Unless Americans have a revolution, we will most likely be heading into WWIII.
Just sayin' like :)
Printable View
Unless Americans have a revolution, we will most likely be heading into WWIII.
Just sayin' like :)
Doubtful.Quote:
Originally Posted by Albert Shagnasty2017
Although I wouldn't want to be in Seoul right now.
Why not?Quote:
Originally Posted by raycarey
It never can happen. There is no US Embassy in USA. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Albert Shagnasty2017
jesus wept.Quote:
Originally Posted by Slick
get better informed.
We've been in WW3 since the 2nd of August 1990.Quote:
Originally Posted by Albert Shagnasty2017
Why would you not want to be in Seoul right now? Im aware of whats going on.Quote:
Originally Posted by raycareyjesus wept.Quote:
Originally Posted by Slick
get better informed.
Im asking why you are scared of Seoul at this time.
Real outright conflict is not healthy for the highly profitable empire expansion -
Small proxy wars. Not a problem.
From the top of My head Seoul is close to the North Korean parallel line, it's not far enough away from a good artillery barrage.
And from what I read, most south koreans are literally going about their daily lives without much of a thought of whats coming out of the North.Quote:
Originally Posted by wasabi
I would not have any fear of traveling there right now.
Not to worry.
Nature will select a purposeful and particular population extermination.
The Anglo-American world.
The world will rest easier.
Small wars. Big problem.Quote:
Originally Posted by thaimeme
WW1: Static Warfare, mostly Western Europe. Earliest beginnings at Congress of Vienna. Territorial War between nations and empires. Mostly affected armies. Massive casualties. Ended by conquest.
WW2: Global conflagration. Earliest beginnings at Treaty of Versailles. Ideological and territorial war between nations, empires and belief systems. Affected all people in all countries involved. Massive casualties. Ended by conquest.
WW3: Global Warfare, mostly Middle and Far East and Central Asia. Global incidence of small wars and individual actions linked by religious ideology. Beginning 1990 after Iraqi invasion of Kuwait. Ideological and religious. started as nation state versus nation state but rapidly devolved into nation states versus multiple non-state actors. One side conventional armies, the other side hundreds of disparate guerrilla and partisan forces, many of which were created by overthrow and destruction of former nation states, and thousands of individuals aligned to ideologies but not to groups. A worldwide conflict with no end in sight. Minimal casualties per action but large numbers of deaths in total. Civilians are the main targets as only one protagonist has armies. No currently feasible end.
Will we be exempt since we live in Thailand?Quote:
Originally Posted by thaimeme
Jeff is supervising the construction of an enormous glass topped coffee table that Surin will shelter under.
you've provided ample evidence on other threads that you're really not all that bright, but do yourself a favor and take a look at a map of the korean peninsula and take note of how close seoul is to the border. seoul's vulnerable location is one of the primary reasons why the US hasn't attacked north korea over the last two decades. clinton, bush and obama would have liked to have taken care of this mess during their administrations, but it's just too risky for the people living in seoul.Quote:
Originally Posted by Slick
even if this doesn't become a nuclear conflict (and i don't think it will), there are 20 million people in seoul who are well within range of north korean conventional weapons.
this situation is extremely volatile, and it if does set off, the people of seoul will not escape unscathed.
for that reason, i wouldn't want to be in seoul right now.
capiche?
if not, too bad.
https://teakdoor.com/images/imported/2017/04/984.jpgQuote:
Originally Posted by Slick
Dream on!!Quote:
Originally Posted by Slick
https://teakdoor.com/images/imported/2017/04/985.jpg
I appreciate the geography lesson, but basically what you are saying is that you are an extremely dramatic little bitch who's afraid of his own shadow.Quote:
Originally Posted by raycarey
Meanwhile South Koreans have been living like this for decades barely giving a fuck.
And no, I would not have even the slightest little pang of fear hopping on a plane to Seoul.
Not even an internet badass, you're just a sissy.
And extremely unlikely that the US is willing to make it less volatile by not playing chicken with Armageddon.Quote:
Originally Posted by raycarey
If the US backed off, would they change?Quote:
Originally Posted by Neo
The promoted US propaganda or the reality?Quote:
Originally Posted by Slick
The North Korean propaganda or the reality?Quote:
Originally Posted by thaimeme
Listen to Dr Bob, folks.Quote:
Originally Posted by DrB0bWe've been in WW3 since the 2nd of August 1990.Quote:
Originally Posted by Albert Shagnasty2017
And Ray, I'm waiting for you to answer about Chavez and Maduro....
The NORKs are no threat. I really don't understand why people are getting so upset. Are memories really so short? I'm not saying we wouldn't get our hair mussed, but I do say no more than 10 to 20 million killed, tops. Depending on the breaks.
Now, I will admit to my ignorance now.
I didn't realise that there is a pact between Nth Korea and China, implying that if you attack Nth Korea, China is duty bound to defend Nth Korea.
It puts, for me, a whole new perspective on the Korean Peninsula and the region in general.
Apart from Trump's ego and his falling popularity in the US, why, on Earth, is Trump pushing regime change?
Japan doesn't wish it, Sth Korea is scared of it, nor does China desire it.
The USA is half a world away.
Are there hidden oil reserves tucked away in Nth Korea? ... :rolleyes:
apparently the chief concern is that north korea will have the capacity to reach seattle with a missile in a couple of years time.Quote:
Originally Posted by David48atTD
^
More like four years time unless you are privy to NK's actual missile delivery capabilities.
Are you privy to NK's actual missile delivery capabilities?Quote:
Originally Posted by rickschoppers
:rolleyes:
a couple....a few....several.....whatever it is, it's sooner than the US is comfortable with.
Did Trump forget he said this?
.
Trump would talk to North Korea's Kim
Wed May 18, 2016
Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump said on Tuesday he is willing to talk to North Korean leader Kim Jong Un to try to stop Pyongyang's nuclear program, proposing a major shift in U.S. policy toward the isolated nation.
The presumptive Republican nominee declined to share details of his plans to deal with North Korea, but said he was open to talking to its leader.
"I would speak to him, I would have no problem speaking to him," he said.
Exclusive: Trump would talk to North Korea's Kim, wants to renegotiate climate accord | Reuters
Quote:
Originally Posted by NevernaAre you privy to NK's actual missile delivery capabilities?Quote:
Originally Posted by rickschoppers
Rick ? ... Nah !
But there is a bit of substance to the thought.
Mr Wilder, a former CIA deputy assistant director for East Asia and the Pacific, told (Australian) Lateline that North Korea could have a long-range intercontinental ballistic missile capable of reaching the US west coast within four years.The story is here.
.
Nope, only the consensus of several experts Neverna. Why are you bird dogging me again? Do you have to question everything I say? I guess these sources are incorrect?Quote:
Originally Posted by NevernaAre you privy to NK's actual missile delivery capabilities?Quote:
Originally Posted by rickschoppers
North Korea 'capable of hitting Western targets with nuclear missile within four years' experts claim - Mirror Online
North Korea could have nuclear missile capable of hitting US west coast within four years: former CIA officer - ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)
Can North Korea hit the USA with a nuclear missile? | World | News | Express.co.uk
Rickshopper, you questioned raycarey about being "privy to NK's actual missile delivery capabilities". To you, that was OK. But when I ask you the very same question, woah, I'm "bird dogging" you, whatever the fuck that means.Quote:
Originally Posted by rickschoppersNope, only the consensus of several experts Neverna. Why are you bird dogging me again? Do you have to question everything I say? I guess these sources are incorrect?Quote:
Originally Posted by NevernaAre you privy to NK's actual missile delivery capabilities?Quote:
Originally Posted by rickschoppers
Of course, you are too thick to see the connection between my question and yours, even though they were only 4 minutes apart.
what kind of range do they have ?Quote:
good artillery barrage
"By God, the Hun won't know what's hit him! After a three day barrage there won't be a single one left alive and our chaps can just stroll over to the Jerry lines."Quote:
Originally Posted by blue
British General shortly to be responsible for the deaths of 200,000 of his own men.
4 years to reach America sounds like they're using my postmanQuote:
Originally Posted by rickschoppers
The ever revolving, and invented, boogieman....
The brilliance of WW1 british generals encapsulated here.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rblf...youtu.be&t=16s
The Chinese proposal was that the Americans and South Koreans stop practicing the invasion of North Korea and the murder of the North Korean leadership and in return, North Korea would stop its nuclear and missile tests. The Americans rejected this.Quote:
If the US backed off, would they change?