Fixed that for ya so nobody would confuse your original statement with a fact.Quote:
Originally Posted by Boon Mee
Printable View
Fixed that for ya so nobody would confuse your original statement with a fact.Quote:
Originally Posted by Boon Mee
I thought everyone knew the CIA were gun runners.
Wassup Booners, forgotten Iran-Contra already?
Do you "have no recollection" of that?
:rofl:
Are you joking? He's got a 'huge' man-crush on Ollie North.Quote:
Originally Posted by harrybarracuda
Benghazi night call between Clinton and Obama withheld, documents show
Closing in on Hillary - heh
New documents released by a federal court show President Obama called then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton on the night of the 2012 Benghazi attack -- but the contents are being withheld by the State Department.
It had previously been disclosed that Clinton and Obama spoke the night of the terror attacks. But the documents offer additional information about the timing of the call -- after the initial attack on the U.S. consulate, but before the second wave where mortars hit the nearby CIA annex and killed former Navy SEALs Ty Woods and Glen Doherty.
The contents of the call, however, are being withheld, not because the information is classified but because the administration claims they represent internal deliberations about the 2012 terror assault.
The claim comes as Clinton also faces accusations that she withheld Benghazi-related emails from her private server in the trove of emails handed over to the State Department.
The contents of the call were only shared with Obama's and Clinton's closest aides. Deputy National Security Adviser Ben Rhodes sent an email on the call to State Department officials Jake Sullivan and Philippe Reines, and National Security Council spokeswoman Bernadette Meehan.
The email was released as part of an ongoing lawsuit by conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch.
The email on the Obama-Clinton phone call bears the subject line, "Call." The text of the email says, "Readout of President's Call to Secretary Clinton," but the rest of the details are fully redacted. The State Department cited the so-called "B5" exception for internal deliberations."
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/inte...nghazi-attack/
The money quote:
Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said in a statement: "It is little wonder that Mrs. Clinton and the entire Obama administration have fought so hard to keep these documents from the American people -- they shine a spotlight on the administration's incompetence and indifference. All evidence now points to Hillary Clinton, with the approval of the White House, as being the source the Internet video lie."
Benghazi night call between Clinton and Obama withheld, documents show | Fox News
Coincidence that 5 looks just like S. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Boon Mee
Susan Rice has a lot to answer for as well. :yup:
Well that clears that up.
(Another 20,000 equally thrilling pages here)Quote:
Exemption 5 of the FOIA protects "inter-agency or intra-agency
memorandums or letters which would not be available by law to a party other than
an agency in litigation with the agency." (1) The courts have construed this somewhat
opaque language, with its sometimes confusing threshold requirement, (2) to "exempt
those documents, and only those documents that are normally privileged in the civil
discovery context." (3)
Although originally it was "not clear that Exemption 5 was intended to
incorporate every privilege known to civil discovery," (4) the Supreme Court
subsequently made it clear that the coverage of Exemption 5 is quite broad,
encompassing both statutory privileges and those commonly recognized by case
law, and that it is not limited to those privileges explicitly mentioned in its legislative
history. (5) Accordingly, the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit has
stated that the statutory language "unequivocally" incorporates "all civil discovery
rules into FOIA [Exemption 5]." (6) However, this incorporation of discovery privileges
requires that a privilege be applied in the FOIA context exactly as it exists in the
discovery context. (7) Thus, the precise contours of a privilege, with regard to
applicable parties or the types of information that are protectible, are also
incorporated into the FOIA. (8)
Proof!!!! There it is!!!!!
Benghazi
Benghazi
Benghazi
Benghazi
Benghazi
Benghazi
BREAKING: Obama Admin Knew Al-Qaeda Was Planning Attack in Benghazi 10 DAYS IN ADVANCE
They lied....imagine that!
https://teakdoor.com/images/smilies1/You_Rock_Emoticon.gif
They said it was a “protest” not a terrorist attack.
https://teakdoor.com/images/smilies1/You_Rock_Emoticon.gif
Now there’s more proof that they lied.
The Obama administration knew al-Qaeda was planning an attack in Benghazi to “kill as many Americans as possible” ten days in advance.
Judicial Watch reported:
Judicial Watch announced today that it obtained more than 100 pages of previously classified “Secret” documents from the Department of Defense (DOD)and the Department of State revealing that DOD almost immediately reported that the attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi was committed by the al Qaeda and Muslim Brotherhood-linked “Brigades of the Captive Omar Abdul Rahman” (BCOAR), and had been planned at least 10 days in advance. Rahman is known as the Blind Sheikh, and is serving life in prison for his involvement in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing and other terrorist acts. The new documents also provide the first official confirmation that shows the U.S. government was aware of arms shipments from Benghazi to Syria. The documents also include an August 2012 analysis warning of the rise of ISIS and the predicted failure of the Obama policy of regime change in Syria.
The documents were released in response to a court order in accordance with a May 15, 2014, Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit filed against both the DOD and State Department seeking communications between the two agencies and congressional leaders “on matters related to the activities of any agency or department of the U.S. government at the Special Mission Compound and/or classified annex in Benghazi.”
Spelling and punctuation is duplicated in this release without corrections.
A Defense Department document from the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), dated September 12, 2012, the day after the Benghazi attack, details that the attack on the compound had been carefully planned by the BOCAR terrorist group “to kill as many Americans as possible.” The document was sent to then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, then-Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Obama White House National Security Council. The heavily redacted Defense Department “information report” says that the attack on the Benghazi facility “was planned and executed by The Brigades of the Captive Omar Abdul Rahman (BCOAR).” The group subscribes to “AQ ideologies:”
The attack was planned ten or more days prior on approximately 01 September 2012. The intention was to attack the consulate and to kill as many Americans as possible to seek revenge for U.S. killing of Aboyahiye ((ALALIBY)) in Pakistan and in memorial of the 11 September 2001 atacks on the World Trade Center buildings.
“A violent radical,” the DIA report says, is “the leader of BCOAR is Abdul Baset ((AZUZ)), AZUZ was sent by ((ZAWARI)) to set up Al Qaeda (AQ) bases in Libya.”
JW: Obama Admin Knew About Benghazi Before It Happened
BREAKING: Obama Admin Knew Al-Qaeda Was Planning Attack in Benghazi 10 DAYS IN ADVANCE - The Gateway Pundit
How 'bout them little green apples, eh? Told ya so...:chitown:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boon Mee
Appears to me "they" knew 1 day after the attack. Nothing in the text supports the headline.Quote:
Originally Posted by Boon Mee
Rice however either lied or was ignorant of the DIA report. Either inexcusable.
The following couple of paragraphs seem to dispute your position:
A Defense Department document from the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), dated September 12, 2012, the day after the Benghazi attack, details that the attack on the compound had been carefully planned by the BOCAR terrorist group “to kill as many Americans as possible.” The document was sent to then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, then-Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Obama White House National Security Council. The heavily redacted Defense Department “information report” says that the attack on the Benghazi facility “was planned and executed by The Brigades of the Captive Omar Abdul Rahman (BCOAR).” The group subscribes to “AQ ideologies:”
The attack was planned ten or more days prior on approximately 01 September 2012. The intention was to attack the consulate and to kill as many Americans as possible to seek revenge for U.S. killing of Aboyahiye ((ALALIBY)) in Pakistan and in memorial of the 11 September 2001 atacks on the World Trade Center buildings.
Pgs. 394-398 (396) from JW v DOD and State 14-812 - Judicial Watch and JW: Obama Admin Knew About Benghazi Before It Happened
Just saying...
May well have been butQuote:
Originally Posted by Boon Mee
The report was sent to the Obama administration after the attack. Hence the headline is BS. Just saying.....Quote:
Originally Posted by Boon Mee
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boon Mee
Well, perhaps the headline is jumping the gun so to speak although the smoking gun re Clinton/Obama knowing the consulate would be targeted has not been revealed as yet. HRC and her henchmen are doing their collective damndest to keep that knowledge from going public.
This drip, drip, drip must be really fun for them though! :D
BM you ever thought about going back the USA and being a activist.?:)
The CIA as well as other agencies provide the POTUS with "daily," Security reports and briefings. As well the Secretary of State is briefed along with the Presidential cadre and congressional representatives.
It would seem almost impossible that this security data was not previously reported to all concerned. Then I'm not Oliver Stone either...:rolleyes:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Norton
Quote:
Originally Posted by Norton
Good grief - you are shown to be wrong again. The headline is wrong . . . but in true style you still go on about . . . perhaps . . .Quote:
Originally Posted by Boon Mee
Groan
Benghazi
Benghazi
Benghazi
BenghaziBenghazi
BenghaziBenghazi
BenghaziBenghazi
BenghaziBenghazi
BenghaziBenghazi
BenghaziBenghazi
Benghazi
^
Nihogg used hold the title of Pendantic Bastard but you've eclipsed him by light years.
The imprisionment of the video maker on trumped up charges and all the rest of these sordid details still don't resonate with you Obama Lapboys?
https://teakdoor.com/images/imported/2015/07/239.jpg
He violated his parole conditions, how is that 'trumped up'?Quote:
Originally Posted by Boon Mee
^ Yeah, but he reckons the "libs" are the liars, Democrats low class, and the progressives are "low information voters." The irony.
Actually pretty much everyone supports the lie part...but nobody wants to prosecute the guilty. Checked Hillary's truth index lately have you? If you had you surely wouldn't make such a statement.Quote:
Originally Posted by misskit
^Hairy, you're the one who is fixated on fox not me. I come by my opinions all by myself...no need for training these days mate.
Slow Saturday in Muslim land eh Hairy?
It's certainly the case with these see, hear & speak no evil of HRC that they refuse to recognize her cupability in the death of her ambassador and the others in Benghazi. Obama too as he had hit the sack early that night to be up & fresh for Vegas, baby!
Hairy, Misskit & the rest of the LIPS (low information posters) aboard here are the embodiment of the 'deny 'till you die' attitude. Sweep it all under the carpet and hope those LIV's don't wake up.