View Poll Results: Was 9/11 an inside job - 2016 TD poll

Voters
19. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    13 68.42%
  • No

    5 26.32%
  • Not sure

    1 5.26%
  1. #4651
    god
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Bangladesh
    Posts
    28,210
    Quote Originally Posted by terry57 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by koman View Post


    It's kind of odd how the same folks who constantly berate government for being incompetent, stupid and unable to do anything right, can then credit them with such a masterful piece of organization, choreography and execution, with a cast involving tens of thousands of people....and pulling it off without a hitch, or credible security leak.

    One of my points exactly,

    No way on this Earth a Government could pull off such a complicated plan without something or someone fuking up.

    Impossible for all the planets to align on 9/11.
    Didn't ya notice that fewer and fewer people believe any of that horse-sh*t that the US gov. gives out about 9'11 any more?

    And you're the wanna-be fireman that thinks that heat dissipates as rapidly upwards as it does downwards, contrary to all the laws of physics, of course...

  2. #4652
    god
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Bangladesh
    Posts
    28,210
    Scientific Poll: 84% Reject Official 9/11 Story




    Only 16% now believe official fable according to New York Times/CBS News poll
    Truth Movement has the huge majority of opinion
    How will the Bush Cabal react?
    / Prisonplanet.com | October 14 2006

    A monumental new scientific opinion poll has emerged which declares that only 16% of people in America now believe the official government explanation of the September 11th 2001 terror attacks.

    According to the new New York Times/CBS News poll, only 16% of Americans think the government is telling the truth about 9/11 and the intelligence prior to the attacks:

    “Do you think members of the Bush Administration are telling the truth, are mostly telling the truth but hiding something, or are they mostly lying?

    Telling the truth 16%

    Hiding something 53%

    Mostly lying 28%

    Not sure 3%”

    The 84% figure mirrors other recent polls on the same issue. A Canadian Poll put the figure at 85%. A CNN poll had the figure at 89%. Over 80% supported the stance of Charlie Sheen when he went public with his opinions on 9/11 as an inside job.

    A recent CNN poll found that the percentage of Americans who blame the Bush administration for the September 11, 2001, attacks on New York and Washington rose from almost a third to almost half over the past four years. This latest poll shows that that figure has again risen exponentially and now stands at well over three quarters of the population.

    It took 35 plus years for the majority of Americans to wake up to the fact that the assassination of JFK was a government operation. It has only take five years for MORE Americans to wake up to the fact that 9/11 was an inside job on behalf of the Neoconservative crime syndicate within the US.
    Reference to past polls show that in the last five years there has been an explosion in numbers of those who do not buy the official line.


    Scientific Poll: 84% Reject Official 9/11 Story | Global Research


    And that was an old poll!

  3. #4653
    god
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Bangladesh
    Posts
    28,210
    And another more recent poll;




    Newsletter:





    The Evidence

    Building 7Twin TowersYour generous support makes the ReThink911 campaign possible.Donate Today News & UpdatesNew Poll Finds Most Americans Open to Alternative 9/11 Theories


    One in Two Surveyed Have Doubts About Government’s Account of 9/11.
    46% Suspect Controlled Demolition of World Trade Center Building 7 after Viewing Video Footage of Collapse.

    On the 12th anniversary of 9/11, a new national survey by the polling firm YouGov reveals that one in two Americans have doubts about the government’s account of 9/11, and after viewing video footage of World Trade Center Building 7’s collapse, 46% suspect that it was caused by a controlled demolition. Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper, collapsed into its own footprint late in the afternoon on 9/11.

    The poll was sponsored by ReThink911, a global public awareness campaign launched on September 1. The campaign includes a 54-foot billboard in Times Square and a variety of transit and outdoor advertising in 11 other cities, all posing the question, “Did you know a third tower fell on 9/11?

    Among the poll’s findings:
    • 38% of Americans have some doubts about the official account of 9/11, 10% do not believe it at all, and 12% are unsure about it;
    • 46%, nearly one in two, are not aware that a third tower collapsed on 9/11. Of those who are aware of Building 7’s collapse, only 19% know the building’s name;
    • After seeing video footage of Building 7′s collapse:
      • 46% are sure or suspect it was caused by controlled demolition, compared to 28% who are sure or suspect fires caused it, and 27% who don’t know;
      • By a margin of nearly two to one, 41% support a new investigation of Building 7′s collapse, compared to 21% who oppose it.
    30-Second Video Shown to 1,194 Survey Respondents:

    “The poll shows quite clearly what we already knew. Most people who see Building 7’s collapse have trouble believing that fires brought it down,” said Richard Gage, a member of the American Institute of Architects and founder of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, the campaign’s major sponsor. “It simply doesn’t look like a natural building collapse, and that’s because all the columns have been removed at once to allow it to come down symmetrically in free-fall. The evidence of controlled demolition is overwhelming. As more and more people learn about Building 7, public demand for a new investigation grows. People want the truth.”

    According to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), normal office fires caused the failure of a single column, starting a chain reaction that brought Building 7 down. More than 2,000 architects and engineers have signed the Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth petition that questions NIST’s explanation of the building’s collapse.

    “Even the government’s own computer model disproves its theory. It looks nothing like the actual collapse,” said Tony Szamboti, a mechanical engineer from the Philadelphia area. “Not only that, they refuse to release the data that would allow us to verify their model. In the world of science, this is as bad as it gets. I’m glad most people can look at the collapse and see the obvious.”
    The ReThink911 campaign calls for a new investigation into Building 7’s collapse, as well as the destruction of the Twin Towers. The YouGov poll and the ad campaign were financed with more than $225,000 in donations from thousands of supporters.

    All figures, unless otherwise stated, are from YouGov Plc. Total sample size was 1194 adults. Fieldwork was undertaken between 27th – 29th August 2013. The survey was carried out online. The figures have been weighted and are representative of all US adults (aged 18+).


    New Poll Finds Most Americans Open to Alternative 9/11 Theories – ReThink911.org | Sign the Petition for a new 9/11 investigation
    Last edited by ENT; 31-07-2014 at 12:02 PM.

  4. #4654
    Thailand Expat
    koman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Last Online
    09-05-2023 @ 11:36 AM
    Location
    Issan
    Posts
    4,287
    Grand poll there ENT......however take another lookee. Seems 53% are mostly with " telling the truth, but maybe "hiding something"...whatever the fuck that means..... another 3% are just "not sure"..... and 16% believe the government is telling the whole truth and nothing but the truth..

    Sooo in fact 72% seem to believe that the "official" story is right or at least close to being right.

    The results of this kind of will depend a lot on exactly how the questions were asked....and the timing of the latest highly convincing theory about what really happened.

    Personally, I've seen and heard some very well scripted bullshit which can sway ones opinion for a few minutes, and then you start to blow holes in it...and it just reverts back to bullshit again......

  5. #4655
    god
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Bangladesh
    Posts
    28,210
    Wet answer koman, very wet.

    People aren't gonna swallow all that government bullsh*t any more.

  6. #4656
    Thailand Expat
    koman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Last Online
    09-05-2023 @ 11:36 AM
    Location
    Issan
    Posts
    4,287
    Quote Originally Posted by koman
    Most people who see Building 7’s collapse have trouble believing that fires brought it down,”
    Well yes, that's hardly a surprise being as "fires" did not bring it down. The lower section of the structure suffered critical damage to the supporting beams caused by debris, some of which was also burning. The fires on the higher levels were probably a contributing factor but they were not the proximate cause of the collapse.

    Again tin hatters continue to refer back to early misguided statements made by people who assumed all kinds of things before a full examination had been completed.

    One of my favorites is the often referenced "missile" comment made by Donald Rumsfeld. This has been touted around as "proof" that he was in on some big plot involving missiles.....when in fact all he was saying or intending to say, was that the hijacked airlines were used "like missiles" which is perfectly true, and was also said by at least a few news-casters and others before Donnie came out with it....and caused the tin hatters to jump up and down over their great new scoop.....

    Sorry ENT....imaginative stories and fairy tales don't hold up indefinitely....

  7. #4657
    Thailand Expat
    koman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Last Online
    09-05-2023 @ 11:36 AM
    Location
    Issan
    Posts
    4,287
    Quote Originally Posted by ENT View Post
    Wet answer koman, very wet.

    People aren't gonna swallow all that government bullsh*t any more.
    Really? According to your own poll above, it seems 72% of them are OK with the official bullshit. 28% think the government is telling lies.....still a 72% vote in an election would be considered a landslide......

  8. #4658
    Thailand Expat Pragmatic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Last but who gives a shit.
    Posts
    13,316
    If eye witnesses say it was a military plane that hit the towers then I'm with them.

  9. #4659
    Thailand Expat terry57's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Last Online
    07-12-2022 @ 03:12 PM
    Posts
    26,746
    Quote Originally Posted by ENT View Post

    It took 35 plus years for the majority of Americans to wake up to the fact that the assassination of JFK was a government operation.

    ENT, what is this all about ?

    You are posting up once again an opinion, you can not claim this as fact, its an opinion by the conspiracy nutters such as you.

    The bottom line is, nothing you post up is fact , its only an opinion which every person is entitled to but that does not make it fact.

    Fuk Me,

    Now you're posting up shit about the JFK assassination claiming it is now known that the Feds bumped him off.

    Ya Ba's strong in you ENT.

  10. #4660
    Thailand Expat
    wasabi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Last Online
    28-10-2019 @ 03:54 AM
    Location
    England
    Posts
    10,940
    Are threads like this created so that the Intelligent services can gleen secret information.

  11. #4661
    RIP pseudolus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    18,083
    Quote Originally Posted by koman
    Seems 53% are mostly with " telling the truth, but maybe "hiding something"...whatever the fuck that means..... another 3% are just "not sure"..... and 16% believe the government is telling the whole truth and nothing but the truth.
    How can you be judged to be telling the truth, but not telling the truth. Black or white, mate - Truth is the truth, and if there are half truths mixed in, then that is not the truth.

    So, 84% do not believe the government line (not sure, means they do not believe it).

    Pretty damning.

  12. #4662
    Thailand Expat
    koman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Last Online
    09-05-2023 @ 11:36 AM
    Location
    Issan
    Posts
    4,287
    Quote Originally Posted by pseudolus
    So, 84% do not believe the government line (not sure, means they do not believe it).
    NO it does not mean anything of the sort.

    Look at the question and how it is phrased......

    Quote Originally Posted by ENT
    Do you think members of the Bush Administration are telling the truth, are mostly telling the truth but hiding something, or are they mostly lying?
    The 53% are saying that they believe the official story is basically true but there may be some information that has not been made public. It's the old standby...."there must be more to this story" that the tin hatters thrive on...

    That is perfectly normal in todays world where everybody is bombarded with conflicting and confusing crap from all sides. Most people don't know what to believe.....it's remarkable that only 3% say they are "not sure".

    Overall this poll, for what it's worth, does not indicate that the vast majority believe any of the tin hat nonsense that litters the internet. Fortunately most of us are not compelled to live in the shadow of the Illuminate and Zionist hoards with their endless plots and schemes.....

  13. #4663
    god
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Bangladesh
    Posts
    28,210
    Quote Originally Posted by koman View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by koman
    Most people who see Building 7’s collapse have trouble believing that fires brought it down,”
    Well yes, that's hardly a surprise being as "fires" did not bring it down. The lower section of the structure suffered critical damage to the supporting beams caused by debris, some of which was also burning. The fires on the higher levels were probably a contributing factor but they were not the proximate cause of the collapse.

    Again tin hatters continue to refer back to early misguided statements made by people who assumed all kinds of things before a full examination had been completed.

    One of my favorites is the often referenced "missile" comment made by Donald Rumsfeld. This has been touted around as "proof" that he was in on some big plot involving missiles.....when in fact all he was saying or intending to say, was that the hijacked airlines were used "like missiles" which is perfectly true, and was also said by at least a few news-casters and others before Donnie came out with it....and caused the tin hatters to jump up and down over their great new scoop.....

    Sorry ENT....imaginative stories and fairy tales don't hold up indefinitely....
    And your little imaginative apology for Rumsfeld's "slip" doesn't hold up either koman.

    Are you a mind reader?

    I'm sure Rumsfeld knew what he was saying, just as Bush knew what he was saying when he said that he saw the plane hit the first tower on TV, before the video of the plane hit was even aired a few days later.



    Rumsfeld said what he said, that the Pentagon was hit by a missile.



    He didn't once say that a plane hit it it.

    In fact he also said there was no plane wreckage at the Pentagon.

    What he did say in a ;later interview was:

    "Here we're talking about plastic knives and using an American Airlines flight filed with our citizens, and the missile to damage this building and similar (inaudible) that damaged the World Trade Center."
    http://www.defense.gov/transcripts/t...nscriptID=3845




    So explain that one too, koman.


    Got any more apologies?
    Last edited by ENT; 01-08-2014 at 08:42 AM.

  14. #4664
    god
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Bangladesh
    Posts
    28,210
    Quote Originally Posted by koman View Post
    Grand poll there ENT......however take another lookee. Seems 53% are mostly with " telling the truth, but maybe "hiding something"...whatever the fuck that means..... another 3% are just "not sure"..... and 16% believe the government is telling the whole truth and nothing but the truth..

    Sooo in fact 72% seem to believe that the "official" story is right or at least close to being right.

    The results of this kind of will depend a lot on exactly how the questions were asked....and the timing of the latest highly convincing theory about what really happened.

    Personally, I've seen and heard some very well scripted bullshit which can sway ones opinion for a few minutes, and then you start to blow holes in it...and it just reverts back to bullshit again......
    You're the bullshitter.

    In fact 46% believe that WTC 7 was demolished.
    Only 16% believe the official story is right, as you point out, so where you get that fantasy figure of 72% from must be out of your *rse. .

  15. #4665
    god
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Bangladesh
    Posts
    28,210
    Some more fake plane hitting the WTC.


  16. #4666
    Thailand Expat
    koman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Last Online
    09-05-2023 @ 11:36 AM
    Location
    Issan
    Posts
    4,287
    Apologise for what? Rumsfeld said he went outside and there were all these bits of metal laying around, but he did not see any plane wreckage. He did NOT say a plane hit the Pentagon at that time because he did not know what it was. He actually says that if you bother to view your own videos.

    So in the ENT world, this is proof that it was not a plane....because Donnie does not specifically say so... The "missile slip" was in a different interview, and has already been explained.

    As I've already stated previously; these are the kind of straws the tin hatters cling to relentlessly . Little slips of the tongue, or mis-statements made by officials or others before the investigations have even started and everyone is just speculating.

    On the other hand, if some wino who just slept under a bridge, states on TV that he saw a black pained ICBM hit the WTC instead of an airliner and that CIA and Mossad agents were dancing in circles down the street, celebrating....that is considered gospel and clear evidence of an inside job.......

  17. #4667
    god
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Bangladesh
    Posts
    28,210
    Nope, koman, in the ENT world and in the real world, Rumsfeld said that he didnn't see any plane wreckage, (neither did I, at least not from AA77).

    And if some fading old grunt called koman says that AA77 hit the Pentagon, even when Palisades observatory said that there's no evidence of such a crash, and Rumsfeld along with all the photographic evidence available also concur in that finding, you, the fading old grunt koman is looking just like that, a fading old grunt who's mind can't quite grasp the fact that there was no airliner crash at the Pentagon that day.

  18. #4668
    Thailand Expat
    Albert Shagnastier's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Last Online
    22-03-2015 @ 09:09 PM
    Location
    City of Angels
    Posts
    7,164
    Drones, thermite/thermate demolition explosives and "Hollywood Quality" special effects + obviously control of several media outlets.

    In a nutshell.

    This is worth 15 minutes.


  19. #4669
    god
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Bangladesh
    Posts
    28,210
    ^ Good stuff.

    Explains MH 370 also.

  20. #4670
    Thailand Expat
    Albert Shagnastier's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Last Online
    22-03-2015 @ 09:09 PM
    Location
    City of Angels
    Posts
    7,164

  21. #4671
    Thailand Expat
    koman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Last Online
    09-05-2023 @ 11:36 AM
    Location
    Issan
    Posts
    4,287
    Well there you have it. Now that ENT's latest video masterpiece assures us that the CIA and military has technology that is 50-100 years of anything we can even imagine, it all becomes clear.

    So after all the argument and analysis we can now dismiss the idea of the WTC being hit by Cessna's, Jet fighters, Black planes, white planes, drones, and missiles which have all been identified by "witnesses".

    Instead we have holograms projected from stealth aircraft flying alongside, and an entire special effects masterpiece taking place. Pretty hard to argue against such compelling evidence.

    Fuk me, we must be all blind for not seeing this before.....

  22. #4672
    RIP pseudolus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    18,083
    Quote Originally Posted by koman View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by pseudolus
    So, 84% do not believe the government line (not sure, means they do not believe it).
    NO it does not mean anything of the sort.

    Look at the question and how it is phrased......

    Quote Originally Posted by ENT
    Do you think members of the Bush Administration are telling the truth, are mostly telling the truth but hiding something, or are they mostly lying?
    The 53% are saying that they believe the official story is basically true but there may be some information that has not been made public. It's the old standby...."there must be more to this story" that the tin hatters thrive on...

    That is perfectly normal in todays world where everybody is bombarded with conflicting and confusing crap from all sides. Most people don't know what to believe.....it's remarkable that only 3% say they are "not sure".

    Overall this poll, for what it's worth, does not indicate that the vast majority believe any of the tin hat nonsense that litters the internet. Fortunately most of us are not compelled to live in the shadow of the Illuminate and Zionist hoards with their endless plots and schemes.....
    The truth simply IS. Something is either the truth or it is not. There is no variablity about it. As soon as something becomes only PART of the truth, then it is not the truth.

    How can you mostly tell the truth? I know that the modern media has trained us to believe this .... Look at this from CNN



    Mostly true. So now we are expected to believe that something that is Mostly True is the same as being True? Its so that lies and mistruths can be covered up, with the unthinking masses believing that they are being told the truth.

    Also, what if the Truth they are told (planes hit the towers) is not as important as the lies (the parts that are not true) - planes not from OSB, but a false flag mission?

    The Truth is the truth. There is, and should be no room in anyone's mind to accept Mostly True as being True.

    So, 84% do not believe the government line.

    Some outright think they are lying, some think they are lying a bit, others are no in the "we believe" camp, preferring unsure, so therefore as they do not believe they are telling the truth, and are solidly in the "they are a bunch of lying bastards" camp.

    Go on - tell me again how a truth can be partly untrue but still be the truth.


  23. #4673
    Thailand Expat
    koman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Last Online
    09-05-2023 @ 11:36 AM
    Location
    Issan
    Posts
    4,287
    Quote Originally Posted by pseudolus
    Go on - tell me again how a truth can be partly untrue but still be the truth.
    Because explaining something like the WTC attacks and official report is not such a simple matter. In an event like this there will be hard facts established by forensic examinations, and there will be other things that can not be fully explained, for a variety of reasons.

    The report therefor is likely factual in as much as any such a report can be. The things they are supposed to be "hiding" are things that are can not be clearly established facts, so they have to be viewed simply as possibilities. The best guess under the circumstances if you like. What else can one do with such a mass of diverse and complex information?

    You are talking about truth as if it were a simple statement like yes or no....black or white. We are talking about a huge event, involving countless facts and quite a few unknowns. Just because every T can not be crossed and every I dotted, does not mean the report is all lies....as seems to be the position of the tin hatters.

    People believe whatever they want.....but all these videos and conspiracy blog sites seem to involve people who imagine themselves to be so superior and having access to facts not available to anyone else. They almost always rant on about how stupid everyone else must be not to see and believe the same things they do.

    Then they come up with the most ridiculous nonsense, which is never backed up by any evidence whatsoever. The standard position is.....Everybody lies except us...trust us....we are right.....we have an un-named CIA insider giving us all the special goods on this....

    Perhaps you wish to live in some perfect world where everything is so easily placed in the absolute truth basket.....but most people manage to live in a world which they recognize and accept as not quite so perfect....

  24. #4674
    RIP pseudolus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Last Online
    @
    Posts
    18,083
    Quote Originally Posted by koman
    Because explaining something like the WTC attacks and official report is not such a simple matter.
    Sure - but that does not negate the fact of whether what the people are told is the truth though. If they do not know, they should say or make clear they are speculating. However, they put forward information as Facts, as the Truth, when they know damn well they are not Facts of the Truth.

    Quote Originally Posted by koman
    You are talking about truth as if it were a simple statement like yes or no....black or white
    Truth is Black and White. It is simple. Something is the truth or it is not.

    Quote Originally Posted by koman
    does not mean the report is all lies..
    If some of it is lies, then it is not truthful.

    Quote Originally Posted by koman
    Perhaps you wish to live in some perfect world where everything is so easily placed in the absolute truth basket.
    I wish to live in a world where the civil servants of the world are servants to the people they serve. Instead I have to live in a world where the people who run the countries are liars, hell bent on their own personal egos, pandering to the people who give them money and "power" that are typically MNCs and the uber rich.

    I think the people of the world DESERVE the truth. Nothing less. We are kept from the truth in every aspect of our daily lives and only to suit those who have, those in power, those who own us.

  25. #4675
    Suspended from News & Speakers Corner

    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Last Online
    16-05-2022 @ 02:00 AM
    Posts
    2,043
    Quote Originally Posted by ENT
    just as Bush knew what he was saying when he said that he saw the plane hit the first tower on TV, before the video of the plane hit was even aired a few days later.
    What kind of horse pucky is this? The video was live, it was shown the same day hundreds of times that day, and even if it wasn't? It would stand to reason the president, his advisers and intelligence teams would view it BEFORE making it public if it was possible..But that never happened anyway except maybe in your addled mind..

Page 187 of 350 FirstFirst ... 87137177179180181182183184185186187188189190191192193194195197237287 ... LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •