Quote Originally Posted by Iceman123 View Post
Quote Originally Posted by palexxxx View Post
OhOh, you're 0 for 6.
Agreed, (is zero as low as we can go)
Indeed, there's a basic problem with Maths that OhOh has brilliantly highlighted here.

At 0 for 1, he was at 0% success.

At 0 for 2, he was still at 0% success despite being at least twice as guilty of crimes against humour.

At 0 for 6, he is still at 0% success say the maths folks, but clearly these persistent crimes against humour are becoming very serious by this stage and deserve a whole new classification framework...


Did you hear about the constipated mathematician? She worked it out with a pencil.

Why did the chicken cross the mobius strip? To get to the same side.

Why did I divide sin by tan? Just cos.