Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1

    R.I.P.


    dirtydog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Pattaya Jomtien
    Posts
    58,763

    Teesside mother not told of sex offender's past

    Teesside mother not told of sex offender's past


    A Teesside mother was not warned a man living in her home, who later raped her five-year-old daughter, was a known sex offender, a critical review has found.

    Agencies on Teesside and in County Durham knew of the man's past, but did not share information which may have prevented the abuse, the report said.

    Stockton Council has suspended one person after admitting an unqualified social worker visited the family.

    The council, which compiled the review, has issued a "profound apology".

    A serious case review found a catalogue of failings in the case, which happened in Stockton in 2008.

    The mother was not given information in relation to the offences of the adult living in that household
    Jane Humphreys
    Chairwoman of Stockton's Local Safeguarding Children Board

    At the time of the assault, for which the man was later jailed for six years, he was receiving treatment and was being supervised by Cleveland Police and the National Probation Service Teesside and Durham.

    His previous convictions were for three non-contact sexual offences against female children in County Durham, for which he received a 12-month suspended sentence.

    The review, by Stockton's Local Safeguarding Children Board, said: "There were clear failures to consider the protection of [the child] and undertake a full assessment at the point agencies became aware of the original offending."

    Jane Humphreys, who chairs the board, added: "Speaking on behalf of all the agencies we are profoundly sorry for our failures in this case.

    'Insufficient information'

    "We particularly regret we did not provide the mother of this child with information to enable her to adequately protect her daughter. We are continuing to offer support to the family.

    "The wellbeing of children is of utmost importance and we deeply regret the impact this case had on the child.

    "The response was not satisfactory. We sent out an unqualified social worker, who failed to do an assessment properly.

    "The mother was not given information in relation to the offences of the adult living in that household.

    "We fully support the report's recommendations and will continue to work to address the shortcomings highlighted."

    The report stressed the girl's family were not involved with any agency before the abuse took place.

    In a statement, the girl's mother said: "Insufficient information was given to me to enable me to protect my daughter.

    "I sincerely hope that lessons have been learned from this case."


  2. #2
    Thailand Expat
    Kurgen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Last Online
    15-05-2023 @ 10:57 AM
    Location
    Shitsville
    Posts
    8,812
    6 years for his 4th offence!

    He should be castrated.

    and "Jane Humphreys, who chairs the board, and speaks on behalf of all the agencies" should be sacked.

  3. #3
    Thailand Expat
    BobR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Last Online
    19-03-2020 @ 02:26 AM
    Posts
    7,762
    One of the few intelligent things the USA has done in the last 20 years is to make the names of sex offenders public. Too bad Britain seems stuck on the stupid idea that a pedophile has any right to privacy concerning his criminal history. But then most states in the USA allow you to use force to defend your home and do not incarcerate burglary victims who refuse to flee and prefer to fight when an intruder enters. The British are so incredibly stupid sometimes.

  4. #4
    The Dentist English Noodles's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Gaslightingshire
    Posts
    17,808
    Smoggy scum.

  5. #5
    Thailand Expat

    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Last Online
    17-02-2012 @ 04:10 PM
    Posts
    1,304
    Don,t worry

    "Lessons will be learned from this " is the standard reply , again and again and again

    bollocks

  6. #6
    Excommunicated baldrick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Last Online
    Today @ 05:30 PM
    Posts
    24,761
    you have to wonder about the mental skills of the idiot who allowed him to live there.

    Quote Originally Posted by BobR
    One of the few intelligent things the USA has done in the last 20 years is to make the names of sex offenders public
    except for the poor cnuts who make the list for urinating in public or chucking a browneye ( mooning )

  7. #7
    Thailand Expat
    BobR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Last Online
    19-03-2020 @ 02:26 AM
    Posts
    7,762
    Quote Originally Posted by baldrick View Post
    you have to wonder about the mental skills of the idiot who allowed him to live there.

    Quote Originally Posted by BobR
    One of the few intelligent things the USA has done in the last 20 years is to make the names of sex offenders public
    except for the poor cnuts who make the list for urinating in public or chucking a browneye ( mooning )
    That usually does not happen, as an attorney I've read some of the statutes are they quite clear which offenses get you listed. For example, soliciting sex from an adult prostitute and urinating in public when there was no intent to commit indecent exposure will not get you on a sex offender registry in the state where I practiced, and that seems reasonable. I'm not sure about mooning.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •