Quote Originally Posted by Latindancer View Post
On the contrary, Bob. We have examined the evidence most thoroughly in this and other threads. I myself kept an open mind about other possibilities as much as possible for a long time. There is in fact some evidence which seems ambiguous at first. We debated but ENT and Albert proved that they cannot debate in a reasonable fashion.

The fact is ENT and Albert continuously shot themselves in the foot. Sloppy thinking, even complete lack of reasoned analysis, ad hominem attacks, accusations of OTHER people making ad hominem attacks, ENT posting links to, and quoting, every looney theory under the sun. Etc. Morphing, indeed ! Micro-nuclear attack on the WTC, indeed !

So let's call a spade a spade, OK ? They had their chance and blew it.
Total waffle.

Neither you nor anybody on the forum "examined the evidence".. bloody dreamer!!

Posting articles or pics and videos doesn't constitute posting evidence,....but in your Walter Mitty world you imagine yourself as an examiner of evidence, even an erudite examiner thereof! But you're not, neither are your little clique of shills, harrybarry, humbert, floridaborn et al.

What drug are you on?