Thread: 9/11 was an inside job

Originally Posted by bsnub

Some old tin foil retards here.

Ahhh Bsnub - pull up a chair and grab a hat

Originally Posted by Your name here

So only in cartoons would a 3300 kg Rolls-Royce RB211-535E4 engine hitting a wall at 400 knots not even leave a mark?

Yeah - that's a cracker

Another detailed thesis coming soon

I always found it amazing the way the "pilot" managed to duck down, knock over some short lamposts, then with no wings (surely they would of smashed to fuck on the poles no ) pull the plane back up without touching the ground , and then sneak in through a groundfloor window.



Fucking laughable

The word is apt in most cases.

it's never apt. It's a word which has two functions. One is as a get out of jail free card. If I'm a sheeple, you have no need to engage with my arguments. Albert's utterly absurd claims about the Daily Mail faking the picture are no doubt safe (in his mind) from criticism because the people who point out how nonsensical his views are are just sheeple, so why bother with what they say? The second is to give the speaker a pleasant little psychological boost. If I'm a sheeple, you're not. You're some grand truth-seeking hero--someone who can look into the blinding light of reality, whereas us lesser mortals flinch away. Both of these uses are, of course, ridiculous. There's absolutely no virtue in this kind of childish, idiotic self-deception; it's just pathetic and contemptible.

Originally Posted by Albert Shagnastier

So this thread in a minute way helps to keep the info available.

WHAT info ????
Don't you mean that it keeps the SUBJECT alive ? Because all the information points to the official story being correct....apart from foreknowledge and profiteering by a select few, of course. But you get that...

Are you referring to THIS engine ?



Or perhaps THESE photos ?

https://www.google.com.au/search?q=p...Q&ved=0CB8QsAQ

Or perhaps an entire, exhaustive investigation into the subject of engines ?

Aerospaceweb.org | Ask Us - Pentagon & Boeing 757 Engine Investigation

How about eyewitness accounts ?
9/11 Pentagon Eyewitness Accounts

Originally Posted by Zooheekock

Albert's utterly absurd claims about the Daily Mail faking the picture are no doubt safe

I never said that.
However, without a shadow of a doubt there is so much obvious visual and witness discrepancy with the official story that it is hugely possible that it was not the plane they said it was.

No fuck off you sheep.

Originally Posted by Albert Shagnastier

Originally Posted by Zooheekock

Albert's utterly absurd claims about the Daily Mail faking the picture are no doubt safe

I never said that.
However, without a shadow of a doubt there is so much obvious visual and witness discrepancy with the official story that it is hugely possible that it was not the plane they said it was.

No fuck off you sheep.

That's a bit rich coming from a lemming.

Originally Posted by Albert Shagnastier

knock over some short lamposts, then with no wings (surely they would of smashed to fuck on the poles no )

No.

You have just displayed your complete lack of understanding of simple physics and aircraft construction.


All you have so far said is to repeat that to you, it seems "obvious".

For the youth to be aware of it and thus be able to prevent it from progressing and eventually take back their planet - they have to know about it.

The same shitheads who perpertrated this mass multiple-genocide are eager for the kids to forget and buy their shit (materially and mentally)

So this thread in a minute way helps to keep the info available.

You see - always the hero of the narrative. What a fucking loser you are, Albert. Spinning ludicrous fairy tales like this to try to pull together a little self-worth.

^^Please go on.

In fact, please describe the final...hmmmm let's say 5 minutes of the journey and flightpath.

You can't can you

If you can - post it up and I'll rip it to pieces

Originally Posted by Albert

I never said that.

Originally Posted by Albert

Who thinks this image has been photoshopped? I reckon it has

No. You never said it was faked. You said you thought it had been photoshopped, which obviously means something entirely different.

^I was asking a question you language assisting spastic.

[quote]Who thinks this image has been photoshopped? I reckon it has[quote]

[quote]I was asking a question[quote]

Yes. And what else? There's something after the question. Can you see it? What do you think it is, Albert? Any ideas?

My opinion

I tell you what Zoe you cock - I don't want to waste time fighting with you. You are a well known cvnt and I wouldn't waste my time - as you understand fvck-all about the day and have no knowledge on the info available.
So fvck off you utter turd

My opinion

Yes. And what's your opinion? That the Daily Mail photoshopped the picture, which is another way of saying

the Daily Mail fak(ed) the picture

There we go. Your apology is accepted.

Originally Posted by Albert Shagnastier

I tell you what Zoe you cock - I don't want to waste time fighting with you. You are a well known cvnt and I wouldn't waste my time - as you understand fvck-all about the day and have no knowledge on the info available.
So fvck off you utter turd

That's what we like to see....superior debating skills....well done Albert.....

OH...about those Chomsky tapes.....were you going to give us an opinion on the content. Been waiting a while.....

Originally Posted by koman

That's what we like to see....superior debating skills....well done Albert.

It get's tiring resoning with you monkey's - everynow and then I get a bit aggi. Sorry

Originally Posted by koman

OH...about those Chomsky tapes.....were you going to give us an opinion on the content. Been waiting a while

Do you have anything in particular you want to ask my opinion on, because I skimmed them to be honest

Originally Posted by Albert Shagnastier

Do you have anything in particular you want to ask my opinion on, because I skimmed them to be honest

Now we're getting to the truth of things. It seems that you skim a LOT, Albert. It's called "confirmation bias".

Originally Posted by Albert Shagnastier

If you can - post it up and I'll rip it to pieces

Hilarious. You haven't refuted or ripped up ANYTHING on this thread or others....because you haven't entered into rational, analytical debate. Ever, that I remember.

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

That's a bit rich coming from a lemming.

That's even richer coming from a cockroach.

I don't want to waste time fighting with you.

Quite right. You have much bigger battles to fight - only you have the power to destroy the Empire, Luke.

Originally Posted by Albert Shagnastier

Do you have anything in particular you want to ask my opinion on, because I skimmed them to be honest

What? You skimmed a Chomsky video on 9/11. Skimmed your hero while dwelling fanatically on conspiracy sites? Try not skimming...listen carefully while he trashes just about everything you and your buddies keep going on about. I just wonder why he would do that in the face of the kinds of "evidence" you keep producing that the whole thing was faked. Could Noam be a Sheeple too....?

Originally Posted by Albert Shagnastier

It get's tiring resoning

Yes, that does show.....

Originally Posted by Latindancer

Hello my names LD and I'm a dunce.

Originally Posted by Latindancer

Hilarious. Of course I can't answer your question - because I'm thick as pig shit

Well quite.

Originally Posted by koman

What? You skimmed a Chomsky video on 9/11. Skimmed your hero while dwelling fanatically on conspiracy sites? Try not skimming...listen carefully while he trashes just about everything you and your buddies keep going on about. I just wonder why he would do that in the face of the kinds of "evidence" you keep producing that the whole thing was faked. Could Noam be a Sheeple too....?

1: He could be very wrong - by the way, what year were those talks?
2: He's a darkside agent