Thread: Dr. Marc Faber on China bashers.

The oracle of Chiang Mai had a good long discussion about the economy of Asia and all things China.

Lessons the world can learn from the Japanese experience, the Asian reality versus the perspective offered by Western media outlets and the difference between China Bears and China Bashers are all discussed as is the ultimate fate of the US dollar - something Dr. Faber labels a 'time bomb'. So sit back, relax and join us for an hour of vintage Faber.




The Grant Williams Podcast - The End Game Ep. 8 - Dr. Marc Faber | Free Listening on Podbean App

...Faber is a camera-loving bloviating idiot long ignored by informed investors...

Originally Posted by tomcat

...Faber is a camera-loving bloviating idiot long ignored by informed investors...

You are a clueless and brainless fool. You probably don't know who he is

Originally Posted by Backspin

You probably don't know who he is

Originally Posted by tomcat

...years ago, he was a call-in contributor to the CNBC Squawk Box program spouting delirious predictions of impending global financial collapse...eventually, he was replaced by Larry Kudlow whose comments turned out to be just as moronic...Kudlow, of course, was chosen by tRump to head the US National Economic Council, a platform from which he continues to declare pollyannish statements that please his boss...

Originally Posted by tomcat

ill-informed windbag

aka Skidmark

Originally Posted by Backspin

the Asian reality versus the perspective offered by Western media outlets

This is interesting . . . the premise being that the two are different, yet many Asian journalists are employed by and/or write for media syndicates - including western outlets.
How does that fit into your clean-cut differentiation, Skidmark?

...hmmm: nothing further from SpitBack...I can only imagination his humiliation...

Originally Posted by Backspin

You probably don't know who he is

He is the economist who has been wrong in 90% of his predictions while the random outcome from an ape doing the same predictions would be 50%..

...^555...

Originally Posted by tomcat

...hmmm: nothing further from SpitBack...I can only imagination his humiliation...

Here's Marc Faber predicting the new bull market in March of 2009, at the exact bottom , and for the right reasons

Originally Posted by lom

He is the economist who has been wrong in 90% of his predictions while the random outcome from an ape doing the same predictions would be 50%..

Here's Marc Faber predicting the new bull market and the end of the bear market , for the right reasons, at the exact bottom which was March 2009.

Originally Posted by panama hat

aka Skidmark



This is interesting . . . the premise being that the two are different, yet many Asian journalists are employed by and/or write for media syndicates - including western outlets.
How does that fit into your clean-cut differentiation, Skidmark?

Here's Marc Faber predicting the exact bottom for the right reasons

Its Friday night in Surrey, why dont you log out and go find some of your young funky friends to party with?

Originally Posted by aging one

Its Friday night in Surrey, why dont you log out and go find some of your young funky friends to party with?

I'm 36

Originally Posted by Backspin

I'm 36

Maybe in chronological years. In terms of your maturity I would say 14 at the most. Plus you are so phucking gay with your gossip act. Have you ever had your chromosomes checked? If not you should.

Originally Posted by aging one

Plus you are so phucking gay

...not that phucking gay is anything to be ashamed of...

Originally Posted by tomcat

...not that phucking gay is anything to be ashamed of...

...^ok, how about dumb as a bag of rocks, then...

Originally Posted by tomcat

...^ok, how about dumb as a bag of rocks, then...

..^so, you've been possessed by a moron then...

Originally Posted by Backspin

Here's Marc Faber predicting the exact bottom for the right reasons

That's included in the 10% correct, it prolly makes up for half of it.

Originally Posted by lom

He is the economist who has been wrong in 90% of his predictions while the random outcome from an ape doing the same predictions would be 50%..

Originally Posted by Backspin

gay

You blow LB, the next step isn't really that far. It's probably cathartic for for you . . . if you turn out even 5% as intelligent, well-read and interesting as TC . . . it will have been worth it.

Or, you could actually man up more, stay away from LBs and become even 5% as intelligent, well-read and interesting as lom or ao.

Originally Posted by panama hat

You blow LB, the next step isn't really that far. It's probably cathartic for for you . . . if you turn out even 5% as intelligent, well-read and interesting as TC . . . it will have been worth it.

Or, you could actually man up more, stay away from LBs and become even 5% as intelligent, well-read and interesting as lom or ao.

Hmmm. Tax is saying that you were blowing LBs in BKK or something

Originally Posted by Backspin

Hmmm. Tax is saying that you were blowing LBs in BKK or something

And you're dense enough to believe it - an angry gay Asian racist in the UK is schooling you.


I've been told that you allow yourself to be skullfucked by Rottweilers . . . it must be true

Moron

Originally Posted by panama hat

Or, you could actually man up more, stay away from LBs and become even 5% as intelligent, well-read and interesting as lom or ao.

What ? You mean literally a rodent ?

No Chinaman ever called me Limey.