Quite, and the reason gold is so high? There is no faith in paper or material investments.
Taleb (Black Swan) was on Newsnight last night and he pointed out the obvious, there's no integrity in the monetary system because the system continues the same destructive pattern that it always has. The financial market gets bonuses if it performs well and bailed out if it doesn't and nothing has changed in that regard, there may be nothing left to bail it out with, but until the way they operate is properly regulated it will continue to drain money from society into an ever decreasing number of pockets. Banks are a utility and should be treated as such.
Very unlikely to happen, we'll just keep paddling further and further up shit creek, but sound advice from someone who is well ahead of the curve when it comes to long term prediction on the financial markets.
Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming "Wow! What a Ride!"
If companies are sitting on cash as they say, why wouldn't they just convert their cash into gold that way they are ready for the future. Holding cash they are just losing value by the day. Is Apple's wealth in dollars or gold? Anyone know how companies hold their wealth if they are not reinvesting? Are there any in gold besides the gold producers?And people think there is a bubble in gold
what a bunch of non-sense as usual, Neo, what does the bonus has anything to do with the underlying structure problemOriginally Posted by Neo
the issue is about the massive volume of money being played with,
Last edited by Butterfly; 21-08-2011 at 01:41 PM.
and ? Gold doesn't make the economy run, by your logic if everyone would put their cash or assets into Gold, price would be 100,000 USD instead of 1,800 USD and the economy would probably stop for lack of funding. What a concept. No running economy and yet a high price for Gold. Everyone would be sitting on their ass waiting, with no jobs or any business to run. So much for being rich on paper.Originally Posted by socal
It does seem like the gold boom is being exploited by the same types of people who encourage war to get profits from it. Of course not everyone is encouraging the weakening of the dollar but you have to wonder what is going on. Who are the biggest players in this game? Like all big market events there are people in the shadows. jmho
Read it properly butterfly and consider your opinion before firing of the first objection that occurs to you.
You may be able to make relatively small gains by playing the market and feel that you are at an advantage by being able to take part in these successes, but the real market drivers of course are the banks, financial institutions, and stock management companies. It is speculation fueled by potential bonuses that are causing unstability and insecurity in the market, the same kind of unstability that has caused all the financial collapses of the last 30 years.
That may be a good thing for the minority of speculators, but it is seriously unhealthy for the rest of the worlds population. What has not changed is the corporate culture of bonuses and bailouts, while speculators are busing wreaking havoc in search of the next bonus, the population is still paying for the mess of the last financial meltdown.
Now read this bit very carefully Butterfly. This is not about socialist style restraint.
The gravy train is over, but nobody has applied the brakes. A greedy minority will continue to ride that train until it goes over the cliff, yet again, to the detriment of all of us. There is really nothing left, the wild fluctuations in the market prices are not the new beginnings of another golden age, they are the desperate last breaths of a dying animal.
The financial system is as necessary to our modern lives as the electric and water grids, it is a utility required by all, and if it is to continue to function for the benefit of everyone, not just for the reckless few, it needs to be treated as a utility.
It is unfortunate that since the financial crises of 2008 the financial institutions have not been sufficiently regulated and have instead become more consolidated, more powerful and further ingratiated into the running of our societies.
The small gains that you make while so many more lose everything are just the crumbs tossed to you to support their philosophy as they continue to drain the life out of our every day existence.
again a lot of confusion in your little mind, it's all one big bag of "speculators" for youOriginally Posted by Neo
bonus is not driving the speculation on the Exchange, never has. Again you are confusing issues, won't be the first time
here you are exposing your complete confusion, corporate bonus has nothing to do with markets and speculation on an exchangeOriginally Posted by Neo
or maybe you meant bankers bonus ? that is bonus done on private deals, that you will never see and are dealt exclusively on OTC or between knowledgeable parties ?
again you are "projecting" imaginary things to make a case or an explanation for the current financial crisis.
If you want to know what defines speculation, it has more to do with fears and hope, that is emotional human reactions more than anything. Bonus don't even come close into the equation.
the greedy minority is there to stay. Actually, we can rephrase that to the greedy majority that will soon become a minority.Originally Posted by Neo
again you are making all kind of assumptions, speculators are there for a purpose, they are insignificant in the long run. The current instability is about fear and how the non-bonus non-corporate goons, that is government officials, are being scared and showing their incompetence to the world. That's what spooking the speculators. The big "indepedent" guys don't have solutions or answers.Originally Posted by Neo
Well I don't expect you to ever agree or see sense in anything I have said.
You dismiss things far too easily and usually in the most offensive manner.
I made my point quite succinctly in the original post, and I expanded it further, not to convince you, but to explain the point that you so clearly missed.
You are so far off the mark with your position that it would be a fruitless exercise for me to try and engage you further on the subject, but you know who Taleb is right? I highly recommend reading some of his latest comments on the current situation to help broaden your horizon.
maybe because there is no sense in what you are saying. You are doing "The Sun" analysis of the financial crisis we are in, hardly credible or knowledgeableOriginally Posted by Neo
actually you didn'tOriginally Posted by Neo
there was nothing to miss, you were not making any points, just vague speculation and connection that don't existOriginally Posted by Neo
of course I do, and again being right in one particular instance, doesn't mean he is going to be correct on every instance. What he is saying is not false, just the causality you are trying to "rephrase" simply doesn't exist.Originally Posted by Neo
There are many truths being posted by members...but they are only partial truths.
For all ...to see wood for the trees....is an impossibility at all levels.
The Fed....against historic precedent...have tried to direct market forces...and have been surprised...some say...by the outcomes of their intervention.
There are others that say that the Fed is well positioned with their models and algerithims to front run and predict with a confident certanity the future outcomes....
I personally wonder about that idea...it seems the troubles in Japan...a co-dependent of the USA's financial system went unforseen...by those in the know.
To anyone who has participated in the market....at the full monty level...that is not as an employee, an agent, a spectulatior or what is said to be a long term investor...but has got down and dirty as a "Privateer" in the exchange of goods...the remidies are not so clear.
But be assured these sociatal problems....and at the root of it, this exuberance, this lack of morality, the abuse of the duty of care....will revert to the sustainable mean...
We are confident that we as a civilization are not on the cusp of another...
''Dark Age''....the world has moved on....and there will be another wave...just as there has been ebbs and floods in all of history....
The new and obvious frontiers....
nano techknowledge, t-cell development ....coupled with new and clean power sources....point to an exciteing new world...
The nearby we will endure is akin to the Industrial Relevolution of the past...grimey and fraught with invidual danger....
but the promise of a new world is in the offer for those with the tanicity to make the necessary calls...
i am just the nowhere man...
living in the nowhere land...
forever...
"What he is saying is not false, just the causality you are trying to "rephrase" simply doesn't exist."
Take a break from being a totally unknowledgable wanker butterfly, all you do with your spurious bullshit is derail a perfectly reasonable discussion. Red sent.
Here it is again.. from my original post..
And this was your answer...Originally Posted by Neo
Ok one more time...
And this was your answer...Originally Posted by Neo
Hence the reason I elucidated further.
So you have read what Taleb said in the Newsnight interview, and you're saying that what he said is true ("not false")
So is it his conjectured causality that doesn't exist, or my "rephrase" of his conjecture?
Can you point out how his conjecture is wrong or how my "rephrase" of his conjecture differs from what he actually said?
Last edited by Neo; 21-08-2011 at 07:32 PM.
it's not nice of talking like this about yourselfOriginally Posted by Neo
must have touched a nerveOriginally Posted by Neo
is it possible that you have not understood what Taleb was saying and just paraphrasing some non-sense exactly like you did with your CDS tirade ?Originally Posted by Neo
first the monetary system and financial system is not exactly the same thing, but again I wouldn't expect you to know the differenceOriginally Posted by Neo
second, he is complaining about Corporate Governance, what we call the "agency problem", nothing to do with speculators or markets. Again you completely missed the point. Bankers are corporation, not the market or the entire system.
Because we need bankers, we have to suffer from their excesses, and without good corporate governance, we won't be able to control them. This goes beyond the bonus issue. Without regulation or good corporate governance, banks will do what they do best, making massive amount of money and becoming more and more important in the process. This is what scares Taleb. However, he seems to think that bonus are the core of the problem, it's not, that's where he is a bit naive here. The problem is regulation and corporate governance. Even without the massive bonus, banks would fuck up just because they can. There was no massive bonus in the S&L of the 80s, and yet they needed bailout at the end. The lack of oversight is the real issue, nothing else.
maybe he is mad because his hedge fund is not getting a bonus this year for performing so poorly
Last edited by Butterfly; 21-08-2011 at 08:48 PM.
so in summary Neo, just in case you didn't get it
Taleb is not wrong on his analysis of banks excesses, however the "connection" he is making with bonuses is weak and non-existent. Without massive bonuses, it wouldn't stop the banks from fucking up, because that's what they are, they are a force of their own.
regulations and strong corporate governance needs to be put in place and sadly he is not addressing that issue, completely missed it. Yes, it's enraging to see bankers getting massive bonus after what happened, it's an outrage, yet stopping bonus won't make the problem go away.
hope it's all clear for you now
Well you just basically proved that you don't have a fucking clue, not only about what he said but about pretty much everything you have said too. You haven't even read or heard what he said, in relation to my paraphrase.
This is your argument...
And this is my reply... which you avoided...Originally Posted by Butterfly (US Stocks Plunge, Dow Falls Over 300 Points As Fears Grip Market)
of course I do, and again being right in one particular instance, doesn't mean he is going to be correct on every instance. What he is saying is not false, just the causality you are trying to "rephrase" simply doesn't exist.
So instead of spouting 'Markets for dummies' that you have shoved up your arse...Originally Posted by Neo
So you have read what Taleb said in the Newsnight interview, and you're saying that what he said is true ("not false")
So is it his conjectured causality that doesn't exist, or my "rephrase" of his conjecture?
Can you point out how his conjecture is wrong or how my "rephrase" of his conjecture differs from what he actually said?
And making a twat of yourself with comments like...Because we need bankers, we have to suffer from their excesses, and without good corporate governance, we won't be able to control them.
Why don't you explain your argument...that's where he [Taleb] is a bit naive here
..with tangible evidence, rather than poorly thought out diversions.Originally Posted by Butterfly (US Stocks Plunge, Dow Falls Over 300 Points As Fears Grip Market)
What he is saying is not false, just the causality you are trying to "rephrase" simply doesn't exist.
You're on the hook yet again butterfly.
Come to the conclusion that nobody has a clue what is going on. All the posters,as well as the rest of the financial institutions have a different answer to the same questions.
ok Neo, you need to read what you post
the causality that you tried to "rephrase" was about bonus linked to the market instability
Taleb was linking bonuses to financial irresponsibility, another issue
see below for your arguments
speculators don't get bonus from banks, the issue being discussed here. Keep up with the logic will you instead of being distracted with your "Sun" mentalityOriginally Posted by Neo
how are fluctuations in markets related to bonuses ? I will be curious to know how since this is what you are trying to imply from the beginning, even "paraphrasing" badly Taleb to make a point, a point that doesn't exist or was made by Taleb.Originally Posted by Neo
You haven't even listened to what Taleb said in the interview, admit it.
did you ? apparently you didn't even understood what he saidOriginally Posted by Neo
try harder, listen carefully this time, do you need the link ?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)