Thread: 9/11 was an inside job

Originally Posted by Pragmatic

Are you sayin that the 5 Mossad agents who were arrested after being seen filming the attacks on 9/11 never existed. What actually is your take on it then? Honestly. Educate me. You never come up with any other explanation other that everyone's a 'whackjob'.

The only people who said they were Mossad agents were whackjob websites. They were five blokes working for a moving company who took pictures of the towers - by your logic anyone who filmed the towers on the day is a Mossad agent. They were detained, interrogated and released.

You gullible fucking twit.

This is just typical of the irrelevant stories that whackjobs fill out with fluff and claim it to be "evidence" that, in this case, "The Joooos done it".

You lot are hysterical.

Pay attention to the mural on the side of the Israelis van.

Harry "The lady doth protest to much" Barracuda.

50k posts. Nothing but disinformation. A sell-out paid shill, earns his money from the US military industrial complex.

Nuff said.

^Good find Prag, bang on target.

Originally Posted by The Shining Light

Harry "The lady doth protest to much" Barracuda.

50k posts. Nothing but disinformation. A sell-out paid shill, earns his money from the US military industrial complex.

Nuff said.


^Good find Prag, bang on target.

I suspect their may be some truth in what you say? its just not possible for anyone to be as dumb as Harry

of course it was Mossad,

Originally Posted by The Shining Light

Harry "The lady doth protest to much" Barracuda.

50k posts. Nothing but disinformation. A sell-out paid shill, earns his money from the US military industrial complex.

Nuff said.

^Good find Prag, bang on target.

Fuck off pseudopussy you silly cunto.

Originally Posted by Pragmatic

Which was a Mossad front and the owner did a bunk back to Israel the day after 9/11 as I recall

If I recall correctly. All 5 failed a polygraph test.

You seem to do a lot of "recalling" of shit that only ever appeared on whackjob websites.

And now you have all the other whackjobs all excited.

Harry, the forums news enema

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

And now you have all the other whackjobs all excited.

Harry, for christ sake, the mural on the side of the van gives the game away. How long would it take to paint a mural on the side of the van? How did they know exactly what to paint? The removal firm was an ideal cover to store the explosives prior to being planted in the towers. Someone gets caught with tons of explosives and nobody does jail time? Come on Harry, no one's going to laugh at you cuz couldn't see the light in the beginning. Sorry couldn't help that. Just admit you've been wrong.

For Harry who can't be bothered to watch videos.

Originally Posted by Pragmatic

Which was a Mossad front and the owner did a bunk back to Israel the day after 9/11 as I recall

If I recall correctly. All 5 failed a polygraph test.

I don't know the details of who went where when and why, but I would be surprised if there were many front line Mossad agents that couldn't pass a polygraph, seeing as that would be a natural part of their training; or to put it another way, what odds for 5 Mossad agents to all fail a polygraph?

The truth is out there, somewhere, buried deep among erroneous conclusions from selective facts pimped by a few to feed the many. - Someone

The photo of the van appears to come from this Wordpress blog, which has a disclaimer saying it is photoshopped: an "artist's impression" based on the alleged report.
Create a visual to "illustrate" a possible (or fictional) event.
Visual becomes the evidence that possible (or fictional) event truly occurred.



Peculiar that not a single actual image exists ... just these two "artist's impressions" repeated forever

It does all stink, and is collectively very compelling.
However, the mountains of evidence are all just collections of circumstantial evidence, unfortunately.
When one considers that the greater the crime, the greater the efforts to cover it would be tenfold true in this conspiracy, we should expect that if any solid evidence exists, the holder of that evidence would be in the gravest of danger if he/she revealed it. We should also expect that any solid evidence would have been destroyed by now.
We can only hope that a secret recording, a forgotten/overlooked email, a random photo of an indiscreet meeting etc might surface.

Prag, it's in the conspiracist's best interest to completely discard the nutter stuff. For example, is the mural on the side of the van real? It seems highly unlikely and could very well be shopped. Why would they go to the trouble of getting that mural in such a highly covert operation? It doesn't make sense at all. That's not to say the Israelis are innocent. I reckon they're in it up to their necks, but "compelling" BS is still BS and doesn't serve the cause at all, in fact harms it.


Edit: ^ there we go.

Originally Posted by prawnograph

The photo of the van appears to come from this Wordpress blog, which has a disclaimer saying it is photoshopped: an "artist's impression" based on the alleged report.

If you listen to the police radio calls you will hear the officers describing the van with a mural of a plane, on its side, flying into the twin towers.

So these super secret Mossad agents took the time to paint a mural of the conspiracy they were planning to commit on the side of a removal van, a photoshopped pic of which has become evidence...

Seems legit.

Originally Posted by Pragmatic

If you listen to the police radio calls you will hear the officers describing the van with a mural of a plane, on its side, flying into the twin towers.

This is the downside of the modern internet. It is possible to convince gullible fucking muppets of almost anything.

The police describe the van quite clearly at 4 min 25 sec into the video, post #8305. You can't get better evidence than a eye witness that is a policeman.

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

photoshopped pic of which has become evidence...

What photoshopped evidence. Where's the proof? Oh yeah Pawnograph published some pictures with no link so it must be true.

Do you honestly believe a bunch of Mossad agents were driving around New York in a van with a picture of planes flying into the twin towers?

Are you *really* that stupid?

Originally Posted by Pragmatic

If you listen to the police radio calls you will hear the officers describing the van with a mural of a plane, on its side, flying into the twin towers.

That's interesting and really needs verification because as I said above, it's so very unlikely that secret agents, or even hired stooges hired to record the event would advertise their mission. Unless they had money to waste and were stupid, and had prior knowledge.
Lets disect this a bit. Hired stooges wouldn't have been told what was going to happen. Secret agents wouldn't be so stupid as to paint evidence of their forknowledge on the side of the van they were driving.



An interesting angle would be what was the footage they recorded. Did recording start before the first impact?

Keep in mind, this argument is only wrt the mural, not that the Israelis existed and were there and filmed the event.
As I say, you have to filter out the BS and the unlikely stuff to make the compelling facts stand out more.

Originally Posted by Pragmatic

The police describe the van quite clearly at 4 min 25 sec into the video, post #8305. You can't get better evidence than a eye witness that is a policeman.

Yeah because no-one fakes shit in Youtube videos, do they?

Originally Posted by Maanaam

That's interesting and really needs verification

An early candidate for "TD Understatement of the Year" there Maanaam.

Originally Posted by Maanaam

An interesting angle would be what was the footage they recorded. Did recording start before the first impact?

Eyewitnesses reported them just after the first plane struck. Also in a TV interview when they arrived home they claimed they only went to document the event. So in doing so they must have had prior knowledge. The video they took is now classified.
Also the van they used tested positive for having had explosives in it.