Printable View
Nobody fell for anything, except apparantly you. Because it's easy to state the opposite, claim that those you disagree with fell for something, try to discredit the source (even if the report was issued by Pep Boys it would have more credibility than the sources posted by the conspirationalists), and then send people on a fools errand to "disprove" their statements pulled from a tin hat.Quote:
Originally Posted by Pragmatic
Waste of my time.
Discuss among yourselves.
MuG,
"Nobody fell for anything", you say.
Wrong, Popular Mechanics readers fell for it.
Bye bye. :)
Thats a decent drumpfism you have there prattmaster ENT.Quote:
Originally Posted by ENT
Apart from living in a glass bubble, you also can't read spaz,Quote:
Originally Posted by hazz
I referred to those black boxes as supposedly indestructible, as touted by media, so go Google for references, troll.
Well ent you would only say 'supposedly' if you believed that they should be.... then you also believe in indestructible orange paint don't you.... whats next water into wine?
And that's your best shot?Quote:
Originally Posted by Latindancer
:smileylaughing:
"I have debated various issues and details hotly. In depth."
OK, as in the way you haven't answered the questions asked re. those 17 seconds discrepancy you claim to exist in the 9/11 seismic readings published by Palisades.
You don't want to discuss that point either.
What about the time those spikes occurred as the twin towers fell, around 4-5 seconds after collapse initiated, about the moment the whole towers, each, visibly exploded, sending massive steel columns and beams up to 300 metres distance horizontally across from the collapsing towers.
That explosion of energy was picked up as a massive spike in the readings, around five seconds before the collapse ended.
2M on the Richter scale, 5 seconds before the bulk of the tower hit the ground,..the greatest force during the collapse as registered on the seismograph.
Please continue with your display of intelligence, at least explain about that 17 second discrepancy bit you claim to know about.
It's not my bet shot, but my expression of contempt for your idiocy.
And it's not that I don't want to "discuss" (if that can be said is what you do:rolleyes:) any points, it's that after years of this crap, I just can't be bothered dealing with a retarded idiot like you anymore.
You seem to be totally enslaved by insisting upon beliefs or having to believe something or other,...in this case the so-called black boxes you're carrying on about.Quote:
Originally Posted by hazzThats a decent drumpfism you have there prattmaster ENT.Quote:
Originally Posted by ENTApart from living in a glass bubble, you also can't read spaz,Quote:
Originally Posted by hazz
I referred to those black boxes as supposedly indestructible, as touted by media, so go Google for references, troll.
Well ent you would only say 'supposedly' if you believed that they should be.... then you also believe in indestructible orange paint don't you.... whats next water into wine?
Interesting. Are you a religious man? Struggle with English?
H'mmmm.
In English, there's a difference between two words, as in 'believe' and 'suppose',
A supposition is at best a postulation, a theory, a good guess, a hunch, intuition, a kind of a maybe, one may suppose.
A belief is an implicit faith and trust in a theory, postulation without any doubt, whatsoever, so that something or other may be accepted as fact.
Now you know the difference, try again.
Other than hurl as many insults as possible, along with lots of cut and pastes, very little of any intellectual worth has escaped your brain.Quote:
Originally Posted by Latindancer
It's a pity really.
https://teakdoor.com/images/imported/2016/03/16.jpg
2WTCC coming down,
https://teakdoor.com/images/smilies1/You_Rock_Emoticon.gif
Registered at Palisades Observatory
South Tower (WTC 2) coming down.
https://teakdoor.com/images/imported/2016/03/18.jpg
1WTC coming down at 2 Magnitude, a big explosion.
Just for reference. :)
PS.
Ignore the idiot below
\/
While we're posting graphs, here's ENT's most recent EEG.
https://teakdoor.com/images/imported/2016/03/20.jpg
I take it all back, you pout more than trump caught on a lie.Quote:
Originally Posted by ENTYou seem to be totally enslaved by insisting upon beliefs or having to believe something or other,...in this case the so-called black boxes you're carrying on about.Quote:
Originally Posted by hazzThats a decent drumpfism you have there prattmaster ENT.Quote:
Originally Posted by ENTApart from living in a glass bubble, you also can't read spaz,Quote:
Originally Posted by hazz
I referred to those black boxes as supposedly indestructible, as touted by media, so go Google for references, troll.
Well ent you would only say 'supposedly' if you believed that they should be.... then you also believe in indestructible orange paint don't you.... whats next water into wine?
Interesting. Are you a religious man? Struggle with English?
H'mmmm.
In English, there's a difference between two words, as in 'believe' and 'suppose',
A supposition is at best a postulation, a theory, a good guess, a hunch, intuition, a kind of a maybe, one may suppose.
A belief is an implicit faith and trust in a theory, postulation without any doubt, whatsoever, so that something or other may be accepted as fact.
Now you know the difference, try again.
At the end of the say nobody forced you to post stuff saying that blackboxes are indestructible or that something cannot be a blackbox because its not orange as if they are are painted with magical indestructible orange paint.
Come on, blackboxes are not indestructible and neither is the orange paint. 14 years and that is still not obvious to you...
Chappy, it's neither my belief (which you suffer from) nor my contention, that the so called black boxes are either black or indestructible.
Neither did I post stuff saying that they are.
Troll.
And the orange paint, do you think thats indestructible?
The answer's in the post above yours, if you read it carefully.
I did ent, and that's why i asked about the indestructible orange paint on blackboxes
Good. Now you have the answer to your question.
:dtroll:
What that you do believe black boxes are covered with magic indestructible orange paint, but are too shy to admit it. I can accept that.... i would be shy too if i belived in bollocks like that.
Good footage of North tower WTC collapse, interesting details, and more of South tower hit,..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lKYW89xEYg0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=siqj9lQzvmw#t=0.66
Yes, it's a tower collapsing.
We've all seen it before, and had to endure your retarded lack of understanding about "squibs", or compressed air.
:dtroll:
Where's the smiley for "Do not feed the ENT-fuckwit" ??Quote:
Originally Posted by ENT
There you go, you even said it yourself.Quote:
Originally Posted by ENT
It collapses.
It happens.
Look, no planes flew into the buildings! It was explosives! Special explosives that suck things in!
:rofl:
https://teakdoor.com/images/imported/2016/03/54.jpg
Ah yes...the implosives :rolleyes:.
Pretty weird about that woman appearing in the opening. Don't think she got out, but must have been an unusual set of circumstances. Ah well....that's reality.
TRUST BUSH - He has never EVER lied or done anything that would endanger the lives of US citizens. He has never ordered planes to destroy civilian infrastructure for profit and power gain. He has never done anything like this. TRUST BUSH. IF you believe the official line of 9/11 you are on a par with Bush. You are one of his followers.
Hahahha - fucktards. Confirmation Bias - to see something in the mainstream media that stops you having face your incredulity that the government could kill its own people for power....which they do all the time. Sleep tight little babies.
Whooops.
Carry on.
I thought you said ye woz gonna fwk orf and wooden de-bate agin, no never-no-mo' wid me, snookums.Quote:
Originally Posted by Latindancer
Now prove how much of an honest straight shot debater y'are by staryting off wid an explanation of how or what squibbs are, ............................................mate(? ). :rolleyes:
I know what they are, but please explain yor understanding of what that word means to you in the context of the demolition of both towers 1 and 2 at WTC Ny 9/11/2001,...........please
Tell us how compressed air worked in relation to the two towers' collapse.
Don't want to know about yer compressor ya got in yer garage for blowing up bicycle tyres.
That's right Harry, the towers collapsed................................after being blown up,............it didn't happen by itself.Quote:
Originally Posted by harrybarracuda
What sort of planes are you talking about Harry?
Airliners? Military aircraft? rocket propelled aircraft? Missiles?
Weren't no airliners that we got any info about banged into them towers, charley.
The first one was too small and too fast to be a Boeing airliner.
The second one just wasn't the right colour, length nor shape of an airliner when ya watch those morphing images of a supposed airliner crashing into the 2nd (South) Tower WTC 9/11.
So now, why the glee? Fwk yer desperate Harry :)