View Poll Results: Was 9/11 an inside job - 2016 TD poll

Voters
19. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    13 68.42%
  • No

    5 26.32%
  • Not sure

    1 5.26%
  1. #7426
    Thailand Expat
    redhaze's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Just south of Uranus
    Posts
    3,167
    Quote Originally Posted by Dragonfly
    and trying and failing to make a case doesn't mean it wasn't part of their objective in the first place
    So they were smart enough to pull off the biggest hoax in the history of mankind, yet just totally forgot to build any case whatever to achieve their objective as a part of that process. That's what you're going with

    Kill yourself. Seriously

  2. #7427
    Thailand Expat
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Last Online
    16-07-2021 @ 10:31 PM
    Posts
    14,636


    redhaze conservation logic: failed again, four in a row

    When they burn the reishtag, were they sure they would succeed in their take over ? of course not,

    same same here, 911 happened, American NeoCons retards (like you apparently) thought that would be enough to take over and go to Iraq, but that wasn't enough. They did suceed with the Patriot Act and the widespread surveillance of Americans though (despite claiming otherwise, another lie again)

    still failing to understand ? kill yourself and fuck the body

  3. #7428
    Thailand Expat
    redhaze's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Just south of Uranus
    Posts
    3,167
    I suggest we all collectively decide to just close the thread right now.

    Very flailing display on your part Butters. Pretty embarrassing

  4. #7429
    Thailand Expat
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Last Online
    16-07-2021 @ 10:31 PM
    Posts
    14,636
    told you it would be too much for your little brain to take

  5. #7430
    Thailand Expat
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Last Online
    16-07-2021 @ 10:31 PM
    Posts
    14,636
    Quote Originally Posted by redhaze
    we all collectively decide to just close the thread right now
    another conservative MO, when the facts are disturbing their fragile logic, close down the discussion.

    Thanks for demonstrating your complete stupidity here, maybe you could vote for Trump next time

  6. #7431
    Thailand Expat AntRobertson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    41,562
    Quote Originally Posted by redhaze
    Very flailing display on your part Butters. Pretty embarrassing
    Butters will argue at length that up is down and then - in the face of incontrovertible evidence it actually isn't - will just turn around and tell you that he was saying that left is right all along and that somehow you're the one that has been saying backwards is forwards.

    It's pointless trying to debate him. Amusing, but pointless.

  7. #7432
    Member

    Join Date
    May 2017
    Last Online
    19-11-2023 @ 04:41 AM
    Posts
    967
    The evidence of thermite at the WTC.
    Thermite can cut structural steel as needed for a demolition.

    1. Molten metal: There are numerous photographs and eyewitness testimonies to the presence of molten metal at the WTC, both in the buildings and in the rubble. No legitimate explanation has been provided for this evidence other than the exothermic reaction of thermite, which generates the temperatures required and molten iron as a product.

    2. The fires at Ground Zero could not be put out for several months. Despite the application of millions of gallons of water to the pile, several rainfall events at the site, and the use of a chemical fire suppressant, the fires would not subside. Thermal images made by satellite showed that the temperatures in the pile were far above that expected in the debris from a typical structure fire. Only thermite, which contains its own oxidant and therefore cannot be extinguished by smothering it, can explain this evidence.

    3. Numerous eyewitnesses who were fleeing the area described the air mass as a hot wind filled with burning particles. This evidence agrees with the presence of large quantities of thermite byproducts in the air, including hot metallic microspheres and still-reacting agglomerates of thermite.

    4. Numerous vehicles were scorched or set on fire in the area. Photographic evidence shows that cars parked within the lower-level garage areas of the WTC complex burned as if impacted by a super-hot wind like that described by the eyewitnesses. All non-metallic parts of the cars, including the plastic, rubber, and glass, were completely burned off by a hot blast.
    5. There was a distinct “white smoke” present—clearly different from smoke caused by a normal structural fire—as indicated by eyewitnesses and photographic evidence. The second major product of the thermite reaction is aluminum oxide, which is emitted as a white solid shortly after reaction.
    6. Peer-reviewed, scientific research confirmed the presence of extremely high temperatures at the WTC. The high temperatures were evidenced by metallic and other microspheres, along with evaporated metals and silicates. These findings were confirmed by 9/11 investigators and by scientists at an independent company and at the United States Geologic Survey.
    7. The elemental composition of the metallic microspheres from the WTC dust matches that of metallic microspheres produced by the thermite reaction.
    8. The environmental data collected at Ground Zero in the months following 9/11 indicate that violent incendiary fires, like those produced by thermite, occurred on specific dates. Peer-reviewed scientific analysis of these data show that the components of thermite spiked to extraordinary levels on specific dates in both the air and aerosol emissions at Ground Zero.
    9. Carbon nanotubes have been found in the WTC dust and in the lungs of 9/11 first responders. Formation of carbon nanotubes requires extremely high temperatures, specific metal catalysts, and carbon compounds exactly like those found in nanothermite formulations. Researchers have discovered that nanothermite produces the same kinds of carbon nanotubes. That finding has been confirmed by independent analysis in a commercial contract laboratory.
    10.A peer-reviewed scientific publication has identified the presence of nanothermite in the WTC dust. One of the critical aspects of that paper has been confirmed by an independent scientist. A visual comparison between nanothermite residues and particles found in the WTC dust is remarkable.


  8. #7433
    Thailand Expat harrybarracuda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    96,555
    Fucking whackjobs, they never give up do they?


  9. #7434
    Member

    Join Date
    May 2017
    Last Online
    19-11-2023 @ 04:41 AM
    Posts
    967
    Quote Originally Posted by harrybarracuda View Post
    Fucking whackjobs, they never give up do they?

    That's it, answer the question with stupidity.

  10. #7435
    I'm in Jail

    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Last Online
    14-12-2023 @ 11:54 AM
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    13,986
    ^ Hi Albert.

    The thing is : the whackjobs continue to post the same stuff.

  11. #7436
    Thailand Expat
    redhaze's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Just south of Uranus
    Posts
    3,167
    The video leads with "there was an explosion in the lobby, then a plane hit". That's the lead-in.

    Funny how thousands of people escaped the WTC before the buildings fell, unharmed, through a "blown up" lobby. Which apparently none of them actually saw, they actually just reported a normal, non-blown up lobby.

    Yet, that's what the 30 minute video starts with.

    A five year old could see the problem here.

  12. #7437
    god
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Bangladesh
    Posts
    28,210
    ^ Explain, or describe what your hypothetical five year old could see as the problem with explosions in the WTC tower lobby.

    Are you denying NY firefighter testimony that the explosions occurred?

  13. #7438
    god
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Bangladesh
    Posts
    28,210
    Quote Originally Posted by harrybarracuda View Post
    Fucking whackjobs, they never give up do they?

    Fwk off shill.

    You still haven't come up with an explanation for that wing part found lodged behind the new Muslim centre WTC,...ya know,...the one they couldn't match to any damned plane that ever flew...

  14. #7439
    Member

    Join Date
    May 2017
    Last Online
    19-11-2023 @ 04:41 AM
    Posts
    967
    Quote Originally Posted by redhaze View Post
    The video leads with "there was an explosion in the lobby, then a plane hit". That's the lead-in.

    Funny how thousands of people escaped the WTC before the buildings fell, unharmed, through a "blown up" lobby. Which apparently none of them actually saw, they actually just reported a normal, non-blown up lobby.

    Yet, that's what the 30 minute video starts with.

    A five year old could see the problem here.
    No, the video leads with witnesses saying it wasn't a civilian plane that hit the tower as it had no windows on the side, it looked like a military plane with no markings.
    After that one fireman mentions a bomb, perhaps because all the windows were blown out in the lobby.
    As said in the video enclosed they were told it was flaming jet fuel shooting down the elevator shaft. The lobby wasn't looking normal when the firemen entered.

  15. #7440
    god
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Bangladesh
    Posts
    28,210
    How much jet fuel was the hypothetical airliner carrying?

    Far less than full capacity of 8,300 gallons (imp).

    Anyway, upon impact, any fuel would have been atomized and diffused into the surrounding atmosphere as spray and microdroplets, resulting in an explosive, self consuming fireball leaving very little to flow down the tower.

    So, no fuel sufficient to cause a major explosion ever reached the lobby.

    Neither did any remain after the initial explosion to cause a fire sufficient to melt steel.

    End of story.
    “Is it not written in your Law, ‘I said, you are gods’? John 10:34.

  16. #7441
    Thailand Expat harrybarracuda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    96,555
    Since my last post, yet more fabricated nonsense to which these pathetic little basement dwellers cling like their mothers' very nipples.


  17. #7442
    god
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Bangladesh
    Posts
    28,210
    Quote Originally Posted by harrybarracuda View Post
    Since my last post, yet more fabricated nonsense to which these pathetic little basement dwellers cling like their mothers' very nipples.
    Says the once proud Brit now a kafr slave in a sandpit.

  18. #7443
    Thailand Expat harrybarracuda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    96,555
    Quote Originally Posted by ENT View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by harrybarracuda View Post
    Since my last post, yet more fabricated nonsense to which these pathetic little basement dwellers cling like their mothers' very nipples.
    Says the once proud Brit now a kafr slave in a sandpit.
    Hmmmm wonder if Kunta Kinte was on my package?


  19. #7444
    Thailand Expat
    Klondyke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Last Online
    26-09-2021 @ 10:28 PM
    Posts
    10,105
    The pictures of the plane penetrating the tower structure reminds me of a French movie I saw many years ago - Le passe-muraille, a man (Bourvil) walking through the walls...



  20. #7445
    Member

    Join Date
    May 2017
    Last Online
    19-11-2023 @ 04:41 AM
    Posts
    967
    Quote Originally Posted by ENT View Post
    How much jet fuel was the hypothetical airliner carrying?

    Far less than full capacity of 8,300 gallons (imp).

    Anyway, upon impact, any fuel would have been atomized and diffused into the surrounding atmosphere as spray and microdroplets, resulting in an explosive, self consuming fireball leaving very little to flow down the tower.

    So, no fuel sufficient to cause a major explosion ever reached the lobby.

    Neither did any remain after the initial explosion to cause a fire sufficient to melt steel.

    End of story.
    So what blew all the windows out in the lobby?

  21. #7446
    Member

    Join Date
    May 2017
    Last Online
    19-11-2023 @ 04:41 AM
    Posts
    967
    Quote Originally Posted by harrybarracuda View Post
    Since my last post, yet more fabricated nonsense to which these pathetic little basement dwellers cling like their mothers' very nipples.

    Jeez, have you thought of applying for a role in the upcoming remake of 'Deliverance'?
    Herbert Coward's too old to play his part again.


  22. #7447
    Thailand Expat Pragmatic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Last but who gives a shit.
    Posts
    13,316
    Sorry cancel.
    Last edited by Pragmatic; 01-07-2017 at 09:20 PM.

  23. #7448
    god
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Bangladesh
    Posts
    28,210
    Quote Originally Posted by Crestofawave View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ENT View Post
    How much jet fuel was the hypothetical airliner carrying?

    Far less than full capacity of 8,300 gallons (imp).

    Anyway, upon impact, any fuel would have been atomized and diffused into the surrounding atmosphere as spray and microdroplets, resulting in an explosive, self consuming fireball leaving very little to flow down the tower.

    So, no fuel sufficient to cause a major explosion ever reached the lobby.

    Neither did any remain after the initial explosion to cause a fire sufficient to melt steel.

    End of story.
    So what blew all the windows out in the lobby?
    It wan't a few gallons of kerosene dribbling down (impossible) in the heat.

  24. #7449
    Thailand Expat harrybarracuda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    96,555
    I see ENT is determined to keep his place as chief teakdoor whackjob, despite the pathetic attempts of the multinicing Albert and other noobs to usurp his position.


  25. #7450
    Member elche's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Last Online
    19-09-2021 @ 01:19 AM
    Posts
    974
    Crestofawave and ENT ... you've got it all wrong. You haven't gone far enough with your conspiracy theory. 9/11 didn't happen, just like the moon landings and the holocaust didn't happen. You can find videos all over Youtube to prove it and more. All those pics of planes crashing and buildings burning are all fake.



    It's big bad communist government getting inside your head again. That's what happens when you take off your tinfoil hat. Keep your tinfoil hat on for christ's sake.

Page 298 of 350 FirstFirst ... 198248288290291292293294295296297298299300301302303304305306308348 ... LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •