Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1
    Thailand Expat
    William's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Last Online
    19-05-2013 @ 06:37 AM
    Location
    In jail
    Posts
    5,822

    INVESTMENT FOREIGN BUSINESS ACT: Foreign chambers step up lobbying

    INVESTMENT FOREIGN BUSINESS ACT

    Foreign chambers step up lobbying


    UMESH PANDEY
    The Joint Foreign Chambers of Commerce is set to lobby cabinet ministers, senior officials, embassies and other chambers in its quest to clear up the thorny issue of nominee business ownership structures. Reports that authorities would give foreign-owned joint ventures only a few months to sell down their shareholdings to meet the 49% limit set under the Foreign Business Act (FBA) have raised new concerns among foreign businesses.

    The Commerce Ministry previously said that it would give businesses ample time to restructure their shareholdings, but has yet to offer details. Business leaders say they may need years, not months, to find new Thai investors and wind down nominee structures in an orderly fashion.

    Peter Van Haren, the JFCC president, said the organisation would seek clarification from the authorities, including the Prime Minister's Office, about the policy direction and plans to amend the FBA.

    ''We are going to write a letter to the various organisations and committees to seek support for our effort to seek a better business environment in the country,'' he said yesterday.

    ''We want to state in the letter that if the country applies further restrictions, then it will have negative repercussions.''

    A government committee set up to examine the widespread use of nominees in foreign ventures is expected to deliver its recommendations soon.

    The issue of nominees has become explosive since the January takeover of the local telecom giant Shin Corp by Singapore's Temasek Holdings. Temasek is accused of using a complicated shareholding structure to bypass the 49% limit on foreign investment in telecoms.

    Mr Van Haren said the JFCC also intended to remind the government of the commitment it made to the World Trade Organisation in 2003: ''It states explicitly that the government will look at the 49% shareholding structure and not at who exerts control over the company.''

    JFCC members met on Tuesday with diplomats and others who agreed that even if existing companies were given three years to restructure their shareholdings, it might not be sufficient.

    ''It is estimated that there are at least 14,000 companies using the nominee structure. If they are given three years to restructure, then their option would be to sell out. And you could end up with more sellers than buyers,'' said a US-based diplomat who attended the meeting.

    He said participants were unanimous about what the government should and should not do if it wanted to maintain investor confidence, which took a huge hit this week when the Bank of Thailand imposed tough capital controls.

    ''The market is already very fragile and any misstep could create more problems,'' said a local analyst. ''Most people are optimistic that the decision will be on the positive side.''

    Supavud Saicheua, a managing director of Phatra Securities, said he hoped for a market-friendly outcome.
    ''If it's true that they will give three years to restructure, then I would say it is not as bad a problem as the one we saw on Monday,'' he said. ''But to be fair to the authorities, we have to look at the details to make an assessment on the issue of nominees.''

  2. #2
    Thailand Expat

    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Last Online
    05-12-2007 @ 03:50 AM
    Location
    Gropecvnt Lane Bkk
    Posts
    1,476
    ''It is estimated that there are at least 14,000 companies using the nominee structure. If they are given three years to restructure, then their option would be to sell out. And you could end up with more sellers than buyers,'' said a US-based diplomat who attended the meeting.
    And guess who is gonna buy?
    Thais, at 2 cents to the dollar, book value 55555
    reminds me a bit of the '97 thai meltdown
    an interesting article here
    Fixing Thailand's Debt Mess (int'l edition)
    verbatim from art.

    More troubling is the fact that some companies are again not servicing their debts: They cling to the belief that they can grow their way out of trouble and pay their creditors off later. ''I don't know if it's reckless optimism or denial''
    fuck shittiwatra can now buy back tamasek for peanuts, wow

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •