9/11 was an inside job

**Tom Sawyer** · 27-04-2014, 09:40 PM

Harry the US paid-for troll? Probably a nice little earner. 40 days on 40 days off the shit-hole platform, doesn't matter, just keep spewing against those who keep asking difficult questions. Not much else to do in shit-hole rag-head land anyway..May as well earn some cash

**Albert Shagnastier** · 27-04-2014, 09:47 PM

Originally Posted by Tom Sawyer

Harry the US paid-for troll?

Spot on Tom.

When someone is dumb, you can forgive their ignorance. But when they are intelligent and still spout ridiculous shit - they are a shill.

That's Harry in a nutshell.

**TonyBKK** · 27-04-2014, 10:32 PM

Gawd this silly thread is still going? The tin foil is thick here, innit...

**TonyBKK** · 27-04-2014, 10:38 PM

Originally Posted by Latindancer

Originally Posted by Butterfly

when the US government tells him that a plane flew into the Pentagon,

I think the hundreds of witnesses told us this.

Careful now, don't let those pesky FACTS get in the way of a good conspiracy theory or the tinfoil hat brigade will be on you faster than you can say Lizard People!

**Albert Shagnastier** · 27-04-2014, 10:45 PM

Originally Posted by TonyBKK

Gawd this silly thread is still going? The tin foil is thick here, innit...

Originally Posted by TonyBKK

Careful now, don't let those pesky FACTS get in the way of a good conspiracy theory or the tinfoil hat brigade will be on you faster than you can say Lizard People!

Listen Tony CIA you muggy midget, stick to promoting your rubbish GT Rider site and crap US foreign policy like what you're paid for you twat

**harrybarracuda** · 28-04-2014, 03:10 PM

Originally Posted by Albert Shagnastier

Originally Posted by Tom Sawyer

Harry the US paid-for troll?

Spot on Tom.

When someone is dumb, you can forgive their ignorance. But when they are intelligent and still spout ridiculous shit - they are a shill.

That's Harry in a nutshell.

Intelligence is a trait that you unfortunately do not share.

**Butterfly** · 28-04-2014, 03:18 PM

Originally Posted by 9999

Butters in the nut job camp eh. What is a corporate conformist like this doing speaking out for the truth?

There is hope. Even the most unlikely of souls are starting to wake up.

I am hardly a corporate conformist, why would you get this idea ?

is it because I read economics and financial literature and have university degree ?

strange logic you have,

**Butterfly** · 28-04-2014, 03:20 PM

Originally Posted by Albert Shagnastier

When someone is dumb, you can forgive their ignorance. But when they are intelligent and still spout ridiculous shit - they are a shill.

Harry is neither, he is a teenageboy in an adult body, both hormones "dumb" and a follower of authoritative figures

he is a good boy actually

**harrybarracuda** · 28-04-2014, 03:21 PM

Originally Posted by Tom Sawyer

Harry the US paid-for troll? Probably a nice little earner. 40 days on 40 days off the shit-hole platform, doesn't matter, just keep spewing against those who keep asking difficult questions. Not much else to do in shit-hole rag-head land anyway..May as well earn some cash

What on earth are you babbling on about? What an idiot.

**Butterfly** · 28-04-2014, 03:22 PM

Originally Posted by TonyBKK

Careful now, don't let those pesky FACTS get in the way of a good conspiracy theory or the tinfoil hat brigade will be on you faster than you can say Lizard People!

so you believe in UFOs too ? how are you different from those conspiracy theorist nutters ?

**ENT** · 29-04-2014, 12:04 PM

Originally Posted by Latindancer

Originally Posted by Butterfly

when the US government tells him that a plane flew into the Pentagon,

I think the hundreds of witnesses told us this.

There were NO hundreds of witnesses to a non-existent plane flight into the Pentagon.
AA Flt 77 wasn't scheduled to fly that day.

There were hundreds of witnesses who did indeed see other aircraft in the vicinity, one large airliner was seen to fly low OVER the Pentagon.

The Pentagon didn't even know what time the alleged crash occurred and had to ask Palisades observatory to check its seismographic records to tell them!!!

You see, two Pentagon wall clocks stopped at around 9.32 am that day, but the purported "airliner crash" didn't happen until 9.38 (Pentagon stated, Wikipedia gives 9.37 am), 9.40 am, and 9.43 am, from other media, reportedly.

It turned out that all Palisades could do was to give a time of an electrical disturbance that occurred at the Pentagon at about 9.36 am., then, three minutes of continuous data shown starting at 09:36:30 EDT (13:36:30 UTC) 9.36 am.

That three minutes of continuous data was not generated by P waves, as expected from a plane crash, as occurred with the UA 93 event in Shanksville, it was described as "electrical disturbances". In their words;

"The largest signal at MVL at around 09:38:50 is probably generated by electrical disturbance."

So, no P waves, so, no plane crash or mighty explosions on the ground., so none at the Pentagon, but plenty of P waves at WTC, a series of explosions registered for WTC 1, 2 and 7, as well as the basement of NY Customs house, WTC, where several tons of explosives were stored.

Now, who's story are you going to believe, the Pentagon's, CNN, other media, Palisades observatory, or the stopped wall clock?

The Pentagon heliport clock didn't lie, it stopped at 9.31.30 am.
Palisades seismographs don't lie either, they recorded the largest signal much later at 9:38:50 am.

Something occurred at the earlier time of (circa) 9.32 am to stop those clocks, but it couldn't have been an airliner crash, as the timing is wrong, according to Rumsfeld, who indicated a time of 9:38 am.

Between that early time and 9:38:50 am, a load of electrical signals were picked up from the Pentagon, but no explosion registered.

Strange? Only if you ignore the fact that USA's been developing new electronic technology for its military.

Final statement from Palisades?

"There is no clear seismic signals which can be associated with the airplane crash into the Pentagon."

http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/...C_PENT_KIM.htm

**harrybarracuda** · 29-04-2014, 01:29 PM

And we're back to ENT being a seismologist again, and quoting the usual looney tunes websites.

**** YAWN ****

Fuck this thread should have been DH'd a long time ago, it's just going round in circles.

One cultist bumps it and the rest of the Grange Hill Mob all start squealing the same old bullshit.

**ENT** · 29-04-2014, 01:39 PM

Irc

If you're so bored and disinterested in the topic, piss off shill.

**Butterfly** · 29-04-2014, 02:18 PM

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

And we're back to ENT being a seismologist again, and quoting the usual looney tunes websites.

**** YAWN ****

Fuck this thread should have been DH'd a long time ago, it's just going round in circles.

One cultist bumps it and the rest of the Grange Hill Mob all start squealing the same old bullshit.

then go back to your basement where your XBOX and Atari 2600 are waiting

**harrybarracuda** · 29-04-2014, 03:28 PM

Buttplug we know the only reason you're interested in UFOs is that you like anal probing.

**Latindancer** · 29-04-2014, 03:31 PM

STOP PRESS....Alert Alert....Sound The Klaxon Horns......

Various Pentagon Clocks Found To Be Not Synchronized......a Few Minutes Wrong !

**ENT** · 29-04-2014, 03:57 PM

Like more than15 mins wrong..

**Latindancer** · 29-04-2014, 04:22 PM

Originally Posted by ENT

You see, two Pentagon wall clocks stopped at around 9.32 am that day, but the purported "airliner crash" didn't happen until 9.38 (Pentagon stated, Wikipedia gives 9.37 am), 9.40 am, and 9.43 am, from other media, reportedly.

It turned out that all Palisades could do was to give a time of an electrical disturbance that occurred at the Pentagon at about 9.36 am., then, three minutes of continuous data shown starting at 09:36:30 EDT (13:36:30 UTC) 9.36 am.

Dear oh dear ! 9.32 till 9.43 ! Fully ELEVEN minutes discrepancy ! What is the world coming to ??

**leemo** · 29-04-2014, 06:52 PM

Someone help me out...if a missile flew hundreds of miles into the Pentagon it would need to be a pretty good shot unless it was fired my its owners under due protocol and hard/software. And then, wouldn't there be hundreds if not thousands of witnesses?

A plane flying off course is still a plane, but I imagine people would take note of a missile.

**Albert Shagnastier** · 29-04-2014, 06:57 PM

**Albert Shagnastier** · 29-04-2014, 07:00 PM

Originally Posted by leemo

Someone help me out...if a missile flew hundreds of miles into the Pentagon it would need to be a pretty good shot unless it was fired my its owners under due protocol and hard/software.

What if it was dropped from the plane that "flew over".

**Butterfly** · 29-04-2014, 07:12 PM

Originally Posted by leemo

if a missile flew hundreds of miles into the Pentagon it would need to be a pretty good shot unless it was fired my its owners

you are making too many assumptions here,

**Butterfly** · 29-04-2014, 07:15 PM

Originally Posted by Latindancer

Originally Posted by ENT

You see, two Pentagon wall clocks stopped at around 9.32 am that day, but the purported "airliner crash" didn't happen until 9.38 (Pentagon stated, Wikipedia gives 9.37 am), 9.40 am, and 9.43 am, from other media, reportedly.

It turned out that all Palisades could do was to give a time of an electrical disturbance that occurred at the Pentagon at about 9.36 am., then, three minutes of continuous data shown starting at 09:36:30 EDT (13:36:30 UTC) 9.36 am.

Dear oh dear ! 9.32 till 9.43 ! Fully ELEVEN minutes discrepancy ! What is the world coming to ??

how much would it be if you valve it ?

**ENT** · 29-04-2014, 07:18 PM

Originally Posted by Latindancer

Originally Posted by ENT

You see, two Pentagon wall clocks stopped at around 9.32 am that day, but the purported "airliner crash" didn't happen until 9.38 (Pentagon stated, Wikipedia gives 9.37 am), 9.40 am, and 9.43 am, from other media, reportedly.

It turned out that all Palisades could do was to give a time of an electrical disturbance that occurred at the Pentagon at about 9.36 am., then, three minutes of continuous data shown starting at 09:36:30 EDT (13:36:30 UTC) 9.36 am.

Dear oh dear ! 9.32 till 9.43 ! Fully ELEVEN minutes discrepancy ! What is the world coming to ??

So, it's not just a few minutes, it was 11 minutes.

Carry on.

**pseudolus** · 29-04-2014, 07:45 PM

Originally Posted by Albert Shagnastier

Originally Posted by leemo

Someone help me out...if a missile flew hundreds of miles into the Pentagon it would need to be a pretty good shot unless it was fired my its owners under due protocol and hard/software.

What if it was dropped from the plane that "flew over".

What if all it was doing was flying directly towards a homing beacon?

View Poll Results: Was 9/11 an inside job - 2016 TD poll

Thread: 9/11 was an inside job

Thread Tools

Display

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

Posting Permissions