https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ow5S6C-z77U
Printable View
Well, theres two hours of your life you will never get back.
you should find better things to do with your life
I thought it was Route 66Quote:
Originally Posted by Dapper
Dapper in reminiscing mode.
The expression is "money is the root of all evil".
So no one liked my clever play on words based on the subject matter then?
No, but your backpedal is amusing :rolleyes:
Give us a chance.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dapper
Folks are probably still watching the fucking vid.
This is a much better vdo dealing with the topic:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-0kcet4aPpQ
Deleted
what happened to "rooting for money is evil " ?Quote:
Originally Posted by Cujo
I once knew a girl who did that, and for a little extra she'd do things with her one good arm that'd almost make you forget about that thing growing on the side of her neck.Quote:
Originally Posted by baldrick
ethel ?Quote:
Originally Posted by slackula
red china was only faking the orgasm no matter what mao has told youQuote:
Originally Posted by piwanoi
Being equal might be a good start.Quote:
Originally Posted by piwanoi
No such thing as equal IMHO, I suggest you look up how the CP group of company's started up here in Thailand and how much they are worth now and how many they Employ , every one has an equal chance in life, that is unless you lived in a hard line Communist Country of yesteryear .
I think the OP should be:
Is the Petro-dollar the route of all evil?
Yes, the Petro-dollar is the root of a lot of evil doings.
I started the Video Dapper. I watch the whole thing over a period of a couple of days. Cheers. to you.
The first line of your brilliant equation contains a slight arithmetical error:
Girls=Time AND Money is not equivalent to G=TxM, it is equivalent to G=T+M.
Given that we may surmise that G-M=T and further M=G-T.
Armed with this we can re-approach the dilemma and see that it clearly falls into the realms of a quadriplegic equation, (sometime known as the paralectical conundrum).
M is entirely dependent on given values of G & T, insomuch as it is a function theretofore.
So, much as we would write ƒ = {(1, 3), (2, 1), (3, 4), (4, 6)}, and ∆ = {(1, 5), (2, 3), (3, 4), (4, 1), (5, 3), (6, 2)}, then © ∘ ƒ = {(1, 4), (2, 5), (3, 1), (4, 2)} with carefree bravado and abandon we can also aver that for a given value of M, G will diminish and T will probably remain constant however in the obverse longtitude it is possible to theorise that as ƒ{M} approaches ƒ{T} then G may on occasion remain constant.
HTH.
that argument does not have a leg to stand onQuote:
Originally Posted by slackula
and this one is equally armlessQuote:
Originally Posted by slackula
almost as bad as a milkman OP - I have flashblock installed so at least they do not try to startQuote:
Originally Posted by Looper
Et tu Bruté? *theatrical sigh*Quote:
Originally Posted by AntRobertson
Further prove, as if it were needed, of my theorem.Quote:
Originally Posted by slackula
And all this time I thought I was shit at math! :cool:
Your error occurs at word number 6 (that's the one after 5 and just before 7 M'lud).Quote:
Originally Posted by AntRobertson
Yeah, I'm just gonna go ahead and assume that's either: a) some kind of insult; or b) a complex math equation.Quote:
Originally Posted by slackula
Either way I'll never figure it out. At least not until science has advanced to the point of being able to add an extra finger on my hand.
discussQuote:
Originally Posted by Neo
^^ I've said it before.. wasn't so bad back in the day when, not adding opinion/info to an OP, starting multiple threads or bumping old threads with similar content would get a back-hander of the Dog, was quite entertaining usually. I like the way TD has evolved over the last 6 months or so, but I think too much free reign is given to the tards... it's a mod issue.