does this mean that a restaurant that has a dress code (no trainers, must wear a jacket etc.) is breaking the law?
does this mean that a restaurant that has a dress code (no trainers, must wear a jacket etc.) is breaking the law?
Any business can quite legitimately refuse admission/service to members of the public. The question is what grounds are legitimate. Thankfully the days of pubs having signs outside saying "No blacks. No Irish." are long gone. Added to that are B&Bs saying "No shirtlifters." These aren't legitimate reasons. Not wearing a tie or wearing trainers are quite different types of reason.
Last edited by Zooheekock; 18-10-2012 at 08:52 PM.
Where can I get a sign made up in Thai and English: No fecking Christians (or any others professing blind faith of any other description). Fancy opening a hotel.
no need, BBaa, just put a large phallic statue outside, or a priapic goat
If they had advertised their B&B as a Christian home, and no unmarried couple could share a room, or a bed, then there would have been no problem
and if they had been smarter, when the couple had arrived, apologised profusely and told them that they only had separate single beds available due to a mix-up, again, no problem
I have reported your post
They are no different than that male thai prostitute Emma you sucked off Socal. Just uglier older and have had less cock through them
Was Emma hung ?
Yes, we know he's another notch on your bedpost. Please try to keep to the topic though.Originally Posted by socal
Originally Posted by socal
Uhhmmm. Ok. Not the right board to be discussing this really though.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)