9/11 was an inside job

Printable View

11-03-2016, 08:13 AM
ENT

Quote:

Originally Posted by Latindancer

^ And you whinge in another (doghoused :rolleyes:) thread that I give you a bit of stick on this thread, ENT....

Pathetic.

As you do.

Stick to the topic, y'd be better off. :dtroll:
11-03-2016, 10:02 AM
Latindancer

How about you do ? You haven't explained yourself about this yet :

Quote:

Originally Posted by Latindancer

Quote:

Originally Posted by ENT

So far, there's no proof whatsoever of any airliners crashing into any buildings in USA on 9/11,

Not a single scrap.

You're a liar and full of shit, ENT.

Arabesque: 9/11 Truth: 9/11 and the Pentagon Attack: What Eyewitnesses Described

Afework Hagos, a computer programmer, was on his way to work but stuck in a traffic jam near the Pentagon when the plane flew over. "There was a huge screaming noise and I got out of the car as the plane came over. Everybody was running away in different directions. It was tilting its wings up and down like it was trying to balance. It hit some lampposts on the way in."
A pilot who saw the impact, Tim Timmerman, said it had been an American Airways 757. "It added power on its way in," he said. "The nose hit, and the wings came forward and it went up in a fireball."

Pentagon eyewitness accounts | US news | The Guardian

9-11 Research: Pentagon Eyewitnesses

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1cT8WWt61eg
11-03-2016, 10:14 AM
Pragmatic

Quote:

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

And despite the meticulous planning and all the huge amount of resources that would have been required to fake it they've ultimately tripped themselves up as owing to an oversight or failure of someone invovled two of the planes weren't deregistered on a list at the FAA. Yeah, makes perfect sense.

This video confirms United Airlines flight 175 was still flying after it allegedly flew into the tower.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jdXGSefI6pM
11-03-2016, 10:26 AM
AntRobertson

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pragmatic

This video confirms United Airlines flight 175 was still flying after it allegedly flew into the tower.

No it doesn't. Not unless that's what you want it to confirm.

There are plenty of other explanations.
11-03-2016, 10:52 AM
ENT

[QUOTE=Latindancer;3226084[B]]How about you do ? You haven't explained yourself about this yet :[/B]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Latindancer

Quote:

Originally Posted by ENT

So far, there's no proof whatsoever of any airliners crashing into any buildings in USA on 9/11,

Not a single scrap.

You mean that you haven't explained yourself nor your assertions!

No airliner means there's no airliner, not a single scrap. Not one part of AA77 was found at the Pentagon and positively identified by any means at all.
11-03-2016, 11:00 AM
ENT

Quote:

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pragmatic

This video confirms United Airlines flight 175 was still flying after it allegedly flew into the tower.

No it doesn't. Not unless that's what you want it to confirm.

There are plenty of other explanations.

What garbage.

On viewing it, the video confirms that UAL175 was still flying near New York after it had supposedly crashed into WTC South Tower.

Try and prove otherwise.
11-03-2016, 11:08 AM
AntRobertson

Quote:

Originally Posted by ENT

On viewing it, the video confirms that UAL175 was still flying near New York after it had supposedly crashed into WTC South Tower.

Congratulations, you're seeing what you want to see.

Quote:

Originally Posted by ENT

Try and prove otherwise.

There is a teapot in orbit around the sun. It's very small. So small that you can not see it with even the most powerful of telescopes.

Inside that teapot is a hand written note.

Written on that note is the following: "ENT is a crackpot conspiracy loon who wouldn't know Occam's Razor if it walked up to him and said 'hi, I'm Occam's Razor' and he apparently also takes large quantities of Confirmation Bias pills".

Try and prove otherwise. Or it's real. And true.

:chitown:
11-03-2016, 11:33 AM
ENT

No evidence = no proof.
11-03-2016, 11:44 AM
AntRobertson

The absence of a negative is not proof of a positive.

You do this a lot in this thread: make claims and assertions that you yourself haven't / won't substantiate; expect others to disprove it / them; and then claim that as proof itself.

It's a glaring (and pretty weak) logical fallacy.
11-03-2016, 11:50 AM
ENT

No planes got hijacked on 9/11,.....no proof whatsoever exists to support such a ridiculous theory.

You, though, are deluded enough to keep believing the official line, 14 years after.
11-03-2016, 11:50 AM
Latindancer

Quote:

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

"ENT is a crackpot conspiracy loon

Our evidence is that which has been written by you in previous threads.

Try this page https://teakdoor.com/the-teakdoor-lou...insane-19.html

and go on to page 27 or so.
11-03-2016, 12:00 PM
Cujo

Quote:

Originally Posted by ENT

No planes got hijacked on 9/11,.....no proof whatsoever exists to support such a ridiculous theory.

You, though, are deluded enough to keep believing the official line, 14 years after.

So where did the planes that flew into the towers come from?
11-03-2016, 12:01 PM
AntRobertson

Quote:

Originally Posted by ENT

No planes got hijacked on 9/11,.....no proof whatsoever exists to support such a ridiculous theory.

On the contrary plenty of proof exists.

It's just that you discount it out of hand or completely ignore it.

Confirmation bias: another thing you do a lot.
11-03-2016, 12:04 PM
ENT

Quote:

Originally Posted by Latindancer

Quote:

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

"ENT is a crackpot conspiracy loon

Our evidence is that which has been written by you in previous threads.

Try this page https://teakdoor.com/the-teakdoor-lou...insane-19.html

and go on to page 27 or so.

I did,.......and?

Make sense, will ya?
11-03-2016, 12:04 PM
Latindancer

Neurotypical people will never make sense to you, ENT.
That would be a tragedy, except you have irritated us here for so long, and wasted so much of our time accommodating you.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cujo

So where did the planes that flew into the towers come from?

And what happened to the passengers/pilots/crew ? And whose funerals were held so publicly ?
11-03-2016, 12:05 PM
ENT

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cujo

Quote:

Originally Posted by ENT

No planes got hijacked on 9/11,.....no proof whatsoever exists to support such a ridiculous theory.

You, though, are deluded enough to keep believing the official line, 14 years after.

So where did the planes that flew into the towers come from?

Who says they were planes?
11-03-2016, 12:11 PM
ENT

Quote:

Originally Posted by Latindancer

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cujo

So where did the planes that flew into the towers come from?

And what happened to the passengers/pilots/crew ? And whose funerals were held so publicly ?

There were non on those four allegedly hijacked airliners.

So no funerals,.....all make believe and burial of left over war-victims' body parts obtained from Dover AF Base morgue.

They had a problem disposing of them apparently, a lot of body parts ended up in a landfill, while records got mixed up and destroyed.

Initial reports of the dead from the Pentagon fiasco were of 35 accountants and clerks killed in the accounts section explosion there.
11-03-2016, 12:19 PM
AntRobertson

Quote:

Originally Posted by ENT

Who says they were planes?

https://teakdoor.com/images/imported/2016/03/578.jpg

What's that then, a basketball?
11-03-2016, 12:40 PM
ENT

Oooohhh! A nice clean photoshop job!!

Have a look at this one,

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uo7OJAJtyxk

Photoshopped to the max, by dummies.
11-03-2016, 12:41 PM
Latindancer

^Er....many people report seeing the same thing.

And what of the victims' immediate and extended families ? There were lots of them.

Quote:

Originally Posted by ENT

I'm a complete whack job!!
11-03-2016, 12:43 PM
AntRobertson

Quote:

Originally Posted by ENT

Oooohhh! A nice clean photoshop job!!

So the film of the plane hitting the WTC was photoshop. And the eyewitnesses also, were they photoshopped?
11-03-2016, 12:45 PM
ENT

Or this one,

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qdC4k0-wJlw
11-03-2016, 12:47 PM
ENT

Quote:

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

Quote:

Originally Posted by ENT

Oooohhh! A nice clean photoshop job!!

So the film of the plane hitting the WTC was photoshop. And the eyewitnesses also, were they photoshopped?

You really don't know sh*t from clay do ya?

Tell us all about yer eyewitnesses, .....:)
11-03-2016, 12:50 PM
AntRobertson

Quote:

Originally Posted by ENT

Tell us all about yer eyewitnesses

They weren't my eyewitnesses.

They were the people that were there on the day and saw what happened.

Quote:

Originally Posted by ENT

You really don't know sh*t from clay do ya?

I know that you've currently got a thread running in TDH where you're whining about "ad hominem masquerading as intelligent discussion".
11-03-2016, 12:51 PM
ENT

Quote:

Originally Posted by Latindancer

^Er....many people report seeing the same thing.

And what of the victims' immediate and extended families ? There were lots of them.

Drag up the mortuary lists and name them.

Check that several names aren't double entered as in the passenger lists, then c0-relate them to the named body counts given by the civic authorities, death registry etc.