Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Member peter000's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Last Online
    15-02-2011 @ 01:24 AM
    Bribie Island

    Class action by up to 95,000

    From The Sunday Times
    March 21, 2010
    Islamic cartoon row is latest case of libel tourism
    Richard Kerbaj

    UP TO 95,000 descendants of the prophet Muhammad are planning to bring a libel action in Britain over “blasphemous” cartoons of the founder of Islam, even though they were published in the Danish press.

    The defamation case is being prepared by Faisal Yamani, a Saudi lawyer acting for the descendants, who live in the Middle East, north Africa and as far afield as Australia. Mark Stephens, a British lawyer who has seen a “pre-action” letter sent by Yamani to 10 Danish newspapers, said it “specifically says” he will launch proceedings in London.

    Yamani is expected to justify the action by claiming that the cartoons, including one of Muhammad wearing a bomb-shaped turban, were accessible in Britain on the internet. Critics say the case is a political stunt and yet another example of how England has become the leading destination for “libel tourism”. The English defamation laws make it easier to bring and win libel cases here than in jurisdictions such as America that place greater emphasis on freedom of speech.

    Stephens said the descendants could argue that the cartoons — which first appeared in the Jyllands-Posten newspaper in 2005, sparking violent protests around the world — were a direct slur on them. “Direct descendants of the prophet have a particular place within Muslim society . . . By effectively criticising and making fun of the prophet you are, by implication, holding them up to scandal, contempt and public ridicule,” he said. “So it may be that they will suffer some kind of damage among their own community. The question is, is that defamatory in English law?”

    Stephens said a diplomatic backlash could be sparked if a judge refused to hear the case being brought by the Oxford-educated Yamani.

    “A lot of judges would throw it out, but it is obviously a very highly charged issue and if they do throw it out it becomes political.”

    In a previous case of libel tourism, a Saudi businessman sued an American author whose book on the funding of terrorism was published in the United States but sold 23 copies in Britain via the internet. The businessman was awarded more than £100,000 in damages and costs.

    In another example, the Ukrainian Rinat Akhmetov successfully used the courts in London to sue a Ukrainian language website over an article mainly read in Ukraine.

    Ebbe Dal, managing director of the Danish national newspaper association, voiced concern that Britain was being used to settle libel actions that would struggle to withstand scrutiny in other parts of Europe.

    “It is unacceptable that Yamani should go to foreign courts and come after us with threats, and it is a pity that the British system allows this to happen,” he said.

  2. #2
    Member Another Farang's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Last Online
    13-06-2010 @ 11:02 AM
    on top of things
    Welcome to Saudi Britain!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Last Online
    30-01-2013 @ 09:22 AM
    Well, at least tourism will be up.

    Yamani is expected to justify the action by claiming that the cartoons were accessible in Britain on the internet.
    And presumably every other country in the world.

    Thailand to do the same for LM cases?

  4. #4
    Thailand Expat
    BobR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Last Online
    25-05-2019 @ 12:56 PM
    Unless British Courts have gone off the deep end, it should not be too difficult to get this silly lawsuit dismissed.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts