Printable View
FlyFree, ENT leads people around in circles. You'll be lucky to escape an encounter with him having your sanity intact.
Bug off, ENT !
https://teakdoor.com/speakers-corner/...people.....jpghttps://teakdoor.com/speakers-corner/...people.....jpg
Your retardedness is tedious.
You've never seen that done nor done it yourself. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Latindancer
The analogy doesn't wash, we're talking of elastic metals, not brittle bricks.
Wings and tail and a plastic airliner nose cone won't cut through steel on impact, no matter what speed.
Have a go yourself, try punching a hole into even a wooden wall with a coke can, better still try using something softer like your head onto a brick wall at speed. :rofl:
PS. What's expeck? Don't try and say it's a typo either.
You did mention a couple of times that you're bad with numbers but your reading skills aren't very good either.Quote:
Originally Posted by AntRobertson
I reconstituted nothing, simply explained to poor unenlightened fools such as yourself that aircraft are built out of the lightest possible materials, light, carbon fibre re-enforced, plastic and aluminium skin over a light titanium steel frame, as they're designed to fly economically, not crash, or didn't you know that, dopey?
Quote:
Originally Posted by ENT
You're a rather unique combination of not particularly bright, dishonest, and demented.Quote:
Originally Posted by ENT
Read up about it and quote whatever you can find to prove that airliners are not made of carbon re-enforced plastics, over a light titanium steel frame, covered by a thin aluminium skin, as I posted.Quote:
Originally Posted by AntRobertsonQuote:
Originally Posted by ENT
You're a rather unique combination of not particularly bright, dishonest, and demented.Quote:
Originally Posted by ENT
Maybe where you come from they make planes out of wood and steel and footy leather held together with bootlaces and powered by second hand jockstrap elastic, eh, mong. :smileylaughing:
That's different from "plastic planes", bENT. It's like saying water is only made out of oxygen and therefore has no weight or density. Like I said: uniquely not very bright, dishonest, and demented.
What are unmarked scout cars made out of incidentally?
I never described any "plastic planes", mong. You dreamed that up.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ENT
Quote:
Originally Posted by ENT
A rather unique combination of not particularly bright, dishonest, demented, and Alzheimer's.Quote:
Originally Posted by ENT
You also forgot about the unmarked scout cars. Maybe you just talk so much shit it all blurs into one for you.
Plus no effect on the fireball by the following air turbulence created by said planes.Quote:
No bits of disintegrating plane wreckage peeling back off the wings and fuselage, no tail fin falling off, and above all, no deceleration on impact and after of the plastic and aluminium bodied plane, as it appears to enter the steel girder rimmed tower.
Early videos showed that. Later, on replays of the same clips, the nose conveniently became hidden by an on-screen news banner. It never left an exit hole either.Quote:
Two CNN videos even show what appears to be the undamaged plastic nose section bursting out of the South tower as the tower explodes!
:)
Scary stuff!! :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Latindancer
As I said, I didn't describe any plastic planes, referred to them as such, but a petty minded dimwit on daily medication for bi-polarism, as you are, and pretending to be a lawyer in real life, would seize on that and make a mountain out of a molehill any old time.Quote:
Originally Posted by AntRobertsonQuote:
Originally Posted by ENT
Quote:
Originally Posted by ENT
Quote:
Originally Posted by ENT
You keep talking about how no one has any proof of something that thousands of people witnessed through their own eyes there on the spot, real time, yet you have only announcements that the footage was photoshoped and not real. Where is your proof.Quote:
Originally Posted by ENT
Proofs been posted over and again of photoshopped videos of 9/11 aircraft.
Once more;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m5Dl5jIdtdk
Amazing how many claim to have actually seen planes hitting the towers!
Only a handful of people actually saw something hit the North tower that day.
Regarding the South tower, most eyewitness reports are of an aircraft, in flight, but not of an airliner the size of a Boeing 767-222, (90 ft long) but of a dark, windowless aircraft approaching the South Tower, but no eyewitnesses saw an airliner actually hit the South tower.
Whatever the world saw, they saw first on CNN.....none of it in real time, none of it live, all of it on news videos prepared earlier for public consumption.
They're your words, bENT. Facts matter.Quote:
Originally Posted by ENT
Your rote 'on medication' response is more than a touch ironic coming from a paranoid loon such as yourself.
Good morning Queen Maori Antoinette. :)
Morning bENT. What colour are the unmarked scout cars? Black, I presume?
Good girl, nice to see you respond to your name. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by AntRobertson
Have you any links to back up "only a handfull actually saw..." or that "a dark, windowless aircraft...."Quote:
Originally Posted by ENT
Eye witness accounts of a plane included here 'Real fear': Your September 11 stories - 9/11 Remembered - Ten Years On - ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)
Thousands of people were in New York and saw what happened that day. You were not there yet you pick up some paranoid crank's silly video (and who is trying to sell something) and run with it. Give it a rest.
That's shit, bENT.Quote:
Originally Posted by ENT
You're a 70 year old with the mentality of a seven year old. It's rather unbecoming. I almost feel embarrassed for you.
Why are you trying to shut me up and "give it a rest", who the hell do you think you are? Got something to hide? Who are you working for?Quote:
Originally Posted by misskit
You weren't there either, but you pick up some silly website address that's full of weepy drama stories but no eyewitness accounts of the event. Get real.Quote:
Originally Posted by misskit
Thousands of people in New York that day DID NOT see any airliner crash into the south facade of the South Tower WTC. Some saw some form of aircraft flying at the tower, some saw the tower explode, but nobody saw an airliner melt gently into that tower WITHOUT ANY REDUCTION IN SPEED as depicted in CNN's infamous doctored videos of the event.
That "crank" video is one of CNN's creations, subsequently examined then shown to be a fake, a mock-up.
You, one of TD's newshounds, obviously didn't read that article you linked (above) either, as NO EYEWITNESS ACCOUNTS are contained in it, not one, none whatsoever, read it yourself, so EPIC FAIL misskit!
(a) The handful of people who saw, or claimed to have seen a plane hit the (first hit) North Tower, were the cameraman who filmed the small strangely shaped aircraft, described as a small jet by one eyewitness, the firefighters standing around that he was just happening to talk to at that moment and.......who else?
(b) The South Tower 'plane' hit, eyewitnesses;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jRC4lCQuBmc
More, plus questions and possible explanations;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=huK0MAb0Xa4
What plane?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IL8cJWyOxWQ
PS. Why didn't anybody hear the "second plane" , allegedly UA175, a Boeing 757-222, flying in at a ear popping 400 kph, a physical impossibility without breaking up at that altitude, less than 1,000 ft above SL, as claimed by the US government?
Egypt Air Flt 990 (EA990) a Boeing 767, broke up to bits in a dive of .99 Mach at 22,000 feet, at 21,000 ft higher altitude, and thinner air, thus less air resistance than (alleged)UA175 would have experienced at 1000 ft ASL.
UA 175 would have shaken to bits, its engines or wings falling off at that speed and altitude long before it reached the WTC!
Anyone looking UP at a plane will not see windows as the windows are on the side not the bottom.
I have seen what I think is the only film of the first plane hitting. It was a flim crew talking to some road maintenance guys out on the street when the plane flew by. It was a full size plane.
Isn't it obvious he's working for them.Quote:
Originally Posted by ENTWhy are you trying to shut me up and "give it a rest", who the hell do you think you are? Got something to hide? Who are you working for?Quote:
Originally Posted by misskit
Depends on the angle you see the plane from.Quote:
Originally Posted by Cujo
I can see the windows on airliners coming into Chiangmai at 11 o'clock from midheaven @ 1,000 ft above ground level.
You'd only have to be three blocks at the most away from the towers to see the windows on Flt175 if looking from the east, and even less if looking at the towers from west Lower Manhattan.