Thread: 9/11 was an inside job

Ho hum.....seen this numerous times on this and other threads (why do they mislead us by showing a different pic in the still image above ?).

Originally Posted by TonyBKK

overwhelming evidence shows a plane hit the Pentagon on 911.

Overwhelming evidence? - what, apart from an actual plane you mean?

Tony CIA - TD's very own shill.

Originally Posted by Albert Shagnastier

Originally Posted by TonyBKK

overwhelming evidence shows a plane hit the Pentagon on 911.

Overwhelming evidence? - what, apart from an actual plane you mean?

Tony CIA - TD's very own shill.

Ah ha - I see it now. It's tucked just behind the huge big cable real that is amazingly untouched from the wing and engine that took it out, dragging it through the building to obliteration.

Yup - thanks for clearing that up - Huge big plane there for all to see.

Nice one.

Again: Scroll up for pictures showing debris, engine parts, etc.

That these dumb fools just cannot accept because of their rabid case of cognitive dissonance.

Originally Posted by Latindancer

Originally Posted by pseudolus

the huge big cable real

When someone spells it "real" instead of "reel", I seriously doubt their education and analytical abilities.....


Take a look back through this thread and check out some of the photos (of inside the Pentagon) and reasoned arguments.

Yes sir. Sorry sir. I agree with you based upon predictive text typing.

Show the film of the crashing plane please. THanks

Originally Posted by TonyBKK

It was a firestorm – a war zone. Our Pearl Harbor – ``The Big One.’

What a load of dribble.
Just another piece of hyped up Washington Post sensationalism.

AA flt 77 didn't get anywhere near the Pentagon that day, nor crash into it.

AA Flt 77 was scheduled to fly and did on;
Sept. 10 2001 AA 77 Destination Los Angeles; scheduled departure time 8:10am; Tail # N632AA; Actual departure time. 8:09am.

AA FLlt 77 was not scheduled to fly on;
Sept. 11 2001 AA 77 Destination Los Angeles; scheduled departure time 8:10am Tail # UNKNOWN Actual departure time 0:00

http://www.bts.gov/cgi-bin/ntda/oai/...rLevSel=DetSta

Why? No tail number assigned before take off no take off time!


NO phone calls were possible on cell phones from the alleged plane, as it was allegedly traveling at 450 mph and at around 25,000 ft, it was going far too high and too fast.

I know it's a tall order, a real big ask,...but maybe you could give science and the lads at Palisades some credit for their honest work and declaration that no seismograph for miles and milers around picked up any signals even remotely resembling a plane crash at the Pentagon.


No plane crashed at the Pentagon.......science rules.



Or are you a believer?

Originally Posted by Latindancer

We've been through it all before, actually. I presented a lot of evidence by and about eyewitnesses. Following which I came to the conclusion (once again) that ENT... focuses on detail to the Nth degree and has no real sense of proportion.

And it pisses you right off that someone can shove those little details up yer nose, proving you out to lunch and wrong nearly all of the time.

Originally Posted by pseudolus

Originally Posted by Latindancer

Originally Posted by pseudolus

the huge big cable real

When someone spells it "real" instead of "reel", I seriously doubt their education and analytical abilities.....


Take a look back through this thread and check out some of the photos (of inside the Pentagon) and reasoned arguments.

Yes sir. Sorry sir. I agree with you based upon predictive text typing.

Show the film of the crashing plane please. THanks

He's a total aspie pedant, can't stand a hair out of place, totally neurotic, forgive him.

And what about all the witnesses from such varied backgrounds, including firemen? Shills ?

Originally Posted by Latindancer

And what about all the witnesses from such varied backgrounds, including firemen? Shills ?

Absolutely not you Joey.

Here are NYC firemen saying that the buildings were blown up and that the site was full of molten metal (only possible due to the thermite used to blow the buildings)

^^ Yup, all cooks and shills.

Seismographs don't lie.

U.S. Bureau of Transportation Statistics didn't lie.

AA didn't lie.

No AA Flt 77 flew into the Pentagon.

Proven, by USGS Palisades Observatory, US Bureau of Transport Statistics and American Airlines.

Originally Posted by Latindancer

And what about all the witnesses from such varied backgrounds, including firemen?

Although I am a little a feared to respond here now, I would like to point out that a lot of the testimony from firemen (the few who happened to the be in the area) rests upon a Capt Jim Ingledue, who ever since that fateful day has continued to elaborate on his visions and finds, including a perfectly unscathed ID card for Suzanne Calley, a couple of days after the crash and fireball. Her grieving husband was handed back her as new drivers license and wedding ring as well, also in immaculate condition. Guess she had one of those fireproof handbags or something. Cool.

Originally Posted by Butterfly

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ

that's right harry, keep dreaming

Another perfect disciple of the American Dream (you have to be asleep to believe it).

^^

Originally Posted by Latindancer

Ho hum.....seen this numerous times on this and other threads (why do they mislead us by showing a different pic in the still image above ?).

That's the Etihad Airbus that some plonker stuck in a wall.

Originally Posted by Albert Shagnastier

Originally Posted by Latindancer

And what about all the witnesses from such varied backgrounds, including firemen? Shills ?

Absolutely not you Joey.

Here are NYC firemen saying that the buildings were blown up and that the site was full of molten metal (only possible due to the thermite used to blow the buildings)

But they're all blithering, attention seeking saddos like you.

Now I know you're retarded harry - but try really hard - do you notice a difference?

Originally Posted by Albert Shagnastier

Now I know you're retarded harry - but try really hard - do you notice a difference?

Er, unsurprisingly yes. I was merely pointing out where the original picture came from.

Are you a bit thick or something, or do you see some paranoid hidden meaning in that?

If so, please share it.

My, you are a desperate bell end.

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Er, unsurprisingly yes. I was merely pointing out where the original picture came from.

Yes, but in your own very "special" way you defeated yourself.

Jog-on you muppet

That's odd. I was chatting with some friends at the pool today, about various things when one mentioned that a street in NYC was being named after one of the 911 first responders...a Muslim. Usual moans followed, but that's for another thread if anyone bothers, which they probably shouldn't because some skanky mods believe such types of threads belong in TDH.

Then we got to 'where were you when', someone asked me, I told them, Bond Street, Dixons, PC witch ranting with accusations that I must be a racist for telling my mate it's the Muslims while the first plane footage kept repeating, then ran out crying and screaming when the second plane arrived.

Then another gave his poignant tale. He was working as a contractor about a mile from the Pentagon, outdoors, when his crew all heard a plane coming in - his own words - "real low. It must have been filled with kids, because we could see their faces in the windows."

His crew already knew about the towers, and his first thoughts were wtf there's no runway in this direction so it must be heading for the Pentagon. Then they heard the boom, saw the smoke, and no I did not lead, steer or coach him in any way.

Sorry mate, I'd rather believe him than your selective science.

End of, and I won't be wasting any more bandwidth on this thread.