of a nonprofit, and participation in U.S. politics.
Mr. Band writes that he and his colleague Justin Cooper “have, for the past ten years, served as the primary contact and point of management for President Clinton’s activities—which span from political activity (e.g., campaigning on behalf of candidates for elected office), to business activity (e.g., providing advisory services to business entities with which he has a consulting arrangement), to Foundation activity.”
This excerpt and all the potential conflicts it describes, plus Chelsea’s warning about business “hustling” at foundation events, would seem more than ample cause to trigger an IRS audit of the foundation. For that matter, why aren’t the IRS and prosecutors already on the case? Any normal foundation has to keep records to show it is separating its nonprofit activity from any for-profit business.
Mr. Band’s memo confirms that donors were not seeking merely to help the sick and the poor. He explains that the Clinton Foundation had “engaged an array of fundraising consultants” over the past decade but “these engagements have not resulted in significant new dollars for the Foundation.” In other words, it wasn’t working as a conventional charity.
Mr. Band then explains how he and his Teneo partner Declan Kelly had to carry the fundraising load, and did so by packaging foundation solicitations with other services such as a meeting with Bill Clinton, $450,000 speeches or strategic advice. Many of the donations, from U.S. companies like Coca-Cola and Dow Chemical and foreign firms like UBS and Barclays, occurred while Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State.
Why exactly were donors writing checks? The Band memo makes clear that donations untied to additional Clinton or Teneo services weren’t all that appealing to potential supporters. This is significant, because the large grant-making foundations in the U.S. are almost entirely run by Clinton voters. So you know they weren’t turned off by the brand name. They’d contribute more if they thought they were also buying goodwill and influence with a current Secretary of State and a potential future President.
***
We don’t applaud WikiLeaks or the theft of information, and these hacks deserve a firm U.S. government response. But the emails are public and they will confirm for many Americans their worst suspicions about the people who run their government.
It’s also worth noting that in the vast digital trove of Mr. Podesta’s stolen emails we haven’t noticed emails from Mrs. Clinton. Perhaps they don’t exist. But American voters shouldn’t worry merely about the emails released before the election. What emails or memos exist that these hackers, Russian or not, could be withholding for leverage after the election with another President Clinton?
The Clinton campaign has suggested that Donald Trump has praised Vladimir Putin because the Russian has something on the Republican. The question is what do any number of possible bad actors know about Bill and Hillary Clinton’s mixing of business, charity and politics?
What crime has she been 'found' guilty of. There isn't a shred of evidence that she is corrupt.Quote:
Originally Posted by Chico
What the fcuk does my location have to do with anything you imbecile?Quote:
Originally Posted by Chico
The emails in question did not belong to Hillary. You seem to be jumping to a conclusion that they contain some new damning evidence about classified material. As far as the election goes, it doesn't change a thing. She will win and win big.Quote:
Originally Posted by IsaanBoy
If you haven't been back to the USA lately, perhaps you have not actually witnessed the unfolding social catastrophy in American cities.Quote:
Originally Posted by Humbert
The wealthy are happy as as clams in thier gated communities, while the hired militarized police are rounding up homeless people in hoards.
All brought to courtesy of 8 years of Obama!
A vote for Hillary is a vote for more of the same, preferential treatment for a wealthy elite.
You progressives shoulda listiened to Bernie more.
:rolleyes:
The one who should be wearing an orange jumpsuit is the politicized piece of shit FBI Director. Hope he enjoys his last couple of months in the job.
^I agree. His tenure is all but over. He really has demonstrated total incompetance.
I was in the US for a month fairly recently. And the drama you are hyperventilating about has been going on for decades. Nothing new. Neither wealth nor poverty and homelessness can be pinned on Obama. Only a complete idiot could make that kind of generalization.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Earl
Try looking at the Clinton foundation, and see where all the donations came from.Quote:
Originally Posted by Humbert
She has been implicated and very close to certain associates, whitewater whitewashed by certain elements and there partners pardoned.
Jeez the list goes on.
Finally you live now in Thailand if you love your country so much you should be back there, and then you wouldn't have to listen to people,who now refer to the world leader as a world joke.
You really should look past your rose coloured glasses and see the political class for what it really is.
Seriously shut the fcuk up. You sound like Za and the other nationalists on here.Quote:
Originally Posted by Chico
QUOTE=Humbert;3384522]I was in the US for a month fairly recently. And the drama you are hyperventilating about has been going on for decades. Nothing new. Neither wealth nor poverty and homelessness can be pinned on Obama. Only a complete idiot could make that kind of generalization.[/QUOTE]Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Earl
Like it or not amigo; homelessness is on the rise under the faux social welfare; courtesy of Obama.
You progressive muppets really aren't paying much attention, it seems!Quote:
Many of America’s largest cities continue to grapple with rising food insecurity and homelessness, according to a report released by the U.S. Conference of Mayors on Tuesday. The latest iteration of the non-partisan group’s annual Hunger and Homelessness Survey found that homeless shelters and food pantries across 22 U.S. cities are struggling to keep up with rising demand for their services.
It is in Washington, D.C., Seattle, and Los Angeles where homelessness was found to have increased the most sharply over the past year. The largest increase came in Washington, D.C., where the number of people experiencing homelessness rose by 28 percent and the number of homeless families went up by 60 percent. Meanwhile, requests for emergency food assistance in the city rose by 27 percent during the same period.
Overall, across the 22 cities included in the survey, homelessness increased by 1.6 percent over the past year, the survey found. The amount of emergency food assistance distributed by those cities increased by three percent. The cities surveyed included Chicago, Baltimore, Philadelphia and San Francisco.
As in prior years, officials from those cities identified low wages and a shortage of affordable housing as major factors contributing to hunger and homelessness. A growing number of cities over the past three years have sought to address poverty by raising wages, spurred in part by a series of nationwide strikes and protests from fast-food employees and other low-wage workers. Over the course of 2015, 14 U.S. cities and states — including Los Angeles, the state of New York, and Massachusetts — have approved $15 minimum wage rules for some or all workers, according to a Monday press release from the National Employment Law Project.
The estimated number of homeless people nationwide has declined steadily since 2007, according to the federal Department of Housing and Urban Development. However, the number of people in shelters has remained roughly consistent, and many urban areas have seen homelessness rise.
Hunger, meanwhile, has remained consistently elevated nationwide since the Great Recession. The budget for food stamps has nonetheless been significantly tapered over the last few years, including by a $5 billion across-the-board benefits cut that took place in November 2013.
Some cities did see a marked decrease in homelessness, including San Francisco, which saw a 15 percent drop in the number of homeless people within city limits. The Conference of Mayors did not elaborate on the reasons for the decline, but applauded an “exemplary” city initiative called the Navigation Center, which offers temporary housing to homeless individuals and has them work with case managers to find a more permanent solution.
Hunger, Homelessness on the Rise in US Cities | Al Jazeera America
:deadhorsebig:
I can see that you are out of your depth and seriously uninformed. The Clinton Foundation accepts donations from all types of donors. The source of the donations has nothing to do with the serious good work that the foundation provides. If a moral or political litmus test was required for charitible givers a lot of assistance and aid would not exist.Quote:
Originally Posted by Chico
Ash Carter is another hopeless idiot I'll be glad to see the back of.Quote:
Originally Posted by Humbert
Well, maybe Trump and his Republican cohorts should get out of the way and let legislation for a nationwide minimum wage get passed by congress like your article suggests.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Earl
ye certainly does and many donors are related to arms sales.Quote:
Originally Posted by Humbert
Hilary is the true warmonger which benefits the foundation.
I think you are scared why don't you Just admit it?Quote:
Originally Posted by bsnub
Christ, can you get a friend to provide a translation?:rofl:Quote:
Originally Posted by Chico
:rofl:Quote:
Originally Posted by RPETER65