^er no arry, I scanned it the other day at 2400dpi from an original copy of the daily mail which came out on the 14th September 2001.
Same picture
First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.
Newspaper print is often less than 100 dpi. You've scanned that and blown it up to 2400 dpi and you're wondering why it's not a perfect image? FFS. The micro-nukes were at least funny. This is just stupid.
^Haven't you got some kindergarten papers to mark? - more your level mate
Original source probably 72 dpi. Scanning at a high resolution does not increase the amount image information. Ridiculous to think otherwise.Originally Posted by Zooheekock
No. I'm busy working on a book on phonology at the the moment but my time is all my own so I can spare you five minutes. Now, if you take a very low-resolution image of a silver-gray object against a silver-gray background and blow it up enormously, what would expect to find? Hidden evidence of the Zionist Occupation Government or just that the picture isn't very detailed? I'm going to go for the latter but then I'm not an educationally sub-normal psychotic so I suspect our choices may not be the same.
It's obvious to me that they are too close in color hue to the building background itself to be seen clearly when viewed at such shit resolution. Did you think the evil Bushies vaporized them with a cosmic laser?Originally Posted by Albert Shagnastier
Albert, you really, really are a complete fuckwit.
I think it's time you accepted it.
^^ Right. But you either have a completely obvious, boring, everyday, run-of-the-mill explanation like that or you can have a ludicrously baroque conspiracy involving the coordinated but secret actions of millions of people BUT if you do this, you get to cast yourself in the role of valiant knight, fighting alone for The Truth and doing endless battle with the forces of darkness. For some loons (Albert, ENT, etc.) the appeal of that self-image is clearly too great to resist.
Agreed. We now have consensus.
And this is how the "I love my Govt" fools think they look.
This is more like it.
And you wonder why the "nut job" conspiracy theorists call you "sheeple"
On the contrary, Bob. We have examined the evidence most thoroughly in this and other threads. I myself kept an open mind about other possibilities as much as possible for a long time. There is in fact some evidence which seems ambiguous at first. We debated but ENT and Albert proved that they cannot debate in a reasonable fashion.
The fact is ENT and Albert continuously shot themselves in the foot. Sloppy thinking, even complete lack of reasoned analysis, ad hominem attacks, accusations of OTHER people making ad hominem attacks, ENT posting links to, and quoting, every looney theory under the sun. Etc. Morphing, indeed ! Micro-nuclear attack on the WTC, indeed !
So let's call a spade a spade, OK ? They had their chance and blew it.
Last edited by Latindancer; 23-09-2014 at 03:00 PM.
What a stunningly dumb post. Really scraping the bottom pal.Originally Posted by beazalbob69
You've lost when you have to resort to tired Nazi cliches.
Well it would have been a little different, wouldn't it. Perhaps it might have lost a little in rhetorical impact. I've no idea why but typically, people, however they feel about the awfulness of the various wars started by the British and Americans, don't respond to pictures of The Royal Hussars in the same way that they respond to pictures of the Waffen fucking SS.I could have posted good ole' American or British soldiers lined up the same exact way would that have been better?
Here we go!
Same shit different Country. Sheeple. Fight and die for their glorious leaders that lie and steal and kill the people that fight for their agendas.
I'm not saying it was Aliens, but it was Aliens!
There can't be many words which so instantly mark the speaker. You may as well hold up a sign saying 'Beware - Monomaniacal fruit loop nearby. Keep at a safe distance at all times. Under no circumstances should you respond to the muttering.'...Sheeple...
I think they keep a 'nic for each personality you know.
Funnily enough, I've read most of this thread - and I agree with you. But then, that is the whole point of disinformation isn't it (on a public anonymous forum)?Originally Posted by beazalbob69
That's the point. The official story is obviously bullshit.Originally Posted by beazalbob69
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)